Poly(ADP-Ribose) Glycohydrolase (PARG) Removes Repressive Poly-ADP Ribose Marks from DNA Polymerase Theta (PolΘ) to Stimulate DNA Double-Strand Breaks Repair in Myeloid Malignancies

Abstract

Myeloid malignant cells (AML, MPN, CML) expressing oncogenic tyrosine kinases [OTKs: FLT3(ITD), JAK2(V617F), BCR/ABL1, respectively] accumulate DNA damage but altered DNA repair mechanisms protect them from apoptosis. We reported before that formaldehyde generated by altered serine/one-carbon cycle metabolism in malignant cells harboring OTKs contributed to accumulation of toxic DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) which were converted to highly lethal DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). To counteract the toxicity of DSBs, OTKs enhanced the expression of DNA polymerase theta (PolΘ, encoded by POLQ gene), a unique DNA helicase-DNA polymerase fusion protein that promotes error-prone repair of DSBs by a mechanism referred to as PolΘ-mediated DNA end-joining (TMEJ). PolΘ plays an essential role in the initiation and maintenance of hematological malignancies harboring OTKs. Although the cellular activities of PolΘ have been widely studied, little is known about how PolΘ is regulated at the molecular level. For example, whether post-translational modifications of PolΘ are important for its TMEJ activity and regulation is unknown. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) dependent poly-(ADP)-ribosylation (PARylation) of proteins is one of the major post-translational modification events involved in the DNA damage response (DDR). PARP1 - the founding member of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family -transfers adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose from nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD +) to substrate proteins enabling their PARylation. PARylation is tightly controlled by the glycohydrolase activity of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG). Thus, interplay between PARP1 and PARG is thought to regulate the PARylation status of relevant DDR proteins and multiple studies demonstrated that both PARP1 and PARG contribute to DDR. Here, we investigated whether the interplay of PARP1 and PARG is important for the regulation of TMEJ and the specific activities of PolΘ in myeloid malignancies harboring OTKs. We found that upon DNA damage OTKs exerted temporal effect on PolΘ, PARP1 and PARG detection in chromatin fractions. While both PolΘ and PARG displayed continuous time-dependent accumulation during 120 min. after irradiation, PARP1 levels sharply increased at 20 min. and dissipated at 120 min. We find that PARP1 binds to and directly PARylates PolΘ in vitro and in cells. However, PARylated PolΘ is unable to perform TMEJ in vitro due to its inability to bind DNA despite its PARylation dependent recruitment to DNA. Hence, PARG is needed to reactivate PolΘ DNA binding and its TMEJ activity by removing repressive PAR marks on PolΘ. In support of this, cellular studies show that PARG is essential for TMEJ and support a two-step mechanism of a PARP1-PARG regulatory axis of PolΘ and TMEJ. In the first step, the rate of PARP1-PolΘ spatiotemporal recruitment to DNA damage foci supports a rapid step whereby PARP1 PARylates PolΘ and facilitates its recruitment to the vicinity of DNA damage in an inactive state. The rate of PARG spatiotemporal recruitment supports a second step whereby subsequent recruitment of PARG corresponds to dissipation of PARP1 and PAR at DNA damage sites, dePARylation of PolΘ, and activation of TMEJ. These studies elucidate an unprecedented mechanism of PARP1-PARG activation of TMEJ and reveal the molecular basis by which PARP1 and PARG inhibition suppresses TMEJ. In conclusion, using intracellular and biochemical approaches we show here that both PARP1 and PARG are required for TMEJ despite their counteracting enzymatic activities. We also pinpointed a unique dynamic spatiotemporal interplay between PolΘ, PARP1 and PARG to regulate TMEJ activity. During the initial stage, PARP1 activated by DNA damage PARylates PolΘ and facilitates its recruitment to the vicinity of DNA damage. PARG removal of PAR from PolΘ reactivated its interaction with DNA resulting in robust TMEJ activity in vitro and in cells. Thus, DNA/chromatin binding and TMEJ activity of PolΘ were restored upon PARG-mediated removal of PAR repressive marks on PolΘ. This process seems to play a critical role in protecting OTK-positive hematopoietic malignant cells from genotoxic effect of formaldehyde generated by altered serine/one-carbon cycle metabolism.