Amino Acid Editing Research Articles

Functional Divergence of a Unique C-terminal Domain of Leucyl-tRNA Synthetase to Accommodate Its Splicing and Aminoacylation Roles

Leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) performs dual essential roles in group I intron RNA splicing as well as protein synthesis within the yeast mitochondria. Deletions of the C terminus differentially impact the two functions of the enzyme in splicing and aminoacylation in vivo. Herein, we determined that a fiveamino acid C-terminal deletion of LeuRS, which does not complement a null strain, can form a ternary complex with the bI4 intron and its maturase splicing partner. However, the complex fails to stimulate splicing activity. The x-ray co-crystal structure of LeuRS showed that a C-terminal extension of about 60 amino acids forms a discrete domain, which is unique among the LeuRSs and interacts with the corner of the L-shaped tRNALeu. Interestingly, deletion of the entire yeast mitochondrial LeuRS C-terminal domain enhanced its aminoacylation and amino acid editing activities. In striking contrast, deletion of the corresponding C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli LeuRS abolished aminoacylation of tRNALeu and also amino acid editing of mischarged tRNA molecules. These results suggest that the role of the leucine-specific C-terminal domain in tRNA recognition for aminoacylation and amino acid editing has adapted differentially and with surprisingly opposite effects. We propose that the secondary role of yeast mitochondrial LeuRS in RNA splicing has impacted the functional evolution of this critical C-terminal domain.

Two Conserved Threonines Collaborate in the Escherichia coli Leucyl-tRNA Synthetase Amino Acid Editing Mechanism

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases covalently link transfer RNAs to their cognate amino acids. Some of the tRNA synthetases have employed an editing mechanism to ensure fidelity in this first step of protein synthesis. The amino acid editing active site for Escherichia coli leucyl-tRNA synthetase resides within the CP1 domain that folds discretely from the main body of the enzyme. A portion of the editing active site is lined with conserved threonines. Previously, we identified one of these threonine residues (Thr(252)) as a critical amino acid specificity factor. On the basis of X-ray crystal structure information, two other nearby threonine residues (Thr(247) and Thr(248)) were hypothesized to interact with the editing substrate near its cleavage site. Single mutations of either of these conserved threonine residues had minimal effects on amino acid editing. However, double mutations that deleted the hydroxyl group from the neighboring threonine residues abolished amino acid editing activity. We propose that these threonine residues, which are also conserved in the homologous isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase and valyl-tRNA synthetase editing active sites, play a central role in amino acid editing. It is possible that they collaborate in stabilizing the transition state.

Trans-editing of Cys-tRNAPro by Haemophilus influenzae YbaK Protein

Prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRSs) from all three domains of life have been shown to misactivate cysteine and to mischarge cysteine onto tRNAPro. Although most bacterial ProRSs possess an amino acid editing domain that deacylates mischarged Ala-tRNAPro, editing of Cys-tRNAPro has not been demonstrated and a double-sieve mechanism of editing does not appear to be sufficient to eliminate all misacylated tRNAPro species from the cell. It was recently shown that a ProRS paralog, the YbaK protein from Haemophilus influenzae, which is homologous to the ProRS editing domain, is capable of weakly deacylating Ala-tRNAPro. This function appears to be redundant with that of its corresponding ProRS, which contains a canonical bacterial editing domain. In the present study, we test the specificity of editing by H. influenzae YbaK and show that it efficiently edits Cys-tRNAPro and that a conserved Lys residue is essential for this activity. These findings represent the first example of an editing domain paralog possessing altered specificity and suggest that similar autonomous editing domains could act upon different mischarged tRNAs thus providing cells with enhanced proofreading potential. This work also suggests a novel mechanism of editing wherein a third sieve is used to clear Cys-tRNAPro in at least some organisms.

Molecular dissection of a critical specificity determinant within the amino acid editing domain of leucyl-tRNA synthetase.

