Erythema In Patients Research Articles

Solving the health disparity of eczema assessment: A role for skin tape soluble protein?

The assessment of erythema in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) is based on clinical examination. The difficulty of perceiving erythema in Black patients with AD has led to underestimation of AD severity in these patients. In this study, we analyzed the concentration of skin tape soluble protein of AD lesions against common AD clinical signs. A total of 50 children with AD were included. Skin tape total soluble protein was extracted from AD lesions and analyzed against validated AD clinical signs, including erythema, excoriation, edema, oozing, and lichenification. Concentration of skin tape soluble protein is positively correlated with acute signs of AD, especially erythema. Determination of concentration of skin tape protein is a potential tool for grading erythema of AD lesions, and it may have an application in improving the health disparity of assessment of eczema severity in Black patients with AD.

Turning Down the Fire: The Role of Botulinum Toxin Microdroplets in Refractory Rosacea Erythema

Introduction: Dermal “micro-injections" of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) treatment can improve facial flushing and erythema in patients with refractory rosacea. We present a case of a patient with longstanding papulo-pustular rosacea with flushing, refractory to laser, topical and systemic therapies, where intradermal microdroplet BTX-A injections successfully controlled erythema and flushing. Case Description: A 49-year-old White female with a 4-year history of refractory papulo-pustular rosacea presented with bright, central facial erythema and telangiectasias after failing multiple 595 nm pulsed dye laser, topical (azelaic acid 15% gel, 0.025% tretinoin cream, and metrocream 0.75%) and systemic (isotretinoin 20 mg daily, spironolactone 25 mg daily and doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 14 days) treatments. At treatment 1, 20 U of BTX-A was injected intradermally (0.05 mL of 1.25 IU/0.1 mL per microdroplet) to erythematous lesion. Treatment 2 was performed at her 4 week follow-up were we administer 15 U of BTX-A intradermally (0.05 mL of 1.25 IU/0.1 mL per microdroplet) . The patient was seen 4, 8, and 16 weeks after her second treatment were no BTX-A was administered due to a significant reduction in erythema and lasting results. Discussion: Significant clinical improvement and patient satisfaction was achieved. No adverse events were reported after treatment aside from mild, localized injection site pain during the procedure. BTX-A administered as intradermal microdroplet injects can be a safe and efficacious option in the treatment of refractory rosacea erythema. Microbotox may be an effective adjunct, especially when topical and systemic therapies have failed.

Facial erythema in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with Dupilumab – a descriptive study of morphology and Aetiology

The development of dermatitis on face and neck, which was not described in phase 3 clinical trials, has been reported in the literature in patients treated with dupilumab. Little is known regarding the causes or defining features of the facial dermatitis. We conducted surveys of consecutive patients with AD on dupilumab to describe its clinical features, morphology and aetiology. A multi-centre prospective cohort study was conducted from 1 January 2020, to 31 December 31 2020. A total of 162 patients under dupilumab treatment were asked to complete a questionnaire and patients were evaluated by dermatologists. Of all 162 patients, 137 (84.6%) patients reported pre-existing facial dermatitis prior to dupilumab therapy. One hundred and twenty-one (88.3%) patients with pre-existing facial dermatitis reported improvement of their facial dermatitis with dupilumab therapy, nine (6.6%) patients reported no change after the treatment and seven (4.3%) patients of them got worse after the treatment (exacerbation group). Of 25 patients who reported no pre-existing active facial dermatitis, six (24%) patients reported new-onset facial erythema after the starting dupilumab therapy (new-onset group). A large proportion of the patients in both the exacerbation (86%) and new-onset groups (67%) had a history of facial TCS use. Both groups showed similar clinical manifestations and distribution with few differences. The vast majority of patients treated with dupilumab in academic institutions from Korea and the United States experienced improvement in their facial dermatitis with dupilumab therapy. A small proportion of patients had new onset and exacerbation. Although the mechanisms of this adverse event remain unclear, steroid withdrawal should be considered as a diagnosis of the erythema in some patients.

