Purpose: (i) To compare 3 real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods, 2 enzyme immunoassay (EIA) methods for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and Toxin A/B, and cell culture neutralization assay (CCNA) to toxigenic culture (TC), and (ii) to find correlation between C. difficile infection and patient covariates including nursing home residency, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, immune deficiency (ID), antibiotic use, consistency and number of stool, presence of diabetes mellitus (DM), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), sepsis and connective tissue disease (CTD). Methods: 401 patients were included in the study. The BD GeneOhm C. diff Assay (BD-PCR), Cepheid Xpert C. difficile Assay (GE-PCR), Prodesse Pro-Gastro CD Assay (PG-PCR), Meridian ImmunoCard Toxins A & B (ICTAB), TechLab C. diff Chek - 60 (GDH), TechLab C. diff Quick Chek Complete (CDQC) and CCNA were performed. TC for C. difficile was tested for toxin by CCNA. Patient groups were simplified for comparison in C. difficile positive group, which comprised all patients with positive cultures, and C. difficile negative group, which included all other patients. Clinical data was statistically analyzed by chi-square test. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. Results:C. difficile was isolated from 82 specimens with 72 being toxin positive. The sensitivity/specificity of the BD-PCR, GE-PCR, PG-PCR, GDH, ICTAB, CDQC and CCNA compared to toxigenic culture were 87.5%/99.7%, 94.4%/97.9%, 83.3%/99.1%, 91.7%/96.0%, 55.6%/99.1%, 58.3%/100%, and 75%/100%, respectively. The GE-PCR detected the most toxigenic C. difficile followed by the BD-PCR and then the PG-PCR. The difference in sensitivity between the methods was not statistically significant (P=0.109). All 3 PCR methods were more sensitive than the CCNA (P<0.05). The only statistically significant correlations with C. difficile infection were 3 or more stools, loose consistency of stools and antibiotic use (p<0.01). The criterion of 3 or more stools had 100% sensitivity and included all the patients with positive cultures. There was no correlation between C. difficile and nursing home residency (p<0.175), PPI use (p<0.397), DM (p<0.535), CTD (p<0.138), IBD (p<0.561), ID (p<0.320) and sepsis (p<0.141). Conclusion: All 3 PCR methods were more sensitive than the CCNA (P< 0.05) with the GE-PCR being the most sensitive, but with no statistical significance. There is no value in testing stool specimens from patients who lack the clinical criterion of 3 or more loose stools per day. The use of antibiotics and loose consistency of stool were the only other statistically significant patient covariates. There was no correlation with PPI use, nursing home residency or presence of sepsis, IBD, DM, ID or CTD.
Read full abstract