MLRn 96.3,200 I 823 Adorno, lioucault, Lyotard), Hayesthen elaborates a studied examination ofthe discursive history oftheterm andconcept oftysteme from theRenaissance tothe Revolution. Originally a musical term, to describe a constituted organization, tysteme wasenlisted intheattempt byphilosophical discourse toimpose orderliness upona disorderly world.The notion ofsysteme wouldseemto exemplify the problematic legacyof theEnlightenment thatis at once emancipatory and oppressive. Thetensions present inthe systematizing project aretraced through the correspondences ofElizabeth ofBohemia andDescartes, Desjardins andVilledieu andGraffigny andDevauxn through the physics ofDu Chatelet, through the reading strategies ofCondillac's 7FraiM des tystemes, andthrough selected writings ofDiderotS including theLettre surlesovseugles theLettre surlessourds etmuets entries forthe Encyclopedie andtheSupplement auvoyage deBougainville. Hayesdescribes Diderot's texts, with their insistence upon'inconsequence', as 'dissipatory structures', which she explains asa kind ofde-territorialization where categories areneither attacked nor supported, butaresimply allowed either todisintegrate ortoremain absurdly in place.ForHayes, Diderot istheleastsystematic ofthethinkers studied, onewho resists theimpulse to'fixer lalangue'. Diderot, shewrites, possesses 'anintuition of the radical contingency oftheconnections that wemaponthe world' (p. I42).This important bookisofinterest, notonly toscholars oftheFrench Enlightenment but alsotomoregeneral readers inthehistory ofEuropean thought, andwouldbe 'enlightening' forstudents ofccxntemporary culture seeking a counter-discursive scepticism towards ourability toknow andcontrol. Reading the FrenJ Enlightenment courses a topographical trajectory from twentieth-century dystopias ofEnlightenment gone wrong, through the criss-crossing textual networks ofeighteenth-century Europe, toDiderot's fictionalized Tahiti, andconcludes with a pauseinLe Notre's designforthelabyrinth in thegardens at Versailles, ofwhichtheirregular, asymmetrical layout results from simultaneous systematizing andchaotic impulses. Theprocess ofre-interpreting the apparently familiar territory ofthe Enlightenment isthrown into interesting anecdotal relief through theauthor's relation ofherown curiously asymmetrical bilingual upbringing, writing French butspeaking English. Herexperience oftwo-way linguistic otherness accords with Diderot's realization in theLettre sur lesaveugles, following theblind man'saccount ofhisunderstanding of theword'mirror', thatiFrench couldbe a foreign language within French' (PP.I58-59). Hayesachieves heraim ofdemonstrating thatthere is another Enlightenment written within theEnlightenment we know, justas disorder is immanent tosystematicity. UNIVERSITY OFBRISTOL MARTIN CALDER Refexions surlesgrands hommes quisont morts enplaisantant. Arec despoesiesodiverses. BY ANDRE-FRANSOIS DESLANDES. Ed. by FRANCK SALAUN.(LAge des Lumieres, 8)Paris: Champion. 2000. I75PP. 250F. .. . n ... . . . . . s 1nlsworx, nrst puDllstecl anonymously lnI7I2,enJoyed a conslderable successas isproved bya significant number ofeditions andtranslations that went onappearing almost totheendofthecentury. Thisvolume isthefirst newedition ofthework since then, and,as such7 istobewelcomed. Famous lastwords willalways holda certain (morbid?) fascination, andthis aspect ofthis elegantly written text will give pleasure tomodern readers as itdidtotheauthor's contemporaries, butdoesnot entirely account for itsinitial popularity. Thiswas,infact, something ofa succes de scandale, for Deslandes's great men(and,indeed, women) arepresented, whether historically accurately or not,as modelrepresentatives of thephilosophical Reviews 824 movement offree thinking. Itistheir intellectual independence from the prejudices oftheChristian religion that allows them toseedeath as a logical endtothelifecycle that canbe faced inthesamewayas theother events inlife, free from the solemnsuperstitions withwhichreligion surrounds it. This was, of course, inflammatory stuff atthetime ofitspublication, andFranck Salaun's introduction dealswell with theimportance ofthis aspect both for thecontent ofthetext andits success. Deslandes's initial inspiration, ashetells ushimself, camefrom Montaigne, butheisnottheonly influence, andanother strength oftheedition isthedetailed treatment given tosources inthefootnotes. The editor's study ofcontemporary responses tothework is supported byan appendix containing reviews from the jrournal deWrevoux andthe jroarnal litteraire, andthearticle onDeslandes inSabatier deCastres's LesErois Siecles denotre litte'rature. Thewitty writing andclarity ofstyle andexpression maketheReJifexions a joy to read;theselected poemsthatwere appended toitinlater editions aremore pedestrian, although many ofthem have interesting links with theprose work, particularly poignantly inthelast, inwhich thepoetaspires to makethesamegooddeathas hisheroes.One oddity of presentation, which aXects verse quotations intheReflexions as wellas thetoe'sies diverses, isthehabit inpoems with varying line-lengths ofaligning alllinestothe sameleft margin, rather thanfollowing thenormal practice ofindenting shorter lines, a characteristic that makes appreciation ofthe rhythmic subtleties ofthe verse difficult. Thatapart, though, this is a welcome edition ofa text which, with its controversial content, isaninteresting social document, butalsomakes pleasurable . . . . reac mglnlts ownrlg zt. UNIVERSITY OFWALES, SWANSEA DEREK F.CONNON 'DesBeaute's plushardies...': le theatre allemand dansla France de l'Ancien Re'gime (I750-I789). BYFRANSOIS GENTON. (Seriedetudes germaniques, 4) SaintDenis :EditionsSuger. I999. 3s8pp. gsF. The importance oftheinfluence of Diderot's dramatic theories on Lessing's Hamburgische Dramaturgie isreadily acknowledged, as areother eighteenth-century French cultural exports totheGerman-speaking countries. FranSois Genton's study gives a timely reminder that this wasnot, however...
Read full abstract