Discriminative Stimulus Effects Of Morphine Research Articles

Modulation of morphine physical dependence and discriminative stimulus effects by ovarian hormones: Role of estradiol

Ovarian hormones influence the activity of endogenous opioids, and exogenous administration of estradiol reduces opioid intake and opioid seeking in animal models of opioid reward and reinforcement. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of ovarian hormones on the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine and naloxone-precipitated opioid withdrawal. To this end, separate groups of ovariectomized female rats were trained to discriminate the stimulus effects of either 3.0 or 10 mg/kg morphine, and substitution tests were conducted with estradiol or progesterone alone and in combination with morphine. At the conclusion of discrimination testing, rats were treated chronically with estradiol, progesterone, or their combination, and challenged with naloxone to measure opioid-like withdrawal symptoms. Finally, the effects of estradiol, progesterone, and their combination were examined on naloxone-precipitated withdrawal in morphine-dependent rats. Neither estradiol nor progesterone substituted for the morphine discriminative stimulus, but estradiol significantly increased the potency of morphine in rats trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg but not 3 mg/kg morphine. When administered chronically, neither hormone nor their combination produced an opioid-like withdrawal syndrome following a naloxone challenge. Acute administration of estradiol, but not progesterone or a combination of estradiol and progesterone, significantly reduced naloxone-precipitated weight loss in morphine-dependent rats. These data indicate that estradiol influences the behavioral effects of morphine, possibly by increasing endogenous tone at mu opioid receptors.

Discriminative stimulus effects of morphine and oxycodone in the absence and presence of acetic acid in male and female C57Bl/6 mice.

The use of prescription opioids for clinical management of pain remains problematic because of concerns about addiction associated with opioid use. Another difficulty in pain management is the increasing evidence for sex differences in pain behavior and opioid-induced behavioral effects. However, few studies have documented the abuse potential of prescription opioids as a function of pain in rodents, with significant gaps in the literature pertaining to sex differences in the interaction between pain and opioid effects. The present study evaluated the effects of an experimentally induced acute pain state (acetic acid injections) on the potency of morphine and oxycodone to produce discriminative stimulus effects in male and female C57Bl/6 mice trained to discriminate 3.2 mg/kg morphine from saline. Acetic acid injections attenuated the stimulus potency of morphine by 2.2-fold but not the stimulus potency of oxycodone in male mice. Acetic acid injections did not alter the discriminative stimulus effects of either morphine or oxycodone in female mice. The antinociceptive effects of the 2 opioids were evaluated using the acetic acid-induced stretching test. For antinociceptive effects, morphine was 2.0-fold less potent relative to oxycodone in male mice, whereas morphine and oxycodone were equipotent in female mice. Taken together, these results indicate that acetic acid-induced acute pain differentially modulates the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in male and female mice and that this change may be related to the variable antinociceptive effectiveness of these opioids across sexes.

Predisposing effects of neonatal visceral pain on abuse-related effects of morphine in adult male Sprague Dawley rats.

Adverse early life experiences are risk factors for drug abuse and addiction. Changes in brain opioid systems have been demonstrated in response to neonatal visceral pain (NVP), but the impact of these changes on abuse-related effects of morphine are unknown. The NVP procedure used models chronic visceral hyperalgesia persisting across development. Intravenous self-administration, drug discrimination, and locomotor activity were used to compare the abuse-related effects of morphine in NVP and control rats. Rats self-administered 0.3mg/kg/inj morphine under an FR1 schedule, and dose-effect functions for morphine were then established. Separate rats were trained to discriminate 3.2mg/kg morphine from saline under an FR20 schedule, and morphine dose-effect functions were then determined in the absence and presence of 0.1mg/kg naltrexone. A third group of rats was tested with a range of morphine doses in an assay of locomotor activity, then injected daily with 10mg/kg morphine to assess locomotor sensitization. NVP rats self-administered more morphine than controls at reinforcing doses. Discriminative stimulus effects of morphine were similar between groups, but in the presence of naltrexone, the ED50 for morphine was more than 12× greater in control rats than in NVP animals. Morphine did not stimulate locomotor activity at any tested dose in NVP rats, although significant effects were observed in controls. Finally, significant locomotor sensitization was observed only in NVP rats. NVP-induced changes in brain opioid systems have persistent pharmacological consequences into adulthood and may increase sensitivity to abuse-related effects of opioids across development.

