Dose Area Product Research Articles

Impact of equipment technology on reference levels in fluoroscopy-guided gastrointestinal procedures

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of equipment technology on reference point air kerma (Ka,r), air kerma-area product (PKA), and fluoroscopic time for fluoroscopically-guided gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures and establish benchmark levels. MethodsThis retrospective study included the consecutive patients who underwent fluoroscopically-guided gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures from May 2016 to August 2023 at a tertiary care hospital in the U.S. Fluoroscopic systems included (a) Omega CS-50 e-View, (b) GE Precision 500D, and (c) Siemens Cios Alpha. Radiation dose was analyzed for four procedure types of endoscopic retrograde biliary, pancreas, biliary and pancreas combined, and other guidance. Median and 75th percentile values were computed using software package R (version 4.0.5, R Foundation). ResultsThis large study analyzed 9,459 gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. Among four procedure types, median Ka,r was 108.8–433.2 mGy (a), 70–272 mGy (b), and 22–55.1 mGy (c). Median PKA was 20.9–49.5 Gy∙cm2 (a), 13.4–39.7 Gy∙cm2 (b), and 8.91–20.9 Gy∙cm2 (c). Median fluoroscopic time was 2.8–8.1 min (a), 3.6–9.2 min (b), and 2.9–9.4 min (c). Their median value ratio (a:b:c) was 8.5:4.8:1 (Ka,r), 2.7:2.1:1 (PKA), and 1.0:1.1:1 (fluoroscopic time). Median value and 75th percentile are presented for Ka,r, PKA, and fluoroscopic time for each procedure type, which can function as benchmark for comparison for dose optimization studies. ConclusionThis study shows manifold variation in doses (Ka,r and PKA) among three fluoroscopic equipment types and provides local reference levels (50th and 75th percentiles) for four gastrointestinal endoscopic procedure types. Besides procedure type, imaging technology should be considered for establishing diagnostic reference level. SummaryWith manifold (2 to 12 times) variation in doses observed in this study among 3 machines, we recommend development of technology-based diagnostic reference levels for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.

Evaluation of the reduction of radiation dose received by pediatric patients in new-generation biplane angiocardiography: Randomized controlled study

ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiation dose reduction with a new-generation biplane angiocardiography system in patients undergoing transcatheter isolated patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure. Materials and methodsFifty pediatric patients who underwent transcatheter PDA closure were randomly divided into two groups as normal radiation dose and low dose. Patients who required additional procedures other than PDA closure were excluded. PDA closure was performed according to the angiographic measurement of the defect. After the procedure, age, weight, sex, PDA measurements, and radiation measurements such as dose-area product (DAP, Gy.cm2) and air kerma (AK, mGy) were compared between the groups. ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference between the groups in age, sex, weight, PDA diameter, PDA type, device used, and device diameter (p > 0.05). While there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of cine recording, number of recorded images, and fluoroscopy time (p > 0.05), there was a statistically significant difference between the total DAP, cine and fluoroscopy DAP, total AK, frontal and lateral tube AK, and DAP/kg (mGy.m2/kg) measurements (p < 0.05). ConclusionTranscatheter PDA closure with a low radiation dose is as effective as that with a normal radiation dose. The radiation dose received by the patient during the procedure was significantly reduced. With the vision provided by this study, it seems possible to work with a low radiation dose in other groups of patients.

Assessing Patient Radiation Exposure in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of Procedural Complexity and Clinical Factors.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures can result in significant patient radiation exposure. This retrospective multicenter study aimed to assess the influence of procedural complexity and other clinical factors on radiation exposure in ERCP. Data on kerma-area product (KAP), air-kerma at the reference point (Ka,r), fluoroscopy time, and the number of exposures, and relevant patient, procedure, and operator factors were collected from 2641 ERCP procedures performed at four university hospitals. The influence of procedural complexity, assessed using the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and HOUSE complexity grading scales, on radiation exposure quantities was analyzed within each center. The procedures were categorized into two groups based on ERCP indications: primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and other ERCPs. Both the ASGE and HOUSE complexity grading scales had a significant impact on radiation exposure quantities. Remarkably, there was up to a 50-fold difference in dose quantities observed across the participating centers. For non-PSC ERCP procedures, the median KAP ranged from 0.9 to 64.4 Gy·cm2 among the centers. The individual endoscopist also had a substantial influence on radiation dose. Procedural complexity grading in ERCP significantly affects radiation exposure. Higher procedural complexity is typically associated with increased patient radiation dose. The ASGE complexity grading scale demonstrated greater sensitivity to changes in radiation exposure compared to the HOUSE grading scale. Additionally, significant variations in dose indices, fluoroscopy times, and number of exposures were observed across the participating centers.

