AbstractThe accuracy of profile simulation calculations depends heavily on the accuracy of the parameters used. In particular, the development parameters, which represent the development characteristics (profile and sensitivity) of the resist, have a significant effect on profile simulation accuracy. However, as yet there have been almost no studies into methods used to calculate the development parameters for electron beam lithography, nor have there been comparisons of simulation results using these development parameters with observed resist profiles. In light of this, the authors have developed a system for the measurement of development parameters for use in simulations of electron beam lithography, and have undertaken study into the methods used to calculate such development parameters. In addition, the authors have also attempted to compare simulation results with observed resist profiles. Specifically, a diazanaphthoquinone–novolac resin positive‐type electron beam resist and a chemically amplified positive‐type electron beam resist were used, to which the Fujino development rate equation and the Mack development rate equation were applied. Trial calculations of the development parameters were performed, and the parameters thus obtained were input into a ProBEAM/3D electron beam lithography simulator. The electron beam resist profiles were simulated and compared with SEM images of actual resist samples. From the results it was found that both the Fujino and Mack development rate equations accurately reproduce resist behavior for the novolac positive‐type electron beam resist, whereas the Mack development rate equation was more accurate than the Fujino equation for the chemically amplified positive‐type electron beam resist. © 2001 Scripta Technica, Electron Comm Jpn Pt 2, 84(4): 16–25, 2001
Read full abstract