Definition Of Remission Research Articles

Controversies in the management of active Charcot neuroarthropathy.

Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN) was first described over 150 years ago. Despite this there remains uncertanity around the factors that contribute to its development, and progression. This article will discuss the current controversies around the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, assessment and management of the condition. The exact pathogenesis of CN is not fully understood, and it is likely to be multifactorial, with perhaps currently unknown mechanisms contributing to its development. Further studies are needed to examine opportunities to help screen for and diagnose CN. As a result of many of these factors, the true prevalence of CN is still largely unknown. Almost all of the recommendations for the assessment and treatment of CN are based on low-quality level III and IV evidence. Despite recommendations to offer people with CN nonremovable devices, currently only 40-50% people are treated with this type of device. Evidence is also lacking about the optimal duration of treatment; reported outcomes range from 3 months to more than a year. The reason for this variation is not entirely clear. A lack of standardised definitions for diagnosis, remission and relapse, heterogeneity of populations, different management approaches, monitoring techniques with unknown diagnostic precision and variation in follow-up times prevent meaningful comparison of outcome data. If people can be better supported to manage the emotional and physical consequences of CN, then this could improve people's quality of life and well-being. Finally, we highlight the need for an internationally coordinated approach to research in CN.

Early identification of treatment non-response in first-episode psychosis.

Approximately one-third of patients with psychotic disorders does not respond to standard antipsychotic treatments. Consensus criteria for treatment resistance (TR) may aid the identification of non-response and subsequent tailoring of treatments. Since consensus criteria require stability of clinical status, they are challenging to apply in first-episode psychosis (FEP). This study aims to investigate (a) if an adaptation of consensus criteria can be used to identify FEP patients with early signs of TR (no early clinical recovery-no-ECR) after 1year in treatment and (b) to what extent differences in antipsychotic treatments differentiate between outcome groups. Participants with FEP DSM-IV schizophrenia spectrum disorders were recruited during their first treatment. A total of 207 participated in the 1-year follow-up. Remission and recovery definitions were based on adaptations of the "Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group" criteria and TR on adaptations of the "Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis" (TRRIP) working group criteria. 97 participants (47%) could be classified as no-ECR, 61 (30%) as ECR, and 49 (23%) as with partial ECR (P-ECR). Statistically significant baseline predictors of no-ECR matched previously identified predictors of long-term TR. Only 35 no-ECR participants had two adequate treatment trials and met the full TRRIP criteria. 21 no-ECR participants were using the same medication over the follow-up year despite the lack of significant effects. The difference in the percentage of FEP participants classified as no-ECR versus TR indicates that we may underestimate the prevalence of early TR when using consensus criteria.

Real-World Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Remission in a U.S. Insured Population Using a Large Administrative Claims Database.

A 2021 international consensus statement defined type 2 diabetes remission as A1C <6.5% measured at least 3 months after cessation of glucose-lowering therapy. We aimed to investigate whether retrospective claims-based data can assess remission based on this definition, whether three increasingly strict alternative definitions affect the prevalence of remission and characteristics of remission cohorts, and how cohorts with and without sufficient data to assess for remission differ. We used de-identified administrative claims from commercially insured and Medicare Advantage members, enriched with laboratory values, to assess diabetes remission. We used alternative glycemic, temporal, and pharmacologic criteria to assess the sensitivity of remission definitions to changes in claims-based logic. Among 524,076 adults with type 2 diabetes, 185,285 (35.4%) had insufficient additional laboratory and/or enrollment data to assess for remission. While more likely to be younger, these individuals had similar initial A1C values and geographical distribution as the 338,791 (64.6%) assessed for remission. Of those assessed for remission, 10,694 (3.2%) met the 2021 consensus statement definition. The proportion of individuals meeting the three alternative definitions ranged from 0.8 to 2.3%. Across all criteria, those meeting the remission definition were more likely to be female, had a lower initially observed A1C, and had a higher prevalence of bariatric surgery. This study demonstrates the feasibility of laboratory-value enriched claims-based assessments of type 2 diabetes remission. Establishing stable claims-based markers of remission can enable population assessments of diabetes remission and evaluate the association between remission and clinical outcomes.

Can lupus low disease activity state predict mortality in patients with SLE?

Since 2000, our ability to measure systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from a diagnostic, assessment, and prognostic standpoint has advanced substantially. These advances include the incorporation of the SLE Disease Activity Index, the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group, and their composite indices in clinical trials. Additional benchmarks, such as the Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS) framework and lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS), have been used to evaluate disease activity and attainment of remission.

Lupus low disease activity state and remission and risk of mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective, multinational, longitudinal cohort study.

