Doctoral Degree Research Articles

Maximizing Marketing Value: An Empirical Study on the Framework for Assessing AI and ML Integration in Marketing Management

To address this issue, we conduct an empirical investigation into the application of AI and ML in marketing management using a rich framework that aims to optimize marketing value as much as possible. The framework is structured in four pillars: data gathering and processing, customer insights & segmentation, personalized marketing strategies and performance improvement. The utility and practical implementation of the framework was examined through a mixed-methods study design employing quantitative surveys validated by qualitative interviews. The survey was conducted among marketing practitioners across all industries. We also analyze the extent of AI and ML integration in each component empirically, with qualitative insights providing perspectives on opportunity areas, challenges and best practices. Three of these areas in the framework organizational readiness, resource allocations and skill gaps are highlighted as those with most pronounced differences on AI & ML deployment. To learn more about the dataset, demographics of 38 respondents in sample. The sample has a diversified age distribution and it ranges from 27 to 50 years of age. This demonstrates a significant bit of variation (SD = 7.30) and an average age of around 36-37 years Because there's also diversity when it comes to gender representation, with seven people identifying as "Other", besides the six male and fifteen women. According to the statistics, most people are bachelor’s degree holders although also a lot of masters and doctorate degrees which adds depth into information. Overall, the results provide a glimpse into demographic attributes regarding marketing performance and providing useful information for strategic decision making by doing so on behalf of management in charge with implementing those decisions. Finally, this research provides actual data rather than theory on how AI and ML mechanics are being integrated in the marketing management space. The strategic deployment of AI and ML in this research can significantly improve the efficient utilization of resources, maximize marketing efficiency by displaying key parameters impacting shopping behaviour as possesses with more long standing competitive benefits. When they can lean on hard data, researchers, marketers and decision-makers alike are likely to find a more straightforward path to the tasks that matter most as well as how AI/ML factors into driving real marketing value. The research also underscores the importance of ongoing learning, adapting and aligning strategies to leverage new technology in an ever-evolving field like marketing.

The Pursuit of Doctoral Studies in an African Context

This paper discusses the pursuit of doctoral studies in an African context. Doctoral studies are not a new development worldwide. It has been reported that the first conferred doctoral degree was at the University of Paris. This paper examines the situation of doctoral studies in Africa, the role of doctoral students, the role of supervisors, doctoral studies across the globe, and the challenges facing doctoral students in Africa. This paper reveals that the role of a doctoral student is planning research, scheduling meetings, searching for literature, carrying out the research, drafting the thesis preparation, proofreading the thesis, writing the final thesis, submitting the final thesis, defending the final thesis, publishing the final thesis, and communicating the findings in the form of publications. The situation of doctoral studies in Africa, the role of supervisors, doctoral studies across the globe, and the challenges facing doctoral students in Africa have been discussed. It is recommended that the research work should be collaborative to enhance sharing of ideas and knowledge, involvement in presentations at seminars, participating in conferences/workshops, commitment to a research plan, and if possible joining research associations or groups. In this article recommendations for the quality doctoral programs in Africa have been provided. The conclusion states that the effort and input of supervisors also play a critical role in the quality of doctoral students who are turned out at any point in time. So, the future of research in the African context needs special attention regarding the role of role of doctoral candidates, supervisors and the government itself.

Effect of Construction Management Instructors’ Degree and Industry Experience on Construction Management Graduate Job Readiness

ABSTRACT This study investigates the impact of faculty education and industry experience on the work readiness of Construction Management (CM) graduates within their first three years’ post-graduation. This research hypothesized that the educational background and industry experience of CM faculty significantly influence graduates’ preparedness for the construction industry. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this study surveyed 465 full-time faculty members across 30 ACCE-accredited CM programs, evaluating their degrees and relevant industry experience. Recent graduates and industry leaders were surveyed to assess perceived readiness to work. The demographic findings revealed only 7% of faculty hold doctoral degrees in CM and 47% lack work experience in the field. The results also indicated that there is a linear relationship between programs with higher levels of industry experienced faculty and doctoral degrees in CM with enhanced career preparedness. The study proposes the Construction Faculty Qualifications (CFQ) Score, a metric combining academic and industry experience to evaluate and improve faculty qualifications comprehensively. The CFQ Score aims to drive accreditation requirements toward a more balanced combination of academic achievement and practical experience. This research underscores the necessity for CM-specific educational backgrounds and significant industry experience to enhance the quality and effectiveness of CM education.