Ring-shaped erythema and herpetic infections in children

Exanthema in children accompanies various diseases. Often, polymorphic elements on the skin occur against the background of infectious diseases. Until the second part of the XXth century, children’s classical infectology described only 6 diseases in children characterized by spotty and maculopapular rash. Now there are more than two dozen exanthemes in children with an “infectious origin”. The article considers 2 clinical cases of a relatively rare annular erythema in patients of 1 year 2 months and 11 months associated with chronic herpetic infections. The article presents photo documents of the dynamics of the skin process and laboratory parameters against the background of antiviral therapy.

M038 SEVERE DUPILUMAB-ASSOCIATED HEAD AND NECK DERMATITIS WITH OCULAR INVOLVEMENT IN A TEN-YEAR-OLD WITH ATOPIC DERMATITIS

Dupilumab-associated head and neck dermatitis (HND) is the term used to describe the new onset or exacerbation of head and neck erythema in patients receiving dupilumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). While not reported in phase three clinical trials, it was later documented in 10% of adults. An off-label trial of dupilumab in children found HDN in 5.4% of subjects. Since its approval for children six years and up, a dozen cases have been reported in children, most of them postpubertal.

Evaluation of a First-in-Class Proteasome Inhibitor in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rosacea.

Novel, effective, affordable therapies for rosacea are needed. Innovative methods of assessing response for rosacea treatments are needed as well. This trial was designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of ACU-D1, a novel inhibitor of the 26S protea-some for the treatment of moderate to severe rosacea in a first in human pilot study. In addition, this is the first trial to our knowledge to use Canfield imaging to quantitatively assess responses. This was a 14-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, performed at two well established rosacea clini-cal trial sites, which randomized 40 adult subjects with moderate to severe rosacea (Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA]=3/4) to either ACU-D1 (27) or comparator vehicle (13) twice daily. In addition, Canfield imaging was used to assess responses both qualitatively and quantitatively Results: A total of 39 subjects participated, with 38 completing the study. ACU-D1 displayed efficacy in 92% (25 of 27) of patients in reducing inflammatory lesions and a 2 plus grade IGA reduction of clear to near clear in 27% of patients. There was a trend toward improvement in erythema as well in the active arm. This study demonstrates that topical ACU-D1 is safe and well-tolerated by patients in the study and demonstrates efficacy in reducing inflammatory lesions and erythema in patients with rosacea. Improvement was also noted on Canfield imaging, and this modality is likely to be used as an objective measure in the future. Further studies are warranted based on these initial positive results. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03064438 J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(6):660-664. doi:10.36849/JDD.5925.

Skin erythema assessment techniques

Skin erythema may present owing to many causes. One of the common causes is prolonged exposure to sunrays. Other than sun exposure, skin erythema is an accompanying sign of dermatologic diseases, such as psoriasis and acne. Quantifying skin erythema in patients enables the dermatologist to assess the patient's skin health. Quantitative assessment of skin erythema has been the focus of several studies. The clinical standard for erythema evaluation is visual assessment; however, this standard has some deficiencies. For instance, visual assessment is subjective and ineffectual for precise color information exchange. To overcome these limitations, in the past three decades various methodologies have been developed in an attempt to achieve objective erythema assessments, such as diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and both optical and nonoptical systems. This review considers the studies published during the past three decades and discusses the performance, the mathematical tactics for computation, and the limited capabilities of erythema assessment techniques for cutaneous diseases. The achievements and limitations of the current techniques in erythema assessment are presented. The advantages and development trends of optical and nonoptical methods are presented to make the reader aware of the present technological advances and their potential for dermatological disease research.

The Efficacy and Safety of Dual-Frequency Ultrasound for Improving Skin Hydration and Erythema in Patients with Rosacea and Acne.

