Degenerative Spinal Conditions Research Articles

Lumbar lateral interbody fusion: step-by-step surgical technique and clinical experience.

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a minimally invasive surgical approach used to treat a variety of degenerative and deformity conditions of the lumbar spine such as advanced degenerative disease, degenerative scoliosis, foraminal and central stenosis. It has emerged as an alternative to the traditional posterior and anterior lumbar approaches with some potential benefits such as lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay. In this article, we provide our single institutional surgical experience including main indications and contraindications, a step-by-step surgical technique description, a detailed preoperative imaging assessment with a focus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) psoas anatomy, operative room (OR) setup and patient positioning. A descriptive surgical technical note of the following steps is provided: positioning and fluoroscopic confirmation, incision and intraoperative level confirmation, discectomy and endplate preparation, implant size selection and insertion and final fluoroscopic control, hemostasis check and wound closure along with an instructional surgical video with tips and pearls, postoperative patient care recommendations, common approach-related complications, along with our historical clinical institutional group experience. Finally, we summarize our research experience in this surgical approach with a focus on LLIF as a standalone procedure. Based on our experience, LLIF can be considered an effective surgical technique to treat degenerative lumbar spine conditions. Proper patient selection is mandatory to achieve good outcomes. Our institutional experience shows higher fusion rates with good clinical outcomes and a relatively low rate of complications.

Reducing surgical site infections after spine surgery: the optimal amount of normal saline for intra-wound irrigation

BACKGROUND CONTEXTSurgical site infection (SSI) following lumbar surgery can increase healthcare costs and lead to poor clinical outcome. Irrigation of wounds with saline solution is widely accepted globally and safe for nearly all kinds of surgery. However, the efficacy of different volumes of wound irrigation has not been addressed in elective spine surgery. The role and the optimal amount of intraoperative wound saline irrigation in preventing SSI in clean spinal surgery remain unclear. PURPOSEWe aimed to investigate if insufficient intraoperative irrigation may be a risk factor for postoperative SSI. Additionally, we investigated the optimal amount of normal saline (NS) for irrigation to prevent postoperative SSI. STUDY DESIGNThis is a retrospective study of patients with degenerative spinal stenosis who were treated surgically. Patients were grouped according to the amount of intra-wound irrigation during surgery. PATIENT SAMPLEWe included 444 patients with degenerative lumbar spinal conditions who had undergone one to five level open spinal fusion surgeries from January 2015 through April 2020. OUTCOME MEASURESThe definition of superficial or deep SSI in this study was based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for SSI. The fusion status accessed was based on the Bridwell grading system at the final follow-up. Self-reported and clinical outcome measures include visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index. METHODSA total of 193 patients underwent irrigation with a bulb syringe with manual method (B group) with 2,000 mL NS; 251 patients underwent interpulse battery-powered device irrigation (P group) with >6,000 mL NS. Based on our protocolized departmental guidelines, all patients received the same preoperative preparation and standard surgical steps and postoperative care plan. Patients’ demographic and surgical parameters were recorded. The main outcome measures included superficial wound infection, deep infection and overall infection. RESULTSThe incidence of overall SSI was 4.66% in the B group and 1.59% in the P group. The univariate analysis revealed a significant correlation with DM and irrigation amount per hour during surgery but not age, BMI, smoking, operative duration, fusion level, or blood loss. We determined the optimal irrigation amount during surgery as 1,400 mL per hour based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (sensitivity, 92.3%; specificity, 44.1%). This was statistically significant (p=.033) with an odds ratio of 9.284 (95% confidence interval 1.2–72.0). In the analysis of surgical factors, the infection group had a significantly lower irrigation amount during surgery. To summarize, patients with diabetes and those receiving less than 1,400 mL of NS/hour had a higher likelihood of developing SSI. CONCLUSIONSWe observed that diabetes and lower volume of intraoperative irrigation were both risk factors for postoperative SSI following degenerative lumbar spine surgery. To reduce SSI in lumbar spine surgery, intra-wound irrigation with more than 1,400 mL/h of NS was recommended.

Utilizing Deep Learning for X-ray Imaging: Detecting and Classifying Degenerative Spinal Conditions.

