Effect Of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Research Articles

Menstrual cycle and the protective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning against endothelial ischemia/reperfusion injury: comparison with postmenopausal women.

The aim of this study was to determine whether the capacity of remote ischemic preconditioning (IPC) against endothelial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury changes across the menstrual cycle in premenopausal women and to compare IPC responses to postmenopausal women. Thirty-five women were studied (22 premenopausal/13 postmenopausal). Changes in endothelial function were determined during the early follicular vs. the late follicular phase (after positive urine ovulation test; Study 1), vs. the mid-luteal phase (after positive urine progesterone test; Study 2), and vs. estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women; Study 3). Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was assessed by the forearm blood flow (FBF) to reactive hyperemia with/without I/R injury with remote IPC (3 × 5 min cycles of upper arm ischemia). In the premenopausal women, peak FBF responses during the early follicular phase were blunted 20% (P < 0.0001) with I/R injury (from baseline: 23.4 ± 6.2 to 19.5 ± 4.9 mL/100 mL tissue/min) compared with the late follicular/mid-luteal phases despite IPC. In postmenopausal women, peak FBF was diminished (from: 21.1 ± 5.1 to 17.2 ± 4.4 mL/100 mL tissue/min), and total FBF (area under the curve) was decreased a third (-32%; P < 0.001) with I/R injury. Protection from I/R injury was preserved during the late follicular (from baseline: 21.7 ± 5.3 to 24.8 ± 5.9 mL/100 mL tissue/min; P = 0.109) and mid-luteal phases (from: 25.1 ± 3.9 to 27.2 ± 5.7 mL/100 mL tissue/min; P = 0.267). Reduced estrogen during the early follicular phase and the rise in estrogen associated with ovulation and the mid-luteal phase may contribute to changes in IPC-mediated protection in premenopausal women and shed light on how cardioprotection may change with ovarian hormone deficiency with the menopause transition.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The capacity of remote ischemic preconditioning to protect against vascular endothelial ischemia/reperfusion injury varies widely across the phases of the menstrual cycle in healthy premenopausal women. Robust protection was afforded during the late follicular and mid-luteal phases. In contrast, weakened protection was demonstrated during the early follicular phase, with a level of impairment similar to estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women.

Defining the molecular response to ischemia-reperfusion injury and remote ischemic preconditioning in human kidney transplantation

Background Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) inevitably occurs during kidney transplantation and extended ischemia is associated with delayed graft function and poor outcomes. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a simple, noninvasive procedure aimed at reducing IRI and improving graft function. Experimental studies have implicated the kynurenine pathway as a protective mechanism behind RIPC. Methods First, paired biopsies from 11 living kidney donors were analyzed to characterize the acute transcriptomic response to IRI. Second, 16 living kidney donors were subjected to either RIPC (n = 9) or no pretreatment (n = 7) to evaluate the impact of RIPC on the transcriptomic response to IRI. Finally, the effect of RIPC on plasma metabolites was analyzed in 49 healthy subjects. Results There was a robust immediate response to IRI in the renal transcriptomes of living-donor kidney transplantation, including activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathways. Preconditioning with RIPC did not significantly alter the transcriptomic response to IRI or the concentration of plasma metabolites. Conclusions The present data validate living-donor kidney transplantation as a suitable model for mechanistic studies of IRI in human kidneys. The failure of RIPC to alter transcriptomic responses or metabolites in the kynurenine pathway raises the question of the robustness of the standard procedure used to induce RIPC, and might explain the mixed results in clinical trials evaluating RIPC as a method to attenuate IRI.

Cardioprotection in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the impact of remote ischemic preconditioning on modulating LOX-1 and SOD-1 to counteract oxidative stress.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is frequently used to treat severe coronary artery disease (CAD), but it can lead to increased oxidative stress and inflammation, worsening patient outcomes. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been suggested as a potential strategy to protect against these effects by modulating oxidative stress and inflammatory responses, though its impact on specific biomarkers requires further investigation. This study aims to assess the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on inflammation markers and oxidative stress in patients with severe CAD undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. We conducted a case-control study involving 80 patients with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Fifty percent of these patients received ischemic preconditioning prior to surgery. Plasma levels of Lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 (LOX-1) and Superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD-1) levels were measured in all individuals using the ELISA method at three important time points: before surgery (visit 1 or V1), immediately post-operatively (visit 2 or V2), and one week post-operatively (visit 3 or V3). We enrolled 80 patients, of which 40 were assigned to the studied group receiving remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) and 40 to the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding baseline, clinical, or operative characteristics. RIPC treatment significantly reduced plasma levels of Lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-1 (LOX-1) (p < 0.05) as well as significantly increasing total values of Superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD-1) (p < 0.05, respectively). There were notable differences between the studied and control groups at V2 and V3. The studied group had higher SOD-1 levels (p < 0.05) and significantly lower LOX-1 levels at both time points (p < 0.05). The significant changes in plasma levels of both LOX-1 and SOD-1 observed in this study strongly suggest that remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) plays an important role in reducing oxidative stress and enhancing the antioxidative status of patients. This is evidenced by the marked decrease in LOX-1 levels, alongside a corresponding increase in SOD-1 levels, indicating that RIPC may contribute to improved cardioprotection through these mechanisms.

Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on cerebral circulation time in severe carotid artery stenosis: Results from the RIC-CCT trial.

In patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis (sICAS), cerebral circulation time (CCT) is associated with cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. This study aims to investigate the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIC) on CCT in patients with sICAS. Patients are randomly assigned to the RIC group (RIC twice daily, for 2-4days before carotid artery stenting [CAS] as an adjunct to standard medical therapy) and the control group. The results show that RIC produces a significant decrease in CCT of the stenosis side (sCCT) from baseline to pre-CAS, and the occurrence of contrast staining on brain computed tomography (CT) is lower in RIC versus control group after CAS. In addition, significant changes in some serum biomarkers suggest that anti-neuroinflammation, anti-oxidative stress, protecting endothelial injury, and improving cerebral autoregulation may be associated with the effect of RIC. These findings provide supporting evidence that RIC can modulate cerebral circulation in patients with sICAS. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05451030).

Remote ischemic preconditioning plays a neuroprotective role in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion mice by inhibiting mitophagy

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) represents a clinically feasible method for safeguarding vital organs against ischemic injury. However, its specific role in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury remains to be definitively elucidated. In this study, we investigated the neuroprotective effects of RIPC on mice at 7 days post-cerebral I/R and its involvement in mitophagy and mitochondrial dysfunction. Cerebral I/R led to impaired brain function, as well as structural and functional damage to mitochondria. Notably, RIPC treatment ameliorated the neurological dysfunction induced by cerebral I/R. Compared with the I/R group, the expression levels of NeuN, MBP, PDH, and Tom20 were significantly elevated in the RIPC + I/R group. Furthermore, mitochondria in the RIPC + I/R group exhibited more intact structure compared to those in the I/R group. In mice subjected to I/R injury, RIPC treatment markedly increased ATP content, ADP content, TAN level and glucose uptake while upregulating expression levels of Parkin, Pink1 and P62 proteins; it also reduced both the volume of ischemic foci and the number of mitochondrial autophagosomes along with decreasing LC3B II/I ratio. In conclusion, RIPC may exert a neuroprotective role by inhibiting excessive mitophagy during subacute stages following an ischemic stroke.

Non-invasive remote ischemic preconditioning for patients with heart failure undergoing cardiac catheterization: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of six non-invasive remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) interventions during the nursing care of patients with heart failure (HF) prior to cardiac catheterization.MethodsA comprehensive search of nine Chinese and English online databases was conducted from the date of their inception to June 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating RIPC in patients with HF prior to cardiac catheterization. Two independent investigators screened the articles, extracted data, and assessed their quality. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and a network meta-analysis was conducted using R software.ResultsFour trials involving 511 patients with a low risk of bias were included in the analysis. Six non-invasive RIPC interventions were identified, all demonstrating effectiveness in reducing the incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). Among these, Intervention F (applying up to 50 mmHg above the resting systolic pressure for 5 min to the dominant leg or upper limb, repeated three times with an 18-minute interval) was deemed optimal, although the timing of the procedure was not specified. Intervention D (applying up to 200 mmHg pressure to the upper limb for 5 min, repeated four times with 5-minute intervals, within 45 min prior to cardiac catheterization, ) was considered suboptimal.ConclusionAlthough Intervention D was recommended as the preferred option, none of the four trials examined its impact on the cardiac function of patients with HF. Large-scale, multi-center RCTs are required, with outcome indicators including cardiac function and the occurrence of CI-AKI, to better understand the therapeutic effects of RIPC on HF and reduce the incidence of CI-AKI. This will provide a more robust foundation for clinical practice.

Effectiveness of remote ischemic preconditioning in patients undergoing transplant surgery: meta-analysis of randomized control studies.