Ocular radiation exposure is negligible in normal volume endourological practice.

The annual dose limit for radiation exposure to the eye has been reduced recently; the eye is widely recognised as one of the most radiosensitive tissues in the body. There is minimal good quality research as to the radiation dose that the eye receives during endourological surgery and this study aimed to address this. A prospective study was performed over an 8-month period at a single large teaching hospital in the UK. Three index procedures were included: ureteric stent insertion, ureteroscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Surgeons wore a dosimeter on the glabella with fluoroscopy time (FT) and dose area product (DAP) recorded for each case. A total of 404 procedures were included (247 URSs, 150 ureteric stent insertions and 7 PCNLs). Dosimeters were worn by ten surgeons. Mean FTs (URS 20.56s; ureteric stent 18.96s; PCNL 360.67s) and mean DAP (URS 100.82cGy/m2, ureteric stent 119.82cGy/m2 and PCNL 1121.62cGy/m2) were identified with significant intersurgeon variability. No surgeon had a total dosimeter dose >0.00mSv. The International Commission on Radiological Protection recently reduced the yearly eye dose limit from 150 to 20mSv. Cataractogenesis is no longer considered a typical deterministic effect, with a threshold level below which no effect occurs. Even in higher volume centres, these annual limits are unlikely to be reached. Lead glasses may be considered for surgeons and radiologists with the highest exposure but, for the majority, ocular radiation exposure is negligible.

Comparison of head positioning using the Mayfield skull clamp versus padded headrest in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a commonly implemented surgical intervention for a variety of pathologies affecting the cervical spine. The current literature and daily practice reveal variations on patient head positioning for this procedure with both rigid fixations in the Mayfield skull clamp as well as use of a padded headrest being used. In this study, we therefore examine whether patients undergoing surgery using head positioning in the Mayfield skull clamp versus a padded headrest differ in regard to adverse events, surgical parameters and clinical outcome. A single-center, retrospective analysis of 121 patients treated with ACDF for degenerative disease, traumatic cervical spine injury and infectious disease between November 2019 and March 2023 was performed. Clinical and imaging data for 59 patients positioned in the Mayfield skull clamp and 62 patients positioned in a padded headrest were evaluated using electronic medical records. In addition to demographic data, surgical indications, procedures performed were analyzed for both groups. Level of training (chief, attending and resident), length of surgery and intraoperative radiation exposure (measured by dose area product and total radiation time) were also examined. Finally, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) preoperatively and at last follow-up as well as adverse events were compared between groups. We found no statistically significant differences between the Mayfield and headrest groups regarding surgical indications (P=0.583), procedures performed (P=0.069), level of training of the surgeon (P=0.218), length of surgery (P=0.752), adverse events (P=0.619) or neurological impairment (P=0.080) following surgical intervention. There was a significant difference regarding dose area product between both groups with patients positioned in the Mayfield skull clamp showing lower mean levels of radiation than those in the headrest group (99 versus 131 cGy/cm2; P=0.003). Patient positioning using the Mayfield skull clamp may reduce required radiation exposure during ACDF procedures versus use of a padded headrest.

