DNA-protein Crosslinks Research Articles

DNA-protein crosslinks are key to platinum-based chemotherapeutic cytotoxicity

DNA-protein crosslinks are key to platinum-based chemotherapeutic cytotoxicity

Endogenous aldehyde-induced DNA–protein crosslinks are resolved by transcription-coupled repair

DNA–protein crosslinks (DPCs) induced by aldehydes interfere with replication and transcription. Hereditary deficiencies in DPC repair and aldehyde clearance processes cause progeria, including Ruijs–Aalfs syndrome (RJALS) and AMeD syndrome (AMeDS) in humans. Although the elimination of DPC during replication has been well established, how cells overcome DPC lesions in transcription remains elusive. Here we show that endogenous aldehyde-induced DPC roadblocks are efficiently resolved by transcription-coupled repair (TCR). We develop a high-throughput sequencing technique to measure the genome-wide distribution of DPCs (DPC-seq). Using proteomics and DPC-seq, we demonstrate that the conventional TCR complex as well as VCP/p97 and the proteasome are required for the removal of formaldehyde-induced DPCs. TFIIS-dependent cleavage of RNAPII transcripts protects against transcription obstacles. Finally, a mouse model lacking both aldehyde clearance and TCR confirms endogenous DPC accumulation in actively transcribed regions. Collectively, our data provide evidence that transcription-coupled DPC repair (TC-DPCR) as well as aldehyde clearance are crucial for protecting against metabolic genotoxin, thus explaining the molecular pathogenesis of AMeDS and other disorders associated with defects in TCR, such as Cockayne syndrome.

Transcription-coupled DNA–protein crosslink repair by CSB and CRL4CSA-mediated degradation

DNA–protein crosslinks (DPCs) arise from enzymatic intermediates, metabolism or chemicals like chemotherapeutics. DPCs are highly cytotoxic as they impede DNA-based processes such as replication, which is counteracted through proteolysis-mediated DPC removal by spartan (SPRTN) or the proteasome. However, whether DPCs affect transcription and how transcription-blocking DPCs are repaired remains largely unknown. Here we show that DPCs severely impede RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription and are preferentially repaired in active genes by transcription-coupled DPC (TC-DPC) repair. TC-DPC repair is initiated by recruiting the transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair (TC-NER) factors CSB and CSA to DPC-stalled RNA polymerase II. CSA and CSB are indispensable for TC-DPC repair; however, the downstream TC-NER factors UVSSA and XPA are not, a result indicative of a non-canonical TC-NER mechanism. TC-DPC repair functions independently of SPRTN but is mediated by the ubiquitin ligase CRL4CSA and the proteasome. Thus, DPCs in genes are preferentially repaired in a transcription-coupled manner to facilitate unperturbed transcription.

Transcription-coupled repair of DNA–protein cross-links depends on CSA and CSB

Covalent DNA–protein cross-links (DPCs) are toxic DNA lesions that block replication and require repair by multiple pathways. Whether transcription blockage contributes to the toxicity of DPCs and how cells respond when RNA polymerases stall at DPCs is unknown. Here we find that DPC formation arrests transcription and induces ubiquitylation and degradation of RNA polymerase II. Using genetic screens and a method for the genome-wide mapping of DNA–protein adducts, DPC sequencing, we discover that Cockayne syndrome (CS) proteins CSB and CSA provide resistance to DPC-inducing agents by promoting DPC repair in actively transcribed genes. Consequently, CSB- or CSA-deficient cells fail to efficiently restart transcription after induction of DPCs. In contrast, nucleotide excision repair factors that act downstream of CSB and CSA at ultraviolet light-induced DNA lesions are dispensable. Our study describes a transcription-coupled DPC repair pathway and suggests that defects in this pathway may contribute to the unique neurological features of CS.

