Abstract Background Anastomotic leak (AL), a potently life-threatening complication after esophagectomy, has a wide spectrum of presentation. There are also several treatment modalities but uncertainty about its clinical applicability remains, being mostly guided by personal experience and available resources. Regarding cervical anastomosis, literature is especially scarce. Although classically it was managed conservatively with cervical wound drainage, 60-70% have an intrathoracic manifestation, which is not only associated with worst clinical severity, as it appears more difficult to manage. In this study, we propose a new classification system for cervical esophago-gastric leak, based on its imaging presentation, with a standardized therapeutic approach. Methods Cervical AL classification and therapeutic protocol were developed through retrospective evaluation of a prospective database, including all patients submitted to esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction and cervical anastomosis since the 1st January 2018 to the 31st March 2024, in an upper gastro-intestinal surgery unit, at a tertiary cancer center. AL manifestation was classified according to imaging appearance on CT scan, reviewed by a dedicated radiologist. Protocol was developed considering treatment patterns according to each manifestation and respective success rate. Results During this period, 253 esophagectomies were performed, 171 with cervical anastomosis and thus included to analysis. AL rate was 21.6%. Four types of AL manifestation were identified: A – exclusive cervical manifestation (32.4%); B – mediastinal drainage without pleural involvement (8.1%); C – apical pleural collection (8.1%); D – pleural involvement (51.2%). Based on these patterns, a standardized therapeutic algorithm was developed (figure 1): conservative treatment with cervical wound drainage for A, endoscopic therapy for B and C (first-line endoluminal esosponge®, stent as option) and for type D, in addition to endoscopic therapy, pleural drainage and empyema decortication in refractory cases. Conclusion Although well stablished and easy to apply, the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) classification for esophagectomy AL differentiates its severity, but does not guide its treatment. In this study, we identified four types of cervical AL manifestation, which we consider relevant to select the appropriate treatment modality. This protocol was recently adopted in our center and we pretend to evaluate its results in a short-term.
Read full abstract