Dose In Mammography Research Articles

Evaluating Factors Affecting Mean Glandular Dose in Mammography: Insights from a Retrospective Study in Dubai

Background/Objective: This study evaluates the mean glandular dose (MGD) in mammography screening for women aged 40–69 in Dubai, based on a retrospective analysis of a dose survey involving 2599 participants. Methods: MGD was calculated using the Dance formula. Results: The average MGD was 0.96 ± 0.39 mGy for mediolateral oblique (MLO) views and 0.81 ± 0.33 mGy for craniocaudal (CC) views. Weak inverse correlations were found between age and organ dose (OD) for both views, while a direct relationship was observed between breast thickness and entrance skin dose (ESD). In adjusted models, ESD was strongly associated with MGD (β = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.09), while OD showed a moderate association (β = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.40, 0.49). Significant variations in ESD, OD, and MGD were noted across age groups and breast thicknesses. Conclusions: Lower MGD indicates reduced radiation exposure risk, while higher MGD in MLO views suggests improved imaging quality. Monitoring and optimizing MGD are essential for enhancing patient safety and screening efficacy.

39 - Exploring the Association between Mammography Dose Optimization and Image Quality

39 - Exploring the Association between Mammography Dose Optimization and Image Quality

Data analysis of average glandular dose in mammography toward revision of the diagnostic reference level of Japan.

Diagnostic reference level (DRL) for mammography for 2015 and 2020 has been published by J-RIME. More new dose studies are needed to revise the next DRL. In preparation for the next revision of the DRL for mammography, this study investigated data from the Japan Central Organization on Quality Assurance of Breast Cancer Screening on the mean average glandular dose (AGD) for institutional image accreditation in 2019-2023 and the relationship between the average at eligible institutions to date and the type of breast X-ray system. The 95th percentile values of the AGD distributions for the Computed Radiography (CR) and Flat Panel Detector (FPD) systems were 2.5mGy and 2.0mGy, respectively. Moreover, it is assumed that AGD is decreasing due to the spread of FPD systems, and it is expected that the further spread of FPD systems and systems with W/Rh target/filter will reduce AGD in future.

Computational evaluation of the bucky components influence on the estimation of normalized glandular dose in digital mammography

The mean glandular dose (MGD) is the most suitable dosimetric quantity used in mammography to describe the absorbed dose by the breast, although it cannot be directly acquired. Studies have provided conversion factors widely implemented in international dosimetry protocols to estimate MGD, such as normalized glandular dose (DgN). Over time, the DgN estimation was refined by considering geometric models that approach a real clinical environment, such as new anode/filter combinations, compression plate and breast models. However, there is no detailed study of how the bucky (support plate, antiscatter grid and detector) can affect the DgN estimation. A modified PENELOPE Monte Carlo code was used for DgN estimation. The irradiation geometric model was built as a complete digital mammography system, considering a homogeneous breast and different typical bucky models in commercial mammography units. Simulations were carried out for mono and polyenergetic beams considering different imaging geometries. Studies with monoenergetic beams showed that the bucky presence affected DgN mainly for higher beam energies and thinner breasts. The breast support plate was the bucky component that most affected the DgN, followed by the antis-scatter grid and finally, the image detector. Studies with polyenergetic conventional (low-energy) spectra showed that the bucky exerted a minimal influence on DgN values (less than 1.0%). For high-energy spectra, mainly employed in modalities such as contrast-enhanced digital mammography, the DgN values were more affected by the bucky, increasing by 4.8% the DgN values for a 2 cm thick breast and a W/Cu 50 kV spectrum. Bucky inclusion in computer simulations is highly recommended mainly for thinner breasts and high-energy spectra. To simplify the simulations, we confirm that a homogeneous carbon fibre block support, with thickness between 3.9 and 4.1 mm, can be used as a good substitute for a complete bucky model.