Inflammatory skin diseases, such as rosacea and acne, are major causes of facial erythema and accompanying skin barrier dysfunction. Several methods to restore the impaired skin barrier and improve facial erythema, such as medication, radiofrequency, laser, and ultrasound therapy were attempted. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of dual-frequency ultrasound with impulse mode, for improving skin hydration and erythema in Asian subjects with rosacea and acne. Twenty-six subjects with facial erythema received an ultrasound treatment once per week, for 4 weeks, over both cheeks. The erythema index and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were measured at each visit. Clinicians assessed the erythema improvement and patients evaluated their satisfaction level. The average decrease in TEWL and erythema index at 6 weeks was 5.37 ± 13.22 g·h−1·m−2 (p = 0.020) and 39.73 ± 44.21 (p = 0.010), respectively. The clinician’s erythema assessment and the subject satisfaction questionnaire score significantly improved at final follow-up (p < 0.001; p = 0.003, respectively). No serious adverse effects were observed during the treatment and follow-up periods. The dual-frequency ultrasound with impulse mode appears to be effective and safe for improving skin hydration and erythema in patients with rosacea and acne.

Safety and immunogenicity of the adjunct therapeutic vaccine ID93 + GLA-SE in adults who have completed treatment for tuberculosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial

A therapeutic vaccine that prevents recurrent tuberculosis would be a major advance in the development of shorter treatment regimens. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the ID93 + GLA-SE vaccine at various doses and injection schedules in patients with previously treated tuberculosis. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial was conducted at three clinical sites near Cape Town, South Africa. Patients were recruited at local clinics after receiving 4 months of tuberculosis treatment, and screened for eligibility after providing written informed consent. Participants were aged 18-60 years, BCG-vaccinated, HIV-uninfected, and diagnosed with drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis. Eligible patients had completed standard treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis in the past 28 days. Participants were enrolled after completing standard treatment and randomly assigned sequentially to receive vaccine or placebo in three cohorts: 2 μg intramuscular ID93 + 2 μg GLA-SE on days 0 and 56 (cohort 1); 10 μg ID93 + 2 μg GLA-SE on days 0 and 56 (cohort 2); 2 μg ID93 + 5 μg GLA-SE on days 0 and 56 and placebo on day 28 (cohort 3); 2 μg ID93 + 5 μg GLA-SE on days 0, 28, and 56 (cohort 3); or placebo on days 0 and 56 (cohorts 1 and 2), with the placebo group for cohort 3 receiving an additional injection on day 28. Randomisation was in a ratio of 3:1 for ID93 + GLA-SE and saline placebo in cohorts 1 and 2, and in a ratio of 3:3:1 for (2 ×) ID93 + GLA-SE, (3 ×) ID93 + GLA-SE, and placebo in cohort 3. The primary outcomes were safety and immunogenicity (vaccine-specific antibody response and T-cell response). For the safety outcome, participants were observed for 30 min after each injection, injection site reactions and systemic adverse events were monitored until day 84, and serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest were monitored for 6 months after the last injection. Vaccine-specific antibody responses were measured by serum ELISA, and T-cell responses after stimulation with vaccine antigens were measured in cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells specimens using intracellular cytokine staining followed by flow cytometry. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02465216. Between June 17, 2015, and May 30, 2016, we assessed 177 patients for inclusion. 61 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive: saline placebo (n=5) or (2 ×) 2 μg ID93 + 2 μg GLA-SE (n=15) on days 0 and 56 (cohort 1); saline placebo (n=2) or (2 ×) 10 μg ID93 + 2 μg GLA-SE (n=5) on days 0 and 56 (cohort 2); saline placebo (n=5) on days 0, 28 and 56, or 2 μg ID93 + 5 μg GLA-SE (n=15) on days 0 and 56 and placebo injection on day 28, or (3 ×) 2 μg ID93 + 5 μg GLA-SE (n=14) on days 0, 28, and 56 (cohort 3). ID93 + GLA-SE induced robust and durable antibody responses and specific, polyfunctional CD4 T-cell responses to vaccine antigens. Two injections of the 2 μg ID93 + 5 μg GLA-SE dose induced antigen-specific IgG and CD4 T-cell responses that were significantly higher than those with placebo and persisted for the 6-month study duration. Mild to moderate injection site pain was reported after vaccination across all dose combinations, and induration and erythema in patients given 2 μg ID93 + 5 μg GLA-SE in two or three doses. One participant had grade 3 erythema and induration at the injection site. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were observed. Vaccination with ID93 + GLA-SE was safe and immunogenic for all tested regimens. These data support further evaluation of ID93 + GLA-SE in therapeutic vaccination strategies to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes. Wellcome Trust (102028/Z/13/Z).