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a phenomenon in which the induction of shortened periods of ischemia prior to surgical procedures within a distant tissue preserves other tissues or organs of concern, such as the liver or kidney in transplant surgery, in the event of prolonged ischemic insults. The authors aim to evaluate the effectiveness of RIPC in patients undergoing transplant surgery, specifically kidney and liver transplants. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched until 19 December 2023 for trials evaluating RIPC in patients undergoing transplant surgery. A total of 9364 search articles were obtained, which yielded 10 eligible studies. Data analysis was done using RevMan 5.4 software. The risk of bias was done using Cochrane risk of bias tool. For graft rejection, the study observed a relative risk of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.49-1.98, P=0.97) from 5 trials, indicating no significant effect of RIPC on graft survival in both kidney and liver transplants. The length of hospital stay also showed no significant decrease for those undergoing RIPC, with mean difference (MD) of -0.58 (95% CI, -1.38 to 0.23, P=0.16). GFR at 1-year post-kidney transplant did not significantly change in the RIPC group compared to controls, as evidenced by an MD of -0.13 (95% CI, -3.79 to 3.54, P=0.95). These results collectively suggest that RIPC may not be effective in reducing patient, or graft, outcomes.

Short cycles of remote ischemic preconditioning had no effect on tensile strength in small intestinal anastomoses: an experimental animal study

PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on the healing of small intestinal anastomoses, evaluated by tensile strength and histologic wound healing on postoperative day 5. MethodsA total of 22 female pigs were randomized 1:1 into either an intervention or control group. The intervention group received 5 cycles of 3-minute ischemia followed by 3-minute reperfusion on the right forelimb. Two end-to-end anastomoses, a distal and a proximal, were created in the small intestine 30 and 60 min after RIPC, respectively. On postoperative day 5, the anastomoses were harvested and underwent a maximal anastomotic tensile strength (MATS) test (MATS 1–3) followed by histologic analyses. ResultsMATS 1, when a tear became visible in the serosa, was significantly increased in the proximal anastomoses of the RIPC group compared with the control group (4.91 N vs 3.83 N; P = .005). No other significant differences were found when comparing these 2 groups. ConclusionOur study showed no convincing results of RIPC on intestinal anastomotic healing to recommend its use in a general clinical setting. Further animal studies on RIPC’s effect after relative or absolute intestinal ischemia may be recommended.

Remote ischaemic preconditioning on gene expression and circulating proteins after subacute laparoscopic cholecystectomy: randomized clinical trial.

Surgical stress may lead to postsurgical hypercoagulability, endothelial dysfunction and systemic inflammation, which can impact on patient recovery. Remote ischaemic preconditioning is a procedure that activates the body's endogenous defences against ischaemia and reperfusion injury. Studies have suggested that remote ischaemic preconditioning has antithrombotic, antioxidative and anti-inflammatory effects. The hypothesis was that remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces surgery-induced systemic stress response. During a 24-month period (2019-2021), adult patients undergoing subacute laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to acute cholecystitis were randomized to remote ischaemic preconditioning or control. Remote ischaemic preconditioning was performed less than 4 h before surgery on the upper arm. It consisted of four cycles of 5 min ischaemia and 5 min reperfusion. The gene expression of 750 genes involved in inflammatory processes, oxidative stress and endothelial function was investigated preoperatively and 2-4 h after surgery in both groups. In addition, changes in 20 inflammation- and vascular trauma-associated proteins were assessed preoperatively, 2-4 h after surgery and 24 h after surgery. A total of 60 patients were randomized. There were no statistically significant differences in gene expression 2-4 h after surgery between the groups (P > 0.05). Remote ischaemic preconditioning did not affect concentrations of circulating proteins up to 24 h after surgery (P > 0.05). The study did not demonstrate any effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on expression levels of the chosen genes or in circulating immunological cytokines and vascular trauma-associated proteins up to 24 h after subacute laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis.