Feasibility and Safety of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Advanced Navigation to Optimize Intra-arterial Chemotherapy Infusion of Skull Base Tumors

Abstract Purpose To assess the feasibility and safety of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) advanced navigation for optimizing intra-arterial chemotherapy infusion (IACI) in patients with skull base tumors. Materials and Methods Retrospective review on 10 consecutive IACI procedures performed in five patients (four women, 1 man) over a 1-year period. The median age of the patients was 71 years (interquartile range: 34–74). During the procedures, a CBCT-based navigation software was employed to evaluate tumor perfusion and guide the infusion methods. Catheterization of the primary tumor feeding vessel was performed in seven cases when it originated from the external carotid artery, whereas a temporary balloon-assisted occlusion technique was utilized in the remaining three cases where the tumor was primarily fed by the internal carotid artery. Carboplatin, topotecan, and melphalan were injected over a 10-minute period. Fluoroscopy time, reference dose, and Kerma area product, which estimates effective dose, were analyzed. Results The technical success rate was 100%, with a median procedure length of 82 minutes (79–90). The median fluoroscopy time was 11.3 minutes (9.4–16.9), reference dose was 93.5 mGy (62–256.5), and Kerma area product was 11.6 Gy.cm2 (9.5–25.4). The median effective dose was 3.8 mSv (1.5–5.1). The median follow-up duration was 233.5 days (186.3–432). One severe adverse event was reported, involving a right brachial hematoma and brachiocephalic artery dissection related to catheterization through a type III aortic arch. Three patients exhibited disease progression, but two patients showed stable disease. Conclusion IACI for skull base tumors guided by CBCT navigation is both feasible and safe.

Left bundle branch area pacing versus conventional pacing in patients with advanced atrioventricular conduction abnormalities: a prospective cohort study

BackgroundLeft bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an emerging pacing method that may prevent the deleterious effects of right ventricular pacing. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of LBBAP with right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP) in patients with advanced atrioventricular conduction abnormalities and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. MethodsThe effect of pacing was evaluated by echocardiographic indices of dyssynchrony, including global myocardial work efficiency (GWE) and peak systolic dispersion (PSD). The primary endpoint was GWE postprocedural, at 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. ResultsTwenty patients received LBBAP and 18 RVSP. Complete follow-up was accomplished in 37 patients (97.4%) due to the death of a patient (RVSP arm) from nonrelated cause. GWE was significantly increased in the group of LBBAP compared to RVSP at all time points (90.8% in LBBAP versus 85.8% in RVSP group at 12 months, p = 0.01). PSD was numerically lower in the LBBAP arm at all time points, yet not statistically significant (56.4 msec in LBBP versus 65.1 msec in RVSP arm at 12 months, p = 0.178). The implantation time was increased (median 93 min in LBBAP versus 45 min in RVSP group, p < 0.01), along with fluoroscopy time and dose area product (DAP), in the arm of LBBAP. There were no severe perioperative acute complications in either group. ConclusionsLBBAP is an emerging and safe technique for patients with a pacing indication. Despite the longer procedural and fluoroscopy time, as well as higher DAP, LBBAP seems to offer better left ventricular synchrony compared to RVSP, according to GWE measurements.

A simple method for radiation exposure reduction during atrial fibrillation ablation: the lead-apron-free approach.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is a well-established treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Fluoroscopy, a widely used imaging method for RFCA, has significant implications for human health. Although no fluoroscopy or near-zero fluoroscopy strategies have gained popularity, they have limitations, such as long procedure times, additional equipment, and expertise. A simple and cost-effective radiation reduction method is needed for treating AF and is compatible with the daily workflow. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of fluoroscopy-free and lead apron-free (LAF) after transseptal puncture AF ablation with conventional ablation (CON). This retrospective study included all patients who underwent RF catheter AF ablation. The lead apron used for protection was removed immediately before 3D reconstruction of the left atrium (LA) after transseptal puncture (TSP), while fluoroscopy was performed on stand-by and locked-in. The pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed using a 3D mapping system, a multielectrode catheter, and a Smart Touch contact force (CF) sensing catheter, via the lead-apron-free (LAF) method, which is similar to the conventional ablation (CON) method. This study enrolled 152 consecutive patients, with 72 and 80 patients in the LAF and CON groups, respectively. The LAF group demonstrated significantly lower values in total fluoroscopy time (6.9 vs. 14 min, P<0.001) and dose area product (DAP) values (15.4±12.1 vs. 31.5±17.4 G/m2, P<0.001) than the CON group. However, there was no significant difference in the total procedure time (83.6±21.1 vs. 77.2±11.4 min, P=0.12) between the two groups. Only four procedures (5.5%) required repositioning of the apron, and no complications were observed with the LAF method. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients. The LAF method reduced fluoroscopy use compared with CON, with no change in procedure time or efficacy.