Abstract B142: The impact of financial toxicity as a barrier to access and participation in early phase clinical trials for underrepresented populations using the COST–FACIT tool

Abstract Background: ASCO has reaffirmed critical role of early phase (EP) clinical trials (CT) in cancer research and treatment that patients (pts) may achieve improvement in quality of life, experience psychological and direct medical benefits. Disparities in access and participation to CT exist and are more profoundly seen in EP CT with challenge of engaging underrepresented populations (UP) in EP CT which are often complex and only available at larger cancer centers in metropolitan areas. NCI’s Create Access to Targeted Cancer Therapy for Underserved Populations (CATCH-UP.2020) helped bring EP CT to UP. To determine the impact of financial toxicity (FT) as a barrier specific to EP CT participation of UP, the validated COST-FACIT tool was used to survey cancer pts undergoing treatment at the University of Kansas Cancer Center. Methods: This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board (Study 00150640). During routine scheduled visits, pts completed COST-FACIT survey on touch screen tablet. A list of validated questions on EP CT awareness, access, and willingness to participate were included in the survey. Pts responded to 12-item COST-FACIT questionnaire describing the relationship between financial stress and treatments (scale 0 to 4). The score was computed using responses captured from COST-FACIT. Based on literature, scores <26 were determined to be higher FT. Two-sided Fisher's Exact Tests were used to test for a significant association at an alpha level of 0.05. UP included racial and ethnic minorities, low socioeconomic status, low education, and rural. Results: Of 108 pts, 101 completed surveys. 45% identified as female and 55% as male. 11.2% 18–35 years (yrs) of age, 13.9% 36 –50 yrs, 24% 51–65 yrs and 54% >65 yrs. 62.4% were white, 17.8% black, and 19.8% others (Asian or Native American). 8.9% completed <12th grade, 23.8% completed high school, 29.7% have some college experience, 22% completed college and 16% have master’s/doctoral degree. COST-FACIT mean score was 25.7 (SD 10.4, r^2 of 0.48) showing significant financial stress. 46% of pts had scores <26. Pts 18-35 yrs (p=0.02), 36–65 yrs (p=0.00), had yearly incomes of >150,000 (p=0.02) or unaware of their yearly income (p=0.05) were more likely to have significant FT. Pts with < 12th grade (14.89%) or some college experiences (34.09%) were likely to have significant FT. Pts identifying as Asian or Native American were more likely to experience FT than white or black. Conclusion: Almost half of our pts suffer from significant FT creating disparities in EP CT access and participation. Data suggest ages 35-65 yrs, low levels of education, and races other than white and black experience higher levels of FT that is a barrier to EP CT participation. These data support our ongoing efforts to bring innovative EP CT to everyone including the VA and our other outreach partners with higher concentrations of UP. Data on rural and health professional shortage areas will be reported during the meeting. This project was supported in part by The University of Kansas Cancer Center P30CA168524. Citation Format: Kamiyah Hicks, Anusha Chidharla, Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam, Hope Krebil, Issa Espinoza, Asuka Suzuki, Sam Pepper, Angelica Allen, Jill Hamilton - Reeves, Debra Sullivan, Anna Arthur, Saqib Abbasi, Anup Kasi, Rahul Parikh, Elizabeth Wulff - Burchfield, Al - Ola Abdallah, Lori Barbosa, Erin Carroll, Jennifer Heins, Tara Lin, Gary Doolittle, Weijing Sun, Joaquina Baranda. The impact of financial toxicity as a barrier to access and participation in early phase clinical trials for underrepresented populations using the COST–FACIT tool [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B142.

