Reviewed by: Der Europäer A.W. Schlegel. Romantischer Kulturtransfer—romantische Wissenswelten Jocelyn Holland Der Europäer A.W. Schlegel. Romantischer Kulturtransfer—romantische Wissenswelten. Herausgegeben von York-Gothart Mix und Jochen Strobel. Berlin und New York: de Gruyter, 2010. xi + 354 Seiten. €99,95. The publication of this volume constitutes a significant step forward: not only for a critical understanding of the breadth, depth, and historical reach of August Wilhelm Schlegel's life and work, but also for Romantic scholarship and the growing field of translation studies. The twenty essays of this volume, fronted by a succinct and persuasive introduction by the editors, are the product of an eponymous colloquium which took place at Dresden in 2008. The editors both elaborate glaring gaps in Schlegel studies (his readers must still make do with an incomplete edition from 1846ff.) and make a convincing case for the volume's varied contributions, which can be divided into three main categories: the situation of Schlegel's work in relation to Romantic aesthetics and focal points of recent scholarship; an analysis of Schlegel's own reception and translation practices in the milieu of a transnational Romanticism; and the reception of Schlegel's work in the twentieth century. The range of perspectives and methodological approaches represented in this volume makes it no easy task to provide a concise synopsis or provide a coherent critique, so this review will simply point out a few of the high points as well as one or two comments as a guide for potential readers. One of the more intriguing aspects of the volume, and a recurring theme in several of the essays, is the importance of Schlegel's lectures. While several of the contributions mine the lectures for their thematic content, Manuel Bauer's and Dirk von Petersdorff's essays stand out for laying the theoretical groundwork, such as when the latter emphasizes their dual function of bringing "die Ergebnisse der frühromantischen Theoriearbeit sowohl in einen Zusammenhang als auch in eine kommunikativ vermittelbare Form" (93). Students and scholars of aesthetics will also appreciate Claudia Albert's comparison of Schlegel to Schelling, Schleiermacher, and Hegel, illustrated through a series of diagrams (112-116); this piece also takes the unusual step of connecting questions related to the aesthetic status of dance in the early nineteenth century to a history of modern dance reaching through the mid-twentieth century. There are also essays which stand out either for investigating easily marginalized aspects of Schlegel's work and Romantic research, such as his relationship to Polish Romanticism (Masiakowska-Osses) or British imperialism in India (Bhatti), or for defamiliarizing what are assumed to be "known" quantities, as [End Page 122] in Ulrich Fröschle's essay which takes as its point of departure Schlegel's equation of Germany with the "Orient" of Europe. The questions of how to read this book, or who the intended audience is, do not lend themselves to easy answers. In terms of style and genre, not all essays are on the same level: on the one hand, some still bear traces of the conference paper format, others plunge into an encyclopedic level of detail, and still others function perfectly well in the genre of the literary essay. On the other hand, for a work of this scope, such a division of labor might make sense. After all, the genres of the encyclopedia article and the literary essay are each valuable in their own right—they simply pose different tasks for the reader, and also contribute to the occasional impression that the whole value of this project is somewhat greater than the sum of its parts. Such a composition, a hybrid of the essayistic and encyclopedic, accompanied by a (why deny it?) editorial manifesto for a much-needed critical Schlegel edition, is Romantic in its own right. Given the level of detail, this volume will be most accessible for those graduate students and academics with a prior knowledge of Romantic aesthetics, for whom it should also be required reading. Jocelyn Holland University of California, Santa Barbara Copyright © 2012 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
Read full abstract