Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agents Dose Research Articles

Androgen Deficiency, Associations and Survival of Men With Stage 4 and 5 Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cohort Study.

Anaemia is a key cause of morbidity in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Androgen deficiency (AD) in males can contribute to anaemia of all causes, including in CKD. We sought to examine the prevalence of AD in men with CKD, the extent to which it contributed to anaemia and whether it was independently associated with long-term survival. This cross-sectional observational study was conducted among males aged 18 years and over with CKD stages 4 and 5. The study analysed morning blood samples with regard to their full blood count, urea and electrolytes, albumin, lipids, testosterone (T) and sex hormone binding globulin, with calculation of free testosterone by mass action equation. Mortality data were obtained 15 years later for survival analysis. Among 322 patients with a mean age of 63 years, the overall prevalence of AD was 68.9%. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) dose and testosterone concentrations (Pearson correlation -0.193, p = 0.05). There was a positive correlation between haemoglobin (Hb) and free testosterone level among patients not on ESA therapy (Pearson correlation 0.331, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier plots showed p < 0.001 on log-rank analysis, indicating that AD was significantly associated with worse survival. However, in Cox regression analysis, free testosterone was not associated with survival (95% CI for free testosterone 0.997-1.000). AD is highly prevalent among this population, and increases further with older age and more severe CKD warranting haemodialysis. Association of lower Hb and higher ESA dose with lower T concentration might be causative, which has important pharmaco-economic as well as clinical implications. Lower survival in men with low T, more likely reflects overall poor health rather than causation. A properly constituted randomised controlled study evaluating the effect of native T replacement is warranted in men with CKD and AD.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for preventing acute kidney injury.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is characterised by a rapid decline in kidney function and is caused by a variety of clinical conditions. The incidence of AKI in hospitalised adults is high. In animal studies, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) have been shown to act as a novel nephroprotective agent against ischaemic, toxic, and septic AKI by inhibiting apoptosis, promoting cell proliferation, and inducing antioxidant and anti-inflammatory responses. As a result, ESAs may reduce the incidence of AKI in humans. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted on the efficacy and safety of ESAs, but no prior systematic reviews exist that comprehensively examine ESAs with respect to AKI prevention, although the effectiveness of these agents has been examined for a range of other diseases and clinical situations. This review aimed to look at the benefits and harms of ESAs for preventing AKI in the context of any health condition. We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 30 August 2024 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included RCTs and quasi-RCTs (in which allocation to treatment was based on alternate assignment or order of medical records, admission dates, date of birth or other non-random methods) that compared ESAs with placebo or standard care in people at risk of AKI. Three authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias for included studies. We used random-effects model meta-analyses to perform quantitative synthesis of the data. We used the I2 statistic to measure heterogeneity amongst the studies in each analysis. We indicated summary estimates as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with their 95% confidence interval (CI). We assessed the certainty of the evidence for each main outcome using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A total of 20 studies (36 records, 5348 participants) were included. The number of participants ranged from 10 to 1302, and most studies were carried out in single centres (13/20). All the included studies compared ESAs to placebo or usual care. Many of the studies were judged to have unclear or high risk of reporting bias, but were at low risk for other types of bias. ESAs, when compared to control interventions, probably makes little or no difference to the risk of AKI (18 studies, 5314 participants: RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.10; I² = 19%; moderate-certainty evidence), or death (18 studies, 5263 participants: RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.06; I² = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence), and may make little or no difference to the initiation of dialysis (14 studies, 2059 participants: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.51; I² = 0%; low-certainty evidence). Even with standardised measurement of AKI, the studies showed no difference in results between different routes of administration (subcutaneous or intravenous), background diseases (cardiac surgeries, children or neonates, other adults at risk of AKI), or duration or dose of ESA. ESAs may make little or no difference to the risk of thrombosis when compared to control interventions (8 studies, 3484 participants: RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.24; I² = 0%). Similarly, ESAs may have little or no effect on kidney function measures and adverse events such as myocardial infarction, stroke or hypertension. However, this may be due to the low incidence of these adverse events. In patients at risk of AKI, ESAs probably do not reduce the risk of AKI or death and may not reduce the need for starting dialysis. Similarly, there may be no differences in kidney function measures and adverse events such as thrombosis, myocardial infarction, stroke or hypertension. There are currently two ongoing studies that have either not been completed or published, and it is unclear whether they will change the results. Caution should be exercised when using ESAs to prevent AKI.

Evaluation of hepcidin-25/erythroferrone ratio as a potential biomarker for iron utility and erythropoiesis responsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating therapy in comparison to immature erythrocyte/reticulocyte parameters in hemodialysis patients

Anemia-associated chronic kidney disease increases in more advanced stages with a subsequent acceleration in renal impairment progressing to end-stage renal disease. Although hepcidin and erythroferrone have been described as novel biomarkers of iron metabolism, there is still an area of ambiguity regarding iron utility in anemia-associated end-stage renal disease. This study aims to determine the correlations between erythropoietin, erythroferrone, and hepcidin-25 in hemodialysis, and to evaluate the clinical utility of the hepcidin-25/erythroferrone ratio as a biomarker of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent effectiveness compared to reticulocyte maturation parameters. Serum erythropoietin, erythroferrone, and hepcidin-25 levels in 35 dialysis-dependent patients on a maintenance dose of a short-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agent were consequently assessed on Days 0, 5, and 7. The erythropoiesis activity was monitored by measuring the increment in reticulocyte maturation parameters. Though the effectiveness of erythropoiesis in these patients was not associated with the hepcidin-25/erythroferrone ratio, it was lower among those with effective erythropoiesis than those with ineffective erythropoiesis. The effective group showed a statistically significant increase in reticulocyte maturation parameters compared to the ineffective group. The findings show the pathogenesis of iron homeostasis in hemodialysis, the validity of hepcidin-25/erythroferrone ratio as a biomarker of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent effectiveness, and the advantageous monitoring of reticulocyte maturation measures to improve management of anemia-associated chronic kidney disease.