Rita Levi-Montalcini: From Persecution to the Nobel Prize and an Honorary Degree From a Canadian University.

Rita Levi-Montalcini (RLM) is recognized as a prestigious and renowned researcher of her time. She was the fourth woman to earn the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in 1986 for the discovery of nerve growth factor (NGF). We review her biography and scientific discovery, and provide an example of why her discovery is still important. She had a special relationship with McGill University, Canada, which we describe. We searched for articles and books about her for biographical and scientific material and met with Dr. Claudio Cuello, Former Chair of McGill's Faculty of Medicine. RLM was born in 1909 in Turin, Italy, where she had studied medicine. She started her career in research. Because of the anti-Jewish racial laws in Italy in 1938, she went underground and continued her projects in her bedroom. After the war, she visited St. Louis, USA, and conducted research there. Her experiments confirmed that tumors release a factor that causes nerve growth and cancer proliferation. Initially, scientists responded to this discovery with skepticism, but after its purification in 1959 and determination of its protein structure in 1971, NGF became widely accepted.Currently, crosstalk between cancers and nerves is poorly understood. The example of prostate cancer shows that surgical or chemical denervation of sympathetic nerves prevents the initiation of prostate tumors, whereas inhibition of parasympathetic nerve signaling reduces the spread of prostate cancer. McGill University awarded RLMa doctoral degree in 2011. It was the first time in itshistory that the University awarded an honorary doctorate outside of Canada, and the second one outside of Quebec.Through her discovery of NGF, RLM exemplified the power of passion and determination despite the obstacles she faced. Her relentless dedication has led to remarkable achievements.

Analysis of the library quality assurance system in supporting international accreditation of department at Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia

PurposeLibrary quality assurance systems are collaborative governances that facilitate the presentation of data on international accreditation of departments, which contains data on services, human resources, library facilities and infrastructure. This research analyzes the supporting and inhibiting factors and the advantages of the library quality assurance system in supporting international accreditation of departments at Sebelas Maret University (UNS) Surakarta, Indonesia using Talcott Persons' theory of structural functionalism.Design/methodology/approachPrimary data in exploratory research and action research obtained from the Quality Assurance Team at the university level under the Educational Quality Assurance and Development Institute (LPPMP), the Quality Assurance Unit (UPM) at the faculty level and the Quality Control Group (GKM) at the department, librarian and academic community levels. Supporting informants are international assessor practitioners. Data validation using source triangulation, namely information obtained through different sources, and method triangulation through different methods. Data obtained from library studies, observations, Focus Group Discussions (FGD), documentation and interviews with staff, library leaders, lecturers from departments that have and will carry out international accreditation and UNS students and analyzed interactive analysis models, namely data reduction, data presentation and concluding.FindingsThe research results show that the UNS Library quality assurance system facilitates higher education organizations, such as bachelor's, master's and doctoral departments at UNS; search and presentation of international accreditation data. Supporting factors include the availability of digital library systems, online catalogs (UNSLA), e-journal and e-book databases, library websites and library data links for accreditation; facilities and infrastructure consist of indoor-outdoor study rooms; library social media; Self Access Terminal room; facilities for international students; involvement of librarians in international internships/conferences, librarians who have had competency tests and certification; librarians pursuing doctoral degree and support for student interns in system development. Inhibiting factors include the unavailability of programmers and dependence on UNS Information and Communication of Technology Unit. The benefits of the department quality assurance system include accelerating and improving the organization's quality and presentation of international accreditation data for departments at UNS.Originality/valueThis type of qualitative research with an exploratory approach takes library study data, observations and in-depth interviews with library staff and quality assurance of departments. The informants were selected using purposive sampling, which was adjusted to the needs and interests of the research. It also uses the action research method, a collaboration between the quality assurance unit, librarians and academics. Action research is a form of collective self-reflection that involves a series of daily activities, which include the processes of research, diagnosis, planning, implementation, monitoring and establishing the necessary relationships between evaluation and self-development. The research object is something that will be subject to conclusions resulting from something that will be discussed in the research. The object of this research is the quality assurance of the UNS Library. Primary data was obtained from the Quality Assurance Team at the university level under the LPPMP, the Quality Assurance Unit (UPM) at the faculty level and the Quality Control Group (GKM) at the department, librarian and academic community levels. Supporting informants are international assessor practitioners. Data will be collected using observation, in-depth interviews, Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and documentation. To ensure the validity of the data, source triangulation is used, namely, information obtained through different sources, as well as method triangulation through different methods, for example, interviews with observation or FGD. Data analysis using an interactive analysis model, namely data reduction, data presentation and concluding. This research was conducted at the UNS Library, with the research object being all departments at Sebelas Maret University, which have and will undergo international accreditation.

