Religion & Literature 198 in thematic terms that the book hangs together as a whole. As for intertextuality and influence, the first reason, Pollmann deals with an impressive range of authors and issues. As is often the case in studies of late antique poetry, the focus is Roman rather than Greek (the only exception is the aforementioned chapter on Euripides and the Christus patiens). But within the ranks of late Latin writers, Pollman discusses a wide variety, from the beginnings of late Latin and early Christian poetry down into the Middle Ages, including Walafrid Strabo and Sigebert of Gembloux. She has divided the chapters into three major sections: “The Poetics of Authority in Early Christian Poetry”; “Christian Authority and Poetic Succession”; and “Poetic Authority in Rivalling Cultural and Theological Discourses.” I will focus here on two of the several key themes that emerge throughout the essays. First, in order to understand the social function of late Latin poetry, and particularly Christian Latin poetry, it is essential to grasp that it is poetry with a cultural agenda; the poet—whether Proba or Prudentius, Arator or Avitus—wants you, the reader, to do something. That is, the poems are intended to force a choice on the reader, to interrogate and bring about to a decision. Neutrality in the face of the text’s demands is foreclosed before the text has even begun. As Jesus says in the Gospel of Matthew, “He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad” (Matthew 12:30). This is the impulse that informs Christian poetry. What is the reader to do? He is to accept Christianity and reform his life. It is a theme that has been explored in other recent works as well, such as Marc Mastrangelo’s The Roman Self in Late Anquity: Prudentius and the Poetics of the Soul (2008). The production of Christian poetry, then, is an act consisting of the aggrandizement of authority. Scripture preeminently, and the lives of the saints secondarily, are the authorities that explicitly underwrite the poets’ claims. Second, however, and relatedly, the Christian poet has to deal with a different canon as well: the canon of pagan authors. The best mode of posture toward the pagan past was, throughout late antiquity, in the process of constant renegotiation by Christian writers. Augustine resolved the question most famously through his notion of “spoiling the Egyptians” in Book 2 of De doctrina christiana, but he was neither the first nor the last to make an attempt, nor is his model without rivals. Pollmann treats various possibilities in chapters on Cassiodorus and Venantius Fortunatus and on the cento of Proba. Of Cassiodorus (a prose author, of course), Pollmann argues convincingly for his attempt to “Christianize pagan erudition” (77) through a “manipulative engagement of canonical...authorities,” in which he uses Augustine selectively to forge his own (different) program, “thus BOOK REVIEWS 199 camouflaging a de facto discontinuity by pretending continuity” (97-98). Proba, on the other hand, rewrites in a different way, claiming to find a hidden message of Christian salvation that was locked in the Vergilian poems all along, awaiting only the hand that could draw them out (112); this is set in contrast to Ausonius’ saucy use of the same authority in the Cento nuptialis. On both scores, Christian writers have to find a way to deal with their own “secondariness,” with writing what Gerard Genette (to whom Pollmann refers) calls “literature in the second degree” under the stern stare of their literary ancestors who, in the words of W. H. Auden, “challenge, warn and witness.” Pollman deals with the phenomenon admirably, whether the source text in view is the Bible, a prose Vita of a saint, or a poetic forebear. One further type not covered, but meriting further research in the future, is how to approach authors who transform their own texts, giving different versions in verse and prose; significant here is Sedulius’s foray into the opus geminatum: the Carmen paschale (in verse) and Opus paschale (in prose). But one cannot cover everything, and what Pollmann covers she covers thoroughly. We live in the best time for reading late Latin poetry...
Read full abstract