formation of network society multiplies crisis spreading of enterprises, so crisis management in network times has become a significant task for enterprises to discover and study. Herein we claim The Spiral of Silence Theory continues to play a role in network spreading, which provides enterprise crisis management with a new perspective. th Century, as excellent representation of high technology international network and information high way provide people with capacious space for production, living and activity, and our society gradually steps into network society. Modern enterprises have to bear crisis consciousness, i.e. think of danger in times of peace and prepare for a rainy day, in mind and sufficiently consider and emphasize enterprise crisis management in order to win business competition. We propose in this paper that The Spiral of Silence Theory provides enterprise crisis management with a new perspective. 1. Brief Introduction of The Spiral of Silence Theory The Spiral of Silence was primarily shown in the paper published on Journal of Communication Research by Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, German sociologist, in 1974. She generalized this theory comprehensively in the book The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion—Our Social Skin published in 1980. This theory is based on the following case. Allensbach Research Institution of Germany made a study in 1965 on the coming national selection. During the research process, the two Parties always run neck and neck in the selection. first estimate result showed the two Parties both have opportunity to win. However 6 months later, i.e. 2 months before the selection, the winning possibility of the Christianity Democracy Party to the other Party is 4:1. last 2 weeks before the selection, the Christianity Democracy Party won 4% of votes, but the Society Democracy Party lost 5% of that. In the selection of the same year, the Christianity Democracy Party won finally leading with 9% over the other one. concept of the spiral of came from the confusion brought by this selection, and scholars have been trying to interpret it. basis idea could be described as follows: Avoid social punishment due to isolation. People tend to observe surrounding before pointing out an idea. A person is likely to an opinion boldly and actively if one feels that one is in the or opinions; while he is likely to turn to be silent or echo due to environmental pressure if one feels that one is in the minority or opinions. emphasized by public media are underground and spread widely, so they are easily perceived as or opinions. During the spiral expanding of silence of disadvantageous opinions and voice of advantageous opinions, advantageous majority opinions in social life—consensus, comes into being. Neumann proposed a hypothesis: most of individuals will choose public media opinion to avoid isolation from holding particular attitude and belief. One is not willing to his own opinion for fear of isolation. Actually this cognition almost exists in everyone's mind both in western and eastern society, especially for the Chinese people experiencing Culture Revolution. However Professor Neumann caught this phenomenon and proposed hypothesis: dominant and increasingly supported are more advantageous, while the opposite side tends to lose step by step. Thus, the situation of one party with but the other with turns out to be a spiral process which constantly establishes main opinion from one opinion. If public media participate in this process, the spiral will be formed more quickly and obviously. Neumann claimed not until 18 th
Read full abstract