Worth of three doctor's degrees (On Bernardas Gailius "The Guerrilla War of 1944-1953 in the Historical, Political and Legal Culture of Contemporary Lithuania")

Worth of three doctor's degrees (On Bernardas Gailius "The Guerrilla War of 1944-1953 in the Historical, Political and Legal Culture of Contemporary Lithuania")

Doctoral Degree Programs and Soft Skills: Reflections by Faculty Members

Soft skills are people-oriented skills, and they, like technical (hard) skills, are essential for employees including faculty members. A qualitative pilot study was conducted with eight current and retired faculty members to learn how they acquired and/or honed soft skills during their doctoral program. The analysis of semi-structured interviews revealed that the participants explicitly and implicitly gained soft skills through formal and informal opportunities during their program of study. This study will contribute toliterature related to soft skills, particularly in the context of academic work. The study also aims to draw attention to the ways in which soft skills can be systematically and intentionally taught and nurtured during a doctoral student’s program of study.

Design and Validation of the Scientific-Research Skills Questionnaire for Basic Education Teachers

One teacher skill that has allowed for progress and development in pedagogy is that of scientific research, but there is very little attention to its measurement in basic education. The aim of the study was to design and validate a questionnaire of teachers' scientific-research skills and to compare them according to socio-demographic variables. The design was psychometric and descriptive-comparative with the participation of 736 Peruvian teachers. The results indicate that the instrument has evidence of content validity with a concordance > 0.7 among the 9 judges. The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) exposed 25 items and 3 dimensions that explained 81.1% of the total variance (KMO > 0.7, Bartlett < 0.05) and was confirmed by adequate fit indices (X2/df = 4.648, p < 0.001, SRMR=0.036, RMSEA=0.099, TLI, CFI and GFI >0.95). The values obtained for convergent validity (AVE > 0.5), discriminant validity (√AVE > r) and internal consistency (αordinal and ωordinal > 0.7) exceeded the minimum expected values. In addition, it was found that there are moderate and significant differences in the skills of problematisation and research theorisation, research contrastation and scientific communication according to teaching levels in favour of secondary school teachers and in academic training with higher scores in teachers with a doctorate degree (p < 0.05; ɛ̂ > 0.25). In conclusion, the questionnaire has adequate evidence of validity and reliability, and there are differences in teachers' abilities according to teaching and training levels.

Intentions versus outcomes in doctoral degree completion

ABSTRACT The decline in doctoral program completion has become one of the main challenges in doctoral education worldwide. As concern about this issue grows, the number of studies examining the topic has also increased. Many of these studies, which aim to identify the factors that contribute to high attrition rates, rely on cross-sectional data and often use students’ degree completion plans as a proxy for either completion or attrition. This approach raises a crucial question: How well do these proxies correlate with actual graduation outcomes? Utilizing a quasi-longitudinal dataset, our study investigates the relationship between various indicators of student plans, as used in cross-sectional studies, and students’ eventual completion or withdrawal from doctoral programs. Our analysis reveals a significant disconnect between student intentions and their actual outcomes, which indicates that students’ plans may not always be a reliable predictor of graduation results. The findings suggest that using these proxies can lead to misinterpretations or the omission of key factors that affect outcomes. Such insights are valuable for developing more accurate scales and indicators to measure dropout intentions in cross-sectional studies and contribute to the broader understanding and discussion of doctoral student outcomes and success.