Putative pain‐like states alter the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in mice dependent on sex

Sex‐differences in pain sensitivity, opioid analgesia, and reinforcing effects of opioids are observed in rodents. The purpose of our study is to test the hypothesis that the presence of an acute noxious stimulus and/or chemotherapy‐induced chronic neuropathy will reduce the potency of morphine to produce discriminative stimulus effects in mice. Saline and morphine (3.2 mg/kg) were established as discriminative stimuli for food‐reinforced responses using a two‐choice operant training procedure in male and female C57Bl6 mice. After obtaining morphine dose‐response curves, mice were tested with acetic acid (0.4% conc.)+ morphine combinations to determine the effects of noxious stimulus on morphine potency. Next, mice were administered with saline or the chemotherapeutic agent paclitaxel (8 mg/kg) on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 while training was suspended for a week. Morphine dose‐curves were re‐established between days 8–14 post‐paclitaxel treatment (period of peak allodynia). The presence of an acute noxious stimulus and chemotherapy‐induced chronic neuropathy significantly decreased the potency of morphine to function as a discriminative cue in male but not in female mice suggesting a differential modulation of the stimulus effects of morphine in the presence of pain between sexes. Overall, these results may have implications for the understanding of potential sex differences in the clinical management of pain and abuse liability of prescription opioids in humans. (Supported by R01 CA129092).

Interactions betweenμ-Opioid Receptor Agonists and Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists in Rhesus Monkeys: Antinociception, Drug Discrimination, and Drug Self-Administration

Cannabinoid receptor agonists enhance the antinociceptive effects of μ-opioid receptor agonists, which suggests that combinations of these drugs might enhance therapeutic effectiveness (e.g., analgesia). However, it is not clear whether combinations of these drugs also enhance abuse or dependence liability. This experiment examined whether combinations of cannabinoids and opioids that enhance antinociception also increase abuse-related effects by studying the effects of the cannabinoid receptor agonists 2-[(1R,2R,5R)-5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexyl]-5-(2-methyloctan-2-yl)phenol (CP 55,940) and (R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone mesylate (WIN 55,212) on the antinociceptive, discriminative stimulus, and positive reinforcing effects of μ-opioid receptor agonists in rhesus monkeys. In one group of monkeys (n = 3), morphine (0.1-5.6 mg/kg s.c.), CP 55,940 (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg s.c.), and WIN 55,212 (0.1-1.0 mg/kg s.c.) dose-dependently increased tail withdrawal latency from 50°C water, and pretreatment with small, otherwise ineffective, doses of CP 55,940 and WIN 55,212 shifted the morphine dose-effect curve to the left. In monkeys (n = 3) discriminating 3.2 mg/kg morphine, CP 55,940 (0.01-0.032 mg/kg s.c.) and WIN 55,212 (0.1-1.78 mg/kg s.c.) attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine, shifting the dose-effect curve to the right. In monkeys (n = 4) self-administering heroin (0.32-32.0 µg/kg/infusion i.v.), CP 55,940 (0.001-0.032 mg/kg s.c.), and WIN 55,212 (0.1-1.0 mg/kg s.c.) shifted the heroin dose-effect curve rightward and downward. Cannabinoid receptor agonists CP 55,940 and WIN 55,212 enhanced the antinociceptive effects but not the discriminative stimulus or positive reinforcing effects of μ-opioid receptor agonists in rhesus monkeys, supporting the view that combining cannabinoid and opioid receptor agonists might result in enhanced treatment effectiveness for pain without similarly enhancing abuse and dependence liability.