Phantom-based analysis of variations in automatic exposure control across three mammography systems: implications for radiation dose and image quality in mammography, DBT, and CEM

BackgroundAutomatic exposure control (AEC) plays a crucial role in mammography by determining the exposure conditions needed to achieve specific image quality based on the absorption characteristics of compressed breasts. This study aimed to characterize the behavior of AEC for digital mammography (DM), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), and low-energy (LE) and high-energy (HE) acquisitions used in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) for three mammography systems from two manufacturers.MethodsUsing phantoms simulating various breast thicknesses, 363 studies were acquired using all available AEC modes 165 DM, 132 DBT, and 66 LE-CEM and HE-CEM. AEC behaviors were compared across systems and modalities to assess the impact of different technical components and manufacturers’ strategies on the resulting mean glandular doses (MGDs) and image quality metrics such as contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR).ResultsFor all systems and modalities, AEC increased MGD for increasing phantom thicknesses and decreased CNR. The median MGD values (interquartile ranges) were 1.135 mGy (0.772–1.668) for DM, 1.257 mGy (0.971–1.863) for DBT, 1.280 mGy (0.937–1.878) for LE-CEM, and 0.630 mGy (0.397–0.713) for HE-CEM. Medians CNRs were 14.2 (7.8–20.2) for DM, 4.91 (2.58–7.20) for a single projection in DBT, 11.9 (8.0–18.2) for LE-CEM, and 5.2 (3.6–9.2) for HE-CEM. AECs showed high repeatability, with variations lower than 5% for all modes in DM, DBT, and CEM.ConclusionsThe study revealed substantial differences in AEC behavior between systems, modalities, and AEC modes, influenced by technical components and manufacturers’ strategies, with potential implications in radiation dose and image quality in clinical settings.Relevance statementThe study emphasized the central role of automatic exposure control in DM, DBT, and CEM acquisitions and the great variability in dose and image quality among manufacturers and between modalities. Caution is needed when generalizing conclusions about differences across mammography modalities.Key points• AEC plays a crucial role in DM, DBT, and CEM.• AEC determines the “optimal” exposure conditions needed to achieve specific image quality.• The study revealed substantial differences in AEC behavior, influenced by differences in technical components and strategies.Graphical

Radiation doses received in the UK breast screening programmes 2019-2023.

To report the latest UK mammography dose survey results and to compare radiation doses from digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in UK breast screening. Anonymized exposure factors were collected for 111 152 screening cases and 5113 assessment cases from 405 x-ray sets across the United Kingdom using an online submission system linked to a national database of mammography quality control data. Output and beam quality measurements from each set were combined with exposure data to estimate mean glandular doses (MGD). FFDM doses increased by ∼10% compared to the 2016-2019 national survey but compressed breast thicknesses (CBT) remained similar. DBT doses were 34%-40% higher than FFDM overall and 34% higher than FFDM for breasts 50-60mm thick. We found a possible overestimation of PMMA breast equivalent thicknesses at low CBTs, but the evidence was not conclusive. Recent changes to the mix of x-ray models in use in UK breast screening have resulted in higher FFDM breast doses. DBT doses in the NHSBSP are on average higher than FFDM by ∼34%-40%. This is the first national study to report DBT and FFDM MGDs in UK breast screening.

The relationship between mean glandular dose and compressed breast thickness specified for Jordan.

The mean glandular dose (MGD) is a measurement used in mammography to assess the amount of radiation absorbed. By considering specific exposure radiation dose criteria, MGD ensures minimal radiation while maintaining image quality for detecting abnormalities. The relationship between MGD and compressed breast thickness (CBT) is commonly utilized in mammographic dose surveys. This study aims to estimate the MGD-CBT relationship based on patient age in Jordan through retrospective analysis. The analysis involved 3465 screening mammography images of women aged 40-80, divided into three age groups: 40-49, 50-64 and 65-80years. Each group had a specific CBT range (16.5-156mm). The results indicate that MGD ranges from 1.6 to 1.7mGy across all three age groups, independent of CBT. Thus, a significant and positive correlation exists between MGD and CBT in all age groups.