A highly conserved threonine residue marks the amino acid binding pocket within the editing active site of leucyl-tRNA synthetases (LeuRSs). It is essential to substrate specificity for the Escherichia coli enzyme in that it blocks the cognate leucine amino acid from binding in the hydrolytic editing active site. We combined mutagenesis and computational approaches to elucidate the molecular role of the critical side chain of this threonine residue. Removal of the terminal methyl group of the threonine side chain by replacement with serine yielded a mutant LeuRS that hydrolyzes Leu-tRNA(Leu). Substitution of valine for the conserved threonine conferred similar activities to the wild-type enzyme. However, an additional substitution within the editing active site suggested synergistic interactions with the conserved threonine site that significantly affected amino acid editing. On the basis of our combined biochemical and computational data, we propose that the threonine 252 side chain not only sterically hinders the cognate charged leucine from binding for hydrolysis but also plays a critical role in maintaining an active site geometry that is required for the fidelity of LeuRS.

An Isolated Class II Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase Insertion Domain Is Functional in Amino Acid Editing

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are responsible for activating specific amino acids and transferring them onto cognate tRNA molecules. Due to the similarity in many amino acid side chains, certain synthetases misactivate non-cognate amino acids to an extent that would be detrimental to protein synthesis if left uncorrected. To ensure accurate translation of the genetic code, some synthetases therefore utilize editing mechanisms to hydrolyze non-cognate products. Previously class II Escherichia coli proline-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) was shown to exhibit pre- and post-transfer editing activity, hydrolyzing a misactivated alanine-adenylate (Ala-AMP) and a mischarged Ala-tRNAPro variant, respectively. Residues critical for the editing activity (Asp-350 and Lys-279) are found in a novel insertion domain (INS) positioned between motifs 2 and 3 of the class defining aminoacylation active site. In this work, we present further evidence that INS is responsible for editing in ProRS. We deleted the INS from wild-type E. coli ProRS to yield DeltaINS-ProRS. While DeltaINS-ProRS was still capable of misactivating alanine, the truncated construct was defective in hydrolyzing non-cognate Ala-AMP. When the INS domain was cloned and expressed as an independent protein, it was capable of deacylating a mischarged Ala-microhelixPro variant. Similar to full-length ProRS, post-transfer editing was abolished in a K279A mutant INS. We also show that YbaK, a protein of unknown function from Haemophilus influenzae with high sequence homology to the prokaryotic INS domain, was capable of deacylating Ala-tRNAPro and Ala-microhelixPro variants but not cognate Pro-tRNAPro. Thus, we demonstrate for the first time that an independently folded class II synthetase editing domain and a previously identified homolog can catalyze a hydrolytic editing reaction.

Rational Design to Block Amino Acid Editing of a tRNA Synthetase [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7286−7287

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVAddition/CorrectionORIGINAL ARTICLEThis notice is a correctionRational Design to Block Amino Acid Editing of a tRNA Synthetase [J. Am. Chem. Soc.2002, 124, 7286−7287].Richard S. Mursinna and Susan A. MartinisCite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 38, 11773Publication Date (Web):August 29, 2003Publication History Published online29 August 2003Published inissue 1 September 2003https://doi.org/10.1021/ja033453nCopyright © 2003 American Chemical SocietyRIGHTS & PERMISSIONSArticle Views232Altmetric-Citations1LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InReddit PDF (13 KB) Get e-Alerts Get e-Alerts

Elucidation of tRNA-dependent editing by a class II tRNA synthetase and significance for cell viability.

Editing of misactivated amino acids by class I tRNA synthetases is encoded by a specialized internal domain specific to class I enzymes. In contrast, little is known about editing activities of the structurally distinct class II enzymes. Here we show that the class II alanyl-tRNA synthetase (AlaRS) has a specialized internal domain that appears weakly related to an appended domain of threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS), but is unrelated to that found in class I enzymes. Editing of misactivated glycine or serine was shown to require a tRNA cofactor. Specific mutations in the aforementioned domain disrupt editing and lead to production of mischarged tRNA. This class-specific editing domain was found to be essential for cell growth, in the presence of elevated concentrations of glycine or serine. In contrast to ThrRS, where the editing domain is not found in all three kingdoms of living organisms, it was incorporated early into AlaRSs and is present throughout evolution. Thus, tRNA-dependent editing by AlaRS may have been critical for making the genetic code sufficiently accurate to generate the tree of life.

An inserted region of leucyl-tRNA synthetase plays a critical role in group I intron splicing.

