Abstract Westerly wind events (WWEs) are anomalously strong, long-lasting westerlies over the Indian or Pacific Oceans that are capable of forcing oceanic wave modes, which in turn can impact the evolution of coupled ocean-atmosphere phenomena such as the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO). This work examines the fidelity of equatorial WWEs over the Pacific Ocean in 30 CMIP6 historical simulations against observations. WWEs are identified using equatorially-averaged zonal wind stress anomaly duration, zonal extent, and intensity criteria. Most simulations correctly place the majority of WWEs over the west Pacific, although they are skewed westward and generally occur less frequently compared to observations. Simulated WWEs tend to be weaker than observations for a given duration and zonal extent with several models having shorter durations and zonal extents than observations. Biases in simulated WWEs are associated with biases in Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) and convectively-coupled Rossby wave (CRW) variability. Models that underpredict WWE forcing in the west Pacific also severely underpredict MJO and CRW variance. Further, the multi-model mean shows a smaller fraction of WWEs associated with both the MJO and CRW than observations.