Background Degenerative spinal conditions (DSCs) involve a diverse set of pathologies that significantly impact health and quality of life, affecting many individuals at least once during their lifetime. Treatment approaches are varied and complex, reflecting the intricacy of spinal anatomy and kinetics. Diagnosis and management pose challenges, with the accurate detection of lesions further complicated by age-related degeneration and surgical implants. Technological advancements, particularly in artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning, have demonstrated the potential to enhance detection of spinal lesions. Despite challenges in dataset creation and integration into clinical settings, further research holds promise forimproved patient outcomes. Methods This study aimed to develop a DSCdetection and classification model using a Kaggle dataset of 967 spinal X-ray images at the Department of Neurosurgery of Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, California, USA.Our entire workflow, including data preprocessing, training, validation, and testing, was performed by utilizing an online-cloud based AI platform. The model's performance was evaluated based on its ability to accurately classify certain DSCs (osteophytes, spinal implants, and foraminal stenosis) and distinguish these from normal X-rays. Evaluation metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and confusion matrix, were calculated. Results The model achieved an average precision of 0.88, with precision and recall values of 87% and 83.3%, respectively, indicating its high accuracy in classifying DSCs and distinguishing these from normal cases. Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated as 94.12% and 96.68%, respectively. The overall accuracy of the model was calculated to be 89%. Conclusion These findings indicate the utility of deep learning algorithms in enhancing early DSC detection and screening. Our platform is a cost-effective tool that demonstrates robust performance given a heterogeneous dataset. However, additional validation studies are required to evaluate the model's generalizability across different populations and optimize its seamless integration into various types of clinical practice.

Lumbar paraspinal muscle morphology is associated with spinal degeneration in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXTLumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has been reported to induce changes in paraspinal muscle morphology, but objective physical function and degenerative spine conditions are rarely assessed. PURPOSETo identify factors associated with paraspinal muscle morphology using objective physical and degenerative spine assessments in patients with LSS. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGCross-sectional design. PATIENT SAMPLESeventy patients with neurogenic claudication caused by LSS, receiving outpatient physical therapy. OUTCOME MEASURESCross-sectional area (CSA) and functional CSA (FCSA) of the multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas muscles, the severity of stenosis, disc degeneration, and endplate abnormalities were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging, as well as sagittal spinopelvic alignment by X-ray. Objective physical assessments included pedometry and claudication distance. Patient-reported outcomes included the numerical rating scale of low back pain, leg pain, and leg numbness, and the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire. METHODSTo assess the impact of LSS on paraspinal muscles, FCSA and FCSA/CSA were compared between the dominant and nondominant sides based on the patients’ neurogenic symptoms, and multivariable regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, height, and weight were performed; p<.05 was considered significant. RESULTSSeventy patients were analyzed. At one level below the maximum stenotic level, erector spinae FCSA on the dominant side was significantly lower than that on the nondominant side. In the multivariable regression analyses, at one level below the symptomatic level, disc degeneration, endplate abnormalities, and lumbar spinopelvic alignment, such as decreased lumbar lordosis and increased pelvic tilt, were negatively associated with multifidus FCSA and FCSA/CSA ratio. A significant association was observed between dural sac CSA and erector spinae FCSA. Throughout L1/2 to L5/S, disc degeneration, endplate abnormalities, and lumbar spinopelvic alignment were negatively associated with multifidus and erector spinae FCSA or FCSA/CSA. CONCLUSIONSLumbar paraspinal muscle asymmetry caused by LSS was observed only in erector spinae. Disc degeneration, endplate abnormalities, and lumbar spinopelvic alignment, rather than spinal stenosis and LSS symptoms, were more associated with paraspinal muscle atrophy or fat infiltration.

Comparing Patient-Reported Outcomes, Complications, Readmissions, and Revisions in Posterior Lumbar Fusion With, Versus Without, an Interbody Device.

Retrospective analysis on prospectively collected data. To compare posterior lumbar fusions with versus without an interbody in: (1) Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 1 year and (2) postoperative complications, readmission, and reoperations. Elective lumbar fusion is commonly used to treat various lumbar pathologies. Two common approaches for open posterior lumbar fusion include posterolateral fusion (PLF) alone without an interbody and with an interbody through techniques, like transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Whether fusion with or without an interbody leads to better outcomes remains an area of active research. The Lumbar Module of the Quality Outcomes Database was queried for adults undergoing elective primary posterior lumbar fusion with or without an interbody. Covariates included demographic variables, comorbidities, primary spine diagnosis, operative variables, and baseline PROs, including Oswestry Disability Index, North American Spine Society satisfaction index, numeric rating scale-back/leg pain, and Euroqol 5-dimension. Outcomes included complications, reoperations, readmissions, return to work/activities, and PROs. Propensity score matching and linear regression modeling were used to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated to assess the impact of interbody use on patient outcomes. After propensity matching, there were 1044 patients with interbody and 215 patients undergoing PLF. The average treatment effect on the treated analysis showed that having an interbody or not had no significant impact on any outcome of interest, including 30-day complications and reoperations, 3-month readmissions, 12-month return to work, and 12-month PROs. There were no discernible differences in outcomes between patients undergoing PLF alone versus with an interbody in elective posterior lumbar fusion. These results add to the growing body of evidence that posterior lumbar fusions with and without an interbody seem to have similar outcomes up to 1 year postoperatively when treating degenerative lumbar spine conditions.