Advancing doctoral student professional development through a strengths-based cohort program

Purpose Strengths-based professional development has been associated with positive outcomes in academia and in the organizational workplace. Students pursuing their doctoral degrees in the biomedical sciences in the US are often on graduate assistantships, where they experience an academic component to their training integrated with an employee-like existence. The individual who serves as their academic and research advisor is often their supervisor, who pays their stipend. The traditional training structure poses unique challenges and may be accompanied by stress, burnout and imposter phenomenon. The purpose of this study is to utilize a strengths-based approach to equip students with essential personal and professional skills that build self-awareness and self-confidence further preparing them for their future in the scientific workforce. Design/methodology/approach The authors developed and implemented a novel strengths-based professional development cohort program for doctoral students in the biomedical sciences at a research-intensive (R1) institution. The program was designed to create a supportive and inclusive space for participants (n = 18) to explore their identity as a student and scientists and to develop and leverage their talents for more effective and strategic use. Program outcomes were evaluated through a mixed methods case study design using a post-program Likert-based survey (n = 10 participants) and participant interviews (n = 13). Explanatory sequential design was used in the interpretation of the findings. Findings The results show that the program had a positive impact on students’ perceptions of themselves as scientists, as well as on their self-efficacy, self-confidence and interpersonal interactions in the research setting. Practical implications This strengths-based professional development program demonstrates immense potential as a model to equip students with self-awareness and a new foundation of essential skills needed to supplement their technical and scientific training for their future careers in the team-based workplace. Originality/value This study demonstrates how professional development programming can complement scientific training by equipping students with self-awareness and other lifelong skills to navigate feelings of imposter phenomenon and interpersonal relationships in the team-based workplace.

INTEGRA methodology for the development of integrative reviews: origins, guidelines, and recommendations

Introduction: The "INTEGRA" methodology represents an updated approach for integrative reviews, emphasizing the quality of outcomes in response to a need expressed by the scientific community.Objective: To present the INTEGRA methodology and provide guidelines and recommendations for its application.Methods: This methodological study was conducted in two stages: a) Development of the guideline and b) Analysis. The study was carried out by a team of experts from Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Costa Rica, and Brazil, who met at least one of the following criteria: a) holding a doctoral degree or being a doctoral candidate with experience in conducting literature reviews; b) having experience in developing reviews for or with professionals in clinical-care settings, policymakers, government agencies, or other decision-makers.Results: The "INTEGRA" methodology consists of seven stages: 1. (I) Idea or study problem; 2. (N) Narrowing down the inquiry or objective; 3. (T) Targeting the search strategy; 4. (E) Execution or implementation of the search; 5. (G) Grading and quality control of the results; 6. (R) Reviewing the results; 7. (A) Analysis and discussion.Conclusions: The application of the "INTEGRA" methodology will provide authors with guidelines for developing integrative reviews and improving the quality of contributions in this field.

The Main Body and Legal Basis of American Graduate Degree Awarding Authority

The right to confer postgraduate degrees is involved a key measure to universities and its students. Nations in the world pay a very high attention to postgraduate education and play it core role. As we known, U.S. has rich resources and great influences in the field of higher education worldwide. And there are many students from all over the world to enroll American universities to study for master or doctor degree. Although the degree is divided into curriculum and paper degree, the quality of both are strictly regulated and guaranteed in the United States. The main body has become different types of universities and diversity pattern in the course of developing. The right to award degree was struggled by universities in the development of history, and it is a part of its charter. In the process, the legitimacy of awarding degree gradually was established. As so far, it is known as an important measure for the development of universities and students. There are different bodies of the right to grant graduate degrees in American universities, and the methods of obtaining graduate degrees are also different. How to ensure that the right to confer university degrees is not affected by the government and its actions? This paper will explicit from the point view of legal basis.