Memantine and dizocilpine interactions with antinociceptive or discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in rats after acute or chronic treatment with morphine

Memantine is a N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor (NMDAR) channel blocker that binds to dizocilpine sites and appears well tolerated during chronic use. Published studies suggest NMDAR antagonists prevent development of tolerance to effects of morphine by blocking NMDAR hyperactivation. We sought to compare effects of memantine to those of the more frequently studied dizocilpine and to evaluate memantine as a potential adjunct to modify tolerance to mu-opioid receptor agonists. Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate morphine (3.2 mg/kg) and saline under fixed ratio 15 schedules of food delivery. Potency and maximal stimulus or rate-altering effects of cumulative doses of morphine were examined 30 min after pretreatment with dizocilpine (0.032-0.1 mg/kg) or memantine (5-10 mg/kg) and after chronic treatment with combinations of dizocilpine or memantine and morphine, 10 mg/kg twice daily, for 6 to 14 days. Effects of dizocilpine or memantine on morphine antinociception were examined in a 55 °C water tail-withdrawal assay with drug treatments parallel to those in discrimination studies. Acutely, memantine attenuated while dizocilpine potentiated the stimulus and antinociceptive effects of morphine. Neither chronic dizocilpine nor memantine blocked tolerance to the stimulus effects of morphine. In contrast, combined treatment with dizocilpine (0.1 mg/kg) blocked tolerance to antinociceptive effects of lower (0.1~3.2 mg/kg) but not higher doses of morphine, whereas memantine did not block tolerance. Memantine and dizocilpine interacted differently with morphine, possibly due to different NMDAR binding profiles. The lack of memantine-induced changes in morphine tolerance suggests that memantine may not be a useful adjunct in chronic pain management.

Effects of Direct- and Indirect-Acting Serotonin Receptor Agonists on the Antinociceptive and Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Morphine in Rhesus Monkeys

Serotonergic (5-HT) systems modulate pain, and drugs acting on 5-HT systems are used with opioids to treat pain. This study examined the effects of 5-HT receptor agonists on the antinociceptive and discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in monkeys. Morphine increased tail-withdrawal latency in a dose-related manner; 5-HT receptor agonists alone increased tail-withdrawal latency at 50 °C but not 55 °C water. The antinociceptive effects of morphine occurred with smaller doses when monkeys received an indirect-acting (fenfluramine) or direct acting (8-OH-DPAT, F13714, buspirone, quipazine, DOM, and 2C-T-7) agonist. The role of 5-HT receptor subtypes in these interactions was confirmed with selective 5-HT(1A) (WAY100635) and 5-HT(2A) (MDL100907) receptor antagonists. None of the 5-HT drugs had morphine-like discriminative stimulus effects; however, fenfluramine and 5-HT(2A) receptor agonists attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine and this attenuation was prevented by MDL100907. The 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists did not alter the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. Thus, 5-HT receptor agonists increase the potency of morphine in an assay of antinociception, even under conditions where 5-HT agonists are themselves without effect (ie, 55 °C water), without increasing (and in some cases decreasing) the potency of morphine in a drug discrimination assay. Whereas 5-HT(2A) receptor agonists increase the potency of morphine for antinociception at doses that have no effect on the rate of operant responding, 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists increase the potency of morphine only at doses that eliminate operant responding. These data suggest that drugs acting selectively on 5-HT receptor subtypes could help to improve the use of opioids for treating pain.

Single and repeated baclofen treatment attenuates the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in rats

The GABA B agonists block the rewarding properties of opiates. However, the role of GABA B receptors in the discriminative properties of these drugs has received little attention. In this line, the present study was performed to investigate the effects of acute (Experiment 1) and chronic (Experiment 2) pretreatment with baclofen on the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. Rats were trained to discriminate morphine (5 mg/kg i.p.) from saline under a two-lever fixed-ratio schedule of food reinforcement. Experiment 1: a morphine generalization curve was obtained under standard conditions in control and baclofen (1 and 2 mg/kg i.p.) pretreated animals. Acute baclofen pretreatment attenuated morphine-lever responding and response rate at both doses. Experiment 2: the animals were randomly divided in two groups and a morphine generalization curve was obtained in daily consecutive test sessions before (TEST1) and after (TEST2) chronic saline (Group I) or chronic baclofen (2 mg/kg) (Group II) administration. As expected, chronic saline pretreatment was ineffective, while chronic baclofen pretreatment attenuated the stimulus properties of morphine, without modifying the rate-decreasing effect of the drug.The data support a role for GABAergic neurotransmission in the discriminative effects of opiates and demonstrate that a short-term treatment with baclofen is useful for decreasing the sensitivity to narcotic cue.

