Abstract During summer, feedlot cattle are often subjected to multiple high heat load events which can cause heat stress and negatively impact on cattle performance and well-being. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different dietary buffering feeding strategies, on dry matter intake (DMI), water intake (WI), rumen temperature (TRUM), rumen pH and average daily gain (ADG) of grain-fed beef steers exposed to a simulated heat wave event. Angus steers [n = 12; body weight (BW) = 582 ± 8.92 kg] were housed within climate control rooms for 21 d and randomly allocated into one of three dietary treatments (4 steers/treatment): 1) Treatment 1 (T1), finisher diet; 2) Treatment 2 (T2), transitioned from finisher to heat load diet (HLD) on d 4 and fed HLD until d 16; 3) Treatment 3 (T3), fed finisher and supplemented with a calcareous marine algae (CMA; Acid Buffer, Celtic Sea Minerals) on d 4 until d 16. On d 17, T2 and T3 transitioned back to the finisher. Days were split into three phases consisting of i) d 0 to 6 [PI, Temperature Humidity Index (THI), THI 65-78]; ii) d 7 to 11 (PII, THI 83-87); iii) d 12 to 20 (PIII, THI 65-78). Data were analyzed using a repeated measures model, with a first order auto-regressive error structure, including fixed effects for treatment, phase, day and hour, with animal ID as a random effect. Body weight declined (P < 0.005) during PII, with steers losing on average, 17.65 ± 3.06 kg BW/steer (T1), 12.30 ± 3.06 kg BW/steer (T2) and 16.20 ± 3.06 kg BW/steer (T3) at conclusion of PII, with muscle atrophy visually evident (Table 1). There were no effects (P ≥ 0.93) for treatment on ADG. During PII, DMI decreased (P < 0.005), with T2 and T3 having >2kg DMIּ steer-1ּ d-1 greater (P ≤ 0.006) DMI compared with T1. During PIII, T1 maintained decreased (P ≤ 0.001) DMI compared with T2 and T3. During PII, mean WI increased (P ≤ 0.05) for T1 and T3, although remained unchanged (P = 0.11) for T2, TRUM increased (P < 0.0001), whilst range in TRUM decreased (P ≤ 0.01) for all TRT and rumen pH for T2 and T3 decreased (P ≤ 0.0003), whilst T1 tended (P ≥ 0.05) to decrease. Rumen pH diurnal rhythms were disrupted during PII, range in rumen pH also reduced (P < 0.0001) for T1 and T3, remaining unchanged (P = 0.94) for T2. Mean rumen pH was lower (P ≤ 0.002) during PIII compared with PI for all treatments. Both T2 and T3 had a lower (P ≤ 0.05) range in rumen pH than T1 during PIII. Data from the current study suggest that feeding strategies to include CMA may aide in moderating DMI reductions observed during and post-heat stress periods, whilst also reducing the range in rumen pH during post-heat wave conditions when rumen dysfunction challenges may present.
Read full abstract