Abstract 7113: Targeting the repair of DNA-protein crosslinks induced by bifunctional alkylating agents

Abstract Bifunctional alkylating agents, such as nitrosoureas, platinum-based therapeutics, and chloroethylhydrazines, have demonstrated clinical successes against cancer by inducing cytotoxic interstrand or intrastrand DNA crosslinks. However, the less well-characterized capacity of these agents to couple DNA to chromosomally-associated proteins may also contribute to these compounds’ observed cytotoxicities. Bulky DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) could obstruct the DNA metabolism critical to cancer proliferation, thus contribute to genomic instability and cell death. To endogenously repair DPCs, human cells often utilize a DPC-specific proteolytic mechanism dependent on the metalloprotease SPRTN. Complementary approaches for quantifying DPCs, generated ex vivo, to assess the capacity of several bifunctional alkylating agents to induce these lesions in cultured human leukemia cells are presented here. In the first approach, proteins were isolated from lysates of drug-treated cells and protein-bound DNA was quantified as a ratio to the total DNA present in the lysates. In the complementary approach, DNA was extracted from lysates of drug-treated cells using a modified ‘STAR’ assay in which genomic DNA is isolated and the DNA-bound proteins were quantified by fluorescein isothiocyanate labeling. Micromolar concentrations of the nitrogen mustard mechlorethamine and nitrosourea lomustine induced significant DPC formation while more modest DPC formation was observed using similar concentrations of the chloroethylating agents carmustine and laromustine, as well as cisplatin. Bifunctional alkylating agents dependent on epoxide functionality, including dianhydrogalacticol and diepoxybutane, required drug concentrations of at least one order of magnitude larger to produce similar DPC yields measurable by these techniques. A strategy to interfere with the DPC repair pathway via SPRTN knockdown and assess increased sensitivity of cancer cells to bifunctional alkylating agents is also presented. Chemotherapeutic sensitization by targeting SPRTN could suggest a therapeutic strategy to improve effectiveness of several DNA-targeted anticancer agents, especially if extended to other therapeutics that trap DPCs such as inhibitors of topoisomerase and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Further, identifying structure-function relationships with respect to bifunctional alkylating agents and DPC formation could inform the future development and clinical utilization of these chemotherapies. Citation Format: Cole Turner, Hailey Cerrato, Victoria Melehov, Charlotte Healy, Kevin P. Rice. Targeting the repair of DNA-protein crosslinks induced by bifunctional alkylating agents [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 7113.

Simple, Visual, Point-of-Care SARS-CoV-2 Detection Incorporating Recombinase Polymerase Amplification and Target DNA-Protein Crosslinking Enhanced Chemiluminescence.

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, driven by persistent SARS-CoV-2 transmission, threatens human health worldwide, underscoring the urgent need for an efficient, low-cost, rapid SARS-CoV-2 detection method. Herein, we developed a point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 detection method incorporating recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) and DNA-protein crosslinking chemiluminescence (DPCL) (RPADPCL). RPADPCL involves the crosslinking of biotinylated double-stranded RPA DNA products with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled streptavidin (SA-HRP). Modified products are captured using SA-labeled magnetic beads, and then analyzed using a chemiluminescence detector and smartphone after the addition of a chemiluminescent substrate. Under optimal conditions, the RPADPCL limit of detection (LOD) was observed to be 6 copies (within the linear detection range of 1-300 copies) for a plasmid containing the SARS-CoV-2 N gene and 15 copies (within the linear range of 10-500 copies) for in vitro transcribed (IVT) SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The proposed method is convenient, specific, visually intuitive, easy to use, and does not require external excitation. The effective RPADPCL detection of SARS-CoV-2 in complex matrix systems was verified by testing simulated clinical samples containing 10% human saliva or a virus transfer medium (VTM) spiked with a plasmid containing a SARS-CoV-2 N gene sequence or SARS-CoV-2 IVT RNA. Consequently, this method has great potential for detecting targets in clinical samples.

Abstract 1129 Examination of the Biochemical Mechanism of SPRTN in the Selection and Removal of DNA-Protein Crosslinks

Abstract 1129 Examination of the Biochemical Mechanism of SPRTN in the Selection and Removal of DNA-Protein Crosslinks

