Water Economics and PolicyOnline Ready No AccessPolicy Nook — Policy Note: An Alternative Approach to Designing Tariffs for Household Water Use: The Case of Los AngelesMichael HanemannMichael HanemannDepartment of Economics, Arizona State University USAhttps://doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X22710047Cited by:0 PreviousNext AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsRecommend to Library ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View article References Araya, F, K Osman and KM Faust [2020] Perceptions versus reality: Assessing residential water conservation efforts in the household. Resources. Conservation and Recycling, 162, 105020. Crossref, Google Scholar Attari, SZ [2014] Perceptions of water use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(14), 5129–5134. Crossref, Google Scholar Beal, CD, RA Stewart and K Fielding [2013] A novel mixed method smart metering approach to reconciling differences between perceived and actual residential end use water consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 60, 116–128. Crossref, Google Scholar Brent, DA and MB Ward [2019] Price perceptions in water demand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 98, 102266. Crossref, Google Scholar Bruner, M, K Wilson, I Boardley, A Benson, J Sutcliffe, Z Root and J Cote [2016] Examining the role of descriptive norms in the social identity and moral behaviour relationship in youth sport. Sport Psychology, 48. Google Scholar Chesnutt, T, D Pekelney and J Spach (2018). Lower water bills: The city of Los Angeles shows how water conservation and efficient water rates produce affordable and sustainable use. California Water Efficiency Partnership and Alliance for Water Efficiency. https://www.financingsustainablewater.org/sites/www.financingsustainablewater.org/files/resource_pdfs/LADWP_Rates_Conservation_1.pdf. Google Scholar Cook, J and D Brent [2021] Do households respond to marginal or average price of piped water service?, in Oxford Encyclopedia of Water, Sanitation, and Global Health. New York: Oxford University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar Dixit, AK [1996] The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction Cost Politics Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Crossref, Google Scholar Ehn, ML (2015). Injunctive and descriptive norms effect on physical activity (2015). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/166. Google Scholar Gaudin, S [2006] Effect of price information on residential water Demand. Applied Economics, 38, 383–393. Crossref, Google Scholar Hall, DC and WM Hanemann [1996] Urban water rate design based on marginal cost, in D. C. Hall (ed.), Advances in the Economics of Environmental Resources: Marginal Cost Rate Design and Wholesale Water Markets, Vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 95–122. Google Scholar Hall, DC [1996] Calculating Marginal Cost for Water Rates, D. C. Hall (ed.). Advances in the Economics of Environmental Resources: Marginal Cost Rate Design and Wholesale Water Markets, Vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 77–94. Google Scholar Hall, DC [2000] Public choice and water rate design. The Political Economy of Water Pricing Implementation, A. Dinar (ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 189–212. Google Scholar Hall, DC [2009a] Politically feasible, revenue sufficient, and economically efficient municipal water rates. Contemporary Economic Policy, 27(4), 539–554. Crossref, Google Scholar Hall, DC [2009b] Prescriptive public choice: Application to residential water rate reform. Contemporary Economic Policy, 27(4), 555–565. Crossref, Google Scholar Hamilton, LC [1985] Self-reported and actual savings in a water conservation campaign. Environment and Behavior, 17(3), 315–326. Crossref, Google Scholar Hanemann, M and C Dyckman [2009] The San Francisco Bay-Delta: A failure of decision-making Capacity. Environmental Science and Policy, 12, 710–725. Crossref, Google Scholar Klaiber, HA, VK Smith, M Kaminsky and A Strong [2014] Measuring price elasticities for residential water demand with limited information. Land Economics, 90(1), 100–113. Crossref, Google Scholar Lott, C (2016). The Effect of Price Information on Consumer Behavior Under Non-linear Tariffs: Evidence from a Water Utility Merger. Working Paper, Department of Economics, U.C. Santa Barbara, November. Google Scholar Martin, WE, HM Ingram, NK Laney and AH Griffin [1984] Saving Water in a Desert City. Washington DC: Resources for the Future. Google Scholar Mini, C, TS Hogue and S Pincetl [2014a] Patterns and controlling factors of residential water use in Los Angeles, California. Water Policy, 16(6), 1054–1069. Crossref, Google Scholar Mini, C, TS Hogue and S Pincetl [2014b] Estimation of residential outdoor water use in Los Angeles, California. Landscape and Urban Planning, 127, 124–135. Crossref, Google Scholar Nauges, C and D Whittington [2017] Evaluating the performance of alternative municipal water tariff designs: Quantifying the tradeoffs between equity, economic efficiency, and cost recovery. World Development, 91, 125–43. Crossref, Google Scholar Reynaud, A (2014). Modeling Household Water Demand in Europe. Report EUR 27310. European Commission, Joint Research Center. Google Scholar Wang, J, X Fu, L Zhang and Y Khou [2015] ‘The impacts of moral evaluations and descriptive norms on children’s and adolescents’ tolerance of transgressions. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 9(2), 86–96. Crossref, Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Recommended Online Ready Metrics History Published: 20 February 2023 PDF download