Treatment of Anemia Associated with Chronic Kidney Disease: Plea for Considering Physiological Erythropoiesis.

Traditionally, the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) involves prescribing erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) or iron preparations. The effectiveness and safety of ESAs and iron have been established. However, several clinical issues, such as hyporesponsiveness to ESAs or defective iron utilization for erythropoiesis, have been demonstrated. Recently, a new class of therapeutics for renal anemia known as hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)/proline hydroxylase (PH) inhibitors has been developed. Several studies have reported that HIF-PH inhibitors have unique characteristics compared with those of ESAs. In particular, the use of HIF-PH inhibitors may maintain target Hb concentration in patients treated with a high dose of ESAs without increasing the dose. Furthermore, several recent studies have demonstrated that patients with CKD with defective iron utilization for erythropoiesis had a high risk of cardiovascular events or premature death. HIF-PH inhibitors increase iron transport and absorption from the gastrointestinal tract; thus, they may ameliorate defective iron utilization for erythropoiesis in patients with CKD. Conversely, several clinical problems, such as aggravation of thrombotic and embolic complications, diabetic retinal disease, and cancer, have been noted at the time of HIF-PH inhibitor administration. Recently, several pooled analyses of phase III trials have reported the non-inferiority of HIF-PH inhibitors regarding these clinical concerns compared with ESAs. The advantages and issues of anemia treatment by ESAs, iron preparations, and HIF-PH inhibitors must be fully understood. Moreover, patients with anemia and CKD should be treated by providing a physiological erythropoiesis environment that is similar to that of healthy individuals.

Effects of Individualized Anemia Therapy on Hemoglobin Stability: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial in Patients on Hemodialysis.

Anemia is common among hemodialysis patients. Maintaining stable hemoglobin levels within predefined target levels can be challenging, particularly in patients with frequent hemoglobin fluctuations both above and below the desired targets. We conducted a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial comparing our anemia therapy assistance software against a standard population-based anemia treatment protocol. We hypothesized that personalized dosing of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) improves hemoglobin target attainment. Ninety-six patients undergoing hemodialysis and receiving methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta were randomized 1:1 to the intervention group (personalized ESA dose recommendations computed by the software) or the standard of care group for twenty-six weeks. The therapy assistance software combined a physiology-based mathematical model and a model predictive controller designed to stabilize hemoglobin levels within a tight target range (10 to 11 g/dl). The primary outcome measure was the percentage of hemoglobin measurements within the target. Secondary outcome measures included measures of hemoglobin variability and ESA utilization. The intervention group showed an improved median percentage of hemoglobin measurements within target at 47% (IQR 39 to 58), with a 10 percentage points median difference between the two groups (95% CI: 3 to 16; P=0.008). The odds ratio of being within the hemoglobin target in the standard of care group compared to the group receiving the personalized ESA recommendations was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.51 to 0.92). The variability of hemoglobin levels decreased in the intervention group, with the percentage of patients experiencing fluctuating hemoglobin levels being 45% vs 82% in the standard of care group. ESA usage was reduced by about 25% in the intervention group. Our results demonstrated an improved hemoglobin target attainment and variability by employing personalized ESA recommendations using the physiology-based anemia therapy assistance software.

Household Water Lead and Hematologic Toxic Effects in Chronic Kidney Disease

The consequences of low levels of environmental lead exposure, as found commonly in US household water, have not been established. To examine whether commonly encountered levels of lead in household water are associated with hematologic toxicity among individuals with advanced kidney disease, a group known to have disproportionate susceptibility to environmental toxicants. Cross-sectional analysis of household water lead concentrations and hematologic outcomes was performed among patients beginning dialysis at a Fresenius Medical Care outpatient facility between January 1, 2017, and December 20, 2021. Data analysis was performed from April 1 to August 15, 2023. Concentrations of lead in household water were examined in categorical proportions of the Environmental Protection Agency's allowable threshold (15 μg/L) and continuously. Hematologic toxic effects were defined by monthly erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) dosing during the first 90 days of incident kidney failure care and examined as 3 primary outcomes: a proportion receiving maximum or higher dosing, continuously, and by a resistance index that normalized to body weight and hemoglobin concentrations. Secondarily, hemoglobin concentrations for patients with data prior to kidney failure onset were examined, overall and among those with concurrent iron deficiency, thought to increase gastrointestinal absorption of ingested lead. Among 6404 patients with incident kidney failure (male, 4182 [65%]; mean [SD] age, 57 [14] years) followed up for the first 90 days of dialysis therapy, 12% (n = 742) had measurable lead in household drinking water. A higher category of household lead contamination was associated with 15% (odds ratio [OR], 1.15 [95% CI, 1.04-1.27]) higher risk of maximum monthly ESA dosing, 4.5 (95% CI, 0.8-8.2) μg higher monthly ESA dose, and a 0.48% (95% CI, 0.002%-0.96%) higher monthly resistance index. Among patients with pre-kidney failure hemoglobin measures (n = 2648), a higher household lead categorization was associated with a 0.12 (95% CI, -0.23 to -0.002) g/dL lower hemoglobin concentration, particularly among those with concurrent iron deficiency (multiplicative interaction, P = .07), among whom hemoglobin concentrations were 0.25 (95% CI, -0.47 to -0.04) g/dL lower. The findings of this study suggest that levels of lead found commonly in US drinking water may be associated with lead poisoning among susceptible individuals.