Skin erythema and pigmentation: a review of optical assessment techniques.

Skin erythema may present due to many causes. One of the common causes is prolonged exposure to sun rays. Other than sun exposure, skin erythema is an accompanying sign of dermatological diseases such as acne, psoriasis, melasma, post inflammatory hyperpigmentation, fever, as well as exposure to specific electromagnetic wave bands. Quantifying skin erythema in patients enables the dermatologist to assess the patient's skin health. Therefore, quantitative assessment of skin erythema was the target of several studies. The clinical standard for erythema evaluation is visual assessment. However, the former standard has some imperfections. For instance, it is subjective, and unqualified for precise color information exchange. To overcome these shortcomings, the past three decades witnessed various methodologies that aimed to achieve erythema objective assessment, such as diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), and both optical and non-optical systems. This review article reports on the studies published in the past three decades where the performance, the mathematical tactics for computation, and the capabilities of erythema assessment techniques for cutaneous diseases are discussed. In particular, the achievements and limitations of the current techniques in erythema assessment are presented. The profits and development trends of optical and non-optical methods are displayed to provide the researcher with awareness into the present technological advances and its potential for dermatological diseases research.

Oxymetazoline and Energy-Based Therapy in Patients with Rosacea: Evaluation of the Safety and Tolerability in an Open-Label, Interventional Study.

Background and ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of oxymetazoline hydrochloride cream, 1% (oxymetazoline) when used as an adjunctive treatment with energy‐based therapy for patients with moderate to severe facial erythema associated with rosacea.Study Design/Materials and MethodsIn this Phase 4, multicenter, interventional, open‐label study, eligible patients received one of four energy‐based therapies (potassium titanyl phosphate laser, intense pulsed light therapy, pulsed‐dye laser Vbeam Perfecta, or pulsed‐dye laser Cynergy) on day 1 and day 29 and once‐daily application of oxymetazoline on days 3 through 27 and days 31 through 56. Improvement from baseline in Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) score, patient satisfaction measures, incidence of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and worsening from baseline on dermal tolerability assessments and the Clinician Telangiectasia Assessment (CTA) were assessed. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics.ResultsA total of 46 patients (mean age, 51.1 years; 78.3% female) enrolled in this study. Similar numbers of patients received each of the energy‐based therapies in addition to oxymetazoline. All patients demonstrated an improvement from baseline in CEA during the study with 39 of 43 evaluable patients (90.7%) demonstrating an improvement 6 hours posttreatment on day 56. Most patients were satisfied or very satisfied with treatment at the end of the study. All TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. Some patients experienced worsening in dermal tolerability assessment symptoms (range: 4–21 patients; 8.7–45.7%). Worsening in CEA and CTA were each reported by three patients (6.5%) at any time during the study.ConclusionsTreatment with oxymetazoline as adjunctive therapy with energy‐based therapy was safe, well tolerated, and reduced facial erythema in patients with moderate to severe persistent facial erythema associated with rosacea. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC

Rubeosis faciei diabeticorum is not associated with oxidative stress and skin autofluorescence

BackgroundRubeosis faciei diabeticorum is a persistent facial erythema in patients with diabetes mellitus. The actual pathogenesis has not been studied. However, it is speculated to be a cutaneous diabetic microangiopathy. ObjectiveExamine the correlation between the severity of facial erythema and the possible causes of microvascular diabetic complications, namely oxidative stress, hyperglycemia, and cutaneous accumulation of advanced glycation end-products . MethodsPatients diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=32) were enrolled in the study. The facial erythema index was measured using the Mexameter MX18; cutaneous accumulation of advanced glycation end-products was estimated by measuring skin auto fluorescence with the AGE Reader (DiagnOptics Technologies B.V. – Groningen, Netherlands). Glycated haemoglobin, total antioxidant status, and malondialdehyde were measured in blood by TBARS assay. The correlation between the selected variables was assessed by Spearman's rank test; p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsThere was a statistically significant correlation between total antioxidant status and the facial erythema index (ρ=0.398, p=0.024). Malondialdehyde, skin autofluorescence, glycated haemoglobin, body mass index, duration of diabetes, and age did not demonstrate statistically significant correlation with the facial erythema index. Study limitationsThis is an observational study. Elevation of total antioxidant status could have been caused by several factors that might have also influenced the development of rubeosis faciei, including hyperbilirubinemia and hyperuricemia. ConclusionsThe results contradicted expectations. Total antioxidant status correlated positively with facial erythema index; however, there was no correlation with oxidative stress and skin autofluorescence. Further investigations should be conducted to reveal the cause of total antioxidant status elevation in patients with rubeosis faciei.