Treat-to-target goals for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been validated to protect against organ damage and to improve quality of life. We aimed to investigate the association between lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) and remission and risk of mortality in patients with SLE. We hypothesised that LLDAS has a protective association with mortality risk. In this prospective, multinational, longitudinal cohort study, we used data from patients with SLE in the Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration cohort collected between May 1, 2013, and Dec 31, 2020. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) who met either the 1997 American College of Rheumatology modified classification criteria for SLE or the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and LLDAS, remission, and variations of remission with lower glucocorticoid thresholds were the primary exposure variables. Survival analyses were used to examine longitudinal associations between these endpoints and risk of mortality. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03138941. Among a total of 4106 patients in the cohort, 3811 (92·8%) patients were included in the final analysis (median follow-up 2·8 years [IQR 1·0-5·3]; 3509 [92·1%] women and 302 [7·9%] men), of whom 80 died during the observation period (crude mortality rate 6·4 deaths per 1000 person-years). LLDAS was attained at least once in 43 (53·8%) of 80 participants who died and in 3035 (81·3%) of 3731 participants who were alive at the end of the study (p<0·0001); 22 (27·5%) participants who died versus 1966 (52·7%) who were alive at the end of the study attained LLDAS for at least 50% of observed time (p<0·0001). Remission was attained by 32 (40·0%) of 80 who died and in 2403 (64·4%) of 3731 participants who were alive at the end of the study (p<0·0001); 14 (17·5%) participants who died versus 1389 (37·2%) who were alive at the end of the study attained remission for at least 50% of observed time (p<0·0001). LLDAS for at least 50% of observed time (adjusted hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·31-0·85]; p=0·010) and remission for at least 50% of observed time (0·52 [0·29-0·93]; p=0·027) were associated with reduced risk of mortality. Modifying the remission glucocorticoid threshold (<5·0 mg/day prednisolone) was more protective against mortality than current remission definitions (0·31 [0·12-0·77]; p=0·012), and glucocorticoid-free remission was the most protective (0·13 [0·02-0·96]; p=0·046). LLDAS significantly reduced the risk of mortality in patients with SLE. Remission did not further reduce the risk of mortality compared with LLDAS, unless lower glucocorticoid thresholds were used. The Asia-Pacific Lupus Collaboration received funding from Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, and UCB for this study.

De-escalation of Therapy in Patients with Quiescent Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic disease of unknown origin that requires long-term treatment. The optical duration of maintenance treatment once remission has been achieved remains unclear. When discussing a de-escalation strategy, not only the likelihood of relapse but also, the outcome of retreatment for relapse after de-escalation should be considered. Previous evidence has demonstrated controversial results for risk factors for relapse after de-escalation due to the various definitions of remission and relapse. In fact, endoscopic or histologic remission has been suggested as a treatment target; however, it might not always be indicative of a successful drug withdrawal. For better risk stratification of relapse after de-escalation, it may be necessary to evaluate both the current and previous treatments. Following de-escalation, biomarkers should be closely monitored. In addition to the risk of relapse, a comprehensive understanding of the overall outcome, such as the long-term safety, patient quality of life, and impact on healthcare costs, is necessary. Therefore, a shared decision-making with patients on a case-by-case basis is imperative.

Targeting the interleukin-5 pathway in EGPA: evidence, uncertainties and opportunities

Only a minority of patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) can be weaned-off glucocorticoids (GC) using conventional treatment strategies. The development of biological agents specifically inhibiting the IL-5 pathway...

Inflammation mediates approximately one quarter of excess relative all-cause mortality in persons with rheumatoid arthritis: the Trøndelag Health Study

Inflammation may contribute to excess mortality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. We investigated associations to all-cause mortality of the inflammation markers high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), lactoferrin (neutrophil activation marker), and neopterin (monocyte activation marker). From the population-based Trøndelag Health Study (3rd wave 2006–2008), 316 RA patients and 43,579 controls were included. Lactoferrin and neopterin were quantified in a nested cohort (n = 283 RA patients, n = 3698 controls). Follow-up was until death found by linkage to the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry or 31.12.2018. All-cause mortality was analyzed using Cox regression and Cox regression-based mediation analysis. Having RA (hazard ratio (HR): 1.25, 95%CI: 1.00, 1.56, p = 0.048), and CRP ≥ 3 mg/L (HR: 1.50, 95%CI: 1.41, 1.60, p < 0.001) were associated with all-cause mortality. The overall excess relative mortality risk of having RA was 38%. CRP ≥ 3 mg/L mediated approximately 1/4 of this risk (p < 0.001). In the nested cohort, CRP ≥ 3 mg/L (HR: 1.51, 95%CI: 1.26, 1.80, p < 0.001) and neopterin (HR: 1.17, 95%CI: 1.01, 1.36, p = 0.031) were associated with all-cause mortality. In conclusion, CRP levels ≥ 3 mg/L mediated approximately a quarter of the 38% excess relative all-cause mortality risk associated with RA. Using definitions of RA remission with emphasis both on joint status and the level of general inflammation may help guide the most efficient treatment regimens.

