Elective Endovascular Repair Research Articles

Postoperative thoracic and low back pain following endovascular aortic repair associated with stenting location.

We have noted that patients frequently complain of thoracic or low back pain after undergoing an endovascular aortic repair, which we speculated was caused by the indwelling stent. We investigated the patients who underwent an elective thoracic or abdominal endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR or EVAR) and noted the location of stent, and postoperative pain. The incidence of either thoracic or low back pain at individual vertebra levels was determined, after which we fitted the sigmoidal function to the discrete data to obtain a cut-off line. The study patients were then divided into 2 groups using the cut-off line to compare the incidence of pain. We analyzed 96 patients (68 TEVAR, 28 EVAR). The incidence of thoracic pain was significantly higher in TEVAR as compared to EVAR (26.5% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.01), while that of low back pain was significantly higher in EVAR (35.7% vs. 16.2%, P = 0.04). With the cut-off line for thoracic pain set at the 12th thoracic vertebra, the incidence of thoracic pain was significantly higher in patients with the upper end of the stent above the cut-off as compared to at a lower point (26.5% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.01). As for low back pain, the cut-off line was set at the 9th thoracic vertebra, and the incidence of that pain was significantly higher in patients with the lower end of the stent below that line (30.9% vs. 0.0%, P < 0.01). Thoracic and low back pain after an endovascular aortic repair procedure were associated with stenting site.

Predictors of perioperative and late survival in octogenarians undergoing elective endovascular abdominal aortic repair

ObjectiveThe appropriateness of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of uncomplicated abdominal aortic aneurysm depends on the risk-benefit ratio, particularly in elderly patients with short life expectancy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of EVAR in >80-year-old patients by evaluating their postoperative survival and analyzing the possible predictors of late mortality. MethodsAll consecutive patients aged >80 years undergoing elective EVAR from 2006 to 2015 were prospectively evaluated. The 30-day mortality and long-term survival were assessed, and independent risk factors for mortality were determined by multivariate logistic and Cox analysis. ResultsOf a total of 1135 EVARs performed in a 10-year period, 201 (18%) occurred in patients older than 80 years. The median age was 84 years (interquartile range, 3 years), and 85% were male. Thirty-four patients (17%) had a score of 4 according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. Overall 30-day mortality was 2% (n = 4); it was significantly higher in those with ASA score of 4 compared with ASA score <4 (9.4% vs 0.6%; P = .04) and was also confirmed by multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 12.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-141.8; P = .04). The mean follow-up was 36 ± 18 months, and the overall survival at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years was 85% ± 2%, 77% ± 3%, and 52% ± 4%, respectively. Using multivariate Cox regression, ASA score of 4 and peripheral artery obstructive disease (PAOD) were the only independent predictors for midterm mortality (hazard ratio of 2.0 [95% CI, 1.2-2.9; P = .04] and 3.07 [95% CI, 1.06-5.2; P = .04], respectively). The 2-year survival was significantly influenced by the presence of both (ASA score of 4 and PAOD; survival, 33% ± 2%) or one (ASA score of 4 or PAOD; survival, 67% ± 8%) of the two independent predictors. If neither ASA score of 4 nor PAOD was present, survival was significantly improved (92% ± 3%; P = .02). ConclusionsThe performance of EVAR in >80-year-old patients is associated with an overall early mortality rate as low as 2%. In patients with no or only one risk factor, the survival rate warrants the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm; in contrast, patients with ASA score of 4 and PAOD have a significantly higher mortality rate and reduction of life expectancy.

