<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Most head and neck cancers (HNC) overexpress EGFR, a feature associated with poor clinical outcome. Preclinical and clinical data suggest that peritumoral myofibroblasts (MF) express EGFR ligands and the presence of a high MF density in the tumor stroma is associated with statistically worse survival in patients with locally advanced HNC. We evaluated whether peritumoral MF density was prognostic of outcome in patients treated on RTOG 0522, a negative phase III trial evaluating the addition of C225 to cisplatin-based chemoradiation (CRT). We also evaluated whether MF density was predictive of benefit to C225. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Specimens from HPV-negative patients treated on RTOG 0522 were obtained from the NRG Oncology Biospecimen Repository and evaluated by a blinded pathologist (JW). MF density was determined as a percentage and the skewed data were normalized using Box-Cox transformation, from which the mean was calculated and used to stratify patients into low- and high-density groups. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis (DM) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariable analysis (MVA) by Cox proportional hazards model was used to test for the prognostic effect of this biomarker for patients with low vs. high MF density. To test for predictive effect of MF density on clinical outcomes in patients treated with CRT vs. CRT+C225, a Cox model with a treatment-by-biomarker interaction term was used. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 186 patients were evaluated, 94 were treated with CRT and 92 were treated with CRT+C225. On MVA, including primary site, age, PS, smoking history, T-stage, N-stage, and EGFR level, there was no significant difference in OS (Hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.41-1.02; P=0.06), PFS (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.50-1.12; P=0.16), or DM (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.38-1.54; P=0.44) based on MF density. However, MVA Cox model including biomarker, treatment arm and biomarker-treatment interaction demonstrated that this interaction was significant (P=0.01). Within the low MF density subgroup, patients treated with CRT+C225 had significantly higher PFS (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.82; P=0.01) and lower incidence of DM (HR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.82; P=0.01), as well as numerically higher OS (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.22 to 1.05; P=0.06) compared to patients treated with CRT. Patients with high MF density demonstrated no difference in OS, PFS, or DM based on treatment arm. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Peritumoral MF density was not prognostic of OS, PFS, or DM among patients treated on RTOG 0522. However, patients with low peritumoral MF density who received CRT+C225 had significantly higher PFS and lower incidence of DM compared to patients who received CRT alone. These results suggest that MF density is not a prognostic biomarker but may be predictive of benefit to C225. Further investigations are needed to validate these exploratory findings.
Read full abstract