Effect Of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Research Articles

Effect of distal ischemic preconditioning on cardiovascular events in adult patients with hip fracture one year after operation

To investigate the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in elderly patients with hip fracture 1 year after operation. Total of 314 elderly patients with hip fracture of gradeⅡand Ⅲ for American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) were treated by surgical operation from April 2015 to May 2020 including 116 males and 198 females, the age ranged from 60 to 76 years old. The subjects were divided into intervention group and control group according to whether received RIPC. Among them, 157 cases in intervention group included 56 males and 101 females with an average age of (68.12±7.13) years old and 157 cases in control group included 60 males and 97 females with an average age of (68.24±7.05) years old. Both groups were given routine anesthesia. The intervention group was treated with RIPC on the basis of routine anesthesia. The MACE events 1 year after operation in two groups were compared and analyzed. The OR values of RIPC for myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, nonfatal cardiac arrest, coronary revascularization, severe arrhythmia, peripheral artery thrombosis, readmission of cardiovascular disease, and all-cause death in patients with hip fracture one year after operation were 1.269, 1.304, 0.977, 1.089, 1.315, 1.335, 0.896, 0.774, 1.191, respectively, but there was no significant difference (P>0.05). RIPC did not significantly affect and change the occurrence of major cardiovascular adverse events within 1 year after hip fracture surgery. The long term impact of RIPC on clinical cardiovascular outcomes in non cardiac surgery needs to be confirmed in appropriate randomized clinical trials.

Does remote ischemic preconditioning affect the systemic inflammatory response by modulating presepsin levels?

We investigated the effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC) on the inflammatory response during CPB by means of serum presepsin levels at preoperative and postoperative 1st and 24th h. In this prospective, randomized, cross-sectional study we included 81 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Patients were randomized and RIPC was applied to 40 patients in the study group before anesthesia. The remaining 41 patients were determined as the control group. The relationships between RIPC and factors such as presepsin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and leukocyte levels were investigated. There was no significant difference between the groups in postoperative leukocyte and CRP values (p = 0.52, p = 0.13, respectively). When the preoperative and postoperative first hour presepsin values of the patients were compared, no significant difference was found in the control group (p = 0.17), but a significant difference was found in the study group (p < 0.05). When the presepsin values were compared between the groups, a significant difference was found only in the postoperative first hour value (p < 0.05). It was observed that RIPC application caused to increase the presepsin levels in the postoperative first hour significantly in the study group (p < 0.05).

Cardioprotective Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning: From Bench to Bedside

Remote ischemic preconditioning (rIPC) refers to a cardioprotective phenomenon in which short episodes of ischemia, followed by reperfusion, in one organ or tissue might provide future protection against ischemia/reperfusion damage in other organs, namely the heart. The process involves the activation of humoral, neural, or systemic communication channels, which in turn induce various intracellular signals inside the heart. The primary objective of this review is to provide a concise overview of the potential processes implicated in rIPC cardioprotection, as well as to elucidate current clinical studies aimed at establishing the effectiveness of these techniques in safeguarding the heart from detrimental ischemia/reperfusion injury. In this context, many variables contribute to the attenuation of subcellular processes of rIPC in patients, including advanced age, presence of comorbidities, medication use, and variations in anaesthetic protocols. These factors may account for the observed variability in outcomes across different clinical studies. Additional research, meticulously planned, is needed in order to enhance our comprehension of the pathways and mechanisms associated with both early and late rIPC. A comprehensive understanding of the various routes is crucial in facilitating the translation of medical advancements to the benefit of patients. Keyword: Cardioprotection, Ischemic Preconditioning, Remote Ischemic Preconditioning.