Degenerative spinal conditions requiring emergency surgery: an evolving crisis in a publicly funded health care system.

Surgery for degenerative spine pathologies is typically performed on a scheduled basis; however, worsening symptoms may warrant emergency surgery. An increasing number of patients requiring emergency surgery has been observed (22.6% in 2006 to 34.8% in 2019). We sought to compare the outcomes of patients who received scheduled surgery and those who required emergency surgery. All patients treated between Jan. 1, 2006, and Dec. 31, 2019, were included. Retrospective comparisons were made between patients who were scheduled (elective) for surgery and those requiring emergency surgery, patients who were scheduled for surgery and those who decompensated while on the surgical waitlist and patients who presented as de novo emergencies and those who decompensated while on the surgical waitlist. Among the 6217 patients with degenerative pathologies, 4654 (74.9%) patients were scheduled (elective) for surgery and 1563 (25.1%) were patients requiring emergency surgery. Compared with patients who were scheduled, patients requiring emergency surgery had a longer length of stay (LOS) in hospital (5.1 d, interquartile range [IQR] 2.7-11.2 v. 3.6 d, IQR 1.3-6.4, p < 0.001) and lower rate of home discharge (78.6% v. 94.2%, p < 0.001). Patients requiring emergency surgery were 1.34 times more likely to have any adverse events (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.68, p = 0.01). When compared with patients who were scheduled for surgery, those who decompensated while on the surgical waitlist had longer LOS (7.0 d, IQR 3.3-15.0 v. 3.6 d, IQR 1.3-6.4, p < 0.001), less home discharge (77.6% v. 94.2%, p < 0.001) and were 2.5 times more likely to have any adverse events (95% CI 1.5-4.1, p < 0.001). Patients who decompensated had a 2.1 times higher risk of having any adverse events than patients who presented as de novo emergencies (95% CI 1.2-3.6, p < 0.001). We observed worse perioperative outcomes for patients requiring emergency surgery for degenerative spinal conditions than for patients who were scheduled for surgery. Patients who decompensated while on the surgical waitlist had the worst outcomes.

Personalized Interventional Surgery of the Lumbar Spine: A Perspective on Minimally Invasive and Neuroendoscopic Decompression for Spinal Stenosis.

Pain generator-based lumbar spinal decompression surgery is the backbone of modern spine care. In contrast to traditional image-based medical necessity criteria for spinal surgery, assessing the severity of neural element encroachment, instability, and deformity, staged management of common painful degenerative lumbar spine conditions is likely to be more durable and cost-effective. Targeting validated pain generators can be accomplished with simplified decompression procedures associated with lower perioperative complications and long-term revision rates. In this perspective article, the authors summarize the current concepts of successful management of spinal stenosis patients with modern transforaminal endoscopic and translaminar minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques. They represent the consensus statements of 14 international surgeon societies, who have worked in collaborative teams in an open peer-review model based on a systematic review of the existing literature and grading the strength of its clinical evidence. The authors found that personalized clinical care protocols for lumbar spinal stenosis rooted in validated pain generators can successfully treat most patients with sciatica-type back and leg pain including those who fail to meet traditional image-based medical necessity criteria for surgery since nearly half of the surgically treated pain generators are not shown on the preoperative MRI scan. Common pain generators in the lumbar spine include (a) an inflamed disc, (b) an inflamed nerve, (c) a hypervascular scar, (d) a hypertrophied superior articular process (SAP) and ligamentum flavum, (e) a tender capsule, (f) an impacting facet margin, (g) a superior foraminal facet osteophyte and cyst, (h) a superior foraminal ligament impingement, (i) a hidden shoulder osteophyte. The position of the key opinion authors of the perspective article is that further clinical research will continue to validate pain generator-based treatment protocols for lumbar spinal stenosis. The endoscopic technology platform enables spine surgeons to directly visualize pain generators, forming the basis for more simplified targeted surgical pain management therapies. Limitations of this care model are dictated by appropriate patient selection and mastering the learning curve of modern MIS procedures. Decompensated deformity and instability will likely continue to be treated with open corrective surgery. Vertically integrated outpatient spine care programs are the most suitable setting for executing such pain generator-focused programs.

