Early-onset Sepsis Calculator Research Articles

Update to the Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator Utilizing a Contemporary Cohort.

The Kaiser Permanente Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis (EOS) Calculator has been an effective tool for risk stratification to safely reduce newborn antibiotic exposure. The calculator was derived from data on infants born between 1993 and 2007. Since that time, US obstetric practice has adopted universal antepartum screening for group B Streptococcus and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis guidance has changed. Our objective was to update the EOS calculator using a contemporary birth cohort and determine the effect of these changes on EOS case ascertainment and antibiotic recommendations. The study included infants born at ≥35 weeks' gestation at 14 hospitals between January 2010 and December 2020 (n = 412 595 infants, EOS cases = 113). Model coefficients were re-estimated and the point estimates of the likelihood ratios for clinical status used to calculate the posterior probability of EOS. We compared the number of EOS cases correctly identified by each model (sensitivity) and the proportion of infants for whom empirical antibiotics are recommended. The original model had a sensitivity of 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.63-0.85), while the updated model had a sensitivity of 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.68-0.89), P = .15. The recommended empirical antibiotic use was 3.5% with the original model and 3.7% with the updated model, P < .0001. For each additional case identified by the updated model, an additional 158 infants would be treated with antibiotics. Both the original and updated EOS calculators are effective tools for quantifying EOS risk among infants born at ≥35 weeks' gestation.

Antibiotic Treatment for Well-Appearing Infants Born at ≥35 Weeks' Gestation to Mothers with Chorioamnionitis Before and After Implementation of Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator.

Our quality improvement study aimed to determine whether application of a neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator (NSC) among well-appearing infants born at ≥35 weeks' gestation to mothers with chorioamnionitis decreases the number of lab evaluations (LEs) and antibiotic treatments (Abxs) without missing early-onset sepsis. We compared 2 years (January 1, 2019-January 3, 2021) of data from a historical-control group before implementation of the NSC to 1 year (January 4, 2021-December 31, 2021) of data from a calculator group after implementation of the NSC to evaluate whether LE and Abx decreased following implementation of the NSC on January 4, 2021. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant for the chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test used for the analyses. In the historical-control group, 94% of infants received LE and Abx. Retrospective application of the NSC in the historical-control group decreased LE from 94% to 21% and Abx from 94% to 13%. In the calculator group, 14% and 5% of infants received LE and Abx, respectively, and none of the blood culture was positive. Median time from birth to antibiotic initiation was significantly longer (14.5 vs 3.8 hours; P=0.0037) with no increase in median length of stay (2.3 vs 2.4 days; P=0.02) after NSC implementation. No significant difference in neonatal intensive care unit admission was identified between groups (4% vs 1%; P=0.15). There was a significant decrease in LE and Abx among well-appearing infants born at ≥35 weeks' gestation to mothers with chorioamnionitis after implementation of the NSC without missing early-onset sepsis. There was no increase in neonatal intensive care unit admission or length of hospital stay in infants who received antibiotics later after they appeared equivocal or clinically ill in the calculator group. Larger prospective studies that include follow ups are needed to confirm that early-onset sepsis is not missed.

The Utility of Early Onset Sepsis Calculator and Procalcitonin in Prediction of Early Onset Neonatal Sepsis

The Utility of Early Onset Sepsis Calculator and Procalcitonin in Prediction of Early Onset Neonatal Sepsis

Utility of the Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator in a Low-Risk Population.

To compare early-onset sepsis (EOS) risk estimation and recommendations for infectious evaluation and/or empiric antibiotics using a categorical risk assessment versus the Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator in a low-risk population. Retrospective chart review of late preterm (≥350/7-366/7 weeks' gestational age) and term infants born at the Brooke Army Medical Center between January 1, 2012 and August 29, 2019. We evaluated those born via cesarean section with rupture of membranes (ROM) < 10 minutes. Statistical analysis was performed to compare recommendations from a categorical risk assessment versus the calculator. We identified 1,187 infants who met inclusion criteria. A blood culture was obtained within 72 hours after birth from 234 (19.7%) infants and 170 (14.3%) received antibiotics per routine clinical practice, using categorical risk assessment. Respiratory distress was the most common indication for evaluation, occurring in 173 (14.6%) of patients. After applying the Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator to this population, the recommendation was to obtain a blood culture on 166 (14%), to start or strongly consider starting empiric antibiotics on 164 (13.8%), and no culture or antibiotics on 1,021 (86%). Utilizing calculator recommendations would have led to a reduction in frequency of blood culture (19.7 vs. 14%, p < 0.0001) but no reduction in empiric antibiotics (14.3 vs. 13.8%, p = 0.53). There were no cases of culture-proven EOS. This population is low risk for development of EOS; however, 19.7% received an evaluation for infection and 14.3% received antibiotics. Utilization of the Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Risk Calculator would have led to a significant reduction in the evaluation for EOS but no reduction in antibiotic exposure. Consideration of delivery mode and indication for delivery may be beneficial to include in risk assessments for EOS. · Cesarean section with rupture of membranes at delivery confers low risk for EOS.. · Respiratory distress often triggers an EOS evaluation.. · Delivery mode should be considered in EOS risk..