Remote ischemic preconditioning and cognitive dysfunction following coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a common neurological issue following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-assisted heart surgery. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) increases the tolerance of vital organs to ischemia/reperfusion injury, leading to reduced brain injury biomarkers and improved cognitive control. However, the exact mechanisms underlying RIPC's neuroprotective effects remain unclear. This systematic review aimed to explore the hypothesis that RIPC lowers neurocognitive dysfunction in patients undergoing CPB surgery. All relevant studies were searched in PubMed, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane Library database. Assessment of study quality was carried out by two independent reviewers individually using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB-2) tool. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effect model due to low heterogeneity among studies, except for those with substantial heterogeneity. A total of five studies with 1,843 participants were included in the meta-analysis. RIPC was not associated with reduced incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (five RCTs, odds ratio [OR:] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-1.11) nor its improvement (three RCTs, OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.50-1.27). In addition, the analysis of the effect of RIPC on specific cognitive function tests found that pooled SMD for RAVLT 1-3 and RAVLT LT were -0.07 (95% CI: -0.25,012) and -0.04 (95% CI: -0.25-0.12), respectively, and for VFT semantic and phonetic were -0.15 (95% CI: -0.33-0.04) and 0.11 (95% CI: -0.40-0.62), respectively. The effect of RIPC on cognitive performance in CABG patients remained insignificant. Results from previous studies were unable to justify the use of RIPC as a neuroprotective agent in CABG patients.

Protective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on blood pressure control in magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound operations

Backrgound. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MR-FUS) is a new non-invasive technology for the surgical treatment of extrapyramidal movement disorders for such pathologies as essential tremor, Parkinson’s disease, etc. In these cases, the brain is injured and a zone of ischemia is formed. Arterial hypertension (AH) is one of the most common pathologies, which is often accompanied by neurological diseases. Objective. To investigate the effect of the remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on blood pressure (BP) during MR-FUS surgery. Design – blinded, randomized, controlled, 2-group study with sham preconditioning. Materials and Methods. Patients were randomized into the RIPC group (cuff systolic BP (SBP) &gt;50 mmHg, n=42) and the group with sham RIPC (cuff diastolic BP (DBP), n=39) before surgery in regime 3 cycles each 5 min with 5 min rest between cycles. Results. While there was a decrease in SBP and DBP before and after the operation in the RIPC group, there was an increase (p&lt;0.001) in the sham RIPC group. Using the Difference-in-Difference equation for SBP, SBP was 8.9 (5.9–11.9) mm Hg higher in the sham RIPC group than in the RIPC group (p&lt;0.01). Conclusion. As a result, MR-FUS operations showed a significant decrease in BP during RIPC compared to the imitation, which confirms the angioprotective effect of preconditioning.

Changes in excitatory amino acid transporters in response to remote ischaemic preconditioning and glutamate excitotoxicity

The successful implementation of remote ischaemic conditioning as a clinical neuroprotective strategy requires a thorough understanding of its basic principles, which can be modified for each patient. The mechanisms of glutamate homeostasis appear to be a key component. In the current study, we focused on the brain-to-blood glutamate shift mediated by glutamate transporters (excitatory amino acid transports [EAATs]) and the effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) as a mediator of ischaemic tolerance. We used model mimicking ischaemia-mediated excitotoxicity (intracerebroventricular administration of glutamate) to avoid the indirect effect of ischaemia-triggered mechanisms. We found quantitative changes in EAAT2 and EAAT3 and altered membrane trafficking of EAAT1 on the cells of the choroid plexus. These changes could underlie the beneficial effects of ischaemic tolerance. There was reduced oxidative stress and increased glutathione level after RIPC treatment. Moreover, we determined the stimulus-specific response on EAATs. While glutamate overdose stimulated EAAT2 and EAAT3 overexpression, RIPC induced membrane trafficking of EAAT1 and EAAT2 rather than a change in their expression. Taken together, mechanisms related to glutamate homeostasis, especially EAAT-mediated transport, represents a powerful tool of ischaemic tolerance and allow a certain amount of flexibility based on the stimulus used.

The Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on The Outcome of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on The Outcome of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Remote ischemic preconditioning for reduction of ischemia-reperfusion injury after hepatectomy: A randomized sham-controlled trial