Evaluation of average glandular dose (AGD) in screening and diagnostic digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) towards establishing a reference dose range band (DRB): a developing country experience

This study represents the first national survey conducted in Sri Lanka to establish national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs) for screening and diagnostic acquisitions in digital mammography (2D-DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Additionally, the study investigated the relationship between average glandular dose (AGD) and compressed breast thickness (CBT) and introduced a novel concept called dose range bands (DRBs) as a tool for optimizing radiation dose in mammography. DICOM metadata was used to extract dose data and exposure parameters from women undergoing either screening (350) or diagnostic (750) DM. The analysis included both craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views of each breast, acquired using 2D-DM and DBT imaging techniques. The NDRL (AGD per view) was 1.97 mGy and 2.01 mGy for diagnostic DM and DBT, respectively. The corresponding NDRLs for screening acquisition were 2.44 mGy and 2.30 mGy. The mean DBT/DM AGD ratio was 1.39 and 0.97 for diagnostic and screening, respectively. Further, the association between the average glandular AGD per view and CBT is stronger in DBT than in 2D-DM. The study findings highlight the need for standardisation of compression practices, considering factors such as the radiographer’s experience, imaging equipment, breast density, age, breast size, and pain threshold.

Characterization of a new radiochromic film (LD-V1) using mammographic beam qualities

PurposeRadiochromic film (RCF) is a detector that can obtain a two-dimensional dose distribution with high resolution; it is widely used in medical and industrial fields. Several types of RCFs exist based on their application. The type of RCF mainly used for mammography dose assessment has been discontinued; however, a new type of RCF (LD-V1) has been distributed as a successor. Since the medical use of LD-V1 has rarely been studied, we investigated the response characteristics of LD-V1 in mammography. MethodsMeasurements were performed using Mo/Mo and Rh/Ag on a Senographe Pristina mammography device (GE, Fairfield, CT, USA). The reference air kerma was measured using a parallel-plate ionization chamber (PPIC) (C-MA, Applied Engineering Inc, Tokyo, Japan). Pieces of LD-V1 film model were irradiated at the same position where the reference air kerma in air was measured by the PPIC. Irradiation was performed using the time scale method based on the load on the equipment. Two methods of irradiation were considered: placing the detector in air and on the phantom. The LD-V1 was scanned five times at 72 dpi in RGB (48 bit) mode using a flatbed scanner (ES-G11000, Seiko Epson Corp, Nagano, Japan) 24 h following irradiation. The response ratio of the reference air kerma and the air kerma obtained from the LD-V1 were compared and examined for each beam quality and air kerma range. Results and discussionWhen the beam quality was altered, the response ratio varied from 0.8 to 1.2 with respect to the measurement value of the PPIC; however, some outliers were observed. Response ratios were highly variable in the low-dose range; however, as the air kerma increased, the ratios approached 1. Thus, LD-V1 does not need calibration for each beam quality used in mammography. LD-V1 enables air kerma evaluation by creating air kerma response curves under certain X-ray conditions used in mammography. ConclusionWe suggest that the dose range be limited to 12 mGy or more to keep the response variation with beam qualities below ±20%. If further measurement is required for reducing the response variation, the dose range should be shifted to a higher dose range.

Evaluation of patient dose during a digital breast tomosynthesis

IntroductionWhen the patient dose in mammography is assessed, it is important to evaluate both average glandular dose (AGD) and entrance surface dose (ESD). A dose survey on both AGD and ESD in mammography has never been studied in Sri Lanka. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the patient dose received during a full-field digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) examination by determining both AGD and ESD. MethodsThe study was performed on 140 patients who underwent DBT examination. The AGD, ESD, compression breast thickness (CBT), half-value layer (HVL), target/filter combination, kVp, and mAs values were obtained from the machine, and AGD for each projection was calculated using the equation proposed by the Dance 2011. ResultsThe measured mean AGDs and ESDs of both the breasts were statistically significantly lower than the reference values given by European protocol (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in both AGDs and ESDs between the right and left breast, between right craniocauidal (RCC) and left craniocaudal (LCC), and between right mediolateral oblique (RMLO) and left mediolateral oblique (LMLO) examinations (p > 0.05). The measured median AGDs and ESDs received for MLO projections of both breasts were statistically significantly higher than that of CC projections (p < 0.05). ConclusionThe patients receive a low radiation dose during their DBT examination with both lowered AGD and ESD than the recommended values. Implications for practiceThe results can be used as a baseline to optimize the radiation dose in mammography in Sri Lanka

The Impact of Data Management on the Achievable Dose and Efficiency of Mammography and Radiography During the COVID-19 Era: A Facility-Based Cohort Study.