Poor muscle health and low preoperative ODI are independent predictors for slower achievement of MCID after minimally invasive decompression

Although some previous studies have analyzed predictors of non-improvement, most of these have focused on demographic and clinical variables and have not accounted for radiological predictors. In addition, while several studies have examined the degree of improvement after decompression, there is less data on the rate of improvement. To identify the risk factors and predictors (both radiological and non-radiological) for slower as well as non-achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after minimally invasive decompression. Retrospective cohort PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent minimally invasive decompression for degenerative lumbar spine conditions and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. Patients with preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) <20 were excluded. MCID achievement in ODI (cut off 12.8). Patients were stratified into two groups (achieved MCID, did not achieve MCID) at two timepoints (early ≤3 months, late ≥6 months). Non-radiological (age, gender, BMI, comorbidities, anxiety, depression, number of levels operated, preoperative ODI, preoperative back pain) and radiological (MRI - Schizas grading for stenosis, dural sac cross-sectional area, Pfirrmann grading for disc degeneration, psoas cross-sectional area and Goutallier grading, facet cyst/effusion; X-ray - spondylolisthesis, lumbar lordosis, spinopelvic parameters) variables were assessed with comparative analysis to identify risk factors and with multiple regression models to identify predictors for slower achievement of MCID (MCID not achieved by ≤3 months) and non-achievement of MCID (MCID not achieved at ≥6 months). 338 patients were included. At ≤3 months, patients who did not achieve MCID had significantly lower preoperative ODI (40.1 vs. 48.1, p<0.001) and worse psoas Goutallier grading (p=0.048). At ≥6 months, patients who did not achieve MCID had significantly lower preoperative ODI (38 vs. 47.5, p<0.001), higher age (68 vs. 63 years, p=0.007), worse average L1-S1 Pfirrmann grading (3.5 vs. 3.2, p=0.035), and higher rate of pre-existing spondylolisthesis at the operated level (p=0.047). When these and other probable risk factors were put into a regression model, low preoperative ODI (p=0.002) and poor Goutallier grading (p=0.042) at the early timepoint and low preoperative ODI (p<0.001) at the late timepoint came out as independent predictors for MCID non-achievement. After minimally invasive decompression, low preoperative ODI and poor muscle health are risk factors and predictors for slower achievement of MCID. For non-achievement of MCID, low preoperative ODI, higher age, greater disc degeneration, and spondylolisthesis are risk factors and low preoperative ODI is the only independent predictor.

Exercise efficacy in management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy – A case report

Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy is an ageing, degenerative spinal condition and a common cause of myelopathy in adults, with the average age of presentation being 56 years. This case report was on a 63-year man who was apparently healthy until he was presented with grade v on Nurick Classification System for Myelopathy. Lhermitte Sign was present. The clinical presentations were motor deficit in the upper limbs (ULs), lower limbs (LLs) and hands; intermittent bouts of spasms in lower limbs; painfully reduced range of motion (ROM) in the shoulder, cervical and lumbosacral joints; impaired activity of daily living (ADL) including ambulation, and reduced sleeping hours. The treatment plan aimed to relieve pain at the affected joints; improve ROM in joints of ULs and LLs; strengthen weak muscles (ULs and LLs); improve trunk control; improve patella mobility and release of tight muscle/structures(hamstrings). The adopted Exercise protocols, which were done between 11 am-1 pm at thrice weekly appointments for four months, were Mobilization &amp; Strengthening Exercises (all limbs); Back Flexibility Exercises; Quadriceps Strengthening Exercises both LLs and Neuromotor Exercises. The patient became stable on a tripod stand in the fourth month and was discharged on a home programme at the end of the fourth month. The observed improvement in the clinical condition of this Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy patient lays credence to the efficacy of the use of exercise interventions in this condition.