Enhanced Category-Based Risk Assessment for Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study

Introduction: Compared with multivariate risk assessment, traditional category-based risk assessment (CRA) approaches for neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) screening are usually straightforward to use, do not require electronic devices, but are associated with higher rates of antibiotic use. This study aims to evaluate the performance of a novel enhanced CRA (eCRA) framework on EOS admissions and antibiotic use and to investigate whether a modified version with adjustments in risk factor weighting can allow its performance to match the EOS calculator while remaining easy to implement. Method: This is a prospective, single-center, two-phase observational study. Infants of all gestations delivered in a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong with risk factors or clinical features of EOS were recruited. Phase I: A novel eCRA framework (period 2) was compared with the CDC 2010-based protocol (period 1). Phase II: A modified eCRA framework was compared theoretically with the EOS calculator. EOS-specific admissions and antibiotic use were measured. Results: Phase I: 1,025 at-risk infants were recruited during period 2 and compared with 757 infants of period 1. Admissions and antibiotic use decreased from 45.8% to 29.4% and 41.1% to 28.2%, respectively. Antibiotics among those at-risk but well-appearing infants decreased from 25.3% to 16.3% (p < 0.001 for all). Phase II: antibiotic use was similar (7.3 vs. 6.4%, p = 0.42) between the modified eCRA framework and the EOS calculator. Conclusions: An eCRA framework can effectively and safely provide individualized guidance for EOS screening without the need for tools such as the EOS calculator.

Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of the Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator: A Multicenter Survey Study.

Prior studies demonstrated the neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator's potential in drastically reducing antibiotic prescriptions, and its international adoption is increasing rapidly. To optimize the EOS calculator's impact, successful implementation is crucial. This study aimed to identify key barriers and facilitators to inform an implementation strategy. A multicenter cross-sectional survey was carried out among physicians, residents, nurses and clinical obstetricians of thirteen Dutch hospitals. Survey development was prepared through a literature search and stakeholder interviews. Data collection and analysis were based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). A total of 465 stakeholders completed the survey. The main barriers concerned the expectance of the department's capacity problems and the issues with maternal information transfer between departments. Facilitators concerned multiple relative advantages of the EOS calculator, including stakeholder education, EOS calculator integration in the electronic health record and existing positive expectations about the safety and effectivity of the calculator. Based on these findings, tailored implementation interventions can be developed, such as identifying early adopters and champions, conducting educational meetings tailored to the target group, creating ready-to-use educational materials, integrating the EOS calculator into electronic health records, creating a culture of collective responsibility among departments and collecting data to evaluate implementation success and innovation results.

Kaiser Permanente early-onset sepsis calculator as a safe tool for reducing antibiotic use among chorioamnionitis-exposed term neonates: Qatar experience

Being an important cause of early-onset neonatal sepsis, clinical chorioamnionitis in the mother results in frequent laboratory workup and antibiotic use for the neonate. Neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in...

Neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator: Impact on antibiotic use in a level II neonatal unit in Western Australia

BackgroundOveruse of empirical intravenous antibiotics in neonates in high-income countries (HICs) is well documented. The Kaiser Permanente neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator is an evidence-based sepsis risk assessment tool that has demonstrated potential to reduce antibiotic usage in this population. The incidence of early-onset sepsis in most HICs is 0.4–0.8 per 1000 live births. The objective was to evaluate the calculator's impact on antibiotic rates and length of stay in a regional level II Special Care Nursery. MethodsA single-centre retrospective cohort study compared antibiotic administration rates in the first 72 h in neonates ≥35 weeks gestation born during two 6-month periods in 2019 (pre-EOS calculator) and 2021 (post-EOS calculator). Electronic and paper case records were accessed to capture data. Continuous data were summarised using mean and standard deviation, and categorical data were summarized using frequency distributions. There were 951 (2019) and 1129 (2021) infants born during the study periods. ResultsFollowing implementation of the calculator, antibiotic exposure decreased from 13.7% to 4.7% of all neonates without reported negative outcomes. Mean length of stay for neonates born across the two periods decreased from 2.38 to 2.13 days. Indications for antibiotic use shifted more towards clinical condition and away from obstetric risk factors. There were no culture-proven cases of sepsis or readmissions with EOS in either period. ConclusionImplementation of the EOS calculator significantly reduced exposure to antibiotics, without adverse outcomes.