Abstract P402: The Impact of Preeclampsia Education in Rural Communities

Preeclampsia (PE) and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are the leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. There are 4,000 PE cases/year in IA. Rural counties are at a significantly higher risk of pregnancy-related mortality. A lack of PE education regarding signs and symptoms may contribute to this risk. PE complications and mortality may be preventable with early implementation of patient education on preeclampsia during pregnancy. Our objective was to determine if implementing a magnet as an intervention increases patients' knowledge of the signs and symptoms of PE. A magnet that includes common signs and symptoms of PE was designed to serve as an educational visual aid for patients. Pregnant patients ≥18 years old from two hospitals in Northwest IA were recruited. A pre-survey was given at a prenatal appointment prior to receiving the magnet. The post-magnet survey was administered during admission for delivery. The control group did not receive the magnet. Pre- and post-surveys asked about preeclampsia and current understanding, if they received a magnet, if it was referenced, number of healthcare visits, questions during visits about PE, and if they were diagnosed with PE. Between 8/23-5/24, 62 pre- and 83 post-magnet surveys were collected. Statistical analyses were performed using a 95% confidence interval with p<0.05 considered significant. Ages ranged from 18-42 years old, with majority Caucasian patients (69% in pre-survey and 58% in post-survey). Levels of highest education obtained ranged from 4 th grade to doctoral degree, with the majority completing high school as the highest level of education (29%).The magnet group rated their level of understanding of PE as good to excellent which was higher than both pre-intervention and control groups. Both control and magnet groups identified more symptoms and complications of PE on the post-survey compared to the pre-survey. Both control and magnet groups were noted to have increased discussions about preeclampsia with their physician. Lastly, both groups had increased knowledge on what to do if they developed symptoms on the post-survey compared to pre-survey responses. Of the magnet group, 71% thought receiving a magnet was helpful to increase awareness of PE. Implementation of a magnet increased patient literacy regarding the signs, symptoms, and complications of PE, discussions with physicians, and knowledge of what to do if patients develop symptoms of PE.

Conducting mixed methods research with women in a forensic mental health setting: A reflexive account from a nurse as researcher.

To describe a reflexive account of a mental health nurse as researcher undertaking a mixed methods study as part of a doctoral degree, with women in a secure forensic hospital. A discursive paper that draws upon the primary author's experience of dual roles as a mental health nurse and a novice researcher, and relevant literature pertaining to positionality and reflexivity in the context of conducting mixed methods research. A mixed methods study was conducted within a secure forensic hospital in Australia, to identify factors associated with the frequency and duration of seclusion for women and, to explore their experiences of seclusion. Notes and a reflective diary were used to demonstrate the reflexive approach and strategies used throughout the study design and data collection stages of the research. Women in the secure forensic hospital setting often have complex histories and experiences and are considered a vulnerable group, which can add additional challenges when undertaking research with this population. As a doctoral student with clinical experience in mental health undertaking research in the forensic hospital setting with women, positionality and the connection with reflexivity requires exploration to understand self and the influence on research. This understanding along with identified strategies to enhance reflexivity, supports the management of the dual nurse as researcher roles to enhance all stages of the research process. Doctoral nursing candidates undertaking clinical research in their area of clinical practice and at the location of previous employment, may experience challenges in relation to identity and the dichotomy of roles. Further challenges can be posed when research involves complex populations and/or controversial practices. Support to balance role conflict and maintain reflexivity is critical to understanding the role of self in research and to enhance credibility. Women are a complex, yet minority population in forensic mental health settings, however the numbers of women being admitted to services is increasing. Future research may consider the use of the strategies explored here to enhance the reflexive process, and support future researchers in this field to conduct research that aims to support an often-misheard population to better support health outcomes. There was no patient or public contribution to this paper, however the study in which this paper is based on, is grounded in the experience of patients (women).