Immediate Increase in the Root Mean Square of Successive Differences after Three Bouts of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

(1) Background: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is an intervention involving the application of brief episodes of ischemia and reperfusion to distant tissues to activate protective pathways in the heart. There is evidence suggesting the involvement of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in RIPC-induced cardioprotection. This study aimed to investigate the immediate effects of RIPC on the ANS using a randomized controlled trial. (2) Methods: From March 2018 to November 2018, we conducted a single-blinded randomized controlled study involving 51 healthy volunteers (29 female, 24.9 [23.8, 26.4] years). Participants were placed in a supine position and heart rate variability was measured over 260 consecutive beats before they were randomized into either the intervention or the SHAM group. The intervention group underwent an RIPC protocol (3 cycles of 5 min of 200 mmHg ischemia followed by 5 min reperfusion) at the upper thigh. The SHAM group followed the same protocol but on the right upper arm, with just 40 mmHg of pressure inflation, resulting in no ischemic stimulus. Heart rate variability measures were reassessed afterward. (3) Results: The intervention group showed a significant increase in RMSSD, the possible marker of the parasympathetic nervous system (IG: 14.5 [5.4, 27.5] ms vs. CG: 7.0 [-4.3, 23.1 ms], p = 0.027), as well as a significant improvement in Alpha 1 levels compared to the control group (IG: -0.1 [-0.2, 0.1] vs. CG: 0.0 [-0.1, 0.2], p = 0.001). (4) Conclusions: Our results hint that RIPC increases the RMSSD and Alpha 1 parameters showing possible immediate parasympathetic modulations. RIPC could be favorable in promoting cardioprotective or/and cardiovascular effects by ameliorating ANS modulations.

Amplification of Cardioprotective Response of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Rats by Quercetin: Potential Role of Activation of mTOR-dependent Autophagy and Nrf2.

Noninvasive remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a practical, acceptable, and feasible conditioning technique reported to provide cardioprotection in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI). It has been well-reported that quercetin possesses antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. This study investigates the modification of the cardioprotective response of RIPC by quercetin. Adult Wistar rats were randomized into 12 groups of six animals each. MIRI was induced by subjecting the isolated hearts of Wistar rats to global ischemia for 30 min, succeeded by reperfusion of 120 min after mounting on the Langendorff PowerLab apparatus. Hind limb RIPC was applied in four alternate cycles of ischemia and reperfusion of 5 min each by tying the pressure cuff before isolation of hearts. MIRI was reflected by significantly increased infarct size, LDH-1, and CK-MB, TNF-α, TBARS, and decreased GSH, catalase, and hemodynamic index, and modulated Nrf2. Pretreatment of quercetin (25 and 50 mg/kg; i.p.) significantly attenuated the MIRI-induced cardiac damage and potentiated the cardioprotective response of RIPC at the low dose. Pretreatment of ketamine (10 mg/kg; i.p.), an mTOR-dependent autophagy inhibitor, significantly abolished the cardioprotective effects of quercetin and RIPC. The findings highlight the modification of the cardioprotective effect of RIPC by quercetin and that quercetin protects the heart against MIRI through multiple mechanisms, including mTOR-dependent activation of autophagy and Nrf-2 activation.

Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on early markers of intestinal injury in experimental hemorrhage in rats

The maintenance of intestinal integrity and barrier function under conditions of restricted oxygen availability is crucial to avoid bacterial translocation and local inflammation. Both lead to secondary diseases after hemorrhagic shock and might increase morbidity and mortality after surviving the initial event. Monitoring of the intestinal integrity especially in the early course of critical illness remains challenging. Since microcirculation and mitochondrial respiration are main components of the terminal stretch of tissue oxygenation, the evaluation of microcirculatory and mitochondrial variables could identify tissues at risk during hypoxic challenges, indicate an increase of intestinal injury, and improve our understanding of regional pathophysiology during acute hemorrhage. Furthermore, improving intestinal microcirculation or mitochondrial respiration, e.g. by remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) that was reported to exert a sufficient tissue protection in various tissues and was linked to mediators with vasoactive properties could maintain intestinal integrity. In this study, postcapillary oxygen saturation (µHbO2), microvascular flow index (MFI) and plasmatic d-lactate concentration revealed to be early markers of intestinal injury in a rodent model of experimental hemorrhagic shock. Mitochondrial function was not impaired in this experimental model of acute hemorrhage. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) failed to improve intestinal microcirculation and intestinal damage during hemorrhagic shock.

Does remote ischemic preconditioning affect the systemic inflammatory response by modulating presepsin levels?

