For many proteins available in large (milligram) quantities, a three-dimensional structure determination by X-ray or NMR methods is very difficult, impossible, or too costly. In these cases, spectroscopic determination of secondary structure content can be a valuable source of partial information about protein structure in solution. In particular, Raman spectroscopy can be used to determine to fair accuracy the helix and sheet content of a globular protein. However, technical difficulties have hampered the routine application of the method: (1) The large background signal of aqueous solvent in the amide I region is difficult to subtract accurately. (2) The reference data set of Raman spectra of proteins with known crystal structure is incomplete, and the assignment of secondary structure in a known crystal structure is not unambiguous. (3) The mathematical problem of extracting structure information from the spectra is ill determined; i.e., there are many apparently satisfactory solutions for a given spectrum. We have now partly solved and partly sidestepped these problems by improving and simplifying existing methods. Here, we give a step-by-step outline of a procedure intended for routine determination of the percentage of a-helix and @-sheet from the amide I Raman spectra of proteins in solution. Its main features are (a) an uncom- plicated procedure for solvent subtraction, aided by use of a divided spinning cell technique, (b) a numerically stable data handling algorithm, and (c) a clear statement of expected accuracy. In our hands, using the reference spectra of Williams (1 983), helix content can be determined to an accuracy of 6 percentage points (largest error 12%) and @-sheet content to an accuracy of 5 percentage points (largest error 7%). However, the experimental distinction between parallel and antiparallel 0-sheet does not appear possible without a significant expansion of the set of reference proteins. As a test we have measured the Raman spectrum of DNase I, a known structure treated as unknown, and derive 14% a-helix and 22% 0-sheet content, compared to X-ray derived values of 20% helix and 25% sheet (hydrogen bonds per 100 residues). The error, -6% for helix and -3% for sheet content, is typical. The method can be a tool for checking the structural purity of genetically engineered proteins, detecting major structural alterations of mutant proteins, and providing a priori information as input to predictions of protein structure.