Abstract Currently, there are concerns about access restrictions to bouldering, a form of rock climbing, and other outdoor activities practiced at the Niagara Glen Nature Reserve located near Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada. The Niagara Parks Commission is currently in the process of exploring ways to balance protection of the natural area with sustainable recreational use. The purpose of this study was to describe setting perceptions of a husband and wife climbing partnership toward the Niagara Glen using a case study approach. This approach was used to analyze the couple's experiences and reflections using a place-based conceptual lens to highlight interactions with the Niagara Glen over 12 years. Four major themes were identified with respect to setting perception including: 1) Specific rock memories, 2) Community and friendship, 3) Setting location and 4) Environmental degradation. Implications for environmental perspectives and policy are discussed. Restrictions to access at a number of rock climbing areas in southern Ontario, Canada are due to negative environmental impacts, plant and animal protection, and recreational overuse associated with the recreational activity of rock climbing (Leung & Marion, 2000; McMillan, Nekola, & Larson, 2003; Monz, Smith, & Knickerboxer, 2005; Roth, 2007; Siderelis & Attarian, 2004). The negative impacts to these environments are not only detrimental to the physical landscapes and their ecosystems, but they also impact the experiences and perceptions of all recreation participants (Monz et al., 2005). There is, however, some debate that outdoor recreation activities, such as rock climbing and bouldering, can be sustainable at popular sites if participants are taught proper techniques, such as minimum impact practices (Marion & Reid, 2001). Additionally, some suggest while the environmental impacts at such areas are of high concern, the areas have already been impacted and may avoid spreading problems associated with overuse to other areas by concentrating recreationists at particular sites (Leung & Marion, 2000; Watson, 2000). The purpose of this study was to explore setting perceptions from two stakeholders who have devoted a large part of their lives and values to the Niagara Glen Nature Reserve through the activity of bouldering. Specifically, this study was guided by two primary research questions: 1) What are the perceptions of boulderers toward the Niagara Glen? 2) How can perceptions of boulderers be used to inform environmental policy? The authors hope to use this exploratory study to guide another study, which will explore the perceptions of boulderers, other user groups, and park managers toward the Niagara Glen. Potential access restrictions, area closures, and changes in environmental policy at sites like the Niagara Glen are results of a complex intersection of management strategy, people, fragile environments, and human behaviours (Ritchie, 2002). There has been research conducted on the environmental impacts of rock climbing and bouldering from a variety of perspectives with varying results, some which call for management policy to restrict recreational rock climbing activities along the Niagara Escarpment (McMillan et al., 2003). Other studies have shown that specific styles of climbing along the Niagara Escarpment (such as advanced sport climbing) do not necessarily adversely affect cliff-face vegetation, rather, the sites chosen for this style of climbing have natural characteristics that tend to support less vegetation (Kuntz & Larson, 2006). Measuring the impact of rock climbing activities is still evolving and will affect environmental management policy in the future at sites like the Niagara Glen (Ritchie, 2002). The focus of this paper, however, is on the human dimensions of boulderers. While there has been research conducted on other outdoor recreation user groups and the environmental impacts of rock climbing activities, there has been very little research conducted on the environmental perspectives of boulderers. …