SESSION TITLE: Medical Student/Resident Pharmacotherapeutics SESSION TYPE: Med Student/Res Case Rep Postr PRESENTED ON: 10/09/2018 01:15 PM - 02:15 PM INTRODUCTION: Estrogens can increase the synthesis of several clotting factors and increase platelet aggregation.Intravenous estrogen therapy is used to manage uterine bleeding in hospitalized patients.The intravenous route is preferred for a more rapid response.Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially life-threatening consequence of estrogen therapy.This report describes a case of acute pulmonary embolism following two doses of intravenous conjugated estrogen in a female with no identifiable risk factors for VTE CASE PRESENTATION: 41 year old G3 P3 003 female presented with recurrent heavy vaginal bleed associated with clots and fatigue.Three weeks prior to this, she was admitted with weakness, fatigue, vaginal bleed was found to have a hemoglobin of 3.5g/dl, received 4 units of packed red blood cells.Transvaginal ultrasound at the time revealed a fibroid in the lower uterine segment and she was discharged with oral iron supplementation with her hemoglobin at discharge being 8.7g/dl. She was then referred for surgical management of the bleed. During the current admission for recurrent vaginal bleeding, hemoglobin was 9.8/dl. Physical examination revealed a prolapsed fibroid encompassing the cervical os. She received a one dose of 25mg of intravenous Premarin (conjugated estradiol).The same afternoon while receiving the second dose, she experienced severe chest pain and shortness of breath with desaturation, with an oxygen saturation of 79%. A Computed tomography angiography showed filling defects in the right lateral and posterior lower lobe segmental pulmonary artery embolus. She was started on a heparin drip and eventually underwent uterine artery embolization, which helped control her presenting symptoms. The intravenous Premarin was discontinued and she was transferred to the Intensive care unit.She was discharged on Rivaroxaban for 6 months. Given the fact that she was ambulatory and had no other risk factors for thromboembolic disease, Premarin was the presumed cause of her pulmonary embolus. DISCUSSION: Given that our patient is a young female with no comorbidities who was ambulatory, non-obese and a non-smoker with no family history of thrombophilia developed a pulmonary embolus during her inpatient stay, we would attribute the most likely cause of the event to be the dose of premarin that she received. Use of the Naranjo probability scale indicated a possible relationship between IV estrogen and development of pulmonary embolism in this patient.(1) CONCLUSIONS: The causal effect of dose of estrogen and the risk of thromboembolism has been previously established in those using oral contraceptives.(2) It has been determined that there is a direct correlation with dose and incidence of VTE and has been found to be the highest within the first three months of use. It would be of interest to analyze the risk of thromboembolic events with minimal estrogen exposure such as in our patient. Reference #1: Naranjo CA et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981; 30: 239245. Reference #2: van Hylckama Vlieg A et al. The venous thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives, effects of oestrogen dose and progestogen type. BMJ 2009 Aug 13 DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Nikhil Jagan, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Mridula Krishnan, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Mark Malesker, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Michael Sanley, source=Web Response
Read full abstract