The authors would like to thank the discusser for his considerations and comments. The discusser believes that some of the derived formulations need to be referred to his previously published works and also some related studies have not been cited.Up to knowledge of the authors, the idea of drift-based equations of motion presented in the paper is new. While mathematical aspects of the idea are simple, its specifi c form would greatly accelerate optimization process due to the fact that stiffness and damping matrices, which are supposed to be optimized, are diagonal in the drift-based form. The technique is not limited to damper placement and can also be used in the other cases. The authors would like to note thatEqs. (18) and (21) are well known basic formulations which step by step procedure of their derivation is presented in the paper. Equation (18) is simply obtained by taking the Fourier transform of the drift-based equation of motion (Eq. (13)). Zhang and Soong (1992), Cimellaro (2007), Cimellaro and Retamales (2007) and many others have also presented this formulation without mentioning any reference. Moreover, Eq. (21) is a famous relation in random vibration theory which says that the mean square value of a random process equals the area under spectral density graph of that process (Newland, 1993). These well known relations are so familiar to the audiences which do not need any specifi c reference at all. Due to space limitation, only strictly related papers have been cited and other studies discussing other aspects of passive dampers were excluded, as stated in the “Introduction” section. Some of the stated references by the discusser are essentially similar in terms of formulations and optimality criteria, such as Takewaki (2000), Takewaki (1999), and Takewaki and Uetani (1999).As stated in the paper's “Introduction”, adopted optimization index was a combination between those proposed by Zhang and Soong (1992) and Takewaki (1997). However, derived formulations were different and well suited for practical applications. In the paper, considering higher modes effects, optimization procedure selected to be based on target modal damping ratios rather than target total damping coeffi cient which was the case in earlier studies (Takewaki 1997, Takewaki 1999, Takewaki and Uetani 1999, Takewaki 2000, Lopez-Garcia 2001, etc.). As shown in the “Example” section, this new philosophy leads to a lower value of total damping coeffi cient. In our paper, higher mode effects can be easily taken into account by defi ning discrete modal-based transfer matrices (Eq. 22). The discusser mentioned that Eq. (22) of the paper is similar to the formulations in Takewaki (2001). After fi nding and reviewing the paper, the authors found no relation similar to Eq. (22). However, similar concept has been presented schematically for power spectral density (PSD) of the critical excitation. As suggested by Takewaki (2001), the critical excitation has a step-wise Dirac-based PSD function. In other words, in our study, discrete transfer function is achieved based on concept of the shape functions (Eq. (23)), while Takewaki (2001) has conceptually derived discrete PSD function using Dirac delta function with no specifi c equation.As a conclusion, this paper was aimed to address optimal placement of velocity-dependent dampers using a simple yet accurate procedure. The authors believe that the procedure is well suited for professional engineers. The main new contributions of the paper can be summarized as follows: (1) Introducing drift-based equation of motion which has diagonal stiffness and damping matrices.(2) Defi ning optimization procedure based on target modal damping ratios.(3) Considering higher mode effects by defi ning discrete modal-based transfer functions.