Structure of Escherichia coli exonuclease VII

Exonuclease VII (ExoVII) is a ubiquitous bacterial nuclease. Encoded by the xseA and xseB genes, ExoVII participates in multiple nucleic acid-dependent pathways including the processing of multicopy single-stranded DNA and the repair of covalent DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs). Although many biochemical properties of ExoVII have been defined, little is known about its structure/function relationships. Here, we use cryoelectron microscopy (cryoEM) to determine that Escherichia coli ExoVII comprises a highly elongated XseA4·XseB24 holo-complex. Each XseA subunit dimerizes through a central extended α-helical segment decorated by six XseB subunits and a C-terminal, domain-swapped β-barrel element; two XseA2·XseB12 subcomplexes further associate using N-terminal OB (oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding) folds and catalytic domains to form a spindle-shaped, catenated octaicosamer. The catalytic domains of XseA, which adopt a nuclease fold related to 3-dehydroquinate dehydratases, are sequestered in the center of the complex and accessible only through large pores formed between XseA tetramers. The architectural organization of ExoVII, combined with biochemical studies, indicate that substrate selectivity is controlled by steric access to its nuclease elements and that tetramer dissociation results from substrate DNA binding. Despite a lack of sequence and fold homology, the physical organization of ExoVII is reminiscent of Mre11·Rad50/SbcCD ATP (adenosine triphosphate)-dependent nucleases used in the repair of double-stranded DNA breaks, including those formed by DPCs through aberrant topoisomerase activity, suggesting that there may have been convergent evolutionary pressure to contend with such damage events.

Mass Spectrometry Evidence for Forming Schiff Base 3'-DNA-Histone Cross-Links from Abasic Sites in Vitro and in Human Cells.

Histones catalyze DNA strand incision at apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites accompanied by the formation of reversible but long-lived DNA-protein cross-links at 3'-termini (3'-histone-DPCs). However, the chemical structures of 3'-histone-DPCs are not well characterized, and whether they are formed in cells is uncertain. In this study, we developed a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry workflow to characterize DPCs produced from the reaction of histones with AP sites and wish to report evidence that histones cross-link to incised AP sites via Schiff bases. We also demonstrated for the first time that 3'-histone-DPCs are produced endogenously in human embryonic kidney 293T cells.

Enzymatic Processing of DNA-Protein Crosslinks.

DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) represent a unique and complex form of DNA damage formed by covalent attachment of proteins to DNA. DPCs are formed through a variety of mechanisms and can significantly impede essential cellular processes such as transcription and replication. For this reason, anti-cancer drugs that form DPCs have proven effective in cancer therapy. While cells rely on numerous different processes to remove DPCs, the molecular mechanisms responsible for orchestrating these processes remain obscure. Having this insight could potentially be harnessed therapeutically to improve clinical outcomes in the battle against cancer. In this review, we describe the ways cells enzymatically process DPCs. These processing events include direct reversal of the DPC via hydrolysis, nuclease digestion of the DNA backbone to delete the DPC and surrounding DNA, proteolytic processing of the crosslinked protein, as well as covalent modification of the DNA-crosslinked proteins with ubiquitin, SUMO, and Poly(ADP) Ribose (PAR).

Novel Processes Associated with the Repair of Interstrand Cross-Links Derived from Abasic Sites in Duplex DNA: Roles for the Base Excision Repair Glycosylase NEIL3 and the SRAP Protein HMCES.

Recent studies have defined a novel pathway for the repair of interstrand cross-links derived from the reaction of an adenine residue with an apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site on the opposing strand of DNA (dA-AP ICL). Stalling of a replication fork at the dA-AP ICL triggers TRAIP-dependent ubiquitylation of the CMG helicase that recruits the base excision repair glycosylase NEIL3 to the lesion. NEIL3 unhooks the dA-AP ICL to regenerate the native adenine residue on one strand and an AP site on the other strand. Covalent capture of the abasic site by the SRAP protein HMCES protects against genomic instability that would result from cleavage of the abasic site in the context of single-stranded DNA at the replication fork. After repair synthesis moves the HMCES-AP adduct into the context of double-stranded DNA, the DNA-protein cross-link is resolved by a nonproteolytic mechanism involving dissociation of thiazolidine attachment. The AP site in duplex DNA is then repaired by the base excision repair pathway.

Aldehyde-induced DNA-protein crosslinks- DNA damage, repair and mutagenesis.

Aldehyde exposure has been shown to lead to the formation of DNA damage comprising of DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs), base adducts and interstrand or intrastrand crosslinks. DPCs have recently drawn more attention because of recent advances in detection and quantification of these adducts. DPCs are highly deleterious to genome stability and have been shown to block replication forks, leading to wide-spread mutagenesis. Cellular mechanisms to prevent DPC-induced damage include excision repair pathways, homologous recombination, and specialized proteases involved in cleaving the covalently bound proteins from DNA. These pathways were first discovered in formaldehyde-treated cells, however, since then, various other aldehydes have been shown to induce formation of DPCs in cells. Defects in DPC repair or aldehyde clearance mechanisms lead to various diseases including Ruijs-Aalfs syndrome and AMeD syndrome in humans. Here, we discuss recent developments in understanding how aldehydes form DPCs, how they are repaired, and the consequences of defects in these repair pathways.