We investigated the effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC) on the inflammatory response during CPB by means of serum presepsin levels at preoperative and postoperative 1st and 24th h. In this prospective, randomized, cross-sectional study we included 81 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Patients were randomized and RIPC was applied to 40 patients in the study group before anesthesia. The remaining 41 patients were determined as the control group. The relationships between RIPC and factors such as presepsin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and leukocyte levels were investigated. There was no significant difference between the groups in postoperative leukocyte and CRP values (p = 0.52, p = 0.13, respectively). When the preoperative and postoperative first hour presepsin values of the patients were compared, no significant difference was found in the control group (p = 0.17), but a significant difference was found in the study group (p < 0.05). When the presepsin values were compared between the groups, a significant difference was found only in the postoperative first hour value (p < 0.05). It was observed that RIPC application caused to increase the presepsin levels in the postoperative first hour significantly in the study group (p < 0.05).

Effect of distal ischemic preconditioning on cardiovascular events in adult patients with hip fracture one year after operation

To investigate the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in elderly patients with hip fracture 1 year after operation. Total of 314 elderly patients with hip fracture of gradeⅡand Ⅲ for American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) were treated by surgical operation from April 2015 to May 2020 including 116 males and 198 females, the age ranged from 60 to 76 years old. The subjects were divided into intervention group and control group according to whether received RIPC. Among them, 157 cases in intervention group included 56 males and 101 females with an average age of (68.12±7.13) years old and 157 cases in control group included 60 males and 97 females with an average age of (68.24±7.05) years old. Both groups were given routine anesthesia. The intervention group was treated with RIPC on the basis of routine anesthesia. The MACE events 1 year after operation in two groups were compared and analyzed. The OR values of RIPC for myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, nonfatal cardiac arrest, coronary revascularization, severe arrhythmia, peripheral artery thrombosis, readmission of cardiovascular disease, and all-cause death in patients with hip fracture one year after operation were 1.269, 1.304, 0.977, 1.089, 1.315, 1.335, 0.896, 0.774, 1.191, respectively, but there was no significant difference (P>0.05). RIPC did not significantly affect and change the occurrence of major cardiovascular adverse events within 1 year after hip fracture surgery. The long term impact of RIPC on clinical cardiovascular outcomes in non cardiac surgery needs to be confirmed in appropriate randomized clinical trials.

Cardioprotective Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning: From Bench to Bedside

Remote ischemic preconditioning (rIPC) refers to a cardioprotective phenomenon in which short episodes of ischemia, followed by reperfusion, in one organ or tissue might provide future protection against ischemia/reperfusion damage in other organs, namely the heart. The process involves the activation of humoral, neural, or systemic communication channels, which in turn induce various intracellular signals inside the heart. The primary objective of this review is to provide a concise overview of the potential processes implicated in rIPC cardioprotection, as well as to elucidate current clinical studies aimed at establishing the effectiveness of these techniques in safeguarding the heart from detrimental ischemia/reperfusion injury. In this context, many variables contribute to the attenuation of subcellular processes of rIPC in patients, including advanced age, presence of comorbidities, medication use, and variations in anaesthetic protocols. These factors may account for the observed variability in outcomes across different clinical studies. Additional research, meticulously planned, is needed in order to enhance our comprehension of the pathways and mechanisms associated with both early and late rIPC. A comprehensive understanding of the various routes is crucial in facilitating the translation of medical advancements to the benefit of patients. Keyword: Cardioprotection, Ischemic Preconditioning, Remote Ischemic Preconditioning.

Remote ischemic preconditioning and cognitive dysfunction following coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a common neurological issue following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-assisted heart surgery. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) increases the tolerance of vital organs to ischemia/reperfusion injury, leading to reduced brain injury biomarkers and improved cognitive control. However, the exact mechanisms underlying RIPC's neuroprotective effects remain unclear. This systematic review aimed to explore the hypothesis that RIPC lowers neurocognitive dysfunction in patients undergoing CPB surgery. All relevant studies were searched in PubMed, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane Library database. Assessment of study quality was carried out by two independent reviewers individually using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB-2) tool. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effect model due to low heterogeneity among studies, except for those with substantial heterogeneity. A total of five studies with 1,843 participants were included in the meta-analysis. RIPC was not associated with reduced incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (five RCTs, odds ratio [OR:] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-1.11) nor its improvement (three RCTs, OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.50-1.27). In addition, the analysis of the effect of RIPC on specific cognitive function tests found that pooled SMD for RAVLT 1-3 and RAVLT LT were -0.07 (95% CI: -0.25,012) and -0.04 (95% CI: -0.25-0.12), respectively, and for VFT semantic and phonetic were -0.15 (95% CI: -0.33-0.04) and 0.11 (95% CI: -0.40-0.62), respectively. The effect of RIPC on cognitive performance in CABG patients remained insignificant. Results from previous studies were unable to justify the use of RIPC as a neuroprotective agent in CABG patients.