A Learning-based Correlated Graph Model for Spinal Cord Injury Prediction from Magnetic Resonance Spinal Images

In epidemiological research on spine surgery, machine learning represents a promising new area. It is made up of several algorithms that work together to identify patterns in the data. Machine learning provides many benefits over traditional regression techniques, including a lower necessity for a priori predictor information and a higher capacity for managing huge datasets. Recent research has made significant progress toward using machine learning more effectively in spinal cord injury (SCI). Machine learning algorithms are employed to analyze non-traumatic and traumatic spinal cord injuries. Non-traumatic spinal cord injuries often reflect degenerative spine conditions that cause spinal cord compression, such as degenerative cervical myelopathy. This article proposes a novel correlated graph model (CGM) that adopts correlated learning to predict various outcomes published in traumatic and non-traumatic SCI. In the studies mentioned, machine learning is used for several purposes, including imaging analysis and epidemiological data set prediction. We discuss how these clinical predictive models are based on machine learning compared to traditional statistical prediction models. Finally, we outline the actions that must be taken in the future for machine learning to be a more prevalent statistical analysis method in SCI.

The association between paraspinal muscle parameters and vertebral pedicle microstructure in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.

Lumbar fusion surgery has become a standard procedure in spine surgery and commonly includes the posterior placement of pedicle screws. Bone quality is a crucial factor that affects pedicle screw purchase. However, the relationship between paraspinal muscles and the bone quality of the pedicle is unknown. The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between paraspinal muscles and the ex vivo bony microstructure of the lumbar pedicle. Prospectively, collected data of patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative spinal conditions was analyzed. Pre-operative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were evaluated for a quantitative assessment of the cross-sectional area (CSA), functional cross-sectional area (fCSA), and the proportion of intramuscular fat (FI) for the psoas muscle and the posterior paraspinal muscles (PPM) at L4. Intra-operative bone biopsies of the lumbar pedicle were obtained and analyzed with microcomputed tomography (µCT) scans. The following cortical (Cort) and trabecular (Trab) bone parameters were assessed: bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), connectivity density (CD), bone-specific surface (BS/BV), apparent density (AD), and tissue mineral density (TMD). A total of 26 patients with a mean age of 59.1years and a mean BMI of 29.8kg/m2 were analyzed. fCSAPPM showed significant positive correlations with BV/TVTrab (ρ = 0.610; p < 0.001), CDTrab (ρ = 0.679; p < 0.001), Tb.NTrab (ρ = 0.522; p = 0.006), Tb.ThTrab (ρ = 0.415; p = 0.035), and ADTrab (ρ = 0.514; p = 0.007). Cortical bone parameters also demonstrated a significant positive correlation with fCSAPPM (BV/TVCort: ρ = 0.584; p = 0.002; ADCort: ρ = 0.519; p = 0.007). FIPsoas was negatively correlated with TMDCort (ρ = - 0.622; p < 0.001). This study highlights the close interactions between the bone microstructure of the lumbar pedicle and the paraspinal muscle morphology. These findings give us further insights into the interaction between the lumbar pedicle microstructure and paraspinal muscles.

Additional operation rates after surgery for degenerative spine diseases: minimum 10 years follow-up of 4705 patients in the national Swedish spine register

ObjectivesTo identify rates of additional operation after the index operation for degenerative lumbar spine diseases.DesignRetrospective register study.SettingNational outcome data from Swespine, the National Swedish spine register.ParticipantsA total of 4705 patients...

The Impact of Depression and Anxiety on Perioperative Outcomes and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function After Thoracolumbar Surgery.

Depression and anxiety are common within spine patient populations. The demand for surgical management of degenerative spine conditions and the prevalence of mental disorders are expected to increase as the general population ages. Concurrently, there is increasing pressure to demonstrate high-value care through improved perioperative outcome metrics and patient-reported outcome instruments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of common mental disorders on perioperative markers of high resource utilization and patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function (PROMIS-PF) following thoracolumbar (TL) spine surgery. A retrospective review of patients undergoing TL decompression alone or with fusion at a single institution. Data were collected using an administrative database for patient demographics. Outcomes of interest included length of stay, discharge disposition, 90-day return to the emergency department (ED), 90-day hospital readmission, 1-year complication rate, 1-year revision surgery rate, 1-year residual radiculopathy, and PROMIS-PF scores recorded preoperatively, at 0 to 1, 1 to 3, 3 to 6, and 6 to 12 months postoperatively. Univariate analysis and multiple linear regression were utilized to analyze results. A total of 596 patients were included in this study, of whom 205 (34%) had a history of depression or anxiety. Compared with patients with no history of a mental disorder, patients with depression or anxiety who underwent TL decompression alone had higher rates of 90-day ED visits (P = 0.019), 90-day readmissions (P = 0.031), and complications at 1 year (P = 0.012). After risk adjustment, the diagnosis of depression or anxiety had no significant effect on PROMIS-PF improvement from the preoperative to postoperative period. Our study suggests that a history of depression or anxiety is common among patients undergoing spine surgery but has no significant impact on PROMIS-PF improvement. Because some patients with depression or anxiety may be at higher risk of postoperative resource utilization, further study and effort are warranted to support at-risk groups and improve overall care value. Although patients with depression or anxiety are at risk for increased resource utilization after TL decompression or fusion, they can experience similar levels of functional improvement as patients without these conditions. Therefore depression or anxiety should not be considered contraindications to surgery, but additional attention should be paid to this population during the postoperative recovery period.

