This paper concerns the influence of geometry changes on the post-yield behavior of beams and other engineering structures. First, the extant literature on the subject is reviewed. Next, as a specific illustration, the particular problem of a simply supported axially restrained uniform beam, rectangular in cross section and made of rigid perfectly-plastic material, and subjected to vertical load uniformly distributed with respect to length measured along the current centerline of the beam is studied in detail. The beam’s response, following the initial yield associated with the formation of a central yield hinge, is in two consecutive phases. In the primary phase, plastic deformation is associated solely with the outwards movement of two boundaries such that the material behavior at beam cross sections stays rigid except precisely at these boundaries ; the phase terminates when each has moved out to a cross section originally at a distance of one-third of the semispan from the center. The secondary phase now begins with each of the two existing boundaries being joined by a new boundary that separates to travel inwards, and now plastic deformation completely extends over the two outer regions between the boundaries; the phase terminates when these boundaries reach the ends and the center of the beam, and then the beam’s response is simply that of a pure membrane, although this state is only asymptotically achieved. The analysis presented leads, for example, to a complete determination of the load deformation relationship, and the important influence of geometry changes on the response of the beam is thereby made clear. In particular, in practical circumstances of slender beams, it is found that even at central transverse deflections of the order of the beam thickness, the load carrying capacity is considerably enhanced and also the asymptotic membrane state is effectively realized. The results of the present exact analysis of the problem, which is based on the rate equations of equilibrium, extend those obtained earlier in approximate analyses given by other workers. Finally, mention is made of related beam problems, for which a similar analysis is possible and for which similar results obtain, and also of plate problems.