Different Types Of Dyslipidemia Research Articles

Simvastatin-induced changes in circulating oxidized low-density lipoprotein in different types of dyslipidemia

Beyond lowering lipid levels, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) have been shown to possess antioxidant properties, which may explain some of their beneficial effects in reducing atherosclerosis. We sought to determine whether circulating oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) levels differ between subjects with isolated hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia, as well as the effect of simvastatin on circulating ox-LDL according to the type of dyslipidemia. Twenty-five subjects with total cholesterol >200 mg/dl and triglycerides <150 mg/dl, and 22 subjects with total cholesterol >200 mg/dl and triglycerides >150 mg/dl were treated with 40 mg simvastatin daily for 3 months. Serum lipids, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, ox-LDL, and free radicals were measured at baseline and after 3 months of treatment. In both groups studied, simvastatin significantly improved lipids, and reduced C-reactive protein and fibrinogen levels. Free radicals were significantly reduced only in subjects with hypercholesterolemia. Subjects with combined hyperlipidemia had significantly higher baseline levels of ox-LDL compared to those with hypercholesterolemia (64.6 U/l vs 53.5 U/l, P = 0.03). Ox-LDL levels were reduced by 12% in subjects with hypercholesterolemia (P = 0.03) and by 26% in subjects with combined hyperlipidemia (P = 0.001) after simvastatin treatment. In conclusion, subjects with combined hyperlipidemia have increased levels of circulating ox-LDL compared to subjects with isolated hypercholesterolemia. Simvastatin significantly reduced circulating ox-LDL in both groups, but whether this reduction is related to clinical outcomes remains to be shown.

HYPOLIPIDEMIC ACTIVITY OF MEDOSTATIN IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF DYSLIPIDEMIA

Main aim of given study was comparison of effect of 20 mg/day of medostatin on level of lipids in different types of dyslipidemia - isoloted hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia in patient with coronary heart disease. It was noted that 6 months therapy with medostatin exerted positive effect on blood lipid spectrum in both types of dyslipidemia.

The Effect of Apolipoprotein E Polymorphism on the Response to Lipid-Lowering Treatment With Atorvastatin or Fenofibrate

Although the effect of apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism on the response to treatment with statins has been studied, the results are conflicting. Moreover, little is known about the possible effect of apolipoprotein E alleles on the response to treatment with fibrates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on lipid-lowering response to treatment with atorvastatin and fenofibrate in patients with different types of dyslipidemia. The study population included 136 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (type IIA dyslipidemia) treated with atorvastatin (20 mg/day) and 136 patients with either primary hypertriglyceridemia (type IV dyslipidemia) or mixed hyperlipidemia (type IIB dyslipidemia) treated with micronized fenofibrate (200 mg/day). Overall, no significant associations were detected between apolipoprotein E genotype and response to treatment with atorvastatin. In patients treated with fenofibrate, significant associations were noted between apolipoprotein E genotype and changes in apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein E and triglyceride levels. Specifically, in apolipoprotein E2, apolipoprotein E3, and apolipoprotein E4 individuals, apolipoprotein B reductions were 22%, 17%, and 8%, respectively (P = .003); apolipoprotein E reductions were 45%, 20%, and 15%, respectively (P = .006); whereas triglyceride reductions reached 53%, 36%, and 33%, respectively (P = .033). In conclusion, apolipoprotein E genotype had no significant effect on the response to treatment with atorvastatin in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, but in patients with primary hypertriglyceridemia or mixed hyperlipidemia, there was a clear association between apolipoprotein E genotype and response to treatment with fenofibrate.

Impaired free fatty acid suppression during hyperinsulinemia is a characteristic finding in familial combined hyperlipidemia, but insulin resistance is observed only in hypertriglyceridemic patients.

Insulin resistance has been associated with hypertriglyceridemia, combined hyperlipidemia, and familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL). Whether all FCHL patients with different types of dyslipidemia have low insulin sensitivity has not been evaluated. We measured insulin sensitivity by the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp with indirect calorimetry in 110 healthy controls and in 105 nondiabetic, FCHL family members: in 50 without dyslipidemia, in 19 with hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol >/=7.7 mmol/L), in 22 with hypertriglyceridemia (total triglycerides >/=2.4 mmol/L in men 2.4 mmol/L in women), and in 14 with combined hyperlipidemia. During the hyperinsulinemic clamp, FCHL family members had higher free fatty acid levels than did controls (0.06+/-0.06 [mean+/-SD] in controls versus 0.16+/-0.11 in relatives without dyslipidemia versus 0.15+/-0. 07 in hypercholesterolemic patients versus 0.29+/-0.14 in hypertriglyceridemic patients versus 0.27+/-0.17 mmol/L in patients with combined hyperlipidemia; P<0.001 after adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index). Relatives without dyslipidemia (16.4+/-4.4 micromol. kg(-1). min(-1), P=0.001) and patients with hypertriglyceridemia (12.8+/-3.8 micromol. kg(-1). min(-1), P<0.001) and with combined hyperlipidemia (13.7+/-3.1 micromol. kg(-1). min(-1), P<0.001) had lower rates of insulin-stimulated glucose oxidation than did controls (19.4+/-4.7 micromol. kg(-1). min(-1)). Also, the rates of nonoxidative glucose disposal were lower in patients with hypertriglyceridemia (P=0.001) and combined hyperlipidemia (P=0.011) than in controls. In contrast, subjects with hypercholesterolemia and control subjects had similar rates of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. We conclude that a defect in free fatty acid suppression during hyperinsulinemia, probably located in adipose tissue, is characteristic for all FCHL patients with varying types of dyslipidemia, whereas insulin resistance in skeletal muscle is observed only in FCHL patients with elevated triglyceride levels.

Lp(a) levels in different types of dyslipidemia in the French population

The serum lipoprotein Lp(a) concentration was measured in 1065 individuals in order to assess whether there was a relation between the type of dyslipidemia and the level of Lp(a). Males and females, aged between 2 and 83 years old, were included in the study. Quantification was performed by an immunonephelometric technique. The whole population was divided into normolipidemic (NL), type IIa without xanthoma (type IIa), type IIa with xanthoma (FH), type IIb and type IV phenotypes. Lp(a) level was arbitrarily divided into 5 subclasses in each group of dyslipidemia and in the normolipidemic group. In addition each group was divided according to sex and whether or not they were under treatment. We observed a significant difference between the median Lp(a) level of the normolipidemic group (NL) and of the dyslipidemic group as a whole. Median Lp(a) levels in the 4 dyslipidemic groups did not differ significantly. Sex, age and treatment did not influence the distribution of Lp(a) values distribution. Only weak correlations (Spearman's rank test) were observed between Lp(a) and other lipid parameters (total cholesterol, LDL, apo B, HDL, triglycerides): the highest correlation coefficient ( r′= 0.15) was between Lp(a) and apo B. We conclude that Lp(a) level is not influenced by the type of dyslipidemia, sex or hypolipidemic drugs.