Difference In Wound Complications Research Articles

The Violated Neck: Cervical Node Biopsy Prior to Definitive Treatment

The intent of this study was to determine whether open neck biopsy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to the neck influenced the biologic course of the disease or the response to treatment. One hundred ninety‐two patients, treated over a 10‐year period at M.D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute, were reviewed; 102 of the 139 patients, whose primary site of disease was identified prior to definitive treatment, were matched with a control group of 204 patients. The results showed no significant difference in wound complications, neck recurrence, distant metastases, and 5‐year survival. Also, time interval from the biopsy to subsequent treatment and the type of node biopsy did not appear to have any significant detrimental effect. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that, although it is important to refrain from proceeding with an open biopsy until a complete head and neck evaluation has been done, violation of the neck does not signify a poorer prognosis—provided adequate treatment is subsequently given.

The violated neck: cervical node biopsy prior to definitive treatment.

The intent of this study was to determine whether open neck biopsy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to the neck influenced the biologic course of the disease or the response to treatment. One hundred ninety-two patients, treated over a 10-year period at M.D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute, were reviewed; 102 of the 139 patients, whose primary site of disease was identified prior to definitive treatment, were matched with a control group of 204 patients. The results showed no significant difference in wound complications, neck recurrence, distant metastases, and 5-year survival. Also, time interval from the biopsy to subsequent treatment and the type of node biopsy did not appear to have any significant detrimental effect. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that, although it is important to refrain from proceeding with an open biopsy until a complete head and neck evaluation has been done, violation of the neck does not signify a poorer prognosis--provided adequate treatment is subsequently given.

Inflammatory bowel disease

To compare octyl-2-cyanoacrylate (2-OCA) tissue adhesive with subcuticular suture for the closure of incisions in the maxillofacial region to determine 1) whether it is faster than traditional subcuticular suturing, 2) whether the number and length of incisions affect closure time, 3) wound morbidity, 4) patient satisfaction outcome, and 5) cosmetic outcome.In a prospective randomized clinical trial, 29 patients were allocated to 1 of 2 groups for the closure of skin incisions using 2-OCA or conventional subcuticular skin sutures. Postoperative follow-up evaluated wound healing at 5 to 10 days and at 3 months. Assessment of cosmetic outcome was performed by a plastic surgeon using a modified Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale and a validated visual analog scale. Comparisons between groups were performed using the Student t test and χ2 test.Twenty incisions in 14 patients were closed with 2-OCA and 20 incisions in 15 patients were closed with subcuticular sutures. Mean time of closure was significantly (P < .005) faster with 2-OCA at 69.50 ± 33.39 seconds compared with 379.00 ± 75.39 seconds in the suture group. There was no significant difference in wound complications between the 2 groups; also, there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome of scars at the 3-month follow-up between the 2 groups.2-OCA tissue adhesive is an excellent alternative to sutures for effective, reliable, and faster skin closure of maxillofacial incisions.

Clinical comparison of surgical wounds closed by suture and adhesive tapes

Provided the surgeon has closed the subcutaneous dead spaces and secured hemostasis, tape closure of the skin yields advantages over suture closure. By avoiding percutaneous needle tracks, one avoids the risk of suture canal scarring, infection, actual wound infection, and separation. This difference in wound complications is most pronounced in clean-contaminated wounds. The problems in application of this method to wound closure are analyzed and solutions offered. Tape is indicated in the cutaneous closure of all clean-contaminated wounds except those which are mechanically inaccessible or those with profuse drainage.