240 Background: Degarelix, is a GnRH-antagonist, which is used in the treatment of prostate cancer since 2009. We performed a non-interventional study (NIS) with prostate cancer (PCA) patients treated routinely with degarelix. This NIS focused on pharmaco-economical data, quality of life as well as efficacy and safety in patients receiving degarelix as first or second line therapy. Methods: In the interims analysis of this ongoing NIS, data from 279 out of 670 PCA-patients treated with degarelix were included. The included cohort reflects advanced PCA patients (age: 72 years, PSA: 15.8 ng/ml (median values)).Testosterone and PSA values, quality of life and pharmaco-economical data were collected at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Quality of life was assessed by EQ-5D. Pharmaco-economical data included direct costs for physicians, drugs, hospital, emergency treatment and others. Results: Treatment costs in hormon-naïve patients treated with degarelix were lower than in the hormonally pre-treated patients. Direct costs for six month were 498,- € for hormone naïve patients treated with degarelix in contrast to 1436,- € for hormonally pre-treated patients. As expected there was a marked difference in the PSA-decline between hormone-naïve patients and hormonally pre-treated patients. Hormone-naïve patients experienced a sharp median decrease in PSA by 80.7% (n=116) at month 1. This decline remained stable in 98.7% of the patients after one year. Median PSA reduction was significantly different (p=0.013) between hormone-naïve and pre-treated patients. Furthermore treatment of degarelix improved quality of life by 14% at one year compared to baseline. Testosterone was suppressed to a median of 0.2 ng/ml from month 1 to 12. Safety results mirrored the results of clinical trials. Conclusions: First-line treatment with degarelix was supported by a marked difference in health care costs between hormone naïve and pre-treated prostate cancer patients, who received degarelix. As expected a pronounced difference in the PSA-decrease in hormone naïve and pre-treated patients was seen. However a distinct quality of life improvement was noted in all patients.