Discriminative-stimulus effects of methamphetamine and morphine in rats are attenuated by cAMP-related compounds

Animal models of drug discrimination have been used to examine the subjective effects of addictive substances. The cAMP system is a crucial downstream signaling pathway implicated in the long-lasting neuroadaptations induced by addictive drugs. We examined effects of rolipram, nefiracetam, and dopamine D2-like receptor antagonists, all of which have been reported to modulate cAMP level in vivo, on the discriminative-stimulus effects of methamphetamine (METH) and morphine in rats. All these compounds inhibited the discriminative-stimulus effects of METH, while only rolipram and nefiracetam attenuated the discriminative-stimulus effects of morphine. In addition, neither nifedipine nor neomycin, two voltage-sensitive calcium channel blockers, was found to modulate the effect of nefiracetam on METH-associated discriminative stimuli, suggesting that the inhibitory effect of nefiracetam may not involve the activation of calcium channels. These findings suggest that the cAMP signaling cascade may play a key role in the discriminative-stimulus effects of METH and morphine and may be a potential target for the development of therapeutics to counter drugs of abuse.

Role of ventral tegmental area, periaqueductal gray and parabrachial nucleus in the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in the rat

Previous studies have produced mixed results about the role of the ventral tegmental area, periaqueductal gray and parabrachial nucleus in morphine discriminations, perhaps owing to the considerably different methodologies used. The purpose of the present study was to compare the roles of these three brain areas using the same food-reinforced discrimination protocol, to determine whether the schedule of reinforcement influenced maximal substitution produced by site-specific morphine administration and to determine whether the time course of substitution differed by site of morphine administration. Rats were trained to discriminate 3.0 mg/kg subcutaneous morphine from saline under variable interval 15-s or fixed ratio 10 schedules of food reinforcement. Rats were then implanted with one cannula aimed at the lateral ventricle (intracerebroventricular) and one aimed at the ventral tegmental area, periaqueductal gray or parabrachial nucleus. Morphine discrimination curves were obtained by subcutaneous, intracerebroventricular and intrasite routes. When administered subcutaneously, morphine was equipotent in variable interval-trained and fixed ratio-trained rats, although it was more potent in fixed ratio-trained females than fixed ratio-trained males. When administered intracerebroventricularly, morphine (0.3-10 microg) engendered a maximum average of 63% drug-appropriate responding in both variable interval-trained and fixed ratio-trained rats; females showed significantly greater drug-appropriate responding than males, again under the fixed ratio but not under the variable interval schedule. In variable interval-trained rats, intrasite infusions of morphine (0.3-10 microg) produced maximal drug-appropriate responding of approximately 57% (ventral tegmental area), 56% (periaqueductal gray) and 41% (parabrachial nucleus); mean maximal substitution was slightly (< or = 17%) greater in fixed ratio-trained rats. When injected into the ventral tegmental area or periaqueductal gray, but not the parabrachial nucleus, naloxone methiodide (2 microg) significantly decreased drug-appropriate responding following 3.0 mg/kg subcutaneous morphine, in both variable interval-trained and fixed ratio-trained rats. The time course of the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine differed among the three brain sites: intraventral tegmental area morphine produced peak drug-appropriate responding by 15 min after injection, whereas the discriminative stimulus effects of intraperiaqueductal gray and intraparabrachial nucleus morphine peaked at approximately 60 min after injection. Taken together, these results indicate that ventral tegmental area, periaqueductal gray and parabrachial nucleus each play a role in the ability of morphine to function as a discriminative stimulus, regardless of the sex of the subject or the schedule under which the subjects are responding. Ventral tegmental area and periaqueductal gray, however, appear to be more critical than parabrachial nucleus in mediating the discriminative effects of systemic morphine in rats responding under a food reinforcement procedure. The pretreatment time and, to a lesser extent, the schedule of reinforcement are additional variables that should be considered when comparing the relative roles of different brain areas in drug discrimination.

