In this issue, Dr. Robinson provides a comprehensive overview of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) of prematurity and posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH).1 The article covers epidemiology, pathophysiology, management, and current research in these fields. Relevant background material is obtained from a comprehensive MEDLINE database search and from additional references found in the identified articles. There is little to add to this excellent overview, but I would like to highlight and expand on several points raised by the author. The article describes stability in the number of preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit of the author’s institution, but a 3-fold drop in surgical intervention for PHH. As suggested, there are probably many factors contributing to this decrease, but changing attitudes among surgeons is probably one of them. In the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network (HCRN), we have documented significant variation in the management of these patients from one center to another across 4 centers (Riva-Cambrin et al., unpublished data). Among 110 neonates surgically treated for IVH, the strongest factor predicting whether they needed treatment was the center at which they were treated. As a result, we have developed standardized protocols for making decisions about treatment of these children and are now applying these prospectively. The pathophysiology of both IVH and PHH are described by Dr. Robinson. In addition to the biomarkers discussed in the article, some new data are relevant. In a mouse model of intracranial hemorrhage, the brains of mouse embryos were exposed to lysophosphatidic acid (LPA). This exposure resulted in the development of fetal hydrocephalus, which was dependent on the expression of the LPA1 receptor. Administration of an LPA1 antagonist blocked the development of fetal hydrocephalus.8 The LPA signaling pathway therefore appears to have a role in causing fetal hydrocephalus associated with hemorrhage. It is interesting to note that Dr. Robinson’s group has seen a reduced incidence of CSF shunting with serial lumbar punctures. This topic was the subject of a Cochrane database review4 in 2002 that identified 4 controlled trials, 3 of which were randomized. Two of these studies evaluated lumbar punctures and 2 evaluated reservoir tapping. The relative risks for shunt placement, death, and disability in the pooled data were very close to 1.0, with no significant effect. These measures have not been formally reconsidered in the last 10 years, so it is interesting to see that Dr. Robinson’s group has had success with serial lumbar punctures. The recent work by Whitelaw et al.6 on drainage, irrigation, and fibrinolytic therapy (DRIFT) is described by Dr. Robinson. As noted in the section on nonsurgical treatment, a Phase I trial7 suggested a benefit compared with historical controls, but a randomized trial5 was stopped early because of an increased hemorrhage rate. It should be emphasized, as mentioned later in the section on neuropsychological outcome, that the delayed followup of those patients demonstrated a clear benefit from the therapy.6,7 This trial6 was conducted at 3 centers, but most of the patients were from a single center, and further experience with this technique is required before it is more universally adopted. The temporary treatment option of subgaleal shunt versus subgaleal reservoir is discussed. This has been studied by Wellons et al.,3 whose results appeared to favor the use of a reservoir, although the variability in baseline factors did not allow strong conclusions. Within the HCRN, further prospective work is leading to a randomized trial to compare these 2 treatment options. Dr. Robinson describes an increased shunt infection rate in patients in the PHH group compared with those with other causes of hydrocephalus. Our data have demonstrated an increased risk of shunt failure in addition to the risk of infection. Among 554 children with various causes of hydrocephalus, IVH was an independent risk factor for shunt revision.2 Intraventricular hemorrhage and PHH continue to provide significant challenges for children, their families, and their surgeons. The field is broad, and there are many areas of active investigation. We are indebted to Dr. Robinson for this comprehensive review of the current status of this condition. (http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2011.11.PEDS11412) 239 241
Read full abstract