Single-center experience with an inner branched arch endograft

ObjectiveWhereas open repair is the “gold standard” for most aortic arch diseases, a subgroup of patients might benefit from an endovascular approach. The introduction of branched stent grafts with dedicated design to address the challenges of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch has opened an entirely new area of treatment for these patients. We investigated the early outcomes of branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (b-TEVAR) in various types of disease of the aortic arch. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted of prospectively collected data from a single center of all consecutive patients treated with b-TEVAR. The indication for elective endovascular repair was consented in an interdisciplinary case conference. All patients were treated with a custom-made inner branched arch endograft with two internal branches (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) and left-sided carotid-subclavian bypass. Study end points were technical success, 30-day mortality, and complications as well as late complications and reinterventions. ResultsBetween 2012 and 2017, there were 54 patients (38 male; median age, 71 years) treated with diseases of the aortic arch. Indications for therapy involved degenerative aortic arch or proximal descending aortic aneurysms requiring arch repair (n = 24), dissection with or without false lumen aneurysms (n = 26), and penetrating aortic ulcers (n = 4). Forty-three cases (80%) were performed electively and 11 urgently for contained ruptures (n = 3) or symptomatic aneurysms (n = 8) with endografts already available for the patient or with grafts of other patients with similar anatomy. Technical success was achieved in 53 cases (98%). The 30-day mortality and major stroke incidence were 5.5% (3/54) and 5.5% (3/54), respectively; in-hospital mortality was 7.4% (n = 4), and minor strokes (including asymptomatic new cerebral lesions) occurred in 5.5% (n = 3). There were two cases of transient spinal cord ischemia with complete recovery and one of paraplegia. No retrograde type A dissections or cardiac injuries were observed. Three early stent graft-related reinterventions were necessary to correct proximal endograft kinking with type IA endoleak in one patient, a bridging stent graft stenosis in another patient, and false lumen persistent perfusion from dissected supra-aortic vessels in the last patient. Mean in-hospital stay was 14 ± 8 days. During a mean follow-up of 12 ± 9 months, three nonaorta-related deaths and one aorta-related death distal to the arch repair were observed. ConclusionsTreatment of aortic arch diseases with b-TEVAR is feasible and safe with acceptable mortality and stroke rates.

Infrarenal Aortic Endograft Infection: A Single-Center Experience.

Endograft infection is an infrequent but one of the most serious and challenging complications after endovascular aortic repair. The aim of this study was to assess the management of this complication in a tertiary center. A retrospective analysis of a prospective database was performed including all patients who underwent elective endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR) from 2003 to 2016 in a tertiary center. Seven cases of endograft infection were identified during the follow-up period from a total of 473 (1.48%) EVAR. Most frequent symptoms at presentation were fever (71.4%) and lumbar pain (57.1%). One case developed an early infection, while 6 cases were diagnosed as late infections. Mean time from endograft placement to symptom presentation was 28.3 months (2-91.5 months). Gram-positive cocci were the microorganisms most commonly isolated in blood cultures (66%). Two cases were managed with endograft removal and aortic reconstruction with a cryopreserved allograft, 2 cases with surgical drainage, and 2 cases exclusively with antibiotic therapy. In 1 case, the diagnosis was performed postoperatively based on intraoperative findings associated with positive graft cultures; and graft explantation was performed with "in situ" reconstruction using a Dacron graft. Perioperative mortality was 42.9%. One-year mortality was 57.1%. Mean follow-up was 21.5 months. Endograft explantation is the gold standard of treatment; however, given the overall high morbi-mortality rates of this pathology, a tailored approach should always be offered depending on the patient's overall condition. Conservative management can be an acceptable option in those patients with short life expectancy and high surgical risk.

Sex-Dependent Outcomes Following Elective Endovascular Aortic Repair

Retrospective, single-center review from Froedtert Hospital in Milwaukee, WI between 2008 and 2014. In this series, the authors found that the 31 women who underwent elective EVARs had smaller iliac artery diameters at their narrowest diameter (6.8 mm vs 8.0 mm; P < .001), more severe iliac angulation (77% vs 44%; P < .001), and increased risk of postoperative complications (42% vs 11%; P = .003), including myocardial infarction (13% vs 3%; P = .025), wound complications (13% vs 6%; P = .048), stroke, renal failure, and visceral or limb ischemia, compared to 150 men. There were no open conversions and no perioperative mortality. Long-term durability of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) did not differ between the sexes. Women had more complications following EVAR compared to men. Mortality and long-term durability of EVER were the same.