Single catheter approach for treatment of premature ventricular contractions.

Catheter ablation has become one of the main treatment strategies in patients with premature ventricular complexes (PVC).The successful mapping and ablation can be performed with an ablation catheter without additional diagnostic catheters. We hypothesize that using a single catheter for PVC ablation may decrease complications, procedure time, and fluoroscopy exposure while maintaining comparable success rates. Sixty-nineconsecutive patients with PVC were treated with a single catheter approach compared to a historical cohort, in which a conventional setup was used. Propensity score matching was conducted with a 1:1 ratio. Outcome parameters included acute procedural success with elimination of all premature ventricular contractions after catheter ablation, procedural data as well as complication rates. Patients treated with a single catheter approach had shorter total procedure (60 minutes [IQR:47,5-69,0 minutes] vs. 90 minutes [IQR60-120 minutes]; p = 0.001) and fluoroscopy times (218 seconds[IQR:110,5-446 seconds] vs. 310 seconds[IQR190-640 seconds]; p = 0.012), which consecutively leads to a reduction of radiation exposure signified by a lower dose area product (155 cGycm² [IQR74.4-334.5 cGycm²] vs. 368.4 cGycm² [IQR:126-905.4 cGycm²]; p value 0.009). Acute procedural success rates were comparable in both groups (54 [84.3%] in the single catheter approach group and 58 [90.6%] in the conventional group; p: 0.287). A single catheter approach for the treatment of PVC is associated with a reduction of procedure- and fluoroscopy time, as well as a lesser radiation exposure, while maintaining equivalent acute success and complication rates compared with a conventionally used catheter setup.

Radiation Exposure and Contrast Agent Use during Endovascular Aortic Repair Using Mobile Versus Fixed Angiography Systems.

For (thoracic) endovascular aortic repair ((T)EVAR) procedures, both mobile (standard operating room (SOR)) and fixed C-arm (hybrid operating room (HOR)) systems are available. This study evaluated differences in key procedural parameters, and procedural success for (T)EVAR in the SOR versus the HOR. All patients who underwent standard elective (T)EVAR at the Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery at the University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany, between 1 January 2012 and 1 January 2019 were included. Data were retrieved from archived medical records. Endpoints were analyzed for SOR versus HOR during (T)EVAR. A total of 93 patients, including 50 EVAR (SOR (n = 20); HOR (n = 30)) and 43 TEVAR (SOR (n = 22); HOR (n= 21)) were included. The dose area product (DAP) for EVAR and TEVAR was lower in the SOR than in the HOR (EVAR, SOR: 1635 ± 1088 cGy·cm2; EVAR, HOR: 7819 ± 8928 cGy·cm2; TEVAR, SOR: 8963 ± 34,458 cGy·cm2; TEVAR, HOR: 14,591 ± 11,584 cGy·cm2 (p < 0.05)). Procedural fluoroscopy time was shorter in the SOR than in the HOR for EVAR and TEVAR (EVAR, SOR: 7 ± 4 min; EVAR, HOR: 18.8 ± 11.3 min; TEVAR, SOR: 6.6 ± 9.6 min; TEVAR, HOR: 13.9 ± 11.8 min (p < 0.05)). Higher volumes of contrast agent were applied during EVAR and TEVAR in the SOR than in the HOR (EVAR, SOR: 57.5 ± 20 mL; EVAR: HOR: 33.3 ± 5 mL (p < 0.05); TEVAR; SOR: 71.5 ± 53.4 mL, TEVAR, HOR: 48.2 ± 27.5 mL (p ≥ 0.05). The use of a fixed C-arm angiography system in the HOR results in higher radiation exposure and longer fluoroscopy times but lower contrast agent volumes when compared with mobile C-arm systems in the SOR. Because stochastic radiation sequelae are more likely to be tolerated in an older patient population and, in addition, there is a higher incidence of CKD in this patient population, allocation of patients to the HOR for standard (T)EVAR seems particularly advisable based on our results.