Involvement of histaminergic system in the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine

The interactions between morphine and the histaminergic system are not yet fully clarified. More especially, the involvement of the histaminergic system in the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine has not been determined. Therefore, the effects of histamine-related compounds on the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine were examined in rats. Combination tests using histamine-related compounds with morphine were initiated in rats trained to discriminate between 3.0 mg/kg morphine and saline. Zolantidine (central histamine H 2-receptor antagonist), but not pyrilamine (central histamine H 1-receptor antagonist) or ranitidine (peripheral histamine H 2-receptor antagonist), significantly attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. The histamine precursor l-histidine significantly potentiated the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. These results suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine are, at least in part, mediated through the central activation of histamine H 2-receptors in rats.

Sensitization to the morphine-like discriminative stimulus effects of buprenorphine in rats

An experiment was performed to determine whether chronic non-contingent administration of morphine would produce cross-sensitization to the cueing properties of buprenorphine or d -amphetamine. To this end the sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine, buprenorphine and d -amphetamine was determined in rats trained to discriminate 10 mg kg−1morphine from saline in a food-reinforced operant task. Seven rats were given repeated non-contingent treatments with morphine (20 mg kg−1on saline or no-test days and 10 mg kg−1on drug days) starting 20 days before the beginning of discrimination training; another six animals received injections of saline. Chronic administration of morphine resulted in sensitization to the discriminative stimulus effect of this drug and in cross-sensitization to the discriminative stimulus effect of buprenorphine. d -Amphetamine produced only saline lever selection in all rats. In conclusion, the present results confirm that the stimulus properties of opioid drugs may be enhanced, rather than decreased, in animals with a history of repeated non-contingent treatment with morphine. Sensitization to central-acting drugs is thought to play a role in the psychopathology of drug abuse. Hence, the present results point out the necessity of considering the effects of drugs which show tolerance, and those which show sensitization, under any particular drug regimen.

The discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in pigeons responding under a progressive ratio schedule of food presentation.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether progressive ratio (PR) schedules might provide additional information, as compared with fixed ratio or fixed interval schedules, on pharmacologic features of discriminative stimuli (e.g. stimulus intensity). Five pigeons discriminated between 5.6 mg/kg morphine and saline under an arithmetic PR5 schedule of food presentation. The final ratio before pigeons either stopped responding for 5 min or switched responding from the selected to the non-selected key was designated as the last completed ratio (LCR). Pigeons responded 6.8% on the drug key following saline and 96.4% on the drug key following 5.6 mg/kg morphine. The average LCR value for saline was not significantly different from the average LCR value for morphine. A larger dose of morphine (10.0 mg/kg) increased the LCR value and significantly decreased rates of responding. Smaller doses of morphine (0.32 and 1.0 mg/kg) occasioned primarily saline-appropriate responding and decreased LCR values. Buprenorphine substituted for morphine and significantly increased LCR values, whereas nalbuphine produced only partial (20-80%) morphine-key responding and significantly decreased LCR. Cocaine did not substitute for morphine or modify LCR compared with saline control. Together, these results suggest that the stimulus effects of micro-opioids vary on a dimension (e.g. intensity) that can be quantified using PR schedules.

Discriminative stimulus effects of morphine: central versus peripheral training

While it is well known that rats can discriminate a peripheral injection of morphine from a saline injection, to our knowledge no one has trained rats to discriminate a direct brain-site injection of morphine from saline. In the present series of studies, one group of rats was trained to discriminate morphine (0.3 μg) from saline injected into the perifornical area of the hypothalamus (PFA), a process that took rats about 37 sessions to learn. A dose response generalization curve for PFA-injected morphine (0.01, 0.03, 0.1, and 0.17 μg) was generated in which the two highest doses of morphine generalized to the morphine-appropriate training stimulus. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 3 mg/kg, but not 1 mg/kg morphine, resulted in morphine-appropriate responding in the PFA morphine-trained rats. A second group of rats was trained to discriminate i.p. injections of 3 mg/kg morphine from injections of saline. A dose–response generalization test for i.p.-injected morphine (0.3, 0.56, 1.0, and 1.7 mg/kg) was conducted in which the 0.17 mg/kg dose of morphine generalized to the morphine-appropriate training stimulus. Generalization tests using PFA-injected morphine doses (0.17, 0.56, 1.0, and 3.0 μg) failed to result in morphine-appropriate responding in the i.p. morphine-trained rats. Naloxone administered into the PFA (50 μg) or the periphery (3 mg/kg, i.p.) blocked morphine discrimination in the PFA-trained rats. However, when naloxone was injected into the PFA (50 μg) together with i.p. morphine (3 mg/kg) in animals trained using i.p. injections, the antagonist failed to block morphine-appropriate responding. Thus, while peripheral injection of morphine generalized to the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine produced under PFA-injection training, the opposite effects were not noted.