Coverage of visible intercostal and lumbar segmental arteries can predict the volume of cerebrospinal fluid drainage in elective endovascular repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic disease: a pilot study.

Our goal was to identify anatomical and physiological factors that could predict the amount of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage in patients undergoing elective endovascular repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic disease. All consecutive elective endovascular procedures performed for descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic disease between January 2015 and December 2017 were included in the study. Routine use of CSF drainage was established in all patients. The goal of drainage was to reach a spinal fluid pressure of 10-12 mmHg by draining in 5-15-ml aliquots. The number of visible intercostal and lumbar segmental arteries (SAs) was evaluated before and after endovascular repair. The covering ratio of SAs was calculated as covered preoperative SAs/total preoperative SAs. Twenty-four consecutive patients were included in the final analysis. The indication for the intervention was a descending thoracic aneurysm in 13 cases, a thoracoabdominal aneurysm in 4 cases and a chronic type B dissection in 7 cases. The procedure performed was thoracic endovascular aortic repair in 20 cases and fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair in 4 cases. None of the patients developed spinal cord ischaemia. The mean volume of CSF drained was 46 ml. The mean length of aortic coverage was 231 mm. The mean number of total preoperative SAs and of covered preoperative SAs was, respectively, 22 and 9. The volume of CSF drained was significantly correlated with all these variables (length of aortic coverage, total visible SAs and covered SAs), but the most powerful correlation was individuated with the covering ratio of SAs. Our findings suggest that the percentage of intercostal and lumbar SAs covered by placement of a stent graft can predict the volume of CSF drained in patients undergoing elective endovascular repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic disease.

Outcomes and Durability of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Octogenarians

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) accounts for the majority of all abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs in the United States. EVAR utilization in the aging population is increasing due to the minimally invasive nature of the procedure, the low associated perioperative morbidity, and early survival benefit over open repair. The objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of octogenarians after elective EVAR to theiryounger counterparts, a question that can be answered by a long-term, institutional data set. This was a retrospective series of 255 patients, who underwent elective EVAR within our institution from 2008 to 2015. A comparative analysis of patients aged 80years and older and less than 80years was performed. Outcomes measured included perioperative death and myocardial infarction (MI), length of stay, and readmission within 30days. Aneurysm reintervention, long-term surveillance imaging, and aneurysm-related deaths were also evaluated. In addition, subset analyses of octogenarians were compared for survival at 24months. Overall, 255 patients were included in our analysis. Fifty-nine patients were octogenarians, and 196 patients were nonoctogenarians. The mean age difference between the two groups was significant (84.5years [SD, ±3.44] vs. 69.6years [SD, ±6.13] in the ≥80 and <80 groups, respectively; P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in the mean aneurysm size (6.03cm [SD, ±1.12] vs. 5.535cm [SD, ±0.9]; P<0.06) between the ≥80 and<80 groups. Octogenarians had higher rates of perioperative MI (5% vs. 1%, P<0.04), thirty-day mortality (7% vs. 0%, P<0.003), a higher number of perioperative complications (0.64 incidence per patient [SD, ±1.11] vs. 0.31 [SD, ±0.69], P<0.005), and a longer mean hospital stay (5.34 [SD, ±5.75] days vs. 3.16 [SD, ±3.23] days, P<0.0003), and they were also less likely to be discharged home after surgery (75% vs. 91%, P<0.002). In the evaluated long-term outcomes, the two groups were similar with regard to aneurysm reintervention (10% vs. 9%, P<0.06) and the stability of aneurysm sac size on imaging at last follow-up (71% vs. 80%, P<0.27). The overall aortic related cause of death was different between the groups (8% vs. 1%, P<0.003); however, the long-term aortic related mortality was not different between the two groups (2% vs. 1%, P<0.4). Finally, a subset analysis of the octogenarian group was performed comparing patients based on survival status at 24months. Higher preoperative creatinine (1.73mg/dL [SD, ±1.54] vs. 1.15mg/dL [SD, ±0.46]) and lower preoperative hematocrit (33.9% [SD, ±3.43] vs. 37.2% [SD, ±4.9]) along with number of perioperative complications (1.2 incidence per patient [SD, ±1.74] vs. 0.45 [SD, ±0.73]) were associated with death at 24months after the index operation. Elective endovascular repair of AAA in octogenarians carries a higher risk of perioperative mortality but acceptable long-term outcomes. Appropriateness of elective EVAR in octogenarians should be answered based on this potential short-lived survival benefit, taking into account that advanced age should not be the sole basis of exclusion for otherwise suitable candidates for elective EVAR.

