Autonomy within the European Union: A Relational Perspective Ray and Maurice Kinsella Introduction The European Union (EU) has, over the last decade, been scarred – and indeed its viability called into question – by a succession of interrelated crises. This period of instability dates, more or less, from the European banking crisis, including the resultant economic and socio-political instability across the eurozone and the wider EU. But the epicentre of what can best be described as a truly existential crisis goes much deeper – from economic inequality and the near eclipse of Social Europe, to a yawning democratic deficit that has created a widespread sense of disenchantment and alienation from the European Project (as has been given expression in the ongoing Brexit debacle). The resultant tensions have often been rendered, imperfectly, as ‘populism’. At the heart of these strains is the pressure between two tectonic forces, the perception of an increasingly hegemonistic EU and the aspiration to recover iteratively eroded national autonomy. This is a consistent theme that has emerged from a succession of national elections across the EU. It is real and authentic and the single greatest priority of the new European Commission and parliament is to engage reflectively with this phenomenon, beginning with a renewed understanding of autonomy. We explore this pivotally important issue in this paper. Autonomy, as a form of self-law (auto-nomos), can be conceptually excavated in two distinct but related ways. Firstly, from a philosophical perspective,autonomyisaconceptthatcontributestowardsourunderstanding of the socio-political ontology of nations and their attendant normative and legislative status. Secondly, from a practical perspective, it is the iteratively realised capacity that encompasses taking ownership not just of specific decisions and actions, but over a broader national narrative: to govern in accordance with justifications and motivations that are authentically the nation’s own, rather than the product of coercive forces.1 To address the Autonomy within the European Union: A Relational Perspective Studies • volume 108 • number 431 275 Studies_layout_AUTUMN-2019.indd 43 21/08/2019 09:14 question, ‘What path do we wish to carve out for ourselves as a nation?’, therefore first necessitates answering, even to a limited degree,‘who are we as a nation?’ Autonomy is, in this instance, the recognition and realisation of this insight – to progressively become oneself amongst others and, aligned with this, to construct a national narrative that is both authentic and meaningful. In section one, we put forward a provisional model of autonomy as ‘becoming oneself amongst others’; in particular focusing on its relational-rootedness and the significance that this has within the context of EU relations. In section two, we reflect on the extent to which imposed austerity – which is expressed in ‘Troikanomics’ – is indicative of a chronic undermining of EU member nations’ autonomy. In section three we develop this analysis by exploring how Troikanomics has subverted a set of specific autonomous capacities possessed by EU member nations. Looking to the future, a challenge for the EU is the extent to which it is prepared to critique the nature and purpose of intra-EU relationships, to learn lessons from Troikanomics, and to appreciate national autonomy’s relational-rootedness.2 Autonomy: a relationally fostered capacity National autonomy is the relational capacity to move towards a sense of clarity and coherence in who one is as a nation, and to express this understanding within one’s national pursuits. This process of ‘becoming oneself among others’ emerges through the coalescence of three autonomous capacities: self-governance, self-determination and self-affirmation. Self-governance is a nation’s capacity to critically engage with, and respond to, the range of characteristics that constitute its ‘domestic identity’. Self-determination is a nation’s capacity to critically engage with, and respond to, the range of characteristics comprising its transnational environment. Self-affirmation is a nation’s capacity to trust in its own legitimacy as an autonomous entity – encompassing its right to affirm and be answerable for ‘who they are’ amidst a multitude of other nations.3 Every country believes that they have a claim on autonomy – that their capacity to exercise ownership over their trajectory is a right that should be upheld in the treaties, policies and provisions that form and foster transnational...