Yeast mitochondrial leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) binds to the bI4 intron and collaborates with the bI4 maturase to aid excision of the group I intron. Deletion analysis isolated the inserted LeuRS CP1 domain as a critical factor in the protein's splicing activity. Protein fragments comprised of just the LeuRS CP1 region rescued complementation of a yeast strain that expressed a splicing-defective LeuRS. Three-hybrid analysis determined that these CP1-containing LeuRS fragments, ranging from 214 to 375 amino acids, bound to the bI4 intron. In each case, interactions with only the LeuRS protein fragment specifically stimulated bI4 intron splicing activity. Substitution of a homologous CP1 domain from isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase or mutation within the LeuRS CP1 region of the smallest protein fragment abolished RNA binding and splicing activity. The CP1 domain is best known for its amino acid editing activity. However, these results suggest that elements within the LeuRS CP1 domain also play a novel role, independent of the full-length tRNA synthetase, in binding the bI4 group I intron and facilitating its self-splicing activity.

Structural origins of amino acid selection without editing by cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase.

Cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase (CysRS) is highly specific for synthesis of cysteinyl adenylate, yet does not possess the amino acid editing activity characteristic of many other tRNA synthetases. To elucidate how CysRS is able to distinguish cysteine from non-cognate amino acids, crystal structures of the Escherichia coli enzyme were determined in apo and cysteine-bound states. The structures reveal that the substrate cysteine thiolate forms a single direct interaction with a zinc ion bound at the base of the active site cleft, in a trigonal bipyramidal geometry together with four highly conserved protein side chains. Cysteine binding induces movement of the zinc ion towards substrate, as well as flipping of the conserved Trp205 indole ring to pack on the thiol side chain. The imidazole groups of five conserved histidines lie adjacent to the zinc ion, forming a unique arrangement suggestive of functional significance. Thus, amino acid discrimination without editing arises most directly from the favorable zinc-thiolate interaction, which is not possible for non-cognate substrates. Additional selectivity may be generated during the induced-fit conformational changes that help assemble the active site.

Rational design to block amino acid editing of a tRNA synthetase.

Investigations in chemical biology have focused on the synthesis of custom-designed proteins with site-specific incorporation of novel amino acids. Their success requires stable production of misacylated tRNAs. Utilization of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases has been hindered because of enzyme molecular recognition mechanisms that ensure high fidelity of protein synthesis. Leucyl-tRNA synthetase naturally misaminoacylates chemically diverse standard and nonstandard amino acids, but contains a separate amino acid editing active site to hydrolyze incorrectly mischarged tRNAs. In this work, a rational mutagenesis design to block enzyme editing is described and involves substitution of bulky amino acids into the amino acid binding pocket of the hydrolytic active site. These engineered enzymes stably misacylated isoleucine to tRNALeu. The use of these mutant leucyl-tRNA synthetases has the potential to produce pools of mischarged tRNAs that are linked to nonstandard amino acids for in vitro translation. In addition, since many of the leucyl-tRNA synthetases do not interact with or rely upon the tRNA anticodon for identity, these enzymes may offer an excellent scaffold for the development of orthogonal tRNA synthetase/tRNA pairs that can potentially be used to customize protein synthesis.

Identification of essential domains for Escherichia coli tRNA(leu) aminoacylation and amino acid editing using minimalist RNA molecules.

Escherichia coli leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) aminoacylates up to six different class II tRNA(leu) molecules. Each has a distinct anticodon and varied nucleotides in other regions of the tRNA. Attempts to construct a minihelix RNA that can be aminoacylated with leucine have been unsuccessful. Herein, we describe the smallest tRNA(leu) analog that has been aminoacylated to a significant extent to date. A series of tRNA(leu) analogs with various domains and combinations of domains deleted was constructed. The minimal RNA that was efficiently aminoacylated with LeuRS was one in which the anticodon stem-loop and variable arm stem-loop, but neither the D-arm nor T-arm, were deleted. Aminoacylation of this minimal RNA was abolished when the discriminator base A73 was replaced with C73 or when putative tertiary interactions between the D-loop and T-loop were disrupted, suggesting that these identity elements are still functioning in the minimized RNA. The various constructs that were significantly aminoacylated were also tested for amino acid editing by the synthetase. The anticodon and variable stem-loop domains were also dispensable for hydrolysis of the charged tRNA(leu) mimics. These results suggest that LeuRS may rely on identity elements in overlapping domains of the tRNA for both its aminoacylation and editing activities.