Increasing Incidence of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Germany in the Endovascular Era: Secondary Data Analysis of the Nationwide German DRG Microdata

Nationwide population based data on epidemiology and surgical treatment of descending thoracic aortic (DTA) aneurysms are not available for Germany. The aim was to assess the in hospital incidence, and to report outcomes of patients who received surgical treatment. Data were acquired by analysing the diagnosis related group (DRG) statistics of the German Federal Statistical Office. All inpatient cases of ruptured (rDTA aneurysm, ICD Code I71.1) or non-ruptured DTA aneurysm (nrDTA aneurysm; I71.2) who received thoracic endovascular (TEVAR; OPS procedure code 5-38a.7/70/8/80) or open aortic repair (OAR; OPS 5-384.3) between 2005 and 2014 were included. To adjust for sex, age, medical risk (Elixhauser comorbidity score), type of procedure, and type of admission, a multilevel multivariable regression model with robust error variance was applied. The primary outcome was in hospital mortality; secondary outcomes were organ complications. A volume outcome analysis was performed. A total of 48,098 cases of DTA aneurysm (5,848, 12.2% rDTA aneurysm) were identified. The average age was 69±12 years. 65.2% were male. Frequent comorbidities were hypertension (74.9%), peripheral artery disease (including abdominal aortic aneurysm, 42.6%), other heart diseases (41.6%), coronary heart disease (26.2%), and renal failure (22.5%). Surgical treatment was received by 4969 patients (10.3%): 4057 TEVAR (81.6%) and 912 OAR (18.4%) procedures. Mortality for rDTA aneurysm was 42.9% (OAR) and 22.3% (TEVAR). It was 10.5% and 3.7% for DTA aneurysm, respectively. Rupture, increasing age, and higher comorbidity score were significantly associated with higher mortality (RR 6.66, 5.33-8.25; 1.28, 1.17-1.40; and 1.06, 1.05-1.08, respectively). Endovascular treatment was associated with lower mortality (RR 0.31, 0.23-0.41). Hospital volume was not significantly associated with in hospital mortality. Eighty per cent of patients treated surgically for a DTA aneurysm receive endovascular therapy, with low peri-operative mortality in non-ruptured cases. Elective endovascular repair should be considered for individuals at a high risk of rupture who are fit for surgery. Open repair, increased age, and a high comorbidity score are associated with higher mortality.

Validation of AAA Patient Reporting of National Administrative and Clinical Outcomes Databases

As medical payment transitions to quality and value-based incentives, little is known about the validity of the data and metrics used to evaluate patient outcomes after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. This study is designed to validate a national administrative database (Vizient, formerly known as University Health Systems Consortium) and a national clinical dataset (Vascular Quality Initiative or VQI) against prospectively collected surgical data from a robust academic clinical practice. This study will evaluate the relationships between these variable data sources and validate their use as quality parameters for elective endovascular and open AAA repair (EVAR and OAR).