#2063 Safety and efficacy of vadadustat vs darbepoetin alfa in patients on maintenance dialysis by prespecified subgroups of baseline ESA dose

Abstract Background and Aims Vadadustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor approved in Europe, Australia, Japan for the treatment of anemia in patients with dialysis-dependent (DD)-CKD. In the INNO2VATE global phase 3 trials in patients with DD-CKD, including 2 separate trials in patients new to dialysis [NCT02865850] and on maintenance dialysis [NCT02892149], vadadustat was noninferior to the erythropoiesis -stimulating agent (ESA) darbepoetin alfa for cardiovascular safety and hemoglobin efficacy. Among patients with DD-CKD, high ESA dose requirements have been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications. In this secondary analysis, we compared cardiovascular safety and hematological efficacy of vadadustat and darbepoetin alfa across baseline ESA dose categories. Method In the INNO2VATE trials, 3554 patients on maintenance dialysis were randomized 1:1 to vadadustat or darbepoetin alfa, stratified according to geographic region, New York Heart Association heart failure classification, and hemoglobin concentration at trial entry. Data were analyzed for prespecified subgroups of patients categorized by their baseline ESA (epoetin alfa/equivalents) dose: low (&amp;lt;90 U/kg/week), intermediate (90-299 U/kg/week), or high (≥300 U/kg/week). Within these dose subgroups, the key safety endpoint was the first occurrence of an adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE: first occurrence of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], or nonfatal stroke) using a time-to-event analysis. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were mean change in hemoglobin concentration from baseline during the primary (weeks 24-36) and secondary (weeks 40-52) evaluation periods, respectively. Results More participants were in the low (vadadustat: n = 916 [53%], darbepoetin alfa: n = 968 [55%]) and intermediate (vadadustat: n = 724 [42%], darbepoetin alfa: n = 693 [39%]) than in the high (vadadustat: n = 102 [6%], darbepoetin alfa: n = 98 [6%]) baseline ESA dose subgroups. Hazard ratios for the occurrence of first MACE between vadadustat and darbepoetin alfa in the 3 baseline ESA dose subgroups were as follows: low dose, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.81 to 1.23); intermediate dose, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.18); and high dose, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.34 to 1.14) (Fig.). Similar results were observed for other key MACE-related endpoints, including all-cause mortality, MACE plus hospitalizations for heart failure or thromboembolic events, cardiovascular MACE (first occurrence of cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke), and cardiovascular death. Mean hemoglobin concentrations increased in both treatment groups throughout the trial period. The least squares mean treatment difference (vadadustat compared to darbepoetin alfa) for change in hemoglobin concentration from baseline to the primary efficacy period was –0.10 g/dL (95% CI, –0.19 to –0.02), –0.20 g/dL (95% CI, –0.30 to –0.09), and –0.39 g/dL (95% CI, –0.67 to –0.11) for the low, intermediate, and high baseline ESA dose subgroups, respectively. Similar results were observed for the secondary efficacy period. Across baseline ESA dose subgroups, the proportion of patients whose average hemoglobin concentration was within target range was similar between the vadadustat and darbepoetin alfa arms during the primary efficacy period (low: odds ratio [OR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74, 1.08; intermediate: OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.70, 1.09; high: OR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.49, 1.64). Similar results were observed during the secondary efficacy period. Conclusion The cardiovascular safety and efficacy of vadadustat was similar to darbepoetin alfa in patients with DD-CKD irrespective of baseline ESA dose. In patients requiring higher ESA doses at baseline, the risk of MACE was numerically (but not significantly) lower in vadadustat-treated patients. Further investigation is required to confirm or refute this trend.

#2315 Impact of iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dose on mortality of hemodialysis patients with cancer