Protective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on blood pressure control in magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound operations

Backrgound. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MR-FUS) is a new non-invasive technology for the surgical treatment of extrapyramidal movement disorders for such pathologies as essential tremor, Parkinson’s disease, etc. In these cases, the brain is injured and a zone of ischemia is formed. Arterial hypertension (AH) is one of the most common pathologies, which is often accompanied by neurological diseases. Objective. To investigate the effect of the remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on blood pressure (BP) during MR-FUS surgery. Design – blinded, randomized, controlled, 2-group study with sham preconditioning. Materials and Methods. Patients were randomized into the RIPC group (cuff systolic BP (SBP) &gt;50 mmHg, n=42) and the group with sham RIPC (cuff diastolic BP (DBP), n=39) before surgery in regime 3 cycles each 5 min with 5 min rest between cycles. Results. While there was a decrease in SBP and DBP before and after the operation in the RIPC group, there was an increase (p&lt;0.001) in the sham RIPC group. Using the Difference-in-Difference equation for SBP, SBP was 8.9 (5.9–11.9) mm Hg higher in the sham RIPC group than in the RIPC group (p&lt;0.01). Conclusion. As a result, MR-FUS operations showed a significant decrease in BP during RIPC compared to the imitation, which confirms the angioprotective effect of preconditioning.

Changes in excitatory amino acid transporters in response to remote ischaemic preconditioning and glutamate excitotoxicity

The successful implementation of remote ischaemic conditioning as a clinical neuroprotective strategy requires a thorough understanding of its basic principles, which can be modified for each patient. The mechanisms of glutamate homeostasis appear to be a key component. In the current study, we focused on the brain-to-blood glutamate shift mediated by glutamate transporters (excitatory amino acid transports [EAATs]) and the effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) as a mediator of ischaemic tolerance. We used model mimicking ischaemia-mediated excitotoxicity (intracerebroventricular administration of glutamate) to avoid the indirect effect of ischaemia-triggered mechanisms. We found quantitative changes in EAAT2 and EAAT3 and altered membrane trafficking of EAAT1 on the cells of the choroid plexus. These changes could underlie the beneficial effects of ischaemic tolerance. There was reduced oxidative stress and increased glutathione level after RIPC treatment. Moreover, we determined the stimulus-specific response on EAATs. While glutamate overdose stimulated EAAT2 and EAAT3 overexpression, RIPC induced membrane trafficking of EAAT1 and EAAT2 rather than a change in their expression. Taken together, mechanisms related to glutamate homeostasis, especially EAAT-mediated transport, represents a powerful tool of ischaemic tolerance and allow a certain amount of flexibility based on the stimulus used.

The Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on The Outcome of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on The Outcome of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Remote ischemic preconditioning for reduction of ischemia-reperfusion injury after hepatectomy: A randomized sham-controlled trial

BackgroundRemote ischemic preconditioning reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients undergoing hepatectomy. Moreover, there is evidence that the protective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning may be more pronounced in pre-damaged livers. The objective of this trial was to investigate the extent to which remote ischemic preconditioning can attenuate ischemia-reperfusion injury after hepatectomy and Pringle maneuver in patients with chronic liver disease. MethodsIn this randomized, controlled, triple-blind monocenter trial, a total of 102 patients with chronic liver disease and planned hepatectomy were enrolled between December 2019 and March 2022. Eligible patients were randomized to the remote ischemic preconditioning or sham arms. Remote ischemic preconditioning was induced through 3 10-minute cycles of alternating ischemia and reperfusion of the upper extremity. The study was prospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00018931). ResultsA total of 102 patients were included in the study and were randomized (51 per arm). The median age was 69.5 years, approximately two-thirds of the patients were male (69/102, 67.7%), and the mean body mass index was 25.6 kg/m2. Most patients were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists II (55/102, 53.9%) or III (45/102, 44.1%). The primary endpoint, the transaminases on the first postoperative day (alanine aminotransferase /aspartate aminotransferase: remote ischemic preconditioning arm: 250 (35–1721)/320 (42–1525) U/L versus sham control arm: 283 (32–792)/356 (20–1851) U/L, P = .820/0.639), clinical outcomes as well as remote ischemic preconditioning biomarker levels were comparable between both arms. ConclusionRemote ischemic preconditioning did not achieve a significant reduction in postoperative transaminase levels, nor did it affect clinical results and biomarkers.