Predictors of long-term mortality following elective endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) became the preferred modality for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. However, long term survival benefit may sometimes be questionable as many patients would die from other causes rather than aneurysm rupture. It is paramount to identify critical risk factors for late mortality after EVAR to understand its real benefit. The aim of this review is to identify most clinically relevant determinants of late mortality after elective EVAR. English literature was searched to identify publications on long-term predictors of mortality following elective EVAR. A follow-up extending for at least 5 years was the minimum required as inclusion criteria. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. We addressed clinical and demographic variables and observe if they had any associations with long-term all-cause mortality following EVAR. Twelve studies were included describing more than 82306 patients, exploring at least one predictor of long-term mortality. All-cause mortality was associated to age (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.06-3.34), gender (HR: 1.07), aneurysm diameter (HR: 1.09-1.64), smoking habits (HR: 1.51-1.73), heart failure (HR: 1.60-7.34), ischemic heart disease (HR: 1.60), peripheral vascular disease (HR: 1.30), cerebrovascular disease (HR: 1.55), diabetes mellitus (HR: 6.35), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR: 1.50-2.06) and chronic renal disease (HR: 1.90-3.08). Risk factors associated with long-term mortality following elective EVAR remain scarcely published. Several demographic, anatomical, cardiovascular, pulmonary and renal comorbidities seem to have an association with long-term mortality. Critical scrutiny of clinical patient status remains fundamental for a fair health resources allocation.

Sex-dependent outcomes following elective endovascular aortic repair

BackgroundEvidence has shown that women derive less benefit from endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in large part due to more challenging aortoiliac anatomy. This study sought to examine whether sex-dependent outcomes exist following elective EVAR cases. MethodsAn institutional retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent elective EVAR procedures between 2008 and 2014. Outcome data collected included procedural and hospital morbidity, mortality, and overall EVAR durability based on the incidence of unplanned graft-related secondary interventions (SIs) (e.g., open conversion, proximal or distal extensions, and coil embolizations). ResultsOne hundred eighty-one patients (150 men, 31 women) met the study inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 40.3 mo. Women had more challenging anatomy compared to men including smaller overall iliac diameters (6.8 mm versus 8.0 mm, P < 0.001) and more severe iliac angulation (77% moderate to severe versus 44%, P < 0.001). Women had increased risk of postoperative complications compared to men (41.9% versus 11.3%, P = 0.003). There was no perioperative mortality in our series of elective EVAR cases. Median 5-y survival following EVAR was 64.4% for men and 76.3% for women (P = 0.599). Late SI rates following EVAR was 10.5% with 16 (10.7%) men and 3 (9.7%) women needing interventions (P = 0.870). Overall durability of EVAR extrapolated as time to SIs was 91% at 2 y and 85% at 5 y. Factors predisposing SIs were iliac tortuosity (P = 0.046), aortic neck angle (P = 0.022), and endoleak at the follow-up (P = 0.030). ConclusionsIn this study, immediate outcomes following EVAR were different between men and women, with women having increased rates of postoperative complications. Mortality and overall long-term durability of EVAR, however, were the same between sexes despite anatomical differences. EVAR durability was significantly dependent on the severity of iliac tortuosity, aortic neck angulation, and presence of endoleak at the follow-up.

Outcomes of Octogenarians Undergoing Elective Endovascular Aortic Repair Over Seven Consecutive Years: Do They fare Worse than Their Younger Counterparts?

Outcomes of Octogenarians Undergoing Elective Endovascular Aortic Repair Over Seven Consecutive Years: Do They fare Worse than Their Younger Counterparts?

Predictors of Discharge to a Skilled Nursing Facility after EVAR

There is a paucity of data guiding preoperative counselling on the need for discharge to a skilled nursing facilities following elective endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms(EVAR). This study’s purpose was to define preoperative predictors for discharge to a nursing facility.

