HypothesisThe antidepressant drug imipramine, and its metabolite desipramine show different extents of interaction with, and passive permeation through, cellular membrane models, with the effects depending on the membrane composition. Through multimodal interrogation, we can observe that the drugs have a direct impact on the physicochemical properties of the membrane, that may play a role in their pharmacokinetics. ExperimentsMicrocavity pore-suspended lipid bilayers (MSLBs) of four different compositions, each with a different headgroup charge namely; zwitterionic dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (DOPC), mixed DOPC and negatively charged dioleoylphosphatidylglycerol (DOPG) (3:1), mixed DOPC and positively charged dioleoyltrimethylammoniumpropane (DOTAP) (3:1), and with increasing complex composition mimicking blood-brain-barrier (BBB) were prepared on gold and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates using a Langmuir-Blodgett-vesicle fusion method. The molecular interaction and permeation of antidepressants, imipramine, and its metabolite desipramine with the lipid bilayers were evaluated using highly sensitive label-free electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). Drug-induced membrane packing/fluidity alterations were assessed using fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) and fluorescence lifetime correlation spectroscopy (FLCS) of MSLB over microfluidic PDMS array. FindingsUsing EIS to evaluate in real-time membrane admittance changes, we found that imipramine greatly increases the ion permeability of negatively charged DOPC:DOPG (3:1) membranes. The effect was observed also at neutral (DOPC) and to a lesser extent at positively charged DOPC:DOTAP(3:1) membranes. In contrast, desipramine had a much weaker impact on ion permeability across all bilayer compositions. Temporal capacitance data show that desipramine intercalates at negatively charged membrane thereby increasing the thickness of the membrane. The overall kinetics of the imipramine permeation is higher than that of desipramine. This was confirmed using SERS, which also provides an evaluation of drug passive permeation based on arrival time across the membrane. Using FLCS, we found that imipramine increases the lipid membrane fluidity, whereas desipramine lowers it, with the exception of the negatively charged membrane. A translocation rate pharmacokinetics model was established for the first time at the MSLB platform by real-time monitoring of the variation in membrane resistance of pristine DOPC and blood-brain-barrier (BBB) membrane.