Abstract Background and Aims Anemia and iron deficiencies are frequent in hemodialysis (HD) patients and in patients with cancer. If specific guidelines on the management of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) in HD patients with cancer have been published, the association between the iron status and the risk of morbidity and mortality in this population remains elusive. Method This retrospective, observational study include HD patients who had been diagnosed with cancer after the start of HD, between September 2009 and March 2021. Demographics, lab test, iron status and cumulative dose of iron and ESA were collected quarterly, from one year before cancer diagnosis to one year after. Univariate analyses were performed to assess the impact of iron or ESA exposure on mortality, after modelling exposure before and after diagnosis of cancer. Then, each model was adjusted, using the baseline variables that were found to be independently associated with mortality. Cox proportional-hazards modelling was used for all regression analyses. P-value &amp;lt; .05 is considered significant. Results Seventy-nine patients were included, with a median follow-up of 2.2 years (IQR: 0.9–5.3). At baseline, the median age was 72 years (IQR 63–79), 30.4% were women. The median dialysis vintage before the diagnosis of cancer was 3 years (IQR 2-7). The main cancers found were prostate (14%), colorectal (13%), bronchopulmonary (11%), urothelial (10%) and skin (10%). Lymph node involvement were observed in 18% and metastasis in 16% patients. The median hemoglobin level was 10.4 g/dL (IQR 9.9–11.7), the median ferritin level was 412 ng/mL (IQR 213–626). The median cumulative quarterly dose of iron was 600 (215–900) mg and the cumulative dose of ESA was 71 (IQR 40–148) UI/kg/week of darbopoetin alfa or equivalent. The year following the cancer diagnosis, the median dose of iron administered remained stable, but with significant variations between patients. There was an increase in the median dose of ESA, particularly after the 6th month, up to 134 (35–314) UI/kg/week. The median hemoglobin remained between 10 and 12 g/dL. The median ferritin level rises moderately during the first 6 months, then returns to values equivalent to those preceding the diagnosis of cancer. Mortality after 12 months of follow-up was high (mortality rate of 47.4%). Age, the presence of a atrial fibrillation, lymphatic invasion, metastatic invasion, or the need for more than one antitumor treatment were independently associated with mortality. In adjusted analysis (using baseline characteristics associated with death), an association with all-cause mortality was only observed with the cumulative dose of ESA in the year preceding the diagnosis of cancer (HR 1.41 [1.06–1.88], P = .017). In multivariate analysis, an association was observed between all-cause mortality and the cumulative dose of ESA in the year preceding the diagnosis of cancer, with an HR of 1.37 (1.03-1.83, P = .031). This association between all-cause mortality and cumulative dose of ESA was also found in the year following cancer diagnosis, but without reaching significance (HR 1.37 [0.95-1.98], P = .092). However, there was no association between mortality and the cumulative dose of iron administered before or after the diagnosis of cancer in multivariate analyses. Conclusion In HD patients diagnosed with cancer, the amount of iron administered was not associated with an increased risk of mortality, probably making it possible to increase the doses administered, if necessary, without any additional risk. However, it was not possible to guarantee the safety of increasing the dose of ESA in these patients. These findings should be confirmed in a larger population in order to define guideline for iron and ESA supplementation in this population.

Clinical application and future perspectives of HIF-PH inhibitors

Anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) occurs due to insufficient production of erythropoietin to compensate for the decrease in hemoglobin. Anemia in CKD has traditionally been treated with periodic injections of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), which are recombinant human erythropoietin preparations. Although ESA improved anemia in CKD and dramatically improved the quality of life of patients, there are some patients who are hyporesponsive to ESA, and the use of large doses of ESA in these patients may have a negative impact on patient prognosis. Currently, HIF prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitors have been approved in Japan as a new treatment for anemia in CKD. HIF-PH inhibitors activate HIF and promote the production of endogenous erythropoietin. The 2019 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded for groundbreaking research that uncovered the HIF pathway. Because HIF-PH inhibitors improve both erythropoietin production and iron metabolism, they are expected to be effective in treating ESA hyporesponsiveness and solve the inconvenience of injectable preparations. On the other hand, its effects are systemic and multifaceted, and long-term effects must be closely monitored.

Theranova versus FX80: The impact on anemia management in hemodialysis.

Middle uremic toxins (MUTs) can cause anemia and erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness. Theranova dialyzers may improve anemia management by removing MUTs. Hence, the impact of Theranova dialyzers on erythropoietin responsiveness was studied. This exploratory single-center prospective observational study, encompassing 50 patients undergoing dialysis with either the Theranova-400 or FX80 membrane for 6 months, involved monthly tracking of hemoglobin levels, weight-adjusted erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (w-ESA) dosing, and erythropoietin resistance index (ERI), with ESA treatment decisions guided by a proprietary algorithm. The groups were similar in terms of demographics and baseline laboratory test results. The median hemoglobin levels, w-ESA and ERI, were found to be similar between FX80 and Theranova-400 groups at both baseline (11.06 vs 10.57, p = 0.808; 92.3 vs 105.2, p = 0.838; 8.1 vs 10.48, p = 0.876) and the end of the study (11.43 vs 11.03, p = 0.076; 48.7 vs 71.5; 4.48 vs 6.41, p = 0.310), respectively. There was a trend toward lower w-ESA and ERI at the end of the study compared to baseline in both groups, but the difference was non-significant. Based on this study of 50 patients undergoing high-flux dialysis with near-target hemoglobin levels, switching to Theranova 400 dialyzers compared to FX80 dialyzers did not show statistically significant differences in maintaining hemoglobin levels, reducing ESA dose, or lowering ERI. The non-randomized design and small sample size limit the study's power to detect true differences. Larger, randomized trials are needed to confirm findings and definitively assess Theranova 400's benefits.

Impact of C-reactive protein on the effect of Roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundChronic inflammation, reflected by an increased blood C-reactive protein (CRP) level, is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is involved in the development of renal anemia. This systematic review aims to investigate the impacts of CRP on the efficacy of hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) in the treatment of renal anemia in patients with CKD.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases including Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), from their inception to May 19, 2022. We systematically reviewed evidence from randomized controlled trials using HIF-PHIs for renal anemia treatment. The mean difference (MD) in changes in hemoglobin concentration (∆Hb) before and after treatment served as the meta-analysis outcome, utilizing a random-effects model. We compared groups with CRP levels greater than or equal to the upper limit of normal (ULN) and less than the ULN. Additionally, further analysis was conducted in the CRP ≥ ULN group comparing HIF-PHIs and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA).ResultsA total of 7 studies from 6 publications were included in the analysis. In the comparison between the CRP ≥ ULN group and the CRP < ULN group, 524 patients from 4 studies were incorporated into the analysis. All patients received roxadustat as the primary intervention. The pooled results revealed no significant difference in ΔHb between patients with CRP ≥ ULN and CRP < ULN at baseline (Mean Difference: 0.00, 95% Confidence Interval: -0.32 to 0.33, P = 0.99). Moreover, within the CRP ≥ ULN group, three studies involving 1399 patients compared the efficacy of roxadustat and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). The results indicated no significant difference in ΔHb between patients treated with ESAs and HIF-PHIs (Mean Difference: 0.24, 95% Confidence Interval: -0.08 to 0.56, P = 0.14). In terms of medication dosage, an increase in ESA dose over time was observed across various studies, particularly evident in the CRP ≥ ULN group, while the dose of roxadustat remains constant over time and is not influenced by the baseline levels of CRP.ConclusionsOur systematic review demonstrates that roxadustat exhibits similar efficacy across different CRP levels. Moreover, within the CRP ≥ ULN group, roxadustat can maintain efficacy comparable to ESA without the necessity for dose escalation.Trial registrationCRD42023396704.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Hyporesponsiveness to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Hemodialysis Patients: Results from the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.

Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) is important problem in dialysis patients. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may inhibit iron absorption, few studies have examined associations between PPIs and ESA-resistant anemia in hemodialysis patients. This study examined the associations between PPIs and ESA-resistant anemia in hemodialysis patients. The present study was a cross-sectional study using repeated 4-month observations, up to eight observations/patient, from the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (J-DOPPS). The primary outcome was erythropoietin resistance index (ERI). ESA dose, hemoglobin, proportion of erythropoietin-resistant anemia, transferrin saturation (TSAT), and ferritin were also examined. Linear or risk-difference regression models were used with generalized estimating equations to account for repeated measurements. Of 1,644 patients, 867 patients had PPI prescriptions (52.7%). Patients prescribed PPI had higher ERI, higher ESA dose, and lower TSAT levels. Multivariable analysis for 12,048 four-month observations showed significantly greater ERI in PPI users (adjusted difference 0.95 IU/week/kg/[g/dL] [95% CI: 0.40-1.50]). Significant differences were also found in ESA dose (336 IU/week [95% CI: 70-602]) and the prevalence of erythropoietin-resistant anemia (3.9% [2.0-5.8%]) even after adjusted for TSAT and ferritin. Among possible mediators between the association of PPIs and anemia, TSAT was significantly different between PPI users and non-users (adjusted difference, -0.82% [95% CI: -1.56 to -0.07]). This study showed the associations between PPI and ERI, ESA dose, and TSAT in hemodialysis patients; physicians should consider anemia's associations with PPIs in hemodialysis patients.

The Influence of Precursor Depletion and dose Regimens on Resistance to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents: Insights from Simulations with Instantaneous Dose-Adaptation Algorithm

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have been a common treatment for anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD), while 10–20 % of patients continue to suffer from persistent anemia despite receiving ESA treatments. Our previous findings suggested that intensive ESA usage can cause resistance by depleting the erythroid precursor cells. Here, we used a mechanism-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model of ESAs and conducted simulations to evaluate the influence of dose regimens and other factors (such as administration route, individual PK/PD parameters, types of ESAs, and disease status) on ESA resistance with instantaneous dose adaptations in healthy populations and anemic patients. The simulated results show that instantaneous dose-adaptation can reduce ESA resistance, but up to 30 % of subjects still ended up developing ESA resistance in healthy populations. The Smax is markedly higher in hypo-responders than in normal-responders, while hypo-responders possess fewer precursors and experience a faster decline compared to normal-responders. There is a ceiling effect of increasing ESA dosage to improve HGB responses and reduce ESA resistance, and the limit is lower in anemic patients compared to healthy populations. Subcutaneous administrations and ESAs with longer half-lives lead to stronger HGB responses and less resistance at equivalent doses. Taken together, this study indicates that precursor depletion contributes to ESA resistance and dose regimens can greatly influence the occurrence of ESA resistance. Furthermore, ESA treatment for patients showing ESA resistance should avoid continuously increasing doses and instead consider stimulating the renewal of precursors.

Market Competition and Anemia Management in the United States Following Dialysis Payment Reform.

Whether market competition influences health care provider responses to national reimbursement reforms is unknown. We examined whether changes in anemia management after the expansion of Medicare's dialysis payment bundle varied with market competition. With data from the US dialysis registry, we used a difference-in-differences (DID) design to estimate the independent associations of market competition with changes in anemia management after dialysis reimbursement reform. A total of 326,150 patients underwent in-center hemodialysis in 2009 and 2012, representing periods before and after reimbursement reform. Outcomes were erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) and intravenous iron dosage, the probability of hemoglobin <9g/dL, hospitalizations, and mortality. We also examined serum ferritin concentration, an indicator of body iron stores. We used a dichotomous market competition index, with less competitive areas defined as effectively having <2 competing dialysis providers. Compared with areas with more competition, patients in less competitive areas had slightly more pronounced declines in ESA dose (60% vs. 57%) following reimbursement reform (DID estimate: -3%; 95% CI, -5% to -1%) and less pronounced declines in intravenous iron dose (-14% vs. -19%; DID estimate: 5%; 95% CI, 1%-9%). The likelihoods of hemoglobin <9g/dL, hospitalization, and mortality did not vary with market competition. Serum ferritin concentrations in 2012 were 4% (95% CI, 3%-6%) higher in less competitive areas. After the expansion of Medicare's dialysis payment bundle, ESA use declined by more, and intravenous iron use declined by less in concentrated markets. More aggressive cost-reduction strategies may be implemented in less competitive markets.

