Abstract Background Identifying the infected individual with a fast and accurate test is essential to constrain the spread of viruses and provide the proper treatment. Antigen rapid test (ART) provides quick screening of infection for patients; however, it shows less promising in the detection of early infection and patent’s full recovery as its inferior sensitivity to the nucleic acid detection method. On the other hand, bulky and costly instrument, tedious and prolonged procedures in traditional nucleic acid testing is also unfavorable for the screening. Delta is developing a fully automated hand-held POC using molecular technology to simultaneously detect 4 targets in 20 mins. The POC can be stand-alone or linked to mobile or PC app for different application scenarios. The proprietary recipe of the lysis buffer could neutralize the inhibition in the sample with effective pathogen lysis in seconds. The microfluidic cartridge containing lyophilized reagent can be stored at room temperature. The amplification signal is detected via the optical system from the colorimetric LAMP. This study is to evaluate the performance of the POC system in detecting SARS-CoV2 (SC2), FluA and B viruses in nasal swab. In addition, the assay performance was further compared with other commercial products available. Methods The attenuated SC2 virus, FluA and B viruses were diluted with 1xTE into different concentrations. The diluted viruses were spiked into the lysis buffer in 5% v/v ratio. Nasal samples collected from donors were soaked and swirled inside the cartridges containing lysis buffer according to the manufacturers’ instructions. For commercial products without lysis buffer, direct swabs were used. The cartridges were then put into the respective devices for further testing. Results The lyophilized SC2 assay consistently detected the viruses at 1000 copies/ml (20 out of 20) in real nasal samples in the presence of Delta Lysis Buffer (containing lyophilized neutralizer). However, without Lysis buffer, there was no signal detected even in the presence of 240x LoD viruses. The whole workflow sensitivity was tested with SC2 positive samples at 1x, 4x, 10x LoD and negative samples in the nasal sample matrix on Delta hand-held system. The results were processed via embedded algorithm and displayed on device as well as on PC and mobile app respectively. Out of 79 positive samples tested, the detection rate was 100%. There was no false positive detection for 31 negative samples tested. Positive internal control indicated the valid runs. 5 major SC2 subtypes (99.8% in silico analysis of 366,707 strains), 10 FluA and 9 FluB subtypes were successfully detected. Further, Delta hand-held platform outperformed in the LoD of SC2 with 500 copies/swab comparing to the ≥50,000 copies/swab of the benchmarked commercial platforms. Conclusions The performance of the hand-held molecular detection system we developed demonstrated a rapid, sensitive, and competitive analytical performance in the respiratory panel detection. The capability of device linking to apps and clouds for data management and the extendable docking system for multiple devices to run samples simultaneously and independently, make it applicable for the infectious diseases screening in both clinical settings and for home-use.
Read full abstract