Functional role of the prokaryotic proline-tRNA synthetase insertion domain in amino acid editing.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the attachment of specific amino acids to cognate tRNAs in a two-step process that is critical for the faithful translation of genetic information. During the first chemical step of tRNA aminoacylation, noncognate amino acids that are smaller than or isosteric with the cognate substrate can be misactivated. Thus, to maintain high accuracy during protein translation, some synthetases have evolved an editing mechanism. Previously, we showed that class II Escherichia coli proline-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) is capable of (1) weakly misactivating Ala, (2) hydrolyzing the misactivated Ala-AMP in a reaction known as pretransfer editing, and (3) deacylating a mischarged Ala-tRNA(Pro) variant via a post-transfer editing pathway. In contrast to most systems where an editing function has been established, pretransfer editing by E. coli ProRS occurs in a tRNA-independent fashion. However, neither the pre- nor the post-transfer editing active site(s) has been identified. Sequence analyses revealed that most prokaryotic ProRSs possess a large insertion domain (INS) between class II conserved motifs 2 and 3. The function of the approximately 180-amino acid INS in E. coli ProRS is the subject of this investigation. Alignment-guided Ala scanning mutagenesis was carried out to test conserved amino acid residues present in the INS for their role in pre- and post-transfer editing. Our biochemical data and modeling studies suggest that the prokaryotic INS plays a critical role in editing and that this activity resides in a domain that is functionally and structurally distinct from the aminoacylation active site.

Species-specific Differences in Amino Acid Editing by Class II Prolyl-tRNA Synthetase

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are a family of enzymes responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the genetic code by specifically attaching a particular amino acid to their cognate tRNA substrates. Through primary sequence alignments, prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRSs) have been divided into two phylogenetically divergent groups. We have been interested in understanding whether the unusual evolutionary pattern of ProRSs corresponds to functional differences as well. Previously, we showed that some features of tRNA recognition and aminoacylation are indeed group-specific. Here, we examine the species-specific differences in another enzymatic activity, namely amino acid editing. Proofreading or editing provides a mechanism by which incorrectly activated amino acids are hydrolyzed and thus prevented from misincorporation into proteins. "Prokaryotic-like" Escherichia coli ProRS has recently been shown to be capable of misactivating alanine and possesses both pretransfer and post-transfer hydrolytic editing activity against this noncognate amino acid. We now find that two ProRSs belonging to the "eukaryotic-like" group exhibit differences in their hydrolytic editing activity. Whereas ProRS from Methanococcus jannaschii is similar to E. coli in its ability to hydrolyze misactivated alanine via both pretransfer and post-transfer editing pathways, human ProRS lacks these activities. These results have implications for the selection or design of antibiotics that specifically target the editing active site of the prokaryotic-like group of ProRSs.

Insights into Editing from an Ile-tRNA Synthetase Structure with tRNA Ile and Mupirocin

Isoleucyl–transfer RNA (tRNA) synthetase (IleRS) joins Ile to tRNA Ile at its synthetic active site and hydrolyzes incorrectly acylated amino acids at its editing active site. The 2.2 angstrom resolution crystal structure of Staphylococcus aureus IleRS complexed with tRNA Ile and Mupirocin shows the acceptor strand of the tRNA Ile in the continuously stacked, A-form conformation with the 3′ terminal nucleotide in the editing active site. To position the 3′ terminus in the synthetic active site, the acceptor strand must adopt the hairpinned conformation seen in tRNA Gln complexed with its synthetase. The amino acid editing activity of the IleRS may result from the incorrect products shuttling between the synthetic and editing active sites, which is reminiscent of the editing mechanism of DNA polymerases.

Misacylation of tRNALys with noncognate amino acids by lysyl-tRNA synthetase.

Lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS), a class II enzyme whose major function is to provide Lys-tRNALys for protein synthesis, also catalyzes aminoacylation of tRNALys with arginine, threonine, methionine, leucine, alanine, serine, and cysteine. The limited selectivity in the tRNA aminoacylation reaction appears to be due to inefficient editing of some amino acids (Met, Leu, Cys, Ala, Thr) by a pre-transfer mechanism or the absence of editing of other amino acids (Arg and Ser). Purified Arg-tRNALys, Thr-tRNALys, and Met-tRNALys were essentially not deacylated by LysRS, indicating that the enzyme does not possess a post-transfer editing mechanism. However, LysRS possesses an efficient pre-transfer editing mechanism which prevents misacylation of tRNALys with ornithine. A novel feature of this editing reaction is that ornithine lactam is formed by the facile cyclization of ornithyl adenylate.

Editing of errors in selection of amino acids for protein synthesis.

All living cells must conduct protein synthesis with a high degree of accuracy maintained in the transmission and flow of information from gene to finished protein product. One crucial "quality control" point in maintaining a high level of accuracy is the selectivity by which aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases furnish correctly activated amino acids, attached to tRNA species, as the building blocks for growing protein chains. During selection of amino acids, synthetases very often have to distinguish the cognate substrate from a homolog having just one fewer methyl group in its structure. The binding energy of a methyl group is estimated to contribute only a factor of 100 to the specificity of binding, yet synthetases distinguish such closely related amino acids with a discrimination factor of 10,000 to 100,000. Examples of this include methionine versus homocysteine, isoleucine versus valine, alanine versus glycine, and threonine versus serine. Many investigators have demonstrated in vitro the ability of certain aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to edit, that is, correct or prevent incorrect attachment of amino acids to tRNA molecules. Several major editing pathways are now established from in vitro data. Further, at least some aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases have recently been shown to carry out the editing function in vivo. Editing has been demonstrated to occur in both Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Significant energy is expended by the cell for editing of misactivated amino acids, which can be reflected in the growth rate. Because of this, cellular levels of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, as well as amino acid biosynthetic pathways which yield competing substrates for protein synthesis, must be carefully regulated to prevent excessive editing. High-level expression of recombinant proteins imposes a strain on the biosynthetic capacity of the cell which frequently results in misincorporation of abnormal or wrong amino acids owing in part to limited editing by synthetases. Unbalanced amino acid pools associated with some genetic disorders in humans may also lead to errors in tRNA aminoacylation. The availability of X-ray crystallographic structures of some synthetases, combined with site-directed mutagenesis, allows insights into molecular details of the extraordinary selectivity of synthetases, including the editing function.

Editing of errors in selection of amino acids for protein synthesis.

All living cells must conduct protein synthesis with a high degree of accuracy maintained in the transmission and flow of information from gene to finished protein product. One crucial "quality control" point in maintaining a high level of accuracy is the selectivity by which aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases furnish correctly activated amino acids, attached to tRNA species, as the building blocks for growing protein chains. During selection of amino acids, synthetases very often have to distinguish the cognate substrate from a homolog having just one fewer methyl group in its structure. The binding energy of a methyl group is estimated to contribute only a factor of 100 to the specificity of binding, yet synthetases distinguish such closely related amino acids with a discrimination factor of 10,000 to 100,000. Examples of this include methionine versus homocysteine, isoleucine versus valine, alanine versus glycine, and threonine versus serine. Many investigators have demonstrated in vitro the ability of certain aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to edit, that is, correct or prevent incorrect attachment of amino acids to tRNA molecules. Several major editing pathways are now established from in vitro data. Further, at least some aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases have recently been shown to carry out the editing function in vivo. Editing has been demonstrated to occur in both Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Significant energy is expended by the cell for editing of misactivated amino acids, which can be reflected in the growth rate. Because of this, cellular levels of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, as well as amino acid biosynthetic pathways which yield competing substrates for protein synthesis, must be carefully regulated to prevent excessive editing. High-level expression of recombinant proteins imposes a strain on the biosynthetic capacity of the cell which frequently results in misincorporation of abnormal or wrong amino acids owing in part to limited editing by synthetases. Unbalanced amino acid pools associated with some genetic disorders in humans may also lead to errors in tRNA aminoacylation. The availability of X-ray crystallographic structures of some synthetases, combined with site-directed mutagenesis, allows insights into molecular details of the extraordinary selectivity of synthetases, including the editing function.