Do Patient Outcomes Predict Loss to Long-Term Follow-Up After Spine Surgery?

To determine if spine surgery patients with greater improvement in patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) at early postoperative follow-up are more likely to be lost to follow-up at the 1-year and 2-year postoperative visits. All patients older than 18 years who underwent primary or revision decompression or fusion surgery for degenerative spinal conditions at an academic institution were retrospectively identified. Univariate analysis compared patient demographics, surgical factors, and changes in short-term and long-term postoperative PROMs (Neck Disability Index, Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale [VAS] neck, VAS arm, VAS back, VAS leg, and Short-Form 12 Physical and Mental Component Scores) across groups with and without 1 year and 2 years follow-up. Logistic regression isolated predictors of loss to follow-up. A total of 1412 patients were included. Younger patient age, primary surgery, and single surgical approach independently predicted loss at 1 year follow-up. Female sex predicted loss at 2 years follow-up, whereas multilevel fusion surgery predicted attendance at 2 years clinical follow-up. In patients lost at 1 year follow-up compared with those who attended, preoperative to 3-month Mental Component Score and VAS neck pain improvement was significantly greater. When comparing patients based on 2 years follow-up status, VAS back pain improvement at 1 year postoperatively was significantly greater in patients lost to 2 years follow-up. All other changes in PROMs did not differ significantly by 1 or 2 years follow-up attendance. Overall patient outcomes were not found to affect loss to long-term follow-up after spine surgery. The general lack of association between postoperative follow-up status and clinical outcome may limit bias introduced in retrospective PROM studies.

Patients with radiculopathy have worse baseline disability and greater improvements following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion compared to patients with myelopathy

BACKGROUND CONTEXTAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is commonly performed in patients with radiculopathy and myelopathy. Although the goal of surgery in patients with radiculopathy is to improve function and reduce pain, patients with myelopathy undergo surgery to halt disease progression. Although the expectations between these preoperative diagnoses are generally understood to be disparate by spine surgeons, there is limited literature demonstrating their discordant outcomes. PURPOSETo compare improvements in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients undergoing ACDF for myelopathy or radiculopathy. Secondarily, we analyzed the proportion of patients who attain the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) postoperatively using thresholds derived from radiculopathy, myelopathy, and mixed cohort studies. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGSingle institution retrospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLEPatients undergoing primary, elective ACDF with a preoperative diagnosis of radiculopathy or myelopathy and a complete set of preoperative and one-year postoperative PROMs. OUTCOME MEASURESOutcome measures included the following PROMs: Short-Form 12 Physical Component (PCS-12) and Mental Component (MCS-12) scores, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Arm score, and the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Hospital readmissions and revision surgery were also collected and evaluated. METHODSPatients undergoing an ACDF from 2014 to 2020 were identified and grouped based on preoperative diagnosis (radiculopathy or myelopathy). We utilized “general MCID” thresholds from a cohort of patients with degenerative spine conditions, and “specific MCID” thresholds generated from cohorts of patients with myelopathy or radiculopathy, respectively. Multivariate linear regressions were performed for delta (∆) PROMs and multivariate logistic regressions were performed for both general and specific MCID improvements. RESULTSA total of 798 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients with myelopathy had better baseline function and arm pain (MCS-12: 49.6 vs 47.6, p=.018; VAS Arm: 3.94 vs 6.02, p<.001; and NDI: 34.1 vs 41.9, p<.001), were older (p<.001), had more comorbidities (p=.014), more levels fused (p<.001), and had decreased improvement in PROMs following surgery compared to patients with radiculopathy (∆PCS-12: 4.76 vs 7.21, p=.006; ∆VAS Arm: -1.69 vs -3.70, p<.001; and ∆NDI: -11.94 vs -18.61, p<.001). On multivariate analysis, radiculopathy was an independent predictor of increased improvement in PCS-12 (β=2.10, p=.019), ∆NDI (β=-5.36, p<.001), and ∆VAS Arm (β=-1.93, p<.001). Radiculopathy patients were more likely to achieve general MCID improvements following surgery (NDI: Odds ratio (OR): 1.42, p=.035 and VAS Arm: OR: 2.98, p<.001), but there was no difference between patients with radiculopathy or myelopathy when using radiculopathy and myelopathy specific MCID thresholds (MCS-12: p=.113, PCS-12: p=.675, NDI: p=.108, and VAS Arm: p=.314). CONCLUSIONSPatients undergoing ACDF with myelopathy or radiculopathy represent two distinct patient populations with differing treatment indications and clinical outcomes. Compared to radiculopathy, patients with myelopathy have better baseline function, decreased improvement in PROMs, and are less likely to reach MCID using general threshold values, but there is no difference in the proportion reaching MCID when using specific threshold values. LEVEL OF EVIDENCEIRB

