Abstract

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are responsible for activating specific amino acids and transferring them onto cognate tRNA molecules. Due to the similarity in many amino acid side chains, certain synthetases misactivate non-cognate amino acids to an extent that would be detrimental to protein synthesis if left uncorrected. To ensure accurate translation of the genetic code, some synthetases therefore utilize editing mechanisms to hydrolyze non-cognate products. Previously class II Escherichia coli proline-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) was shown to exhibit pre- and post-transfer editing activity, hydrolyzing a misactivated alanine-adenylate (Ala-AMP) and a mischarged Ala-tRNAPro variant, respectively. Residues critical for the editing activity (Asp-350 and Lys-279) are found in a novel insertion domain (INS) positioned between motifs 2 and 3 of the class defining aminoacylation active site. In this work, we present further evidence that INS is responsible for editing in ProRS. We deleted the INS from wild-type E. coli ProRS to yield DeltaINS-ProRS. While DeltaINS-ProRS was still capable of misactivating alanine, the truncated construct was defective in hydrolyzing non-cognate Ala-AMP. When the INS domain was cloned and expressed as an independent protein, it was capable of deacylating a mischarged Ala-microhelixPro variant. Similar to full-length ProRS, post-transfer editing was abolished in a K279A mutant INS. We also show that YbaK, a protein of unknown function from Haemophilus influenzae with high sequence homology to the prokaryotic INS domain, was capable of deacylating Ala-tRNAPro and Ala-microhelixPro variants but not cognate Pro-tRNAPro. Thus, we demonstrate for the first time that an independently folded class II synthetase editing domain and a previously identified homolog can catalyze a hydrolytic editing reaction.

Highlights

  • The cellular pool of 20 different proteinaceous amino acids

  • Two additional proteins derived from full-length E. coli proline-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) were constructed for this work. ⌬insertion domain (INS)-ProRS, a variant with a deletion from residues 249 to 418 resulting in removal of 86% of the INS domain, is shown in Fig. 1

  • The 260-amino acid editing domain of E. coli leucine-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) (CP1Leu), which appears to fold into a stable protein, was reported to lack editing function [9]

Read more

Summary

The abbreviations used are

IleRS, isoleucine-tRNA synthetase; ValRS, valine-tRNA synthetase; LeuRS, leucine-tRNA synthetase; CP1, connective polypeptide 1; ThrRS, threonine-tRNA synthetase, ProRS, proline-tRNA synthetase; AlaRS, alanine-tRNA synthetase; INS, insertion domain; MBP, maltose-binding protein; HI1434, H. influenzae YbaK protein. In the case of Escherichia coli ProRS, a representative member of the prokaryotic-like grouping, the editing active site is a novel insertion domain (INS) located between motifs 2 and 3, which together constitute the aminoacylation active site [18]. This ϳ200-amino acid INS is absent from eukaryotic-like ProRS. The data presented here provide further support for the functional role of the INS domain in translational editing and demonstrate for the first time that an independently folded domain derived from a class II synthetase can catalyze hydrolytic editing

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call