Echocardiographic-Fluoroscopic Fusion Imaging Improves Interventionalists' Learning Curve for Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure-Initial, Single-Center, Retrospective Observations.

Due to the complex and variable anatomy of the left atrial appendage, percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) can be challenging. In this study, we investigated the impact of fusion imaging (FI) on the LAAC learning curve of two interventionalists. The first interventionalist (IC 1) was initially trained without FI and continued his training with FI. The second interventionalist (IC 2) performed all procedures with FI. We compared the first 36 procedures without FI of IC 1 (group 1) with his next 36 interventions with FI (group 2). Furthermore, group 1 was compared to 36 procedures of IC 2 who directly started his training with FI (group 3). Group 1 demonstrated that the learning curve without FI has a flat course with weak correlations for fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, and procedure time, but not for dose area product. Group 2 with FI showed improvement with a steep course and strong correlations for all four parameters. In group 3, we also saw a steep progression with strong correlations. Furthermore, the mean measurements of the parameters in the groups with FI decreased significantly as an indicator of procedural efficacy. We demonstrated that FI may improve the learning curve of experienced and non-experienced ICs.

Technical note: Workload and transmission data for mobile C-arm fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Mobile C-arms may be used in fixed locations, and it is recommended that qualified experts evaluate structural shielding. To assess clinical workload distributions for mobile C-arms used in gastrointestinal endoscopy and determine the Archer equation parameters for the C-arm beam spectra. Consecutive (30 months) gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures on two Cios Alpha systems (Siemens) were retrospectively analyzed. X-ray tube voltage, tube current-time product, reference point air kerma (Ka,r), air kerma-area product (PKA), and fluoroscopic time were examined. The primary beam half-value layer (HVL) was measured with an ionization chamber and aluminum 1100 plates. Stray radiation fraction at 1m from a scattering source (ACR R/F phantom) was directly measured. Monte Carlo (Geant4) simulation was performed to calculate the transmission of broad X-ray beams through lead, concrete, gypsum, and steel, with X-ray HVLs matching those of the C-arm X-ray beam. The transmission data were fitted to the Archer equation. The number of procedures (3509) was equivalent to 13.48 procedures per room per week. Dose quantities were 54.8 mGy (Ka,r), 18.3Gy∙cm2 (PKA), and 7.8 min (fluoroscopic time) per procedure. X-ray beam irradiation events were recorded for 2906 (82.8%) procedures with 160,009 events, whose mA-minute weighted tube voltage was 91.0kV and the workload was 0.68mA-minute per procedure. The two rooms had a significant difference in the number of procedures per week, 17.3 (29) [mean (maximum)] and 9.6 (16), respectively. The stray radiation fraction was 9.7×10-4 (80kV) and 1.25×10-3 (120kV). Transmission fitting parameters were provided for the tube voltage (on average, 90kV; high end, 120kV) of the C-arm. This work provides workload and transmission data for mobile C-arm fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy, which indicates a need for structural shielding evaluation of the procedure rooms.

X-ray Doses in Relation to Body Mass, Indication, and Substrate During Pediatric Electrophysiological Procedures on the Heart.