Effects of Neuropeptide Y on the Discriminative Stimulus and Antinociceptive Properties of Morphine

Previous research indicates that opioid receptor blockade diminishes the effects of neuropeptide Y (NPY) on feeding and memory. Conversely, NPY attenuates naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal. The present study evaluated the effects of NPY on the discriminative stimulus and antinociceptive effects produced by the prototypical mu opioid, morphine. Rats were trained to discriminate 5.6 mg/kg morphine (IP) from saline using a standard two-lever, food-reinforced, drug discrimination procedure. Across a range of doses (3.0, 5.0, and 10 μg), intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of NPY failed to substitute for, antagonize, or potentiate the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. A warm-water tail-withdrawal procedure was used to examine the antinociceptive effects of morphine and NPY, alone and in combination. NPY (3.0 and 10 μg, ICV) failed to alter tail-withdrawal latencies from 52° and 56°C water, whereas morphine (1.0–30 mg/kg, IP) produced a dose-related increase in latencies at both water temperatures. A 10-μg dose of NPY also failed to alter the antinociceptive effects of morphine. This study does not support the idea that the discriminative stimulus and antinociceptive effects of morphine are dependent on an NPYergic pathway.

Effect of gonadectomy on discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in female versus male rats

In a previous study, we found sex differences in the potency of morphine as a discriminative stimulus; the present study was designed to determine whether sex differences in gonadal hormones contribute to sex differences in morphine's discriminative effects. Adult female and male rats were gonadectomized (GNDZ) or sham-gonadectomized (SHAM), and then trained to discriminate 3.0 mg/kg morphine from saline. The ED 50 for morphine discrimination was significantly lower in females than in males (0.66±0.12 vs. 1.25±0.16 mg/kg, respectively); ED 50 values in GNDZ rats were slightly higher than in SHAM rats. The time course of morphine discrimination was not significantly different in females and males, whether GNDZ or not. The μ agonist fentanyl completely substituted for morphine in all rats, with no group differences in ED 50 value. The μ agonists buprenorphine and nalbuphine substituted for morphine in nearly all females and in all SHAM males, but in only four of seven GNDZ males. The κ agonist U69,593 did not substitute for morphine in rats of any group. Most opioid agonists were significantly more potent in decreasing response rate in males than females, and in GNDZ than SHAM rats; morphine and nalbuphine also increased response rate above control in some females. A pA 2 analysis of naltrexone in combination with morphine suggested that there were no significant differences among groups in receptors at which morphine produced its discriminative stimulus effects. Although hormone replacement in GNDZ female rats at the end of the study reinstated estrous cycling, it did not substantially alter the ED 50 for morphine discrimination. Thus, sex differences in potency of morphine as a discriminative stimulus may not be due to sex differences in gonadal hormone milieu. The possibility that sex differences in reinforcement frequency on morphine versus saline levers caused the sex differences in morphine discrimination is discussed.

Interactions Between N-Methyl- d-Aspartate Receptor Antagonists and the Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Morphine in Rats

NMDA receptor antagonists have previously been reported to alter some pharmacological and behavioral effects of acute and chronic opioid administration. The present study assessed the interactions of NMDA antagonists with the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine. Adult male Long–Evans rats were trained to discriminate 3.2 mg/kg of SC morphine from water under a two-lever fixed-ratio 10 schedule of food reinforcement. During test sessions, IP injections of the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist dizocilpine (0.03–0.2 mg/kg), the competitive antagonists NPC 17742 (1–16 mg/kg), and SDZ 220-581 (0.1–3 mg/kg), the polyamine site antagonist eliprodil (3–17.3 mg/kg), the glycine-site partial agonist (+)-HA-966 (3–56 mg/kg), and the nonselective glutamate antagonist kynurenic acid (30–150 mg/kg) were coadministered with SC morphine (1–3.2 mg/kg; interaction tests) or water (generalization tests). In generalization tests, none of the compounds completely substituted for morphine. Concurrent administration of morphine and NMDA antagonists did not greatly alter the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine. Various doses of NPC 17742, SDZ 220-581, or (+)-HA-966 somewhat increased levels of morphine-appropriate lever selection, whereas some attenuation of morphine-lever selection was obtained when morphine was coadministered with eliprodil. These results show that NMDA antagonists have minimal interactions with the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine.