To evaluate the impact of using computational data management resources and analytical software on radiation doses in mammography and radiography during the COVID-19 pandemic, develop departmental diagnostic reference levels (DRLs), and describe achievable doses (ADs) for mammography and radiography based on measured dose parameters. This ambispective cohort study enrolled 795 and 12,115 patients who underwent mammography and radiography, respectively, at the King Fahd Hospital of the University, Al-Khobar City, Saudi Arabia between May 25 and November 4, 2021. Demographic data were acquired from patients' electronic medical charts. Data on mammographic and radiographic dose determinants were acquired from the data management software. Based on the time when the data management software was operational in the institute, the study was divided into the pre-implementation and post-implementation phases. Continuous and categorical variables were compared between the two phases using an unpaired t-test and the chi-square test. The median accumulated average glandular dose (AGD; a mammographic dose determinant) in the post-implementation phase was three-fold higher than that in the pre-implementation phase. The average mammographic exposure time in the post-implementation phase was 16.3 ms shorter than that in the pre-implementation phase. Furthermore, the median values of the dose area product ([DAP], a radiographic dose determinant) were 9.72 and 19.4 cGycm2 in the pre-implementation and post-implementation phases, respectively. Although the data management software used in this study helped reduce the radiation exposure time by 16.3 ms in mammography, its impact on the mean accumulated AGD was unfavorable. Similarly, radiographic exposure indices, including DAP, tube voltage, tube current, and exposure time, were not significantly different after the data management software was implemented. Close monitoring of patient radiation doses in mammography and radiography, and dose reduction will become possible if imaging facilities use DRLs and ADs via automated systems.

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Three-Dimensional Measurement of Breast-Absorbed Dose Distribution.

The dose exposure associated with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is evaluated by multiplying the mean glandular dose (MGD) of mammography (MMG) with the correction coefficient of the angle of X-ray incidence. However, it has been pointed out that there are various problems when using the MGD as a standard for risk assessment in breast cancer screening. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the breast-absorbed dose for different breast sizes for dose assessment. Furthermore, in this study, by measuring the dose distribution three-dimensionally, we aimed to examine the MGD correction method using the breast size as a factor. A simulated breast phantom with a diameter of 40-160 mm and a total thickness of 40 mm, made with polymethyl methacrylate, was created by simulating the phantom shape used in the simulation calculation for calculating the MGD. It was made with polymethyl methacrylate. Radiochromic films were placed at different depths, which measured the breast-absorbed dose distribution three-dimensionally. The MGD was calculated from the breast-absorbed dose distribution obtained. The three-dimensional dose distribution revealed that there was a difference in the distribution of MMG and DBT with increasing depth. In addition, a lower X-ray energy and a smaller breast size resulted in a greater difference in the absorbed dose between DBT and MMG. Incorporating the DBT correction according to the breast size into the MGD improves the accuracy of dose evaluation by the MGD. Additionally, a corrected MGD provides useful information for risk assessment when DBT is used for breast cancer screening.

Dose-reduction Efficiency by Breast Compression in Digital Mammography

Although breast compression has been an efficient practice to reduce the breast dose in mammography, there may be some differences between analog and digital systems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose-reduction efficiency by breast compression in digital mammography under its own criterion that signal difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) be kept at a certain value. By adopting SDNR as an image quality indicator and average glandular dose (AGD) as a dose indicator, we measured SDNR versus AGD relationship for each breast depth. Then by utilizing figure of merit (FOM), we calculated the breast depth that we had to reduce for halving the breast dose while keeping the SDNR. To halve the dose, 1.49 cm compression was necessary for 0% breast density, 1.25 cm for 50%, and 1.06 cm for 100%. Through FOM analysis, we quantitatively revealed the dose-reduction efficiency by breast compression in digital mammography.