An Optimized High-Resolution Mapping Method for Glucocorticoid Receptor-DNA Binding in Mouse Primary Macrophages.

ChIP-exo is a powerful tool for achieving enhanced sensitivity and single-base-pair resolution of transcription factor (TF) binding, which utilizes a combination of chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and lambda exonuclease digestion (exo) followed by high-throughput sequencing. ChIP-nexus (chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments with nucleotide resolution through exonuclease, unique barcode, and single ligation) is an updated and simplified version of the original ChIP-exo method, which has reported an efficient adapter ligation through the DNA circularization step. Building upon an established method, we present a protocol for generating NGS (next-generation sequencing) ready and high-quality ChIP-nexus library for glucocorticoid receptor (GR). This method is specifically optimized for bone marrow-derived macrophage (BMDM) cells. The protocol is initiated by the formation of DNA-protein cross-links in intact cells. This is followed by chromatin shearing, chromatin immunoprecipitation, ligation of sequencing adapters, digestion of adapter-ligated DNA using lambda exonuclease, and purification of single-stranded DNA for circularization and library amplification.

Isolation and detection of DNA-protein crosslinks in mammalian cells.

DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) are toxic DNA lesions wherein a protein is covalently attached to DNA. If not rapidly repaired, DPCs create obstacles that disturb DNA replication, transcription and DNA damage repair, ultimately leading to genome instability. The persistence of DPCs is associated with premature ageing, cancer and neurodegeneration. In mammalian cells, the repair of DPCs mainly relies on the proteolytic activities of SPRTN and the 26S proteasome, complemented by other enzymes including TDP1/2 and the MRN complex, and many of the activities involved are essential, restricting genetic approaches. For many years, the study of DPC repair in mammalian cells was hindered by the lack of standardised assays, most notably assays that reliably quantified the proteins or proteolytic fragments covalently bound to DNA. Recent interest in the field has spurred the development of several biochemical methods for DPC analysis. Here, we critically analyse the latest techniques for DPC isolation and the benefits and drawbacks of each. We aim to assist researchers in selecting the most suitable isolation method for their experimental requirements and questions, and to facilitate the comparison of results across different laboratories using different approaches.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae additions normalized hemocyte differential genes expression and regulated crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) oxidative damage under cadmium stress

Because China produces the most crayfish in the world, safe solutions must be improved to mitigate the risks of ongoing heavy metal stressors accumulation. This study aimed to use Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a bioremediation agent to counteract the harmful effect of cadmium (Cd) on crayfish (Procambarus clarkia). Our study used three concentrations of S. cerevisiae on crayfish feed to assess their Cd toxicity remediation effect by measuring total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and the biomarkers related to oxidative stress like malondialdehyde (MDA), protein carbonyl derivates (PCO), and DNA–protein crosslink (DPC). A graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy device was used to determine Cd contents in crayfish. Furthermore, the mRNA expression levels of lysozyme (LSZ), metallothionein (MT), and prophenoloxidase (proPO) were evaluated before and following the addition of S. cerevisiae. The results indicated that S. cerevisae at 5% supplemented in fundamental feed exhibited the best removal effect, and Cd removal rates at days 4th, 8th, 12th, and 21st were 12, 19, 29.7, and 66.45%, respectively, which were significantly higher than the basal diet of crayfish. The addition of S. cerevisiae increased TAC levels. On the other hand, it decreased MDA, PCO, and DPC, which had risen due to Cd exposure. Furthermore, it increased the expression of proPO, which was reduced by Cd exposure, and decreased the expression of LSZ and MT, acting in the opposite direction of Cd exposure alone. These findings demonstrated that feeding S. cerevisiae effectively reduces the Cd from crayfish and could be used to develop Cd-free crayfish-based foods.

