Abstract

The Islamic legal system differs from other legal attitudes, as civil law traditions described by law’s codification or common law practices based on binding judicial precedents. In Islamic law, there is neither history of law’s classification, nor an understanding of binding legal precedents. The process of ijtihad (analogical deduction) in Islamic (Sharie‘a) law, though, is alike to Case law model. This article discusses the main principles of criminal law substantially and procedurally and the rules of evidence for each crime is so strict and need a lot of work to proof its commission and to apply the punishments, so it sounds stricter in application than the positive laws without any contradiction to them, so it outlined and described the essential features of Islamic criminal law. Some scholars argued that international human rights values should be interpreted, applied, and practiced by domestic cultural and religious ideals. Islamic criminal law is genuinely rooted in the revelations’ tests and as such is divinely based and driven, not to remark circuitously mingled with spirituality and ethics while instructing human dignity’s philosophies and life appreciation’s values. So, in the end, as the Islamic human rights law charter is earlier than the Human Rights Declaration, so we may not ask ourselves if Islamic law is compatible with HR so, instead, we may ask which parts of the that law or the Sharie‘a norms are similar to the HR Declaration and how they are applied in each country.

Highlights

  • Introduction and OverviewThe Islamic legal system varies from other legal approaches, as civil law practices described by law’s codification or common law traditions based on binding judicial precedents

  • Where the principles of the Qur’an and Sunnah do not sufficiently resolve a legal issue, Muslim intellectuals use Fiqh, which is the process of inferring and applying Sharie‘a norms to reach a legal purpose and its methodologies and implementation are numerous, as various schools of jurisprudential (Sunni and Shie‘a) thought (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi‘i, and Hanbali) emerges [4]. Based on this succinct backdrop, this article will delve in elaborating the main principles of the Islamic criminal justice system and proof that it is totally is similar to the positive secular criminal justice mechanisms

  • We discussed the main principles of criminal law substantially and procedurally and the rules of evidence for each crime is so strict and need a lot of work to proof its commission and to apply the punishments, so it sounds stricter in application than the positive laws without any contradiction to them, so it outlined and described the essential features of Islamic criminal law

Read more

Summary

Introduction and Overview

The Islamic legal system varies from other legal approaches, as civil law practices described by law’s codification or common law traditions based on binding judicial precedents. Where the principles of the Qur’an and Sunnah do not sufficiently resolve a legal issue, Muslim intellectuals use Fiqh, which is the process of inferring and applying Sharie‘a norms to reach a legal purpose and its methodologies and implementation are numerous, as various schools of jurisprudential (Sunni and Shie‘a) thought (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi‘i, and Hanbali) emerges [4]. Based on this succinct backdrop, this article will delve in elaborating the main principles of the Islamic criminal justice system and proof that it is totally is similar to the positive secular criminal justice mechanisms

The Relation between the State and Religion
Conclusion and Policy Recommendations
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call