Measurement of conversion factor into mean glandular dose in mammography using OSL dosimeters

Background: Currently, the DRL quantity in mammography are evaluated in terms of mean glandular dose (MGD). Since the MGD cannot be measured directly, it can be obtained by calculation using the equation (D=K*g*c*s). In previous studies, the conversion factor g was calculated by Monte Carlo simulation and is not reported from actual measurements. In this study, we focused on the g-factor, which is a conversion factor to the MGD at 50% glandularity, and attempted to measure it using a nanoDot dosimeter to see if it can be used in mammography. Methods: The nanoDot dosimeters were inserted in a PMMA phantom at depths ranging from 0 cm to 6 cm in 1 cm increments, and measurements were made in three HVLs of 0.3 mmAl, 0.35 mmAl, and 0.4 mmAl HVL. The g-factor was calculated from the nanoDot dosimeter values using a conversion equation. Results and Discussion: The measured g-factors for all the HVLs were in close agreement with those of Dance et al. The values of the previous studies did not include the backscatter factor, which may have underestimated the MGD. The difference was smaller for the 0.4 mm Al. Compared to the other HVLs, the 0.4 mm Al was measured without a compression plate, which may have been influenced by the presence or absence of a compression plate. Conclusion: The nanoDot dosimeters were used to calculate g-factors. The results agreed with those of previous studies within uncertainty. This indicates that nanoDot dosimeters can be used in the mammography field.

Manual or auto-mode: Does this affect radiation dose in digital mammography without compromising image quality?

IntroductionIn current practice, auto-filter exposure mode is used for most screening mammography examinations. However, with better understanding of the side effects of radiation, it is important to examine exposure parameters and practises to minimise radiation dose to patients. The purpose of this phantom study is to investigate the impact that different exposure modes (manual, auto-time and auto-filter) have on radiation dose, while maintaining images of diagnostic quality. MethodsThis study was conducted in three stages. In the first stage, 125 images were taken using a Gammex 156 phantom with polymethyl methacrylate blocks to reflect varying thicknesses (4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0 and 6.5 cm). In the second stage, three mammographers independently assessed image quality and assigned scores based on the number of distinct fibers, masses and speck groups visible. Images with acceptable quality were further investigated in the third stage by comparing their average glandular dose (AGD) using the Kruskal–Wallis H test and Dunn's post-hoc pairwise analysis. ResultsSignificant differences in AGD were shown between the auto-filter mode and manual mode techniques for 6.0 cm, and between auto-time mode and manual mode techniques for 6.5 cm (p < 0.05). ConclusionFor 4.5, 5.0 and 5.5 cm phantoms, as AGD was not significantly different among the different modes, the auto-filter may remain the most practical option. However, significant reductions in AGD were obtained for the 6.0 and 6.5 cm phantoms when manual mode techniques were used. Implications for practiceManual mode techniques can potentially provide dose-saving opportunity in 6.0 and 6.5 cm breast thickness though future work on human breast should be done to confirm this. Results from this study will support future research based on patient data.

Regression Analysis between the Different Breast Dose Quantities Reported in Digital Mammography and Patient Age, Breast Thickness, and Acquisition Parameters.

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. Screening mammography is considered the primary imaging modality for the early detection of breast cancer. The radiation dose from mammography increases the patients’ risk of radiation-induced cancer. The mean glandular dose (MGD), or the average glandular dose (AGD), provides an estimate of the absorbed dose of radiation by the glandular tissues of a breast. In this paper, MGD is estimated for the craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral–oblique (MLO) views using entrance skin dose (ESD), X-ray spectrum information, patient age, breast glandularity, and breast thickness. Moreover, a regression analysis is performed to evaluate the impact of mammography acquisition parameters, age, and breast thickness on the estimated MGD and other machine-produced dose quantities, namely, ESD and organ dose (OD). Furthermore, a correlation study is conducted to evaluate the correlation between the ESD and OD, and the estimated MGD per image view. This retrospective study was applied to a dataset of 2035 mammograms corresponding to a cohort of 486 subjects with an age range of 28–86 years who underwent screening mammography examinations. Linear regression metrics were calculated to evaluate the strength of the correlations. The mean (and range) MGD for the CC view was 0.832 (0.110–3.491) mGy and for the MLO view was 0.995 (0.256–2.949) mGy. All the mammography dose quantities strongly correlated with tube exposure (mAs): ESD (R2 = 0.938 for the CC view and R2 = 0.945 for the MLO view), OD (R2 = 0.969 for the CC view and R2 = 0.983 for the MLO view), and MGD (R2 = 0.980 for the CC view and R2 = 0.972 for the MLO view). Breast thickness showed a better correlation with all the mammography dose quantities than patient age, which showed a poor correlation. Moreover, a strong correlation was found between the calculated MGD and both the ESD (R2 = 0.929 for the CC view and R2 = 0.914 for the MLO view) and OD (R2 = 0.971 for the CC view and R2 = 0.972 for the MLO view). Furthermore, it was found that the MLO scan views yield a slightly higher dose compared to CC scan views. It was also found that the glandular absorbed dose is more dependent on glandularity than size. Despite being more reflective of the dose absorbed by the glandular tissue than OD and ESD, MGD is considered labor-intensive and time-consuming to estimate.