Poly(ADP-Ribose) Glycohydrolase (PARG) Removes Repressive Poly-ADP Ribose Marks from DNA Polymerase Theta (PolΘ) to Stimulate DNA Double-Strand Breaks Repair in Myeloid Malignancies

Myeloid malignant cells (AML, MPN, CML) expressing oncogenic tyrosine kinases [OTKs: FLT3(ITD), JAK2(V617F), BCR/ABL1, respectively] accumulate DNA damage but altered DNA repair mechanisms protect them from apoptosis. We reported before that formaldehyde generated by altered serine/one-carbon cycle metabolism in malignant cells harboring OTKs contributed to accumulation of toxic DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) which were converted to highly lethal DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). To counteract the toxicity of DSBs, OTKs enhanced the expression of DNA polymerase theta (PolΘ, encoded by POLQ gene), a unique DNA helicase-DNA polymerase fusion protein that promotes error-prone repair of DSBs by a mechanism referred to as PolΘ-mediated DNA end-joining (TMEJ). PolΘ plays an essential role in the initiation and maintenance of hematological malignancies harboring OTKs. Although the cellular activities of PolΘ have been widely studied, little is known about how PolΘ is regulated at the molecular level. For example, whether post-translational modifications of PolΘ are important for its TMEJ activity and regulation is unknown. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) dependent poly-(ADP)-ribosylation (PARylation) of proteins is one of the major post-translational modification events involved in the DNA damage response (DDR). PARP1 - the founding member of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family -transfers adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose from nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD +) to substrate proteins enabling their PARylation. PARylation is tightly controlled by the glycohydrolase activity of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG). Thus, interplay between PARP1 and PARG is thought to regulate the PARylation status of relevant DDR proteins and multiple studies demonstrated that both PARP1 and PARG contribute to DDR. Here, we investigated whether the interplay of PARP1 and PARG is important for the regulation of TMEJ and the specific activities of PolΘ in myeloid malignancies harboring OTKs. We found that upon DNA damage OTKs exerted temporal effect on PolΘ, PARP1 and PARG detection in chromatin fractions. While both PolΘ and PARG displayed continuous time-dependent accumulation during 120 min. after irradiation, PARP1 levels sharply increased at 20 min. and dissipated at 120 min. We find that PARP1 binds to and directly PARylates PolΘ in vitro and in cells. However, PARylated PolΘ is unable to perform TMEJ in vitro due to its inability to bind DNA despite its PARylation dependent recruitment to DNA. Hence, PARG is needed to reactivate PolΘ DNA binding and its TMEJ activity by removing repressive PAR marks on PolΘ. In support of this, cellular studies show that PARG is essential for TMEJ and support a two-step mechanism of a PARP1-PARG regulatory axis of PolΘ and TMEJ. In the first step, the rate of PARP1-PolΘ spatiotemporal recruitment to DNA damage foci supports a rapid step whereby PARP1 PARylates PolΘ and facilitates its recruitment to the vicinity of DNA damage in an inactive state. The rate of PARG spatiotemporal recruitment supports a second step whereby subsequent recruitment of PARG corresponds to dissipation of PARP1 and PAR at DNA damage sites, dePARylation of PolΘ, and activation of TMEJ. These studies elucidate an unprecedented mechanism of PARP1-PARG activation of TMEJ and reveal the molecular basis by which PARP1 and PARG inhibition suppresses TMEJ. In conclusion, using intracellular and biochemical approaches we show here that both PARP1 and PARG are required for TMEJ despite their counteracting enzymatic activities. We also pinpointed a unique dynamic spatiotemporal interplay between PolΘ, PARP1 and PARG to regulate TMEJ activity. During the initial stage, PARP1 activated by DNA damage PARylates PolΘ and facilitates its recruitment to the vicinity of DNA damage. PARG removal of PAR from PolΘ reactivated its interaction with DNA resulting in robust TMEJ activity in vitro and in cells. Thus, DNA/chromatin binding and TMEJ activity of PolΘ were restored upon PARG-mediated removal of PAR repressive marks on PolΘ. This process seems to play a critical role in protecting OTK-positive hematopoietic malignant cells from genotoxic effect of formaldehyde generated by altered serine/one-carbon cycle metabolism.