The impact of the early onset neonatal sepsis calculator on antibiotic initiation: a single center study in Israel.

To evaluate the effect of implementation of the Kaiser Permanente (KP) early onset sepsis (EOS) calculator in infants born at 34week's gestation or more on antibiotic utilization and length of hospitalization.A single center, retrospective cohort study included all neonates born in Soroka Medical Center at 34weeks gestation or more between January 1st, 2015, and January 1st, 2019, with a predefined maternal risk factor for EOS. Two cohorts of neonates were compared during two time periods, before and after the implementation of the KP calculator. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions were performed to assess the effect of the KP calculator on antibiotic treatment and length of hospitalization. Also, an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis was used to assess the time trends of the two periods.The study included 3858 neonates in the pre-implementation period and 3081 neonates in the post-implementation cohort. The use of the calculator resulted in a significant reduction (46%) in antibiotics treatment for suspected EOS (5.1 vs. 9.4%, P < 0.001). The ITS analysis demonstrated a sharp decline in the slope of antibiotic treatment in the post intervention period: (b = -0.14, p-value = 0.08). The length of hospitalization was significantly reduced in the post-implementation cohort from 62 to 60h (p-value < 0.001) with no clinical significance. The incidence of EOS was similar in both groups. Conclusion: A significant reduction in antibiotic treatment was demonstrated after the implementation of the KP calculator without an increase incidence of EOS. The calculator is a powerful accessory decision-making tool that can be used safely in combination with, but not replacing, thorough clinical assessment. What is Known: • The EOS calculator is a useful tool that leads to a significant reduction in preemptive antibiotic utilization. What is New: • The EOS calculator is sensitive when applied to the whole-nursery. • The calculator is useful in different populations, also when women are not routinely screened for GBS.

Risk Stratification to Support Antibiotic Stewardship and Breastfeeding Exclusivity in a Military Treatment Facility

ObjectiveTo safely reduce unnecessary antibiotic exposure in neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis and inadequately treated Group B Streptococcus (GBS) using the early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator for risk stratification and a 36-hour antibiotic duration. DesignEvidence-based quality improvement initiative. Setting/Local ProblemObstetric service at a midsized military treatment facility with approximately 2,000 births annually and no standard process for neonatal EOS risk assessment. ParticipantsClinical nurse specialist, physicians, nursing leadership, unit-level nursing champions, and nurses assigned to the mother–baby and labor and delivery units. Intervention/MeasurementsAn interdisciplinary working group created a protocol to institute an EOS risk assessment calculator, a note for the electronic heath record, and interdisciplinary education for all staff providing care to neonates in our facility. ResultsBefore implementation of the EOS calculator, 97.6% of neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis or inadequate maternal GBS treatment received antibiotics; after implementation, the mean rate dropped to 32%. Exclusive breastfeeding rates before discharge in neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis or inadequate maternal GBS treatment also increased during this time, from 40% to a mean of 89%. After implementation, there were no readmissions to our institution for culture-proven sepsis within 14 days of discharge. ConclusionMultidisciplinary team-led implementation of the EOS calculator and of shortened antibiotic duration were associated with safely reduced antibiotic exposure in well-appearing neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis and GBS. In addition, dramatically improved rates of exclusive breastfeeding at discharge were observed in this population.

Evaluating safety and effectiveness of the early-onset sepsis calculator to reduce antibiotic exposure in Dutch at-risk newborns: a protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

IntroductionNewborns are at risk for early-onset sepsis (EOS). In the Netherlands, EOS affects less than 0.2% of newborns, but approximately 5% are treated with empirical antibiotics. These numbers form an...

Agreement between an Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis Risk Calculator and the Colombian Clinical Practice Guideline in Three Tertiary-Care Centers in Bogotá, Colombia.

Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) worldwide help steer the management of early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS). These documents typically discourage the use of risk assessment tools. However, prior work has shown that the Kaiser Permanente calculator (Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator [EOScalc]) could be a useful tool in EONS risk assessment. This study aimed to determine the agreement between the recommendations of the Colombian EONS CPG and those of the EOSCalc tool in a cohort of newborns in Bogotá, Colombia. Multicenter retrospective observational cohort study. We included newborns with a gestational age ≥ 34 weeks who were admitted to the neonatal care unit with a suspected diagnosis of EONS between 2017 and 2019. Agreement between the two tools was examined using Cohen's kappa under two scenarios (unequivocal and cautious). Of the 23.490 live births, 470 (1.71%) were admitted to the neonatal care unit with a presumptive diagnosis of EONS. This diagnosis was confirmed in seven patients by means of blood cultures, with group B streptococcus the most common organism (57%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.4-90.1). A single death occurred among the patients with confirmed EONS (lethality: 14.3%). The overall incidence of EONS was 0.298 per 1,000 live births. After splitting the recommendations into two scenarios regarding antibiotic use, unequivocal and cautious, the agreement between EOSCalc and the CPG was below 15% (6 and 14%, respectively). Recommendations from the Colombian EONS CPG show poor agreement with the EOSCalc, with the latter detecting all newborns with EONS. Although the use of EOSCalc is clinically and administratively advantageous, further prospective studies are warranted to determine the safety of its implementation. · Colombian EONS CPGs recommend that an outsized number of newborns be given antibiotics.. · The KP EOSCalc risk assessment calculator shows poor agreement with CPG recommendations.. · The Colombian CPGs should be updated to include the use of risk assessment calculators..

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Neonatal Early Onset Sepsis Calculator in Screening for Early Onset Sepsis in Neonates More Than 35 Weeks Age of Gestation

Background: Early-onset sepsis (EOS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among neonates. Diagnosis of EOS can be difficult as clinical signs are subtle. The use of the Neonatal EOS Calculator (NEOSC) may help screen high-risk neonates for EOS and may result in a significant reduction in unnecessary antibiotic use. Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the NEOSC in screening for EOS in neonates more than 35 weeks age of gestation. Methodology: This was a retrospective, case-control study where 245 septic (cases) and 245 non-septic (controls) neonatal and maternal medical records were reviewed. The EOS risk classification from the NEOSC was compared with the actual clinical outcome. An online statistical software (medcalc.org) was used to compute for the sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and accuracy of the NEOSC. Results: Based on the NEOSC, only 64 of 245 clinically septic neonates were truly positive for sepsis while 181 were falsely negative for sepsis. Of the 245 non-septic neonates, 3 were falsely positive for sepsis, while 242 were truly negative for sepsis. With a 95% confidence interval, the computed variables showed a Sn 26.12%, Sp 98.78%, PPV 76.12%, NPV 89.95%, PLR 21.33, and NLR 0.75. The accuracy of the NEOSC is 89.33%. Conclusion: The NEOSC had poor sensitivity and is not recommended in screening for EOS in neonates more than 35 weeks age of gestation. It may be used as an adjunct in EOS diagnosis due to its high specificity and accuracy.

Neonatal Early Onset Sepsis (EOS) Calculator plus Universal Serial Physical Examination (SPE): A Prospective Two-Step Implementation of a Neonatal EOS Prevention Protocol for Reduction of Sepsis Workup and Antibiotic Treatment.

Current neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) guidelines lack consensus. Recent studies suggest three different options for EOS risk assessment among infants born ≥35 wks gestational age (GA), leading to different behaviors in the sepsis workup and antibiotic administration. A broad disparity in clinical practice is found in Neonatal Units, with a large number of non-infected newborns evaluated and treated for EOS. Broad spectrum antibiotics in early life may induce different short- and long-term adverse effects, longer hospitalization, and early mother-child separation. In this single-center prospective study, a total of 3002 neonates born in three periods between 2016 and 2020 were studied, and three different workup algorithms were compared: the first one was based on the categorical risk assessment; the second one was based on a Serial Physical Examination (SPE) strategy for infants with EOS risk factors; the third one associated an informatic tool (Neonatal EOS calculator) with a universal extension of the SPE strategy. The main objective of this study was to reduce the number of neonatal sepsis workups and the rate of antibiotic administration and favor rooming-in and mother–infant bonding without increasing the risk of sepsis and mortality. The combined strategy of universal SPE with the EOS Calculator showed a significant reduction of laboratory tests (from 33% to 6.6%; p < 0.01) and antibiotic treatments (from 8.5% to 1.4%; p < 0.01) in term and near-term newborns. EOS and mortality did not change significantly during the study period.