Radiation Dose of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: A Two-Center Prospective Comparison.

Simple SummaryContrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a dual-energy technique where low- and high-energy images are acquired for each mammographic view after contrast agent administration, and are then recombined to enhance potential contrast uptake. As CEM is increasingly used for both screening and diagnostic applications in breast imaging, but its associated radiation dose has been investigated only by single-center studies, we aimed to evaluate the CEM per-patient radiation dose on a large population in a bicentric setting, pooling data from two prospective studies employing the same model of mammography units. The CEM radiation dose showed a 6.2% difference between the two centers, mainly attributable to the study populations’ characteristics and to manufacturing differences between the two systems. The CEM dose was about 30% higher than that of standard digital mammography. Such an increment was close to the dose increase reported for digital breast tomosynthesis, which is already used in both screening and clinical settings. Thus, considering the extensively demonstrated diagnostic gain granted by CEM over these non-contrast-enhanced techniques, radiation dose concerns should not hinder ever-wider clinical implementations of CEM.The radiation dose associated with contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has been investigated only by single-center studies. In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the radiation dose between two centers performing CEM within two prospective studies, using the same type of equipment. The CEM mean glandular dose (MGD) was computed for low energy (LE) and high energy (HE) images and their sum was calculated for each view. MGD and related parameters (entrance dose, breast thickness, compression, and density) were compared between the two centers using the Mann–Whitney test. Finally, per-patient MGD was calculated by pooling the two datasets and determining the contribution of LE and HE images. A total of 348 CEM examinations were analyzed (228 from Center 1 and 120 from Center 2). The median total MGD per view was 2.33 mGy (interquartile range 2.19–2.51 mGy) at Center 1 and 2.46 mGy (interquartile range 2.32–2.70 mGy) at Center 2, with a 0.15 mGy median difference (p < 0.001) equal to 6.2%. LE-images contributed between 64% and 77% to the total patient dose in CEM, with the remaining 23–36% being associated with HE images. The mean radiation dose for a two-view bilateral CEM exam was 4.90 mGy, about 30% higher than for digital mammography.

Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Displayed Average Glandular Dose in Mammography

We aimed to clarify the error of displayed value against the measured value of the average glandular dose (AGD) in two-dimensional (2D) mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and evaluate the accuracy of the displayed AGD as an index to estimate AGD. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantoms with thicknesses varying from 20 to 80 mm were imaged, and the values displayed on the mammography system were used as the displayed AGD. The incident air kerma and the half-valued layer were measured, and the measured AGD in 2D mammography was calculated using the equation by Dance et al. On the other hand, the measured AGD in DBT was calculated by correcting for different projection angles. The relative error to the PMMA thickness was evaluated by assessing the relative error of the displayed AGD against the measured AGD. The maximum relative error of the displayed AGD against the measured AGD was 17.3% in 2D mammography, 19.1% in the standard (ST) mode, and 19.8% in the high-resolution (HR) mode. The relative error of the displayed AGD against the measured AGD tended to increase with increase in PMMA thickness. This tendency was especially noticeable for PMMA with thicknesses of 70 and 80 mm in DBT.

Comparison of displayed and measured mean glandular dose in digital mammography

Comparison of displayed and measured mean glandular dose in digital mammography

P162 - Class of effective dose for mammography with tomosynthesis in compliance to the new Italian regulation

P162 - Class of effective dose for mammography with tomosynthesis in compliance to the new Italian regulation