Sexuality educators’ perceptions of and experiences with sexuality certification

ABSTRACT Sexuality education is often implemented by individuals of various backgrounds and training which may cause doubt about the level of competence and expertise provided. Certification can be a strategy to gain knowledge and skills and distinguish oneself in the field; however, little is known about sexuality educators’ experience of certification. This mixed-methods study sought to address this gap in the literature. Sexuality educators (n = 157) were asked about their experiences of certification and the perceived value of sexuality education and sexology certifications. Findings indicate a variety of certifications (n = 32) held by sexuality educators with significant differences in holding/pursuing a certification based on the highest degree earned, the geographical region worked in, and the work setting. Respondents perceived sexology certification as less valuable than sexuality education certification, and those with bachelor’s degrees valued sexuality education certification more than those with master’s and doctoral degrees. Cost and time were common barriers to certification, and individuals choosing not to pursue certification questioned its value for their job or success in the field. These results provide guidance to organisations offering certification and can also provide insight for sexuality educators as they consider certification as part of their professional journey.

The Reality of Healthcare Professionals in Leadership Positions at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

While pandemics have long been a topic of discussion in public health, COVID-19 placed healthcare leaders in a completely new and challenging situation. This qualitative study sought to understand the personal experiences of healthcare professionals in leadership roles at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sixteen in-depth interviews were conducted and recorded via Zoom. Most participants were men (n = 8, 57.1%) and had a doctorate or master's degree (n = 8, 57.1%). The themes of mental health, dynamic infrastructure, and transformative experience emerged from our participants' narratives. Most respondents reported heightened stress during that time and shared the institutional and personal mechanisms they used to deal with the situation. They were proud of their profession and their work. They discussed the "dynamic infrastructure" they experienced at the time that helped them lead. Feeling overworked was a common experience for them. Most considered leading during COVID-19 a "transformative experience" that taught them valuable lessons. They also witnessed acts of heroism as their colleagues continued to work during difficult times, even though some succumbed to COVID-19. Despite all the challenges and uncertainties healthcare professionals in leadership positions faced at the onset of COVID-19, their resilience, dedication, and commitment to their profession prevailed. In conclusion, the firsthand experiences recounted by healthcare leaders in this study shed light on the multifaceted nature of leadership during a global health crisis. Their unwavering resilience, dedication, and commitment stand as a testament to the fortitude required in such demanding circumstances. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve, the insights gleaned from this research bear significant implications for informing future strategies and support systems aimed at bolstering healthcare leadership worldwide.

BOARD STRUCTURE AND ISLAMIC BANK STABILITY: A STANDALONE RISK COMMITTEE MODERATING EFFECT

This study investigates the impact of board attributes on the stability of Islamic banks and whether the presence a standalone risk management committee (SARC) moderates their relation. Applying the feasible generalized least squares (FGLS) regression as well as the two-step system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator for robustness to a panel sample of 43 Islamic banks across 15 countries over eleven years from 2010 to 2020, we document evidence suggesting that board meetings, board gender diversity and foreign directors do not influence the stability of Islamic banks. Conversely, board members holding doctorate degrees (PhDs) significantly and negatively affect the stability of Islamic banks. In addition, the presence of SARC significantly improves the stability of Islamic banks. The study further finds that SARC partially and positively moderates the effects of board members with PhDs and foreign directors on the stability of Islamic banks.

