"Paradoxically, when speaking about the urban architecture of Wallachia, we refer to buildings that transpose into the urban space the characteristics of vernacular architecture. However, the modelling infl uences of this type of formal expression are multiple and owe much to the transit of Bulgarian and Macedonian master masons through the Ottoman Empire. Representing the typical built stock of Bucharest up to the fi rst half of the nineteenth century, this architecture is going to be almost totally replaced by neoclassical, neo-Gothic and eclectic buildings. The late recognition of the value of town architecture is mostly due to causes linked to “the image” of Bucharest. At the turn of the nineteenth century, the city wanted to erase its rural aspect and emphasize the importance of its recently built representative great eclectic palaces. Nevertheless a parallel reality constituted by its rural character impregnates the city up to the present day. “Europe did never have, since the end of World War II, a capital more submissive to the rural than Bucharest.” Until the 70’s urban architecture was still perceived as minor and somewhat insignifi cant. Then a major change in trend appeared, while Romania underwent a period dominated by protocronism - a theory aiming at emphasising Romanian priorities in the most diverse domains. Th is period overlaps the restoration campaign in the Historic Centre of Bucharest, conducted by architect Constantin Joja. Its goal was to convey the “true image” of the town, by eliminating some of the eclectic façades and reconstituting building fronts in the style called urban architecture. Th is controversial restoration approach resulted in very successful examples (as in the case of Manuc Inn, based on consistent iconographic data) but also in the creation of a series of new façades designed by the architects. Under these circumstances the conservation of the few examples of authentic urban architecture becomes even more signifi cant. Two of the buildings erected in the style, belong to a program that was still representative for Bucharest in the fi rst decades of the 19th century: the commercial inn – a late and small scale version of the Great Inns described by Frederic Damé as characteristic buildings of the 18th century Bucharest. Both are to be found in Calea Moşilor (Podul Târgului de Afară), in different stages of use and conservation. Because it belongs to traditional typologies, dating urban architecture is particularly diffi cult. Based mainly on the characteristics of the buildings, with little or irrelevant documentary support, the supposed construction dates of the two inns are in fact, signifi cantly prior to the real date of their completion. Establishing the exact building date does not diminish their value, demonstrating the late persistence of local models. "
Read full abstract