Reducing Antibiotic Use in a Level III and Two Level II Neonatal Intensive Care Units Targeting Prescribing Practices for Both Early and Late-onset Sepsis: A Quality Improvement Project.

Introduction:Variation in antibiotic (ATB) use exists between neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) without demonstrated benefit to outcomes tested. Studies show that early-onset sepsis occurs in up to 2% of NICU patients, yet antibiotics (ABX) were started in over 50% of neonates admitted to our NICUs. An internal audit identified variations in prescribing practices and excessive use of ABX. As a result, we introduced ATB stewardship to our NICUs in 2015 to reduce unnecessary usage of these medications.Methods:We used standard quality improvement methodology utilizing multiple iterative plan-do-study-act cycles during a 6-year project to test various interventions aimed at using ABX wisely. Specifically, our goals were to reduce ABX on admission (AA), percent of patients who continued on ABX beyond 72 hours of life (AC), and ATB utilization rate in our 3 NICUs by 28% for each metric. Interventions implemented included the development of an ATB stewardship program consisting of a multidisciplinary team that met regularly, creation of tools and guidelines for evaluations of sepsis and ATB use, universal use of the neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator for all newborns 34 weeks and older gestational age, education regarding noninitiation of ABX for maternal indications in clinically well newborns, and discontinuation within 48 hours for asymptomatic newborns with negative blood cultures.Results:AA, AC, and ATB utilization rate decreased by 34.1%, 45.3%, and 34.9%, respectively, in our 3 NICUs.Conclusions:By introducing ATB stewardship in our NICUs, we exceeded our predetermined goal of significantly reducing ATB usage.

The neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator to reduce empiric antibiotic use in newborns exposed to chorioamnionitis

BackgroundTerm and late preterm newborns exposed to maternal chorioamnionitis (CAM) have traditionally received early-onset sepsis (EOS) evaluations and empiric antibiotics despite their clinical appearance leading to ineffective maternal/infant bonding, NICU admissions and unnecessary antibiotic exposure. MethodsPre/post-interventional quality improvement project in a level III NICU to reduce empiric antibiotic therapy and EOS evaluations in newborns exposed to CAM using the Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis (NEOS) Calculator. ResultsMean empiric antibiotic treatment days for newborns exposed to CAM during the pre-implementation period was 3.14 days and 1.33 days during post-implementation period, an 81% reduction. A 16.7% reduction in EOS evaluations between the pre- and post-implementation periods was noted. Antibiotic use in newborns exposed to CAM decreased from 100% during the pre-implementation data collection to 41.7%. DiscussionThe NEOS calculator may reduce unnecessary antibiotic use and diagnostic testing in newborns exposed to CAM while lowering healthcare expenditures in the assessment of EOS in newborns. ConclusionsThese findings emphasize the importance of implementing an evidence-based protocol for newborns exposed to CAM.

Early-onset meningitis with delayed presentation: Is there a role for prevention?

In their valuable study, Snoek and co-workers1 reported 88 infants (≤ 3 days old, gestational age ≥34 weeks) with early-onset sepsis (EOS) and/or meningitis (EOM) due to group B streptococcus (GBS, n = 81) or E.coli (n = 7). Cases came from the Dutch prospective nationwide cohort study (2018–2021). Actual treatment performed under Dutch guidelines was compared with hypothetical indications from NICE guidelines and the US early-onset sepsis calculator (EOSC). EOSC would have led to delayed antibiotic treatment in significantly more cases than Dutch and NICE guidelines.

Neonatal early-onset infections: Comparing the sensitivity of the neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator to the Dutch and the updated NICE guidelines in an observational cohort of culture-positive cases.