Attempts to Classify Dependence-Liable Drugs by Using a Simple Drug-Discrimination Test in Mice

1. In a simple discrimination test using a two-compartment shuttle box with mice, we examined the action properties of dependence-liable drugs. In mice trained to discriminate morphine from saline, neither methamphetamine (MAP) nor cocaine (COCA) was generalized to the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. 2. Similarly, in mice trained to discriminate MAP from saline, COCA, which is known to have neuronal mechanisms in common with MAP, was generalized to the stimulus effects of MAP, but morphine was not. 3. Dihydroetorphine (DHE), which has receptor mechanisms in common with morphine, was generalized to the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine, whereas it was not generalized to the effects of MAP. Thus, the present discrimination test might be useful for the first screening of compounds with unknown neuronal mechanisms, particularly for classification into groups having separate neuropharmacological mechanisms in common.

Effects of intracerebroventricular injection of opioid peptides selective for ?, ? and ? receptors on discriminative stimulus properties of pentazocine in the rat

The present study was designed to investigate the effects of centrally administered morphine and opioid peptides on the discriminative stimulus properties of pentazocine in the rat. Rats were trained to discriminate 3 mg/kg (s.c.) of pentazocine from vehicle in a shock avoidance paradigm. A 3 mg/kg (s.c.) dose of pentazocine produced stimulus effects in common with those induced by a training dose (3 mg/kg, s.c.) of pentazocine. Morphine (0·1–3 μg, i.c.v.) produced a dose-dependent increase in responding appropriate for pentazocine lever. The μ-selective opioid receptor agonist [D-Ala2,NMePhe4,Gly-ol] enkephalin (DAMGO) (0·0003–0·03 μg, i.c.v.) generalized to pentazocine cue. d-Pen2, l-Pen5] enkephalin (DPLPE) (3 and 10 μg, i.c.v.), a δ-selective opioid receptor agonist, produced partial generalization to pentazocine cue. However, the κ-selective opioid receptor agonist dynorphin A-(1–13) (3 and 10 μg, i.c.v.) did not generalize to pentazocine cue. The pentazocine-like discriminative stimulus effects of morphine (3 μg, i.c.v.) and DAMGO (0·03 μg, i.c.v.) were fully reversed by intracerebroventricular injection of the μ-selective opioid receptor antagonist β-funaltrexamine (5 μg, i.c.v.). These results suggest that μ-opioid receptors play a major role in the discriminative stimulus effects of pentazocine, while δ-opioid receptors only partially contribute to them. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Interactions between H1-antagonists and opioids: a drug discrimination study.

We previously demonstrated that combination of opioids, pentazocine and dihydrocodeine, with the histamine H1-receptor antagonists tripelennamine and chlorpheniramine could enhance their rewarding effects in rats. In the present study, the effects of combined treatment with opioids and H1-antagonists on discriminative stimulus effects were examined in rats trained to discriminate between cocaine (10 mg/kg) or morphine (3.0 mg/kg) and saline, since it is believed that discriminative stimulus effects of abused drugs are related to their rewarding effects. Tripelennamine and chlorpheniramine, but not pentazocine or dihydrocodeine, generalized to the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine. Pentazocine (3.0 mg/kg) and dihydrocodeine (5.6 mg/kg) significantly potentiated the cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects of low doses of tripelennamine and chlorpheniramine, respectively. On the other hand, pentazocine and dihydrocodeine, but not tripelennamine or chlorpheniramine, generalized to the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. Neither 1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg tripelennamine nor chlorpheniramine affected the morphine-like discriminative stimulus effects of pentazocine and dihydrocodeine, respectively. These results suggest that the potentiation of the cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects of H1-antagonists by opioids may be involved in the enhanced rewarding effects of combinations of opioids and H1-antagonists.