INTRODUCTION TO JUDICIAL SPECIALTY: BASIC SCIENTIFIC INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDY

The article describes the main scientific results of the study, taking into account the author’s modern representations, which consist in the formation of the basis of the new direction in the system of general theory of forensic science-forensic accounting on the implementation of special knowledge beyond forensic expertise (Forensic Specialty or Special Science) and the development of an integrated interdisciplinary framework that develops forensic science. This article is a continuation of the requirements for the publication of the main results of the thesis for the degree of doctor of legal sciences, and also reflects the empirical basis of the research. On the basis of the research carried out by the author, including those published in the scientific works of the author: a) the expediency and timeliness of the development of the forensic doctrine on the implementation of special knowledge outside the forensic expertise has been substantiated. In this connection, the concept, object, subject, structure, principles, tasks and functions of the Teaching are first disclosed and scientifically substantiated, as well as the language of forensic doctrine on the implementation of special knowledge beyond forensic expertise allowing to enter into scientific circulation a new forensic term «specialty» and clarify the concepts of «specialist», «special knowledge», «expert opinion», «expert testimony» et al. b) the original scientific hypothesis for the adoption of the new codified act-the federal law «On the activity of a specialist in the Russian Federation», which determines the legal basis, the principles of the organization of the activity of a specialist in the Russian Federation and the procedure for its implementation in constitutional, civil, arbitration, administrative and criminal proceedings, as well as the introduction of amendments and additions to the current legislation of the Russian Federation concerning the powers and activities of individuals, Having specialized knowledge outside forensic expertise, taking into account the needs and support of some practitioners of law enforcement and other bodies of the Russian Federation; c) developed scientifically based proposals and practical recommendations, aimed at improving the activities of law enforcement agencies to implement special knowledge outside of forensic expertise, taking into account the specifics of the subject of the study, modern realities and new approaches to problem solving; r) proved the prospect of formation and trends in the development of forensic science on the implementation of special knowledge outside forensic expertise as a new complex interdisciplinary scientific research, as well as the development and introduction into law enforcement activities of the universal forensic information system «Spez» in the conditions of digitalization. The methodology of the study is composed of a dialectic-materialistic approach, which made it possible to study the nature and nature of the implementation of specialized knowledge outside of forensic expertise, creating a theoretical basis for forensic learning about the implementation of specialized knowledge outside forensic expertise. In the course of the study, a number of private scientific methods, traditional for studying legal phenomena, were used: historical-in the analysis of factors that determine the formation of the forensic doctrine on the implementation of specialized knowledge outside the forensic examination; formal-logical, Comparative-legal, systemic-structural methods-in the complex study of forensic science on the implementation of specialized knowledge outside forensic expertise, as well as the study of the mechanism of its legal regulation; statistical method-for the generalization of forensic science, Procuratorial, investigative, legal, expert, forensic and intelligence-gathering practices; a method of generalizing practice-which makes it possible to identify typical, Similar, concordant in the main directions of forensic science on the implementation of special knowledge outside of forensic expertise; sociological method-when conducting a questionnaire and interview on current aspects of the study. In general, general scientific methods were mainly used in the theoretical substantiation of the forensic doctrine on the implementation of special knowledge outside the forensic examination as a new complex interdisciplinary scientific research. Specific (private) methods have been applied in an integrated manner to the study of specific forms and types of implementation of expertise outside forensic expertise.

Delivery Performance of the Administrative Services as Perceived by School Heads and Teachers of El Salvador City Division

This study evaluated the administrative services in the El Salvador City Division Office for the 2021-2022 school year, focusing on personnel, cash, records, and supply and asset management. The research involved 15 school heads and 253 elementary teachers using a survey patterned from Executive Order No. 366. Statistical tools like frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and t-tests were used to analyze the data. The findings revealed that many school heads hold doctorate degrees and have 11-20 years of experience, typically in leadership roles such as Principal or Head Teacher. They have also participated in multiple training sessions. Teachers, however, generally hold bachelor's degrees, have less than 5 years of experience, and occupy Teacher I positions, with some engaging in training at various levels. Both groups rated the administrative services highly. A significant relationship was found between their profiles and how they assess administrative services, suggesting that the educational and professional backgrounds of school heads and teachers influence their perceptions of service effectiveness. The study recommends that the division office improve transparency by timely posting school expenditures and balances to enhance data communication for school heads and teachers.