The purpose of this study is to examine the press within the framework of 'development journalism', a kind of journalism which is responsible for informing the public about the administrative changes and transformation processes experienced by the country, by considering the implementation of ‘new public management’ concept in Turkey within the domain of the ‘global governance’ and ‘globalization’ phenomenon affecting the nation states. It was assumed in the design of the study that long or short term social problems could only be observed in a time tunnel and that the dense break points were spread over time. When some anti-systematic tendencies are examined in the historical process, it can be seen that the order settled in the administrative area can be suddenly reversed by causal relation. Issues in the background of the current problems in Turkey, has been characterized by a feature of uncertainty under the influence of populist politics that have been exhibited over time by different governments coming to power since the cold war. There are many reasons for the historical background of some of the disruptions seen in the administrative application practices of the new public administration approach. These include the late arrival of modernism to Turkey; followed by dependence on international aid programs under the US and EU; being a party to international economic and military agreements; the time required to adapt the definitions of internal law to domestic law; informing citizens about the change and assimilating the transformation. There fore the relations between 'administration and the media' have been tried to be handled in connection with the global order. In many non-Western countries, utilitarian practices of the new governance conception that developed after the abandonment of open or hidden colonial practices have also created an impact on the development of journalism and the differentiation of journalism genres. 'Development journalism' has played an important role in reflecting public administrative changes in Turkey to the public, which was never subjected to colonial rule by the West. In this study, only a descriptive situation is detected. It is expected to be useful for studies on the ‘administration’ and the media relations to be carried out later, during the change and transformation process of Turkey to a presidential system. 'Governance’ and media relations are handled together within the scope of new public administration practices and ‘global governance’ concept, which makes this work original.