SummaryBackgroundThe early-onset sepsis calculator (EOSC) reduces unnecessary antibiotic treatment in newborns. However, its performance in identifying cases with early-onset disease (EOD) is unclear. We compared the sensitivity of the EOSC to the current Dutch and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines when applied to a cohort of newborns with culture-positive early-onset sepsis and meningitis.MethodsCulture-positive Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) sepsis and meningitis patients ≤3 days old with a gestational age ≥34 weeks, identified between 1/1/2018 and 31/1/2021 in a Dutch prospective nationwide cohort study were included. Cases were identified by treating physicians and microbiological surveillance. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients that would have been treated according to the EOSC, the Dutch, and the NICE EOD prevention guidelines. Differences between proportions were analysed using McNemar's test.FindingsWe included 81 GBS and 7 E. coli EOD cases. At 4 h after birth, the EOSC would have recommended antibiotic treatment in 32 (36%) patients, compared to 44 (50%) by the Dutch (p<0·01) and 48 (55%) by the NICE guideline (p<0·01). The EOSC would have initially recommended routine care for 52% of patients compared to 31% and 30% for the Dutch and NICE guidelines (p<0·01). At 24 h after birth, the EOSC would have recommended antibiotic treatment in 54 (61%) infants compared to 64 (73%) by the Dutch (p = 0·02) and 63 (72%) by the NICE guidelines (p = 0·06).InterpretationThe sensitivity of the EOSC in identifying cases of EOD is lower compared to both Dutch and NICE guidelines, especially directly after birth. The EOSC relies more on clinical symptoms and results in less overtreatment of healthy newborns at the cost of later antibiotic treatment in initially well-appearing EOD patients.FundingThis work was supported by grants received from Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw; NWO-Vidi-Grant (grant number 917·17·308); NWO-Vici-Grant (grant number 918·19·627)), the Academic Medical Centre (AMC Innovative Impulse Grant) and Steun Emma Foundation Grant.

Neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator safety in an Australian tertiary perinatal centre.

To determine if any cases of culture-positive neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) would be missed using the neonatal EOS calculator, when compared with current guidelines and practices. Retrospective audit of all neonates born at ≥35 weeks and admitted to Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital with EOS from January 2014 to December 2020. A missed case was defined as antibiotic therapy not being recommended within 24 h of birth. Management recommendations according to the neonatal EOS calculator were compared with current guidelines and current practices. There were significantly more missed cases using the neonatal EOS calculator compared to the current guideline and current management groups. Using the neonatal EOS calculator, 11 neonates (35%, 95% confidence interval 19.2-54.6%) would not have received antibiotics by 24 h of age. In comparison, only one neonate (3%, 95% confidence interval 0.1-16.7%) would not have received antibiotics by 24 h of age using the current guidelines. In terms of the current practice in the cohort of patients, two neonates (6%) did not receive antibiotics by 24 h of age. The significantly higher rate of missed cases using the neonatal EOS calculator compared with current guidelines and practice supports the concerns many neonatologists have regarding safety of the neonatal EOS calculator.

Potential benefit from the implementation of the Kaiser Permanente neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator on clinical management of neonates with presumed sepsis.

To assess the potential benefit from the implementation of the Kaiser Permanente early-onset sepsis calculator (EOS-C), in terms of antibiotic use and requested laboratory tests, in a network of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Greece, and to determine the incidence of early-onset sepsis (EOS) in Greek NICUs, a prospective surveillance study was conducted in 7 NICUs between April 2018 and June 2019. Data were collected for all newborns ≥ 34weeks' gestation receiving empiric antibiotic therapy within the first 3days of life. The number of live births and positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid cultures within the first 3days of life were used for calculation of EOS incidence. Evaluation of possible impact of implementing the calculator was done by comparing the clinicians' recorded management to the calculator's suggested course of action. The unit-specific incidence of culture-proven EOS ranged between 0 and 2.99/1000 live births. The weighted incidence rate for all 7 units was 1.8/1000 live births. Management of EOS guided by the calculator could lead to a reduction of empiric antibiotic initiation up to 100% for the group of "well-appearing" neonates and 86% for "equivocal," lowering exposure to antibiotics by 4.2 and 3.8days per neonate, respectively. Laboratory tests for blood cultures drawn could be reduced by up to 100% and 68%, respectively. Sensitivity of the EOS-C in identifying neonates with positive blood cultures was high.Conclusion: Management strategies based on the Kaiser Permanente neonatal sepsis calculator may significantly reduce antibiotic exposure, invasive diagnostic procedures, and hospitalizations in late preterm and term neonates. What is Known: • Neonates are frequently exposed to antibiotics for presumed EOS. • The Kaiser Permanente sepsis calculator can reduce antibiotic exposure in neonates.. What is New: • EOS calculator can be an effective antibiotic stewardship tool in a high prescribing country and can reduce invasive diagnostic procedures and mother-baby separation. • Incidence of EOS in Greece is higher compared to other European countries.