The main goal of this study is to determine typical values of dose area product (DAP) and difference in the effective dose (ED) for pediatric electrophysiological procedures on the heart in relation to patient body mass. This paper also shows DAP and ED in relation to the indication, the arrhythmia substrate determined during the procedure, and in relation to the reason for using radiation. Organ doses are described as well. The subjects were children who have had an electrophysiological study done with a 3D mapping system and X-rays in two healthcare institutions. Children with congenital heart defects were excluded. There were 347 children included. Significant difference was noted between mass groups, while heavier children had higher values of DAP and ED. Median DAP in different mass groups was between 4.00 (IQR 1.00-14.00) to 26.33 (IQR 8.77-140.84) cGycm2. ED median was between 23.18 (IQR 5.21-67.70) to 60.96 (IQR 20.64-394.04) µSv. The highest DAP and ED in relation to indication were noted for premature ventricular contractions and ventricular tachycardia-27.65 (IQR 12.91-75.0) cGycm2 and 100.73 (IQR 53.31-258.10) µSv, respectively. In arrhythmia substrate groups, results were similar, and the highest doses were in ventricular substrates with DAP 29.62 (IQR 13.81-76.0) cGycm2 and ED 103.15 (IQR 60.78-266.99) µSv. Pediatric electrophysiology can be done with very low doses of X-rays when using 3D mapping systems compared to X-rays-based electrophysiology, or when compared to pediatric interventional cardiology or adult electrophysiology.

Evaluation of Radiation Exposure and Influential Factors in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) of the Head and Abdomen during Interventional Procedures.

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a widely used imaging technique in interventional radiology. Although CBCT offers great advantages in terms of improving comprehension of complex angioarchitectures and guiding therapeutic decisions, its additional degree of radiation exposure has also aroused considerable concern. In this study, we aimed to assess radiation exposure and its influential factors in patients undergoing CBCT scans of the head and abdomen during interventional procedures. A total of 752 patients were included in this retrospective study. Dose area product (DAP) and reference air kerma (RAK) were used as measures of patient dose. The results showed that the median values of DAP were 53.8 (50.5-64.4) Gy⋅cm2 for head CBCT and 47.4 (39.6-54.3) Gy⋅cm2 for that of the abdomen. Male gender and body mass index (BMI) were characterized by increased DAP and RAK values in both head and abdominal CBCT scans. Larger FOV size was associated with a higher DAP but a lower RAK value, especially in head CBCT scans. Exposure parameters under automatic exposure control (AEC) also varied according to patient BMI and gender. In conclusion, the patients received slightly higher radiation doses from head CBCT scans than from those applied to the abdomen. BMI, gender, and FOV size were the key factors that influenced the radiation dose administered to the patients during CBCT scans. Our results may help to define and minimize patients' exposure to radiation.

Image fusion guidance for left subclavian artery in situ fenestration during thoracic endovascular repair.

To evaluate the feasibility and clinical benefit of utilizing image fusion for thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) with in situ fenestration (ISF-TEVAR). Between January 2020 and December 2020, we prospectively collected 18 consecutive cases with complex thoracic aortic lesions who underwent image fusion guided ISF-TEVAR. As a control group, 18 patients were collected from historical medical records from June 2019 to December 2019. The fusion group involved the use of 3D fusion of CTA and fluoroscopic images for real-time 3D guidance, and the control group involved the use of only regular fluoroscopic images for guidance. The total contrast medium volume, hand-injected contrast medium volume, overall operative time, radiation dose and fluoroscopy time were compared between the two groups. Accuracy was measured based on preoperative CTA and intraoperative digital subtraction angiography. 3D fusion imaging guidance was successfully implemented in all patients in the fusion group. Hand-injected contrast medium volume and overall operative time were significantly lower in the fusion group than in the control group (p = .028 and p = .011). Compared with the control group, the fusion group showed a significant reduction in time and radiation dose-area product (DAP) for fluoroscopy (p = .004 and p = .010). No significant differences in total radiation dose (DAP) or total contrast medium volume were observed (p = .079 and p = .443). Full accuracy was achieved in 8 cases (44%), with a mean deviation of 2.61mm ± 3.1 (range 0.0-8.4mm). 3D image fusion for ISF-TEVAR was associated with a significant reduction in hand-injected contrast medium, time and radiation exposure for fluoroscopy and overall operative time. The image fusion guidance showed potential clinical benefits towards improved treatment safety and accuracy for complex thoracic endovascular interventions.

CBCT-based three-dimensional dual-phase vascular image fusion: anovel technique for interventional real-time TIPS guidance.