Self-reversal facilitates the resolution of HMCES DNA-protein crosslinks in cells

Abasic sites are common DNA lesions stalling polymerases and threatening genome stability. When located in single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), they are shielded from aberrant processing by 5-hydroxymethyl cytosine, embryonic stem cell (ESC)-specific (HMCES) via a DNA-protein crosslink (DPC) that prevents double-strand breaks. Nevertheless, HMCES-DPCs must be removed to complete DNA repair. Here, we find that DNA polymerase α inhibition generates ssDNA abasic sites and HMCES-DPCs. These DPCs are resolved with a half-life of approximately 1.5 h. HMCES can catalyze its own DPC self-reversal reaction, which is dependent on glutamate 127 and is favored when the ssDNA is converted to duplex DNA. When the self-reversal mechanism is inactivated in cells, HMCES-DPC removal is delayed, cell proliferation is slowed, and cells become hypersensitive to DNA damage agents that increase AP (apurinic/apyrimidinic) site formation. In these circumstances, proteolysis may become an important mechanism of HMCES-DPC resolution. Thus, HMCES-DPC formation followed by self-reversal is an important mechanism for ssDNA AP site management.

DNA-Histone Cross-Link Formation via Hole Trapping in Nucleosome Core Particles.

Radical cations (holes) produced in DNA by ionizing radiation and other oxidants yield DNA-protein cross-links (DPCs). Detailed studies of DPC formation in chromatin via this process are lacking. We describe here a comprehensive examination of DPC formation within nucleosome core particles (NCPs), which are the monomeric component of chromatin. DNA holes are introduced at defined sites within NCPs that are constructed from the bottom-up. DPCs form at DNA holes in yields comparable to those of alkali-labile DNA lesions that result from water trapping. DPC-forming efficiency and site preference within the NCP are dependent on translational and rotational positioning. Mass spectrometry and the use of mutant histones reveal that lysine residues in histone N-terminal tails and amino termini are responsible for the DPC formation. These studies are corroborated by computational simulation at the microsecond time scale, showing a wide range of interactions that can precede DPC formation. Three consecutive dGs, which are pervasive in the human genome, including G-quadruplex-forming sequences, are sufficient to produce DPCs that could impact gene expression.

Ubiquitin signaling and the proteasome drive human DNA-protein crosslink repair.

DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) are large cytotoxic DNA lesions that form following exposure to chemotherapeutic drugs and environmental chemicals. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) and homologous recombination (HR) promote survival following exposure to DPC-inducing agents. However, it is not known how cells recognize DPC lesions, or what mechanisms selectively target DPC lesions to these respective repair pathways. To address these questions, we examined DPC recognition and repair by transfecting a synthetic DPC lesion comprised of the human oxoguanine glycosylase (OGG1) protein crosslinked to double-stranded M13MP18 into human cells. In wild-type cells, this lesion is efficiently repaired, whereas cells deficient in NER can only repair this lesion if an un-damaged homologous donor is co-transfected. Transfected DPC is subject to rapid K63 polyubiquitination. In NER proficient cells, the DPC is subject to K48 polyubiquitination, and is removed via a proteasome-dependent mechanism. In NER-deficient cells, the DNA-conjugated protein is not subject to K48 polyubiquitination. Instead, the K63 tag remains attached, and is only lost when a homologous donor molecule is present. Taken together, these results support a model in which selective addition of polyubiquitin chains to DNA-crosslinked protein leads to selective recruitment of the proteasome and the cellular NER and recombinational DNA repair machinery.

Effect of pachymaran on oxidative stress and DNA damage induced by formaldehyde

To further explore the pharmacological effect of pachymaran, this article studied the inhibition of pachymaran on oxidative stress and genetic damage induced by formaldehyde. 40 adult Kunming male mice were randomly divided into four groups with different interventions. One week later, the contents of serum SOD, GR, MDA, DNA–protein crosslink (DPC), 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHDG) and DNA adduct were determined by ELISA. The results showed that there were statistically significant differences in the contents of SOD, GR and MDA among the four groups (P < 0.01). The activity of SOD and GR increased along with the increase of pachymaran dosage (SOD: rs = 0.912, P < 0.01; GR: rs = 0.857, P < 0.01), while the content of MDA showing a significant negative correlation (rs = − 0.893, P < 0.01). There were statistically significant differences in the levels of DPC, 8-OHDG and DNA adduct among the four groups (DPC and DNA adduct: P < 0.01, 8-OHDG: P < 0.05), the concentration decreased along with the increase of pachymaran dosage (DPC: rs = − 0.855, P < 0.01; 8-OHDG:rs = − 0.412, P < 0.05, DNA adduct: γs = − 0.869, P < 0.01). It can be inferred that pachymaran can inhibit oxidative stress and DNA damage induced by formaldehyde with the dose–effect relationship.