The impact of prior aortic surgery on outcomes after multibranched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of prior aortic surgery on outcomes after multibranched endovascular aneurysm repair (MBEVAR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) and pararenal aortic aneurysms (PRAAs). MethodsFrom July 2005 to October 2016, there were 153 patients who underwent elective endovascular repair of TAAA and PRAA using multibranched stent grafts. Data on demographics, procedural details, and outcomes were collected prospectively. ResultsThe mean age was 73 ± 8 years, and 113 of 153 (74%) were men. Mean aneurysm diameter was 67 ± 9 mm. Before MBEVAR, 68 of 153 (44%) patients had undergone a prior aortic surgery; 49 of 68 (72%) had prior open aortic surgery, 15 of 68 (22%) had prior endovascular aortic surgery, and 4 of 68 (6%) had both. There were no significant differences in age, sex, preoperative aneurysm diameter, or medical comorbidities (coronary artery disease, lung disease, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension) in patients with previous aortic surgery compared with those without. Patients with previous aortic surgery had higher fluoroscopy times (131 ± 59 vs 118 ± 54 minutes; P = .18) and procedural times (370 ± 101 vs 345 ± 118 minutes; P = .27) during MBEVAR, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. Patients without previous aortic intervention had higher rates of postoperative paraplegia (9/85 [11%]) vs (0/68 [0%]; P = .005) compared with those with previous aortic surgery. Of 153 patients, 3 (2%) had a postoperative stroke, and this was not different between the two groups. Median follow-up time was 2.5 years (interquartile range, 1.0-4.5 years) and did not differ between those with and those without previous aortic surgery. Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year freedom from aneurysm-related mortality and overall mortality was 90% and 48%, respectively, and did not differ between the two groups. There was also no difference in branch vessel occlusion between the two groups. ConclusionsA high proportion of patients undergoing MBEVAR for TAAA or PRAA have already undergone prior open or endovascular aortic procedures, but this does not appear to increase the complication rate or affect midterm clinical outcomes. Patients with prior aortic surgery who undergo MBEVAR have lower rates of paraplegia compared with those without prior surgery, which may be due to effective recruitment of collateral circulation.

Clinical Outcomes of Total Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Aortic Aneurysms Involving the Proximal Anastomotic Aneurysm following Initial Open Repair for Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

To evaluate initial and midterm clinical outcomes of aortic aneurysms involving the proximal anastomotic aneurysm (AAPAAs) following initial open repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. Between July 2006 and August 2015, 24 patients underwent elective endovascular repair for the treatment of AAPAAs at our institution. AAPAA classification has been categorized as 3 types. Type I AAPAA is the most extensive, extending from the descending aorta to the prior proximal anastomosis as similar to Crawford type II or III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. Type II AAPAA is limited to the aortic aneurysm below the diaphragm including the abdominal visceral arteries. Finally, similar to pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, type III AAPAA involves the renal origins, but does not extend to the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries. Total endovascular aneurysm repair (t-EVAR) consisted of fenestrated EVAR (f-EVAR), multibranched EVAR (t-Branch), and snorkel EVAR (s-EVAR) were performed for patients with high-risk open surgical repair. We retrospectively analyzed 24 cases, which were categorized with 3 types of AAPAA. F-EVAR, t-Branch, and s-EVAR for AAPAAs were performed in 15 patients (62.5%), 5patients (20.8%), and 4 patients (16.7%), respectively. Type I and type II AAPAA were identified in 13 patients (54.2%) and 7 patients (29.2%), and type III AAPAA was identified in 4 patients (16.7%). Technical success was 95.8%, and clinical success was 79.2% with t-EVAR. Spinal cord ischemia was identified in 2 patients (8.3%) of type I AAPAA, the 30-day mortality rate was 4.2% (n=1, type I AAPAA). Type II and III endoleaks occurred in 1 (4.2%, type III AAPAA) and 3 patients (12.5%, each case of type I, II, and III AAPAA), respectively. There was no open conversion or aneurysm rupture in the late follow-up period. The estimated overall survival rates of t-EVAR after 1 and 3years were 95.6% and 76.2%, respectively. Rates of freedom from aneurysm-related death and secondary intervention of t-EVAR at 3years were 90.1% and 89.7%, respectively. Finally, rates of target vessel patency at 1 and 3years were 95.3% and 88.8%, respectively. Our initial to midterm results of t-EVAR for the treatment of AAPAA were generally good with low rates of perioperative mortality and aneurysm-related death. However, more attentions should be paid for the treatment of type I AAPAA with high incidence of major adverse events.

