Chinese interbank bond market dates back to June 1997, when the People's Bank of China decided to open an interbank bond trading business at the National Interbank Lending Center, which was formally established. In the following years, this market developed relatively fast, and in June 2002, the bond counter market of commercial banks began to operate, which to a certain extent made the interbank bond market, which institutional investors dominate, expand through the counter trading for all kinds of investors in the whole society.In recent years, applying direct financing tools such as corporate bond issuance has become increasingly widespread. This paper takes Beijing Financial Court Case No. 1 as an example to study in detail the important reasons for the emergence of this type of infringement, focusing on the obligations and responsibilities of each participant, including the issuer Dalian Machine Tool Group, the intermediary bank Industrial Bank, and the investor Bluestone Capital Management. This paper aims to sort out the obligations and responsibilities of each participant in the inter-bank bond market to find out the reasons for the emergence of the phenomenon of misrepresentation and to explore the issues that appear to be suitable for this paper to find out the causes of misrepresentation, explore the operation rules and risk prevention measures of the interbank bond market that are suitable for China's national conditions, to solve the problems of misrepresentation, standardize the obligations and responsibilities of all parties, and promote the development of China's interbank bond market.
Read full abstract