BackgroundRemote ischemic preconditioning reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients undergoing hepatectomy. Moreover, there is evidence that the protective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning may be more pronounced in pre-damaged livers. The objective of this trial was to investigate the extent to which remote ischemic preconditioning can attenuate ischemia-reperfusion injury after hepatectomy and Pringle maneuver in patients with chronic liver disease. MethodsIn this randomized, controlled, triple-blind monocenter trial, a total of 102 patients with chronic liver disease and planned hepatectomy were enrolled between December 2019 and March 2022. Eligible patients were randomized to the remote ischemic preconditioning or sham arms. Remote ischemic preconditioning was induced through 3 10-minute cycles of alternating ischemia and reperfusion of the upper extremity. The study was prospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00018931). ResultsA total of 102 patients were included in the study and were randomized (51 per arm). The median age was 69.5 years, approximately two-thirds of the patients were male (69/102, 67.7%), and the mean body mass index was 25.6 kg/m2. Most patients were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists II (55/102, 53.9%) or III (45/102, 44.1%). The primary endpoint, the transaminases on the first postoperative day (alanine aminotransferase /aspartate aminotransferase: remote ischemic preconditioning arm: 250 (35–1721)/320 (42–1525) U/L versus sham control arm: 283 (32–792)/356 (20–1851) U/L, P = .820/0.639), clinical outcomes as well as remote ischemic preconditioning biomarker levels were comparable between both arms. ConclusionRemote ischemic preconditioning did not achieve a significant reduction in postoperative transaminase levels, nor did it affect clinical results and biomarkers.

Pretreatment with remote ischemic conditioning attenuates testicular damage after testicular ischemia and reperfusion injury in rats.

Testicular torsion is a urological emergency. However, surgical detorsion of the torsed spermatic cord can cause testicular reperfusion injury. Although remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been convincingly shown to protect organs against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, little is known regarding the effect of RIPC on testicular torsion/detorsion-induced reperfusion injury. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of RIPC on testes after testicular I/R injury in a rat model in vivo. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly classified into 4 groups: sham-operated (sham), testicular I/R (TI/R), or remote liver (RIPC liver) and limb (RIPC limb) ischemic preconditioning groups. Testis I/R was induced by 3 h of right spermatic cord torsion (720° clockwise), and reperfusion was allowed for 3 hours. In the RIPC group, four cycles of 5 min of ischemia and 5 min of reperfusion were completed 30 min prior to testicular torsion. The ERK1/2 inhibitor U0126 was administered intravenously at the beginning of reperfusion (1 mg/kg). The testes were taken for the oxidative stress evaluations, histology, apoptosis, immunohistochemical and western blotting analysis. Remote liver and limb ischemic preconditioning attenuated ipsilateral and contralateral testicular damage after testicular I/R injury. For example. RIPC reduced testicular swelling and oxidative stress, lessened structural damage, and inhibited the testicular inflammatory response and apoptosis. Furthermore, RIPC treatment enhanced testicular ERK1/2 phosphorylation postI/R. Inhibition of ERK1/2 activity using U0126 eliminated the protection offered by RIPC. Our data demonstrate for the first time that RIPC protects testes against testicular I/R injury via activation of the ERK1/2 signaling pathway.

Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on lung function after surgery under general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) protects organs from ischemia–reperfusion injury. Recent trials showed that RIPC improved gas exchange in patients undergoing lung or cardiac surgery. We performed a systematic search to identify randomized controlled trials involving RIPC in surgery under general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the PaO2/FIO2 (P/F) ratio at 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were A-a DO2, the respiratory index, duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation (MV), incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and serum cytokine levels. The analyses included 71 trials comprising 7854 patients. Patients with RIPC showed higher P/F ratio than controls (mean difference [MD] 36.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 12.8 to 60.4, I2 = 69%). The cause of heterogeneity was not identified by the subgroup analysis. Similarly, A-a DO2 (MD 15.2, 95% CI − 29.7 to − 0.6, I2 = 87%) and respiratory index (MD − 0.17, 95% CI − 0.34 to − 0.01, I2 = 94%) were lower in the RIPC group. Additionally, the RIPC group was weaned from MV earlier (MD − 0.9 h, 95% CI − 1.4 to − 0.4, I2 = 78%). Furthermore, the incidence of ARDS was lower in the RIPC group (relative risk 0.73, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.89, I2 = 0%). Serum TNFα was lower in the RIPC group (SMD − 0.6, 95%CI − 1.0 to − 0.3 I2 = 87%). No significant difference was observed in interleukin-6, 8 and 10. Our meta-analysis suggested that RIPC improved oxygenation after surgery under general anesthesia.Clinical trial number: This study protocol was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (registration number: UMIN000030918), https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000035305.

