The purpose of this study was to test empirically the hypotheses found in the literature regarding the impact of moral orientation on the counseling process. The correlation between moral orientation variables (match, mismatch, care, and justice) and counselor effectiveness ratings on the CRF-S, SEQ, and RSRS were examined. A naturalistic study was conducted using video footage from real counseling training sessions. Data were collected through transcriptions of video recordings and questionnaires given to clients after four counseling sessions. The participants in the study included master’s level counselors in training paired with undergraduate volunteer clients from courses in educational psychology, sociology, and psychology at a large state university. A canonical correlation analysis revealed no significant correlation between moral orientation variables and counselor effectiveness ratings. Implications drawn from the results of the study include (a) a need to understand both moral voices of care and justice in training; (b) a need to determine appropriate times to validate as well as challenge the voice used by clients in counseling; and (c) a need to investigate further the role of moral development empirically in order to portray correctly the information in the research literature.