Safety of perioperative cerebral oxygen saturation during debranching in patients with incomplete circle of Willis.

The consequences of common carotid artery (CCA) cross-clamping during debranching before thoracic endovascular aortic repair are unclear. We examined the safety of a simple CCA cross-clamping procedure under regional cerebral oxygen saturation monitoring (rSO2) in patients with a complete or incomplete circle of Willis (CoW) anatomy. Twenty-eight patients with thoracic aneurysm underwent elective debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair with bilateral frontal rSO2 monitoring at our institution between January 2012 and October 2015. Before CCA cross-clamping, we maintained a systemic mean arterial pressure of >100 mm Hg with a vasopressor. We recorded the bilateral frontal rSO2 before, during and after CCA cross-clamping. The CoW was incomplete in 11 (39.3%) patients. Of these, 6 patients had a complication of ischaemic potential. The left frontal rSO2 was <50% in 3 patients but did not fall below 40%. Compared with baseline values (mean ± SD 64.6 ± 6.9%), the left frontal rSO2 showed no significant change perioperatively in those with a complete CoW on the left CCA cross-clamping (during: 61.0 ± 7.9%, P = 0.17; after: 65.1 ± 5.9%, P = 0.09). In patients with an incomplete CoW with ischaemic potential, the left frontal rSO2 did not change significantly after cross-clamping (baseline: 59.8 ± 3.2%, during: 55.5 ± 5.0%; P = 0.10) but increased significantly on declamping (62.8 ± 4.5%, P = 0.023). The extent of the changes in the mean left frontal rSO2 on clamping and declamping decreased and increased by 7.3% and 11.7%, respectively, in patients with an incomplete CoW, when compared with 5.3% and 5.8% in those with a complete CoW (P = 0.65 and 0.31, respectively). No perioperative cerebrovascular events were observed. Simple CCA cross-clamping during debranching was safe when arterial pressure was supported and rSO2 was monitored, even with an incomplete CoW and ischaemic potential.

Management of major vascular injury during pedicle screw instrumentation of thoracolumbar spine

ObjectivesVascular injury is a rare complication of spinal instrumentation. Presentation can vary from immediate hemorrhage to pseudoaneurysm formation. In the literature, surgical approach to repair has varied based on anatomy, acuity of diagnosis, infection, and available technology. In this manuscript, we aim to describe our institutional experience with vascular injuries in thoraco-lumbar spine surgery. Patients and methodsWe report our institutional experience of three cases of vascular injury secondary to pedicle screw misplacement and their management, as well as a review of the literature. ResultsThe first case had a history of previous instrumentation and presented with back pain and fever. The patient was taken for instrumentation exploration via a posterior approach. Aortic violation was discovered at T6 intraoperatively during instrumentation removal and the patient underwent emergent endovascular repair. The second case presented with chronic back pain after multiple prior posterior fusions and CT angiogram showing screw perforation on the aorta at T10. The patient underwent elective endovascular repair with synchronous removal of the instrumentation. The third case presented with radicular leg pain 6 months after L4-S1 posterior lumbar interbody fusion, with CT scan demonstrating the left S1 screw abutting the L5 nerve root and common iliac vein. The patient underwent elective instrumentation revision with intraoperative venography. ConclusionMajor vascular injury is a known complication of spinal surgery, especially if it involves instrumentation with pedicle screws. Treatment approach has evolved with the advancement of endovascular technology; however, open surgery remains an option when anatomy or infection is prohibitive. In the elective setting, preoperative planning with attention to surgical approach, positioning, and contingencies, should occur in a multidisciplinary fashion. Repair with an aortic stent-graft cuff may minimize unnecessary coverage of the descending thoracic aorta and intercostal arteries.