The Efficacy of Pulsed Dye Laser Pretreated With or Without Local Anesthetic on Patients Presenting With Erythema of Face, Neck, Chest, and Extremities.

Erythema is one of the most common cosmetic concerns and usually responds well to pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatment. As this laser can cause significant discomfort, topical anesthesia is sometimes offered. However, it is still uncertain whether topical anesthetics can affect the outcome of the laser therapy. We performed a retrospective single site study to compare the efficacy of PDL for the treatment of erythema in patients with and without pretreatment with topical anesthetic. A chart review was performed and patients who presented with erythema of face, neck, chest, and extremities pretreated with topical anesthesia (23% lidocaine/7% tetracaine ointment or 7% lidocaine/7% tetracaine ointment) undergoing PDL were reviewed and compared with another group without anesthesia. Two blinded dermatologists evaluated the postlaser procedure photographs and gave an assessment compared with baseline. A total of 69 patient charts were reviewed. The erythema resulted from various skin conditions including telangiectasia, cherry angioma, striae, and rosacea. The mean improvement was 2.2581 in the anesthesia group and 2.2632 in the nonanesthesia group. There was no significant difference between both groups as confirmed by a noninferiority test. Topical anesthesia with lidocaine and tetracaine ointment do not interfere with the efficacy of the PDL. Since pain management is essential for any cosmetic procedure, the application of a local anesthetic will enhance patient comfort and satisfaction during treatment with PDL. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

EP-1194: Dose-volume relationship for acute skin erythema in patients undergoing breast irradiation

EP-1194: Dose-volume relationship for acute skin erythema in patients undergoing breast irradiation

The Effect of Softener in Polyester Textile Fibers to the Pruritus Response and Erythema with Atopic Dermatitis Patients

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic skin disease that most commonly occurs in children. This study aimed to assess the effective of softener on polyester textile material on the pruritus degree and erythema of patients with atopic dermatitis. The research was conducted at Senior High School 17 of Makassar. The method used was clinical test with experimental design to determine the role of softener on pruritus response of patients with atopic dermatitis. The sample consisted of 50 people given fabric softener material on the right and without softener on the left arms. Two hours and twenty four hours later the degree of pruritus and erythema was measured. The results of the research indicate that the use of softener on polyester textile increases the degree of pruritus and erythema.

Filaggrin genotype does not determine the skin's threshold to UV-induced erythema

Filaggrin genotype does not determine the skin's threshold to UV-induced erythema

Abstract P1-15-12: Development of a photonumeric scale for acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients

Abstract Purpose Scales for rating acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) are inconsistent and have not been validated despite decades of clinical use, making ARD difficult to report reliably. We sought to design a photonumeric scale to consistently describe ARD in breast cancer patients undergoing radiation (RT). Methods Patients undergoing RT for breast cancer were enrolled on a prospective study that included photographs and reporting of physician-rated erythema, hyperpigmentation, and CTCAE toxicity score at baseline and 2, 4, and 6 weeks after initiating RT. Erythema and hyperpigmentation were also quantified using a hand-held colorimetric device. Photographs were taken using a standardized protocol that included 3 views to fully assess the breast/chest wall, axilla, and inframammary fold. 209 photographs from 35 patients with white skin (Fitzpatrick skin types I-IV) and 369 photographs from 50 patients with skin of color (Fitzpatrick skin types V-VI) were clustered according to the apparent severity of ARD. Due to the prevalence of hyperpigmentation that obscured erythema in patients with skin of color, separate images were used to illustrate ARD in this population. Two photonumeric scales (for white skin and skin of color) were developed via an iterative process until group consensus was achieved. Four raters with experience in the evaluation of ARD in breast cancer patients used the photonumeric scale to independently score the entire collection of photographs, sequenced in random order. Intra- and inter-rater agreements were assessed using weighted kappa scores. Results Of the 35 patients with white skin, 20% experienced severe erythema, and 40% experienced dry or moist desquamation. Of the 50 patients with skin of color, 34% experience severe hyperpigmentation, and 48% experienced dry or moist desquamation. Using the photonumeric scales, we observed high intra-rater agreement for independent ratings of erythema or hyperpigmentation (70 to 89% agreement fraction, kappa 0.55 to 0.81) and desquamation (79 to 87% agreement fraction, kappa 0.52 to 0.64). Similarly, we observed moderate to high inter-rater agreement for independent ratings of erythema or hyperpigmentation (61 to 76% agreement fraction, kappa 0.40 to 0.62) and desquamation (69 to 84% agreement fraction, kappa 0.36 to 0.58). Quantitative measurements of erythema in white patients using colorimetry correlated strongly with photonumeric grade (correlation coefficient 0.76, p&amp;lt;0.001), as did physician-rated erythema at the point-of-care (p&amp;lt;0.001). Fitzpatrick score was not significantly associated with maximum photonumeric erythema grade (p = 0.14). Conclusions We report a new photonumeric scale with high intra- and inter-rater reliability for acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients. To our knowledge, this is the first rigorously evaluated scale that is applicable to patients across the spectrum of skin pigmentation, including white skin and skin of color. The photonumeric scale will facilitate consistent reporting of acute radiation dermatitis in research and clinical settings using a simple, standardized instrument. Future work will include prospective real-time clinical validation with multiple raters and correlation with patient-reported outcomes. Funded by a Munn Idea Grant (G011480). Citation Format: Dean Shumway, Eleanor M Walker, Nirav Kapadia, Thy Thy Do, Kent Griffith, Mary Feng, Bonnie DePalma, Reshma Jagsi, Yolanda Helfrich, Erin Gillespie, Alexandria Miller, Adam Liss, Lori J Pierce. Development of a photonumeric scale for acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-15-12.

Phototherapy‐induced erythema in patients with psoriasis and obesity treated with narrowband UVB phototherapy

Phototherapy‐induced erythema in patients with psoriasis and obesity treated with narrowband <scp>UVB</scp> phototherapy

Impact assessment of energy-efficient lighting in patients with lupus erythematosus: a pilot study

Patients with lupus erythematosus (LE) are often abnormally photosensitive. Ultraviolet (UV) exposure can not only induce cutaneous lesions but may also contribute to systemic flares and disease progression. Various forms of energy-efficient lighting have been shown to emit UV radiation. To determine the effects of these emissions on individuals with LE. This assessment investigated cutaneous responses to repeated exposures from three types of lighting: compact fluorescent lamp (CFL), light-emitting diode (LED) and energy-efficient halogen (EEH). The subjects were 15 patients with LE and a control group of five healthy volunteers. No cutaneous LE lesions were induced by any of the light sources. Delayed skin erythema was induced at the site of CFL irradiation in six of the 15 patients with LE and two of the five healthy subjects. Erythema was increased in severity and more persistent in patients with LE. One patient with LE produced a positive delayed erythema to the EEH. A single patient with LE produced immediate abnormal erythemal responses to the CFL, LED and EEH. Further investigation revealed that this patient also had solar urticaria. All other subjects had negative responses to LED exposure. Compact fluorescent lamps emit UV that can induce skin erythema in both individuals with LE and healthy individuals when situated in close proximity. However, this occurs to a greater extent and is more persistent in patients with LE. EEHs emit UVA that can induce erythema in patients with LE. LEDs provide a safer alternative light source without risk of UV exposure.

PO-0700: Development of a predictive spectrophotometry-based model for skin erythema in patients treated for breast cancer

PO-0700: Development of a predictive spectrophotometry-based model for skin erythema in patients treated for breast cancer