You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023PD28-12 ROBOT-ASSISTED FLUOROSCOPY VERSUS ULTRASOUND-GUIDED RENAL PUNCTURE FOR NEPHROLITHOTOMY IN THE SPINE POSITION: MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE STUDY Teruaki Sugino, Kazumi Taguchi, Tatsuya Hattori, Ryusuke Deguchi, Rei Unno, Shimpei Yamashita, Shuzo Hamamoto, Ryosuke Ando, Atsushi Okada, and Takahiro Yasui Teruaki SuginoTeruaki Sugino More articles by this author , Kazumi TaguchiKazumi Taguchi More articles by this author , Tatsuya HattoriTatsuya Hattori More articles by this author , Ryusuke DeguchiRyusuke Deguchi More articles by this author , Rei UnnoRei Unno More articles by this author , Shimpei YamashitaShimpei Yamashita More articles by this author , Shuzo HamamotoShuzo Hamamoto More articles by this author , Ryosuke AndoRyosuke Ando More articles by this author , Atsushi OkadaAtsushi Okada More articles by this author , and Takahiro YasuiTakahiro Yasui More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003313.12AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: We previously reported the efficacy of robot-assisted fluoroscopy-guided (RAG) percutaneous renal puncture for nephrolithotomy. An improved version of the robotic system with biplane fluoroscopy methods which can be used for the puncture in the spine position has been recently developed. In the current study, we compared RAG puncture with an improved robotic system version with ultrasound-guided (USG) puncture. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter prospective benchtop study with a renal phantom model using an improved version of the robot system. Seventeen urologists punctured the renal phantom model from the side using RAG and USG techniques. The single puncture success rates, time from device setup to puncture, puncture time, and fluoroscopic usage time were recorded, and the surgeon’s self-assessment using the NASA-Task Load Index was conducted for the analyses. RESULTS: The single-puncture success rates of the RAG and USG techniques were 100% and 58.8%, respectively (p<0.01). In the RAG technique, the median device setup time was longer (143 and 24 s, p<0.01), the median needle puncture time was shorter (18 and 36 s, p<0.01), and the median time of fluoroscopic exposure was longer (47 and 16 s, p<0.01) than in the USG technique. The results of the surgeon’s self-assessment showed that the mean weighted workload score was lower in the RAG technique than in the USG technique (16.7 and 59.3, p<0.01); the mental workload was significantly smaller in the RAG technique. CONCLUSIONS: The RAG technique showed higher accuracy rates of puncture and a smaller mental workload than the USG technique for renal puncture. Source of Funding: none © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e823 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Teruaki Sugino More articles by this author Kazumi Taguchi More articles by this author Tatsuya Hattori More articles by this author Ryusuke Deguchi More articles by this author Rei Unno More articles by this author Shimpei Yamashita More articles by this author Shuzo Hamamoto More articles by this author Ryosuke Ando More articles by this author Atsushi Okada More articles by this author Takahiro Yasui More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...