Contemporary Practice of Anemia Treatment Among Dialysis Patients in the United States

The treatment of anemia is a major activity in the care of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD). The comparative effectiveness of new pharmacologic treatments, relative to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), should be anticipated on the bases of controlled trials and current practice. We describe the contemporary practice of anemia treatment in a national cohort of patients undergoing maintenance HD. We analyzed the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) data to identify adult patients undergoing in-facility HD in 2016 to 2019. Using the Consolidated Renal Operations in a Web-Enabled Network (CROWNWeb) dataset, we identified hemoglobin and ESA utilization (agent and cumulative dose) during each patient-month, as well as intravenous (IV) iron utilization, ferritin, and transferrin saturation. We compared ESA dosing during the study era to dosing in the Normal Hematocrit Cardiac Trial (NHCT), conducted in the 1990s. We assessed ESA hyporesponsiveness by estimating the prevalence of the following: (i) high erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) and (ii) either 3 or 6 consecutive months with hemoglobin<10 g/dl. Nearly two-thirds of patient-months had hemoglobin of 10.0 to 11.9 g/dl. Mean ESA utilization was 76.7% per month, with increasing use of pegylated epoetin beta. ESA dosing was stable; epoetin alfa dosing was slightly lower than in the low-target arm of the NHCT. The prevalence of ESA hyporesponsiveness was 22.2% if defined by high ERI, but only 2.1% to 6.0% if defined by 3 to 6 consecutive months with hemoglobin<10 g/dl. Median transferrin saturation was 22.3% with high ERI and persistently low hemoglobin. Hemoglobin and ESA dosing distributions are stable, with epoetin alfa dosing below the low-target arm of the NHCT. Persistently low hemoglobin occurs infrequently and may reflect iron depletion.

#3258 MECHANISMS OF HEMOGLOBIN CYCLING IN ANEMIC END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE PATIENTS TREATED WITH ERYTHROPOIESIS-STIMULATING AGENTS

Abstract Background and Aims A considerable fraction of renal anemia patients treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) experience hemoglobin ‘cycling’ periods during which hemoglobin levels periodically over- and undershoot a specified target range [1]. This is an undesired condition, which also necessitates frequent adjustment of the drug dose. The causes of hemoglobin cycling are not understood on a fundamental level. Through a combination of biomedical simulations and quantitative data analysis, we aimed at identifying mechanisms of hemoglobin cycling and the physiological and treatment-related factors contributing to cycling. Method We developed a biomedical modeling and simulation scheme that captures the essential features of ESA therapy involving a minimal feedback model for the delayed hemoglobin response after ESA administration and a stereotypic ESA dosing algorithm [2]. In this model, hemoglobin cycling emerged as a consequence of the delayed feedback between a patient's physiological response to ESA administrations and the resulting dose adjustments, which mutually maintain themselves in a causal loop. Guided by this model, we developed a set of statistical indicators that can detect this type of self-sustained hemoglobin cycling in clinical time series, including the Pearson cross correlation between hemoglobin levels and given ESA doses and hemoglobin standard deviation. Results A model analysis showed that physiological and treatment-related delays in hemoglobin response and ESA dose adjustment and administration were a major driver of hemoglobin cycling. Such delays are caused, e.g., by the cell cycle and maturation times of erythroid progenitors in response to ESA administration on one hand and restrictions in ESA dose changes and typical administration intervals on the other hand. In clinical time series, this was reflected by a systematic delay between bursts of ESA administrations and hemoglobin cycles. We quantified 1134 such datasets from hemodialysis patients and found that more persistent cycling was associated with negative correlation coefficients between hemoglobin levels and ESA doses. Using model simulations with similar behavior, we found that many patient- and therapy-related factors affect the hemoglobin dynamics in several (sometimes competing) ways, obfuscating their overall effect. For example, a larger RBC lifespan generally both entails higher hemoglobin levels but also prolongs the effect of ESA misdosings. However, model simulations suggested that longer RBC lifespans generally have a favorable effect in requiring less ESA on average and preventing hemoglobin cycling. Moreover, the model showed that for a given patient, ESA-specific properties such as its half-life may have a ‘sweet spot’ range of values within which hemoglobin cycling was suppressed while still showing a desired effect on the hemoglobin dynamics. Furthermore, the choice of the hemoglobin target window had an impact on hemoglobin stability. If the window was chosen too small, more frequent dose adjustments could initiate and maintain a cycling behavior. Conclusion Hemoglobin cycling in renal anemia patients often emerges from a complex interplay of multiple physiological and ESA treatment-related factors, with delays between ESA administration, hemoglobin response and subsequent ESA dose adjustment being a key driver of cycling. Biomedical modeling and simulation can aid in systematically exploring these interplays and find improved dosing strategies.

#5864 EFFECT OF IV FERRIC CARBOXYMALTOSE ON PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE AND QOL IN PATIENTS WITH CKD NOT ON DIALYSIS, MILD ANEMIA AND IRON DEFICIENCY