Risk factors for falls in different age groups of patients with chronic cerebral ischaemia

Introduction. Cognitive impairment, gait and balance disorders are the most important risk factors for falls in older persons. These neurological impairments are the main clinical manifestations of chronic cerebral ischaemia (CCI), and can develop at a younger age.&#x0D; Aim: to evaluate the risk factors for falls in patients with CCI in different age groups and to identify the most significant predictors of falls.&#x0D; Materials and methods. We examined 104 patients with CCI. Patients were divided into three age groups: middle age (4059 years old; n = 13), older age (6074 years old; n = 62), and the elderly (75 years and older; n = 29). We assessed the frequency of falls and the presence of risk factors.&#x0D; Results. Thirty-seven (36%) patients had a history of falls, with its incidence increasing from 8% in the middle-aged group to 37% in the older persons and 45% in the elderly. Some patients had multiple risk factors for falls, while the presence of 5 risk factors increased the risk of falling fourfold. The most common factors in middle age were pain due to degenerative spine conditions (85%), anxiety (54%), and visual impairment (31%); in older age back pain (77%), cognitive impairment (45%), visual impairment (39%), and decreased walking speed (23%); in the elderly visual impairment (76%), cognitive impairment (69%), back pain (69%), decreased walking speed (38%), and orthostatic hypotension (28%). Discriminant analysis revealed that the best predictors of falls in CCI were female sex, age over 69 years, depression, cognitive impairment, and a walking speed below 1 m/sec.&#x0D; Conclusion. Falls were observed in all age groups of people with CCI. Not only the presence of a specific risk factor for falls, but the presence of multiple risk factors, has predictive value. The presence of five or more risk factors, as well as a walking speed below 1 m/sec, can indicate a high risk of falls.

Assessing the Insurance Deductible Effect on Outcomes After Elective Spinal Surgery

Private insurers use the calendar deductible system, placing pressure on patients and medical personnel to perform medical services before the end of the year to maximize patient savings. The impact of the deductible calendar on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after spine surgery is poorly understood. The objective of our study was to investigate if patients undergoing surgery in December had different PROs and demographics compared with all other months. The Quality Outcome Database, a national spine registry, was queried for patients who underwent elective spine surgery between January 2012 and January 2021 for degenerative spine conditions. PROs and demographics were compared between the December and non-December groups using various statistical tests. A total of 978 patients (9.3%) underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in December versus 9548 (90.7%) in other months. There was a significantly higher percentage of patients in December who had private insurance and were employed. A total of 1104 patients (8.5%) underwent lumbar fusion in December versus 11,826 (91.5%) in other months. There was a significantly greater chance of undergoing surgery in December if patients had private insurance and were employed. Although some PROs were statistically significant for the lumbar and cervical cohorts between December and non-December patients, none were clinically significant. Patients undergoing elective spine surgery in December were more likely to have private insurance and be employed. PROs for ACDF and lumbar fusions were not affected by surgical timing (December yes/no). Other spinal procedures directed at more chronic diseases might be more susceptible to external influence of insurance deductibles.