Factors Affecting Follow-Up Compliance in Patients After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate potential factors affecting patient non-compliance after endovascular aneurysm repair. We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing elective or emergency endovascular repair for thoracic, abdominal aorta, or iliac artery aneurysm at a single institution from November 2007 to March 2014. Compliance to follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months was assessed. Factors evaluated included patient demographics, size of aneurysm, distance between the patient's residence and outpatient clinic, urgency of surgery, and time of year in which the follow-up visits were scheduled. During the study period, 205 patients (75% male and 25% female) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. One-month mortality was 1.1% for elective procedures and 16.1% for emergency procedures (p = 0.001). Overall mortality at 12 months was 6.3% and 32.3% for elective and emergency procedures, respectively (p = 0.0002). Highest compliance was observed at 1 month, with 184 patients (93%) attending. A significant decrease was seen at 6 (n = 102, 54%) and 12 (n = 89, 48%) months. At the 12-month mark, a larger proportion of minority patients were non-compliant compared with Caucasian patients. Confounders for non-compliance were analyzed using multivariate analysis, and statistical significance was found for widowed marital status (p = 0.008), travel distance >25 miles to the outpatient clinic (p = 0.032), and emergency repair of aneurysms (p = 0.022). Despite emphasizing the importance of follow-up after endovascular aortic procedures, almost half of the treated patients were non-compliant. Our study identified travel distance, marital status, and urgency of surgery as factors that may affect patients' compliance to scheduled follow-up visits.

A registry-based rationale for discrete intervention thresholds for open and endovascular elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in female patients

ObjectiveAn evidence-based consensus for a female-specific intervention threshold for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is missing. This study aims to analyze sex-related differences in the epidemiology of ruptured AAA to establish an intervention threshold for women. MethodsThe Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) is a compulsory, nation-wide registry of AAA repairs in The Netherlands. All patients with emergency or elective AAA repair between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015, were included in the analysis. The main outcomes were age, sex, AAA diameter at time of rupture, and 30-day postoperative mortality. ResultsA total of 1561 ruptured AAA repairs (14.7% women) and 7063 cases of elective AAA repair (13.7% women) were included in the analysis. Women had significantly smaller mean ± standard deviation AAA diameter at time of rupture than men; 70.5 ± 14.4 mm and 78.6 ± 17.5 mm, respectively. In male patients, 8% of ruptures occurred at diameters below the 55 mm intervention threshold. The female equivalent of this eighth percentile is 52 mm. Female patients had significantly higher 30-day mortality after emergency repair, namely, 33% for women versus 24.2% for men, but were also significantly older, mean ± standard deviation age 76.7 ± 7.1 years and 73.9 ± 8.3 years for women and men, respectively. Correcting for age reduced the 30-day mortality risk for women after ruptured AAA repair from 1.53 (95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.04) to 1.27 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.73). Outcome after open elective repair was significantly worse for women compared with men, with a 30-day mortality of 7.97% 30 for women and 4.27% for men (P < .01). ConclusionsThe equivalent of the 55-mm intervention threshold for elective endovascular AAA repair in men is 52 mm in women. The almost doubled mortality risk for elective open repair in women implies that the optimal point for open repair is at higher diameters, very possibly at least 55 mm.

Aortopulmonary Fistula Presenting without an Endoleak after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Herein, we report the case of a 60-year-old man, a smoker with a history of arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus. After computed tomography (CT) for an episode of hemoptysis, the patient underwent elective thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) because of a degenerative aneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta. The area of perianeurysmal pulmonary atelectasis reported on the CT scan was not considered. Three months later, he developed an aortopulmonary fistula without endoleaks. Although TEVAR is a relatively safe procedure, no detail should be overlooked in the preoperative evaluation in order to avoid life-threatening complications. Further, the effectiveness and modality of prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis and/or preoperative respiratory physiotherapy should be assessed in such cases.