Abstract Background and Aims Iron deficiency (ID) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent and contributes to a poorer quality of life. According to current guidelines, treatment with intravenous (IV) iron is limited to CKD patients with ID and anemia to avoid/delay the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) or the reduce the doses of ESA in patients treated with these drugs. Considering the effects of the correction of ID in other settings, we hypothetized that treatment with IV iron in patients with ID and borderline anemia can improve physical performance and their quality of life, independent of the effects on hemoglobin. Method Prospective, unicentric, single-arm study in CKD patients with ID, mild anemia and with-out heart failure. The inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years, CKD patients stages 3–5 not on dialysis, iron deficiency (ferritin &amp;lt;100 ng/ml or ferritin &amp;lt;200 ng/ml if TSAT &amp;lt;20%), mild anaemia (Hb 10.5-11.5 g/dL). At the baseline visit, after all the studies were performed, iv ferric carboxymaltose was administered in a single dose, according to the degree of ID calculated by the Ganzoni´s formula. The co-primary outcome was the change in physical performance, evaluated through the 6 minute-walk test (6MWT) at one week and at four weeks. Secondary end-points: Patient's global assessment (PGA) and quality of life (EQ-5D), Piper's fatigue test, serum phosphorous at four week. Laboratory data, PGA, EQ-5D and Piper test questionnaires were evaluated at baseline, and at weeks 1 and 4 after receiving IV ferric carboximaltose. Results 41 patients completed the study. Primary end-point: the 6MWT increased significantly from 296 ± 101 m to 314 ± 106 m at week 1 (p&amp;lt;0.01), and to 325 ±111 meters at week 4 (p&amp;lt;0.01). at week 4 (p = 0.083). A significant improvement in the PGA test values was detected when compared baseline vs 4 weeks (adjusted p value = 0.031). No significant differences were found between the baseline and week 1 (adjusted p value = 0.083), and week 1 and week 4 visits (adjusted p value = 0.086). No significant differences were found between the initial, 1-week, and 4-week visits in the EQ-5D quality of life questionnaire nor Piper's fatigue test. Phosphorus levels decreased significantly at week 1 from baseline (3.16 ± 0.7 vs 3.72 ± 0.6) (adjusted p&amp;lt;0.001), with a partial recovery of serum levels in week 4 (3.57 ± 0.7 mg/dL). There were no significant increases in hemoglobin concentration between the different time periods. Conclusion IV ferric carboximaltose administration significantly improved the functional capacity of CKD patients with ID in short term. PGA also improved slightly but significantly. Effects that were independent of hemoglobin changes, suggesting a role of ID for a lower physical performance in CKD patients without heart failure, independent of the presence of anemia.

#3715 THE EFFECT OF DAPRODUSTAT ON INTRAVENOUS IRON USE IN PATIENTS WITH CKD-RELATED ANAEMIA ON DIALYSIS IN THE ASCEND TRIALS

Abstract Background and Aims Intravenous (IV) iron is frequently needed in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) to ensure sufficient iron is available for erythropoiesis. However high doses of IV iron and erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) may be associated with risks in these patients [1]. The hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase domain inhibitor daprodustat was non-inferior to comparator ESAs for the primary endpoint of efficacy (change-in-Hb) in the multicentre, randomised, Phase 3 trials ASCEND-D (NCT02879305) [2] and ASCEND-TD (NCT03400033) [3], also for the safety (major adverse cardiovascular [CV] events) coprimary endpoint in ASCEND-D [2]. This analysis of ASCEND-D and ASCEND-TD compared daprodustat to active ESAs on measures of IV iron use in dialysis patients. Method Daprodustat and ESAs were compared in patients with CKD anaemia on haemodialysis/peritoneal dialysis (ASCEND-D); haemodialysis (ASCEND-TD). ASCEND-D (N = 2,964) was an open-label CV outcome study using daprodustat once daily, while ASCEND-TD (N = 407) was a double-blind, double-dummy, 52-week study investigating three times weekly dosing of daprodustat. In both studies, following randomisation, treatment dosage was titrated to achieve the Hb target range of 10.0–11.0g/dL, with Hb efficacy assessed during the evaluation period (EP), Weeks 28–52. All patients were required to have ferritin &amp;gt;100 ng/mL and/or transferrin saturation (TSAT) &amp;gt;20% at baseline for inclusion. Throughout the study, iron therapy was administered if ferritin was ≤100 ng/mL and/or TSAT was ≤20% so patients would remain iron replete throughout the study. Investigators chose the route and dose of iron administration per patient iron status and clinical judgement. Stopping threshold criteria of 800 ng/mL ferritin + TSAT &amp;gt;20%, or TSAT&amp;gt;40% were implemented to avoid iron overload, but investigators could stop administration of iron at levels below the protocol-defined stopping thresholds. The average monthly IV iron dose (mg)/patient to Week 52 was a principal secondary endpoint, while the proportion of patients who met iron management criteria with a decrease in monthly IV iron dose during the EP relative to baseline and until patients received first transfusion were exploratory endpoints. The baseline monthly IV iron dose was defined as the average monthly IV iron (mg) over the 16 weeks prior to randomisation for ASCEND-D and over the 12 weeks prior to randomisation for ASCEND-TD. Results The proportion of patients with IV iron use at baseline was similar in both treatment arms for ASCEND-D (64%) but lower in the daprodustat group in ASCEND-TD (63% vs 72% in the ESA group). In both studies the proportion of patients receiving IV iron during the EP decreased (ASCEND-D: daprodustat 49%, ESA 52%; ASCEND-TD: daprodustat 38%, ESA 40%). The average monthly IV iron dose during the EP and from Day 1 to Week 52 was lower than monthly IV iron dose at baseline, however daprodustat was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in monthly IV iron per patient to Week 52 vs ESA comparator (Table 1). After a period of IV iron requirements decreasing, based on adjustment to protocol-specified levels, IV iron dosage remained relatively stable for daprodustat and ESA (Figure 1). In ASCEND-D, 3 of 23 pre-defined subgroups (prior ESA dose group, ESA hyporesponders2, history of myocardial infarction) showed a trend towards heterogeneity (interaction p-value &amp;lt;0.1), with differences in monthly IV iron use in the prior ESA dose group receiving ≥7000 U/week (-21.2 mg/month) and in the ESA hyporesponder group (-31.7 mg/month) in favour of daprodustat. Fewer patients met the criteria for stopping iron while on daprodustat vs ESA, whereas the converse was observed in ASCEND-TD (Table 1). Conclusion In ASCEND-D and -TD, no clinically or statistically significant reduction in monthly IV iron use was seen with daprodustat vs ESA comparators, although there was a numerical decrease in the proportion of patients receiving IV iron during the EP for the daprodustat group in both studies.

