Background Many countries in Europe are today grappling with the sudden appearance of many types of pedal-assisted electric bicycles on the market (different maximum speeds, and power of the motor as the primary differentiating features). An “ordinary” EPAC, also often known as a pedelec has a maximum pedal-assist speed of 25 km/h after which the motor cuts off, while faster EPACs, often referred to as speed-pedelecs can have a pedal-assist up to 45 km/h. Different countries classify these vehicles differently (e.g. as bicycles and different types of mopeds), and have resultant differing applicable legislation. Consideration of these vehicles needs to be made both to support the use of pedal-assisted electric bicycles for promoting active mobility, but also to reduce any possible negative consequences for traffic safety. Method This study focused on the traffic safety impacts of three classes of EPACs: pedelecs, speed-pedelecs and powered cycles. Different methods to collect information included a literature review in scientific and grey literature and expert interviews performed in Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany and Switzerland. Additionally, a survey was distributed to bicycle dealers in Sweden to get a better understanding of the market and of how well Swedish bicycle dealers know about existing legislation, and a workshop was held gathering industry, bicycle experts, local and regional authorities and legislative authority in Sweden. Results According to our study, faster and more powerful EPACs result in an increased risk of injury compared to normal bicycles and pedelecs. According to interviewed experts, these vehicles also seem to becoming more popular in Europe Sweden, the Netherlands and Germany have similar legislation relating to different categories of vehicles, while Switzerland legislation differs. The most important conclusion was that we need to find out and spread more knowledge about these vehicles and their traffic safety impacts. Additionally, although different categories of EPACs have different technical capabilities and will likely travel with different speeds and acceleration on roads, the vehicles all look the same to other road users. Conclusions Questions remain as to how legislation regarding helmet use and vehicle registration can be applied, and what infrastructure is best used (road or cycle lane?). At the same time, EPACs have been shown to really shift car trips to active mobility trips, and can be seen to provide a promising way to promote active mobility.
Read full abstract