Short cycles of remote ischemic preconditioning had no effect on tensile strength in small intestinal anastomoses: an experimental animal study

Abstract

PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on the healing of small intestinal anastomoses, evaluated by tensile strength and histologic wound healing on postoperative day 5. MethodsA total of 22 female pigs were randomized 1:1 into either an intervention or control group. The intervention group received 5 cycles of 3-minute ischemia followed by 3-minute reperfusion on the right forelimb. Two end-to-end anastomoses, a distal and a proximal, were created in the small intestine 30 and 60 min after RIPC, respectively. On postoperative day 5, the anastomoses were harvested and underwent a maximal anastomotic tensile strength (MATS) test (MATS 1–3) followed by histologic analyses. ResultsMATS 1, when a tear became visible in the serosa, was significantly increased in the proximal anastomoses of the RIPC group compared with the control group (4.91 N vs 3.83 N; P = .005). No other significant differences were found when comparing these 2 groups. ConclusionOur study showed no convincing results of RIPC on intestinal anastomotic healing to recommend its use in a general clinical setting. Further animal studies on RIPC’s effect after relative or absolute intestinal ischemia may be recommended.