The American Psychiatric Association has finalized its restructuring of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, clearing the way for publication of the fifth edition of the DSM in May 2013 and cementing some controversial changes. On Dec. 1, the APA's Board of Trustees approved the final diagnostic criteria, which had been developed by a task force of clinicians and researchers over the last 6 years. The document now will undergo final editing before being published by American Psychiatric Publishing. “We have sought to be very conservative in our approach to revising DSM-5,” Dr. David J. Kupfer, chair of the DSM-5 Task Force, said in a statement. “Our work has been aimed at more accurately defining mental disorders that have a real impact on people's lives, not expanding the scope of psychiatry.” One change that drew the ire of critics is the removal of the bereavement exclusion. Under the DSM-IV, the exclusion was used to describe people who experienced depressive symptoms lasting less than 2 months after the death of a loved one. Instead, the text of the DSM-5 will include notes clarifying the differences between grief and depression. The APA said the change is intended to reflect the recognition that bereavement is a significant psychological stressor that can precipitate a major depressive episode after the death of a loved one. But during the drafting of the DSM-5, the proposal was ridiculed by some opponents who said that removing the exclusion could lead clinicians to diagnose major depressive disorder in people experiencing brief periods of normal grief. Another proposal that was especially controversial during drafting of DSM-5 was the plan to create a new diagnosis of attenuated psychosis syndrome. To qualify for the new diagnosis, patients would need to have relatively intact reality testing but exhibit delusions, delusional ideas, hallucinations, or disorganized speech at least once a week for the past month. The idea was to describe a condition with the recent onset of modest, psychotic-like symptoms and clinically relevant distress and disability. But after field tests failed to garner enough cases to adequately test the reliability of the diagnosis, the DSM-5's Psychotic Disorders Work Group opted to put the new diagnosis in an appendix for diagnoses in need of research. In comments made before the APA board's approval of the new draft, Donna Rockwell, Psy.D., a clinical psychologist and a member of the executive board of the Society for Humanistic Psychology, said the concern with the attenuated psychosis syndrome proposal was that it was so sweeping that it could attach an inaccurate diagnosis to people who were simply “quirky.” Dr. Allen J. Frances, who chaired the DSM-IV task force and is a professor emeritus at Duke University, also in earlier comments, said that several proposals in the pending DSM-5 would take the idea of early diagnosis too far, essentially pathologizing normal behavior. For instance, he said the manual would elevate “temper tantrums” to disruptive mood dysregulation disorder. Diagnostic inflation and excessive use of psychotropic medications already are rampant, Dr. Frances said, and broadening the diagnostic criteria in the DSM will only worsen that trend. The DSM-5 also will include some new disorders, including excoriation (skin picking) disorder and hoarding disorder. Binge eating disorder will be moved out of the DSM-IV's Appendix B, used for diagnoses requiring further study, and into the main manual. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) will be made part of a new chapter on Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorders in the DSM-5. There will be a greater focus on the behavioral symptoms associated with PTSD, according to the APA. Many areas will remain relatively unchanged. The categorical model and criteria for the 10 personality disorders in the DSM-IV will remain the same in the new manual. However, to encourage further study on how personality disorders can be diagnosed, the DSM-5 will include a separate section with new trait-specific methodology.
Read full abstract