Due to the invisibility of the portal vein (PV), how to puncture the PV accurately and safely in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation remains achallenge of the procedure. We aimed to provide the first evaluation of the safety, feasibility, and efficiency of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based three-dimensional (3D) dual-phase vascular image fusion for interventional real-time guided PV puncture during TIPS procedures. From January 2021 to May 2021, 13patients undergoing TIPS were prospectively enrolled in this study. Images of the hepatic artery (HA) and PV in 3D were acquired and overlaid on interventional fluoroscopy images in adual-phase display mode for real-time PV puncture guidance. The number of PV puncture attempts, puncture time, overlaid image accuracy, dose area product, fluoroscopy time, and interventional complications were recorded. Portal vein puncture guided by CBCT-based 3D dual-phase vascular image fusion was successfully performed on 92.3% (12/13) patients. The mean number of PV puncture attempts was 1.8 ± 0.7 (1-3). The mean puncture time and fluoroscopy time was 3.5 ± 1.2 (2-6) min and 25.1 ± 9.4 (15-45) min, respectively. The mean dose area product was 39.49 ± 7.88 (28.81-52.87) mGym2. The error between the reference position of the fusion image and the interventional PV angiography image was less than 0.5 cm. No interventional complication was observed. Our results show that 3D dual-phase vascular image fusion might be asafe and feasible technique for interventional real-time guided PV puncture during TIPS. This novel technique might help to reduce the number of PV puncture attempts and the puncture time as well as lower the risks of interventional complications.

Establishment of Diagnostic Reference Levels in Portuguese Interventional Radiology departments

PurposeTo establish Portuguese Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs), for six body fluoroscopy guided interventional procedures (FGIP). MethodA retrospective study was conducted in five interventional departments most representative of Interventional Radiology (IR) practice. Dose values, in terms of air kerma area product (PKA in Gy.cm2), air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka,r in mGy), and exposure parameters (fluoroscopy time (FT) and number of cine runs) were collected. Examinations were selected per procedure (at least 20), according to the antero-posterior and lateral diameter mean value (±5 cm), measured on previous Computed Tomography (CT) examinations. ResultsData of 489 body FGIP show a large variation on dose values per procedure and per department. National DRLs in terms of PKA were 20.2 Gy.cm2 for Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), 98.2 Gy.cm2 for Bronchial artery embolisation (BAE), 247.7 Gy.cm2 for Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), 331.6 Gy.cm2 for Inferior epigastric arteries embolisation (IEAE), 312.0 Gy.cm2 for Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and 19.3 Gy.cm2 for Endovascular treatment of femoral popliteal arteries (ETFPA). ConclusionsThis is the first study reporting Interventional Radiology DRLs in Portugal and we propose preliminary national estimates for the six more common body FGIP. The results of this study will be presented and discussed with all Portuguese IR departments, to promote procedures optimisation.

A procedural step analysis of radiation exposure in fenestrated endovascular aortic repair

ObjectiveRadiation exposure during complex endovascular aortic repair may be associated with tangible adverse effects in patients and operators. This study aimed to identify the steps of highest radiation exposure during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) and to investigate potential intraoperative factors affecting radiation exposure. MethodsProspective data of 31 consecutive patients managed exclusively with four-fenestration endografts between March 1, 2020, and July 1, 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Leveraging the conformity of the applied technique, every FEVAR operation was considered a combination of six overall stages composed of 28 standardized steps. Intraoperative parameters, including air kerma, dose area product, fluoroscopy time, and number of digital subtraction angiographies (DSAs) and average angulations were collected and analyzed for each step. ResultsThe mean procedure duration and fluoroscopy time was 140 minutes (standard deviation [SD], 32 minutes), and 40 minutes (SD, 9.1 minutes), respectively. The mean air kerma was 814 mGy (SD, 498 mGy), and the mean dose area product was 66.8 Gy cm2 (SD, 33 Gy cm2). The percentage of air kerma of the entire procedure was distributed throughout the following procedure stages: preparation (13.9%), main body (9.6%), target vessel cannulation (27.8%), stent deployment (29.1%), distal aortoiliac grafting (14.3%), and completion (5.3%). DSAs represented 23.0% of the total air kerma. Target vessel cannulation and stent deployment presented the highest mean lateral angulation (67 and 63 degrees, respectively). Using linear regression, each minute of continuous fluoroscopy added 18.9 mGy of air kerma (95% confidence interval, 17.6-20.2 mGy), and each DSA series added 21.1 mGy of air kerma (95% confidence interval, 17.9-24.3 mGy). Body mass index and lateral angulation were significantly associated with increased air kerma (P < .001). ConclusionsCannulation of target vessels and bridging stent deployment are the steps requiring the highest radiation exposure during FEVAR cases. Optimized operator protection during these steps is mandatory.