Anti-Inflammatory and Antipruritic Effects of Remote Ischaemic Postconditioning in a Mouse Model of Experimental Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Background and Objectives: Allergic contact dermatitis is a common type IV hypersensitivity reaction characterised by redness, itching, oedema and thickening of the skin. It occurs in about 7% of the population and its incidence is increasing. It has been observed that the preconditioning of tissues by exposing them to transient ischemia increases resistance to subsequent permanent ischemia, and this phenomenon is called ischemic preconditioning. It has been shown that conditioning in one organ can also protect other organs. The protective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning is thought to be based on the induction of anti-inflammatory responses. The aim of this project was to investigate the anti-inflammatory and antipruritic effects of remote ischemic postconditioning in a mouse model of experimental allergic contact dermatitis. Methods: Experimental allergic contact dermatitis was induced with 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene. Remote ischemic postconditioning was performed at 3 and 25 h after the challenge. Ear thickness and number of scratches 24 and 48 h after challenge, as well as cytokine levels and the infiltration of mast cells, neutrophils, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes in serum and ear tissue at 48 h were measured to determine the effect of RIPsC. Results: Remote ischemic postconditioning decreased ear thickness, one of the symptoms of allergic contact dermatitis (p < 0.0001). It had no significant effect on the number of scratches. It reduced serum IL-17 levels (p < 0.01). It alleviated local inflammation by suppressing CD8+ T lymphocyte and neutrophil infiltration. Conclusions: It was concluded that remote ischemic postconditioning may alleviate the symptoms of allergic contact dermatitis by suppressing CD8+ T lymphocyte and neutrophil infiltration and reducing IL-17 secretion.

Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in severe traumatic brain injury: A single-center randomized controlled trial.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant contributor to global mortality and impairment. Experimental data has shown the advantages of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in treating brain injury, however, there is a lack of evidence-based medicine regarding its clinical effectiveness and safety. In this study, we investigated whether RIPC could enhance outcomes in patients with severe TBI. Between January 2019 and December 2022, a comprehensive assessment was conducted on 392 individuals with severe TBI. Out of these, 304 patients were initially included and randomly assigned to receive either RIPC treatment (n = 153) or a control treatment (n = 151). The main measures of results included Glasgow Outcome Scale scores at 6 months, the occurrence of cerebral infarction during hospitalization, mortality rate within 30 days, levels of neuron-specific enolase and S-100β, any adverse effects, expenses incurred during hospitalization, and duration of hospital stay. The 2 groups did not show any statistically significant differences in baseline clinical data. The Glasgow Outcome Scale scores at 6 months in the RIPC group showed significant improvement when compared with the control group. Additionally, the application of RIPC therapy can reduce the concentrations of neuron-specific enolase and S-100β. There was no notable distinction observed between the 2 groups regarding the adverse reactions of RIPC-induced objective indications of tissue or neurovascular harm. In the RIPC group, there was a significant reduction in both the duration of hospital stays and the expenses associated with hospitalization. The results of this study suggest that RIPC has the potential to enhance clinical outcomes, mitigate nerve damage, and reduce both hospital expenses and length of stay in patients with severe TBI. The use of RIPC is a reliable and efficient method for managing severe TBI.

Effects of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Delirium and Neurological Function in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Postoperative delirium (POD) and neurological dysfunction are very common following cardiac surgery and deteriorate the patient's prognosis and the outcome of surgical procedures. A clinically effective management strategy or drug is not yet available for POD. Additionally, it is unknown whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has neuroprotective and anti-delirium benefits in patients who undergo cardiac surgery. This study examined whether RIPC can improve POD and neurological function in cardiac surgery patients. We screened 510 consecutive adult patients aged 18 and older who underwent cardiac surgery between January 2018 and December 2022. Then, 448 of these patients were recruited in the trial as the intention to treat (ITT) group, who were then randomly assigned to receive either a control (n = 223) or RIPC treatment (n = 225). The primary outcome measures were hospitalization postoperative delirium, six-month modified Rankins scale (mRS), hospital cerebral infarction, 30-day overall mortality, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S-100b levels, related adverse effects, hospital costs, and hospital stay. A statistically significant variation was not observed between the two groups in terms of the baseline clinical data. In contrast to the control group, the POD in the RIPC group was considerably alleviated. RIPC treatment also decreased the levels of NSE and S-100b, which alleviated nerve injury. The adverse impacts of RIPC-induced objective indicators of tissue or neurovascular damage were similar in both groups, showing no significant variations between the two. The hospital stays and hospitalization costs also decreased significantly in the RIPC-treated patients. The study findings suggested that RIPC may benefit cardiac surgery patients by reducing POD, alleviating injury, and lowering hospital expenditures and length of stay. Cardiac surgery patients can be treated with RIPC, which is an effective and safe technique.

Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on coronary blood flow and microcirculation

This study aimed to determine the effect of short-term remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on coronary blood flow and microcirculation function using the quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR). We randomly divided 129 patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) into RIPC and control groups. Following the first CAG, we randomly divided the patients further into the unilateral upper limb and lower limb groups for four cycles of ischemia/reperfusion circulation; subsequently, we performed the second CAG. During each CAG, contrast-flow QFR (cQFR), fixed-flow QFR (fQFR), and IMR (in patients with cardiac syndrome X) were calculated and compared. We measured 253 coronary arteries in 129 patients. Compared to the control group, the average cQFR of the RIPC group increased significantly after RIPC. Additionally, 23 patients with cardiac syndrome X (IMR > 30) were included in this study. Compared to the control group, IMR and the difference between cQFR and fQFR (cQFR-fQFR) both decreased significantly after receiving RIPC. The application of RIPC can increase coronary blood flow and improve coronary microcirculation function.

Effects of RIPC on the Metabolomical Profile during Lower Limb Digital Subtraction Angiography: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has demonstrated protective effects in patients with lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) undergoing digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and/or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). This study aimed to investigate the impact of RIPC on the metabolomical profile of LEAD patients undergoing these procedures and to elucidate its potential underlying mechanisms. A total of 100 LEAD patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the RIPC group (n = 46) or the sham group (n = 54). Blood samples were drawn before and 24 h after intervention. Targeted metabolomics analysis was performed using the AbsoluteIDQ p180 Kit, and changes in metabolite concentrations were compared between the groups. The RIPC group demonstrated significantly different dynamics in nine metabolites compared to the sham group, which generally showed a decrease in metabolite concentrations. The impacted metabolites included glutamate, taurine, the arginine-dimethyl-amide-to-arginine ratio, lysoPC a C24:0, lysoPC a C28:0, lysoPC a C26:1, PC aa C38:1, PC ae C30:2, and PC ae C44:3. RIPC exhibited a 'stabilization' effect, maintaining metabolite levels amidst ischemia-reperfusion injuries, suggesting its role in enhancing metabolic control. This may improve outcomes for LEAD patients. However, additional studies are needed to definitively establish causal relationships among these metabolic changes.

Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Patient Survival and End Organ Injury During Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Surgery Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Patient Survival and End Organ Injury During Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Surgery Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

#6287 EFFECT OF REMOTE ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS, COGNITIVE FUNCTION, AND BONE IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Abstract Background and Aims Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a process in which a brief period of ischemia is induced in one part of the body to protect another part from damage due to subsequent periods of more severe ischemia. Hemodialysis sessions are considered an ischemic process because it involves reducing blood flow to certain parts of the body, which can lead to tissue damage .Malnutrition, deterioration of cognitive function, bone disorders, cardiovascular disease, and hemodynamic instability can result from ischemia induced by hemodialysis sessions. These adverse effects increase mortality in HD patients. RIPC has been studied as a potential therapeutic strategy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients; however, the effect of RIPC on cognitive function, nutritional status, and bone disorder among hemodialysis patients has not been enough studied. Aim: to assess the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on nutritional status, bone disorders, and cognitive function in hemodialysis patients at the urology and nephrology center, Mansoura University. Method Fifty patients who received regular hemodialysis for more than one year in our dialysis unit were included. The patients were randomized (single-blind) into two groups a control group (20 patients) and an intervention group (30 patients). Before each HD session, sphygmomanometer cuffs was placed around the non-vascular access arm. Three cycles of ischemia for five minutes were performed followed by reperfusion for five minutes. Ischemia was induced by inflating the sphygmomanometer cuffs to 200 mmHg. This maneuver was done before each HD session for 12 weeks. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) was used to assess cognitive function. The nutritional state was assessed by anthropometric measurement (body weight, BMI), laboratory (serum albumin and serum cholesterol), and Subjective Global Assessment Form (SGA). Serum calcium (s.Ca) and serum phosphorus (s.po), serum alkaline phosphate (s. ALP) and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) were used as indices for bone profile. Results The intervention group include 30 patient with mean age (36+/-10), 19 male (63.3%) and 11 females (36.7%). The control group include 20 patient with mean age (46+/-9), 12 male (60%) and eight female (40%). None of these patients’ demographic data (age, sex, original kidney disease, and duration of dialysis) were significantly different between the study groups (P&amp;gt;0.05). MOCA test score at baseline was (24.5 +/-2.6) at intervention group and (24.4+/-3.2) at control group, and after 12 weeks intervention was (24.8 +/-2.2) at intervention group and (24.4+/-2.8) at control group. there were no statistical significance regarding cognitive function between the two group over time (p = 0.4). NO significant Statistical changes in anthropometric measurements (Body weight (p = 0.3) and BMI (P = 0.6) were found between the two groups. Additionally, no significant changes (serum albumin and cholesterol) were detected. SGA score at baseline was at intervention group (1.2+/-0.4) and control group (1.1 +/- 0.3), and after 12 week was at the intervention group (1.4 +/-0.5) and control group (1.6 +/-0.5). SGA showed no statistical significance between the two groups over time (p = 0.2). No significant statistical changes regarding bone profile (s.ca (p = 0.5), s.PO (p = 0.2), s.ALP (p = 0.7) and iPTH (p = 0.5)). Conclusion Although some studies showed a beneficial effect of RIBC on reduction of cardiovascular risk, our study found no significant effect on cognitive function, nutritional status, and bone disorders among hemodialysis patients.

Effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury after major abdominal surgery in patients at high risk for cardiovascular adverse events in China (RIPC-MAS): protocol for a randomised, sham-controlled, observer-blinded trial

IntroductionMyocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) caused by an ischaemic mechanism is common and is associated with adverse short-term and long-term prognoses. However, MINS is a recent concept, and few...

Age-Dependent Effects of Remote Preconditioning in Hypertensive Rat Hearts are Associated With Activation of RISK Signaling.

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) represents one of the forms of innate cardioprotection. While being effective in animal models, its application in humans has not been always beneficial, which might be attributed to the presence of various comorbidities, such as hypertension, or being related to the confounding factors, such as patients' sex and age. RIPC has been shown to mediate its cardioprotective effects through the activation of Reperfusion Injury Salvage Kinase (RISK) pathway in healthy animals, however, scarce evidence supports this effect of RIPC in the hearts of spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats, in particular, in relationship with aging. The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of RIPC in male SHR rats of different age and to evaluate the role of RISK pathway in the effect of RIPC on cardiac ischemic tolerance. RIPC was performed using three cycles of inflation/deflation of the pressure cuff placed on the hind limb of anesthetized rats aged three, five and eight months. Subsequently, hearts were excised, Langendorff-perfused and exposed to 30-min global ischemia and 2-h reperfusion. Infarct-sparing and antiarrhythmic effects of RIPC were observed only in three and five months-old animals but not in eight months-old rats. Beneficial effects of RIPC were associated with increased activity of RISK and decreased apoptotic signaling only in three and five months-old animals. In conclusion, RIPC showed cardioprotective effects in SHR rats that were partially age-dependent and might be attributed to the differences in the activation of RISK pathway and various aspects of ischemia/reperfusion injury in aging animals.

Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on renal protection in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

We aimed to evaluate the renoprotective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Data from 59 patients with solitary renal tumors who underwent RAPN with RIPC comprising three cycles of 5-min inflation to 200mmHg of a blood pressure cuff applied to one lower limb followed by 5-min reperfusion by cuff deflation, from 2018 to 2020 were analyzed. Patients who underwent RAPN for solitary renal tumors without RIPC between 2018 and 2020 were selected as controls. The postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the nadir during hospitalization and the percentage change from baseline were compared using propensity score matching analysis. We performed a sensitivity analysis with imputations for missing postoperative renal function data weighted by the inverse probability of the data being observed. Of the 59 patients with RIPC and 482 patients without RIPC, 53 each were matched based on propensity scores. No significant differences in the postoperative eGFR in mL/min/1.73 m2 at nadir (mean difference 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.8 to 10.4) and its percentage change from baseline (mean difference 4.7; 95% CI -1.6 to 11.1) were observed between the two groups. Sensitivity analysis also indicated no significant differences. No complications were associated with the RIPC. In conclusion, we found no significant evidence of the protective effect of RIPC against renal dysfunction after RAPN. Further research is required to determine whether specific patient subgroups benefit from RIPC.Trial registration number: UMIN000030305 (December 8, 2017).