Opioid Use Patterns in a Statewide Adult Medicaid Population Undergoing Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Retrospective administrative database review. Analyze patterns of opioid use in patients undergoing lumbar surgery and determine associated risk factors in a Medicaid population. Opioid use in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar spine conditions is prevalent and impacts outcomes. There is limited information defining the scope of this problem in Medicaid patients. Longitudinal cohort study of adult South Carolina (SC) Medicaid patients undergoing lumbar surgery from 2014 to 2017. All patients had continuous SC Medicaid coverage for 15 consecutive months, including six months before and nine months following surgery. The primary outcome was a longitudinal assessment of postoperative opioid use to determine trajectories and group-based membership using latent modeling. Univariate and multivariable modeling was conducted to assess risk factors for group-based trajectory modeling and chronic opioid use (COU). A total of 1455 surgeries met inclusion criteria. Group-based trajectory model demonstrated patients fit into five groups; very low use (23.4%), rapid wean following surgery (18.8%), increasing use following surgery (12.9%), slow wean following surgery (12.6%) and sustained high use (32.2%). Variables predicting membership in high opioid use included preoperative opioid use, younger age, longer length of stay, concomitant medications, and readmissions. More than three quarter of patients were deemed COUs (76.4%). On bivariate analysis, patients with degenerative disk disease were more likely to be COUs (24.8% vs. 18.6%; P =0.0168), more likely to take opioids before surgery (88.5% vs. 61.9%; P <0.001) and received higher amounts of opioids during the 30 days following surgery (mean morphine milligram equivalents 59.6 vs. 25.1; P <0.001). Most SC Medicaid patients undergoing lumbar elective lumbar spine surgery were using opioids preoperatively and continued long-term use postoperatively at a higher rate than previously reported databases. Preoperative and perioperative intake, degenerative disk disease, multiple prescribers, depression, and concomitant medications were significant risk factors.

Autologous Bone Graft vs PEEK Cage in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Background: Cervical spine stenosis is one of the most common degenerative changes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and results in severe dysfunction of the cervical spinal cord. The conventional treatment of such degenerative cervical spine conditions is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Strut graft remains the gold standard in ACDF with excellent patient recovery but has many shortcomings. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages have recently become popular as a replacement for strut grafts in patients undergoing ACDF.&#x0D; Objective: This study was carried out to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of autologous bone grafts versus PEEK cages in patients undergoing ACDF surgery.&#x0D; Materials and Methods: It was a randomized controlled trial conducted at the Neurosurgery Department Punjab Institute of Neurosciences for three years. Patients who consented to be a part of this study and fulfilled our predefined inclusion criteria were recruited and randomized into 2 groups. One group underwent ACDF with auto bone graft whereas the other group underwent ACDF with PEEK cage.&#x0D; Results: A total of 198 subjects were included in this study. The mean age was calculated as 47.60 ± 9.17 years in the PEEK cage group and 46.74 ± 8.87 years in the Autologous bone graft group. Males accounted for 59.6% of the study population. The fusion rate was found to be higher in the PEEK cage group with a p-value of 0.002.&#x0D; Conclusion: PEEK cages are superior to strut grafts as they have lesser morbidity after ACDF surgery in patients with CSM.&#x0D;

Harpagophytum procumbens Inhibits Iron Overload-Induced Oxidative Stress through Activation of Nrf2 Signaling in a Rat Model of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative spinal condition in older individuals that causes impaired walking and other disabilities due to severe lower back and leg pain. Ligamentum flavum hypertrophy is a major LSS cause that may result from oxidative stress caused by degenerative cascades, including imbalanced iron homeostasis that leads to excessive reactive oxygen species production. We investigated the effects of Harpagophytum procumbens (HP) on iron-induced oxidative stress associated with LSS pathophysiology. Primary spinal cord neuron cultures were incubated in FeSO4-containing medium, followed by addition of 50, 100, or 200 μg/mL HP. Cell viability was assessed by CCK-8 and live/dead cell assays and by propidium iodide-live imaging. In an in vivo rat model of LSS, HP were administered at 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg, and disease progression was monitored for up to 3 weeks. We investigated the in vitro and in vivo effects of HP on iron-induced neurotoxicity by immunochemistry, real-time PCR, and flow cytometry. HP exerted neuroprotective effects and enhanced neurite outgrowths of iron-injured rat primary spinal cord neurons in vitro. HP treatment significantly reduced necrotic cell death and improved cells' antioxidative capacity via the NRF2 signaling pathway in iron-treated neurons. At 1 week after HP administration in LSS rats, the inflammatory response and oxidative stress markers were substantially reduced through regulation of excess iron accumulation. Iron that accumulated in the spinal cord underneath the implanted silicone was also regulated by HP administration via NRF2 signaling pathway activation. HP-treated LSS rats showed gradually reduced mechanical allodynia and amelioration of impaired behavior for 3 weeks. We demonstrated that HP administration can maintain iron homeostasis within neurons via activation of NRF2 signaling and can consequently facilitate functional recovery by regulating iron-induced oxidative stress. This fundamentally new strategy holds promise for LSS treatment.