Artificial recharge of water to an aquifer for later recovery and use, otherwise known as artificial storage and recovery (ASR; Pyne 1995), is nowadays widely applied for seasonal or emergency water storage. Therefore, one would expect a lot of thought to be devoted to what the optimal aquifer conditions for ASR would be, but this does not appear to be the case. In some situations local hydrogeology may impact the selection of ASR sites; however, according to Pyne (1995), this is the exception rather than the rule since ASR wells are usually located where they provide the greatest benefit to the water utility or agency. This location is often in the vicinity of the supply area to reduce the costs and time of transportation. At that specific site, one deals with the existing local hydrogeology through well design and construction (e.g., Maliva and Missimer 2010; Zuurbier et al. 2014) and operation (Ward et al. 2009; Bakker 2010). In line with Pyne’s field experience, Lowry and Anderson (2006) distinguished physical properties of the aquifer and operational factors that control the recovery efficiency of ASR. Properties like porosity, hydraulic conductivity, aquifer thickness and density of native water, as well as quality, are regarded as predefined site-specific conditions, while operational factors such as injected volume, location of injection and recovery wells, recharge and recovery rates and storage duration, can be changed at the wellhead by the operator to optimize the ASR system. The most relevant research determining optimal aquifer conditions for ASR focused on the influence of aquifer properties on the recovery efficiency of ASR wells. These studies are, firstly, comparisons between ASR sites, such as the studies executed by e.g., Merritt (1986), Dillon et al. (2006), Lowry and Anderson (2006) and Misut and Voss (2007). On the other hand, there are theoretical considerations regarding dimensionless parameter groups in analytical solutions, as described by e.g., Esmail and Kimbler (1967), Ward et al. (2007, 2008, 2009) and Bakker (2010). The general outcomes of these studies indicate that porosity, hydraulic conductivity, vertical anisotropy, dispersivity, density of native water versus that of the injected water, and the thickness of the aquifer all influence the recovery efficiency. This makes sense because these aquifer properties determine the degree of the underlying recovery efficiency processes of mixing and density stratification. The question of which aquifer conditions are preferable for ASR is usually not relevant in practice because the costs of the required earth displacement and construction works are so high that they generally outweigh the economic benefits of ASR systems. However, the situation is different in the case of coastal expansions and artificial islands that are currently being constructed worldwide. The most well-known examples are probably the Palms and the islands of the World Archipelago in Dubai (UAE) with a mainly touristic purpose. Artificial islands are also constructed for industrial development such as Maasvlakte II in the Port of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Recently, there is a tendency in densely populated delta cities for urban expansion toward the ocean; examples are Eko Atlantic in the City of Lagos, Nigeria, and the planned land reclamations in Jakarta Bay, Indonesia. Aquifers are, in fact, created in these projects and their conditions can be optimized for specific ASR applications. Specific sediment types may be chosen and different dredging techniques can be applied to create the Boptimal^ aquifer conditions for recharge and recovery in terms of porosity, conductivity, anisotropy, and dispersivity to control mixing processes and density stratification. Received: 1 September 2014 /Accepted: 4 March 2015 Published online: 21 April 2015