(I) Mice belonging to the subspecies Peromyscus maniculatus sonoriensis, from the Mojave Desert, were reared for more than eight years at La Jolla, the resulting stock representing a minimum of seven and a maximum of twelve or more generations. During this period, they did not, in respect to any single measured character, undergo a modification in the direction of the La Jolla subspecies, gambeli. On the contrary, the mice of the later generations were in some regards less like gambeli than were their ancestors trapped in the desert. (II) Mice belonging to the subspecies P. m. rubidus, from the northwest coast of California, were reared at La Jolla for six years, the resulting stock (with a very few exceptions) representing a minimum of four and a maximum of six or seven generations. Here again, the slight differences between the ancestral stock and its descendants were not such as to indicate a modification in the direction of the local race. As in the case of sonoriensis, the mice of the later generations of rubidus were, on the whole, less like gambeli than were their wild ancestors from Humboldt County. (III) Comparing the two introduced strains, sonoriensis and rubidus, there was no tendency towards convergence, under the influence of a common environment. To judge from the samples at our disposal, there was actually a slight divergence in respect to all but one of characters which were measured. (IV) The nature of these slight differences between the transplanted and ancestral series of a given race renders it highly improbable that they have been due to changed climatic conditions. To some extent, they are known to be the results of captivity, irrespective of climate. (V) Subjection of deer-mice of several strains to an atmosphere of high temperature and very low relative humidity gave conflicting results. In P. maniculatus dubius the dry-room animals were, on the whole, noticeably paler than the control, while in the gray juvenile pelage. This difference was not invariable, however, and the numbers were not sufficient to furnish decisive evidence of such a change. In any case, this initial difference in shade disappeared with the assumption of the second pelage, while the difference was actually reversed in later pelages, the dry-room animals now being somewhat darker. Such an effect, of course, was quite unexpected, in view of the prevailingly pale coloration of desert mammals. But, in judging these results, the almost pathological character of the dry-room animals must be taken into account. In mice of certain other races, on the contrary, no differences were noted between the experimental and control series, either in the juvenile or later pelages. (VI) On the whole, one can not fail to be impressed by the comparative stability of these various races of mice under very marked alterations in the physical environment. As regards color characters, such almost wholly negative results are not in agreement with those of certain other experimenters who have reported pronounced color changes in animals, following considerable changes in atmospheric humidity. Nor do the present results afford any support for the view held by certain zoologists that the differences between geographic races or subspecies are purely "somatic" and therefore nonhereditary. Regarding the more difficult question whether climatic influences may not have a cumulative effect in the course of sufficiently great periods of time, our views must at present be decided by considerations of a taxonomic and distributional nature rather than by any available experimental evidence.
Read full abstract