Robotic Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Initial Australian Experience

Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI) has been increasingly performed overseas. Initial observations have demonstrated its clinical efficacy and safety with additional potential benefits of more accurate lesion assessment and stent deployment, with reduced radiation exposure to operators and patients. However, data from randomised controlled trials or clinical experience from Australia are lacking. This was a single-centre experience of all patients undergoing R-PCI as part of the run-in phase for an upcoming randomised clinical trial (ACTRN12623000480684). All R-PCI procedures were performed using the CorPath GRX robot (Corindus Vascular Robotics, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Key inclusion criteria included patients with obstructive coronary disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention. Major exclusion criteria included ST-elevation myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock or lesions deemed unsuitable for R-PCI by the operator. Clinical success was defined as residual stenosis <30% without in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Technical success was defined as the completion of the R-PCI procedure without unplanned manual conversion. Procedural characteristics were compared between early (cases 1-3) and later (cases 4-21) cases. Twenty-one (21) patients with a total of 24 lesions were analysed. The mean age of patients was 66.5 years, and 66% of cases were male. Radial access was used in 18 cases (86%). Most lesions were American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology class B2/C (66%). Clinical success was achieved in 100% with manual conversion required in four cases (19%). No procedural complications or in-hospital MACE occurred. Compared to the early cases, later cases had a statistically significantly shorter fluoroscopy time (44.0mins vs 25.2mins, p<0.007), dose area product (967.3 dGy.cm2 vs 361.0dGy.cm2, p=0.01) and air kerma (2484.3mGy vs 797.4mGy, p=0.009) with no difference in contrast usage (136.7mL vs 131.4mL, p=0.88). We present the first clinical experience of R-PCI in Australia using the Corindus CorPath GRX robot. We achieved clinical success in all patients and technical success in the majority of cases with no procedural complications or in-hospital MACE. With increasing operator and staff experience, cases required shorter fluoroscopy time and less radiation exposure but similar contrast usage.

Radiation dose reduction during venous access port implantation: the importance of upgrading equipment and radiation-protection training.

Implantable central venous port systems are widely used in oncology. We upgraded our fluoroscopy machines, and all anesthetists completed two training courses focusing on the risks of ionizing radiation for patients and health workers. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of upgrading the machines and the radiation-protection training on ionizing radiation exposure during venous port system implantation. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive venous port implantations between 2019 and 2022. The older fluoroscopy machines were replaced by two new machines. A first training session about health worker radioprotection was organized. The medical staff completed a second training course focused on protecting patients from ionizing radiation. We defined four distinct time intervals (TI): venous port implantations performed with the old equipment, the new fluoroscopy machines, after the first training course, and after the second training course. The air kerma-area product (KAP) was compared between these four TI and fluoroscopy times and the number of exposures only with the new machines. We analyzed 2587 procedures. A 93% decrease in the median KAP between the first and last TI was noted (median KAP = 323.0mGy.cm2 vs. 24.0mGy.cm2, p < 0.0001). A decrease in the KAP was observed for each of the 11 anesthetists. We also noted a significant decrease in the time of fluoroscopy and the number of exposures. Upgrading the fluoroscopy equipment and completing two dedicated training courses allowed for a drastic decrease patient exposure to ionizing radiation during venous access port implantation by non-radiologist practitioners.