#3648 INDIVIDUALIZED ANEMIA THERAPY IMPROVES HEMOGLOBIN OUTCOMES AND DECREASES EPOETIN BETA DRUG EXPOSURE IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS

Abstract Background and Aims Anemia is a common complication in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Its treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) is challenging due to a nonlinear dose-response relationship and time delays between ESA administration and hemoglobin (Hgb) response. Anemia treatment protocols are frequently used in clinical settings. However, high variability of patient-specific disease characteristics complicate attainment and maintenance of desired Hgb levels. We developed a novel fully personalized ESA dose recommendation tool and present clinical results of a multi-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT) using this software. Method We conducted an RCT in adult HD patients in six dialysis facilities in the US. Patients were randomized 1:1 and treated with our personalized ESA dose recommendation tool for twenty-six weeks (intervention group) or continued to be treated using an anemia protocol that was used as part of standard of care in those clinics (control group). The recommendation tool utilized a physiology-based model of anemia to estimate patient-specific physiological key characteristics, such as red blood cell lifespan, to create a patient-individual model from recent routine clinical data (gender, height, weight, Hgb measurements, and ESA treatment). These key characteristics and model-based outcome predictions were used to generate patient-specific ESA dose recommendations to stabilize Hgb levels in a target window of 10–11 g/dL. Dose recommendations were disseminated to the anemia managers of patients enrolled in the study for evaluation and further decision-making (Figure 1). This procedure was repeated biweekly with updated clinical data. Results Ninety-six patients were enrolled in the RCT. Patients were included in the statistical analysis when they remained in the clinical study for at least 30 days (n = 45 control group, n = 46 intervention group). We evaluated outcome measures showing efficacy and efficiency of the treatment in achieving target Hgb levels. Hgb-related outcomes were significantly different between the two study groups, with an improved Hgb control in the intervention arm, manifesting in a reduction of the Hgb distance to target by more than 30%. Epoetin-beta utilization in the intervention group was decreased by over 20%, while iron-related parameters showed no difference between the two arms (Table 1). Acceptance rate of dose recommendations was high; roughly 95% of the recommendations were accepted and implemented by the clinical staff. Conclusion A therapy software for personalized anemia management was developed for use with epoetin beta. The model-based ESA dose recommendation tool was evaluated in a clinical RCT in HD patients. Hgb control improved significantly in the group using the novel software tool, while ESA usage decreased, thus providing more efficient anemia management for the individual patient while reducing epoetin-beta drug exposure.

Clinical outcomes by SF3B1 mutation status in patients (pts) with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS) retreated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).

7071 Background: Pts with SF3B1-mutated LR-MDS often have a more favorable prognosis versus those with SF3B1 wildtype. A sizeable number of pts with LR-MDS undergo ESA treatment even after experiencing ESA failure in first line. This study evaluated the outcomes of pts with LR-MDS retreated with ESAs in routine clinical practice, stratified by SF3B1 status. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included pts with LR-MDS in the US community setting who initiated ESAs as first-line therapy between January 1, 2016 and June 30, 2019, and were followed through June 30, 2021. Eligible pts discontinued ESAs (treatment gap ≥ 3 wk for epoetin alfa or ≥ 6 wk for darbepoetin alfa) and subsequently reinitiated ESA therapy at least once during follow-up. Ring sideroblasts (RS) ≥ 15% served as a surrogate for pts with unknown SF3B1 mutation status. Outcomes included ESA switches, dose reductions and escalations, ESA failure, and overall survival (OS). Primary ESA failure was defined as no rise in hemoglobin (Hb) ≥ 1.5 g/dL or no decrease in RBC transfusion requirement by 8 wk of treatment. Transfusion-dependent (TD) status was evaluated for pts who were transfusion independent (TI) at baseline. Results: A total of 82 pts with LR-MDS and repeat ESA treatment were included. Median age at start of ESA treatment was 79 y (interquartile range [IQR], 72–85). Diagnosis of MDS-RS, MDS with isolated del(5q), MDS with multilineage dysplasia, and MDS with single lineage dysplasia was reported in 30 (36%), 7 (9%), 9 (11%), and 9 (11%) pts, respectively; 27 (33%) had unknown classification. Median follow-up was 26 mo (IQR, 13–38) with 65% failing ESA therapy by 8 wk. Table shows pts’ SF3B1 mutation status, median OS, pts who had an ESA switch, dose reduction or escalation, experienced ESA failure, and pts who were TI at baseline and became TD during follow-up. Results were similar when RS was not used as a surrogate, and when analyses were limited to pts who were treated with ESAs only throughout follow-up. Conclusions: In this study of pts with LR-MDS retreated with ESAs, primary ESA failure was high with nearly half of TI pts becoming TD during follow-up. OS was poor regardless of SF3B1 status – 2–4 times lower than the remaining life expectancy for a 79-y-old (108 mo for men; 125 mo for women). Although treatment options were limited during the study period, the high primary failure rate suggests that pts with LR-MDS may benefit from alternatives to ESAs. [Table: see text]