RF28 | PSUN184 New American Diabetes Association Definition of Diabetes Remission Does not Correlate with Time in Remission in Ketosis-Prone Diabetes

Abstract Introduction Approximately 50% of obese Black patients presenting with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at new-onset of diabetes have immunologic and metabolic features of type 2 diabetes, also called ketosis-prone diabetes (KPDM). With intensive insulin treatment, ∼70% have improvements in beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity and achieve diabetes remission. The definition of remission in KPDM has been heterogeneous with our group defining remission as HbA1c &amp;lt; 7%, fasting blood glucose (BG) &amp;lt; 130 mg/dl and random BG &amp;lt; 180 mg/dl while off insulin injections for at least 1 week. In 2021, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) consensus recommended that the definition of diabetes remission as HbA1c &amp;lt; 6.5% or a fasting BG &amp;lt; 126 mg/dl while off medications for &amp;gt; 3 months. We hypothesized that patients who achieved the more intensive ADA definition of remission (HbA1c &amp;lt; 6.5%) will have longer time in remission compared to our previous non-intensive definition of remission (HbA1c 6.5-7%). Methods Forty obese Black patients (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2) with newly diagnosed diabetes and unprovoked DKA had intensive insulin therapy until HbA1c &amp;lt; 7% without insulin therapy for at least one week. Patients were followed until hyperglycemia relapse (HbA1c &amp;gt; 6.5% or fasting BG &amp;gt; 126 mg/dl and/or requiring antidiabetic medications). Baseline characteristics and clinical time to hyperglycemia relapse-free survival were compared between patients with HbA1c &amp;lt; 6.5 (n= 24) and HbA1c 6.5-7% (n=16). Results Age, sex, family history of type 2 diabetes, BMI, HbA1C, weight change and insulin doses received between the two groups (HbA1c &amp;lt; 6.5 vs 6.5-7%) did not differ significantly. Median follow-up overall was 404 days with a range of 7-1099 days. In patients that experienced a hyperglycemia relapse, bivariate analysis shows that median days to hyperglycemia relapse was longer in HbA1c &amp;lt; 6.5% (411 days, range (17-804) vs HbA1c 6.5-7% (126 days, range (7-391), p= 0.05) but without a statistical difference. Survival analysis showed that time in remission did not statistically differ between the two groups (log rank, p=0.6853). Conclusion In obese Black patients with KPDM, HbA1c &amp;lt; 6.5% at time of insulin discontinuation does not prolong diabetes compared to patients that achieved HbA1c 6.5-7%, suggesting that predictors of prolonged remission may differ among diverse populations with diabetes. Presentation: Sunday, June 12, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m., Monday, June 13, 2022 12:44 p.m. - 12:49 p.m.

Evaluating disease control following belimumab treatment in patients with SLE enrolled in the US OBSErve study

ObjectiveTo characterise disease control and remission in patients with SLE receiving belimumab for up to 12 months in the real world.MethodsThis post hoc analysis (GSK Study 213502) used data from...

Operational Definitions of Treatment Response and Remission in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Capture Meaningful Improvements in Everyday Life

Introduction: The operational definitions of treatment response, partial response, and remission in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are widely used in clinical trials and regular practice. However, the clinimetric sensitivity of these definitions, that is, whether they identify patients that experience meaningful changes in their everyday life, remains unexplored. Objective: The objective was to examine the clinimetric sensitivity of the operational definitions of treatment response, partial response, and remission in children and adults with OCD. Methods: Pre- and post-treatment data from five clinical trials and three cohort studies of children and adults with OCD (n = 1,528; 55.3% children, 61.1% female) were pooled. We compared (1) responders, partial responders, and non-responders and (2) remitters and non-remitters on self-reported OCD symptoms, clinician-rated general functioning, and self-reported quality of life. Remission was also evaluated against post-treatment diagnostic interviews. Results: Responders and remitters experienced large improvements across validators. Responders had greater improvements than partial responders and non-responders on self-reported OCD symptoms (Cohen’s d 0.65–1.13), clinician-rated functioning (Cohen’s d 0.53–1.03), and self-reported quality of life (Cohen’s d 0.63–0.73). Few meaningful differences emerged between partial responders and non-responders. Remitters had better outcomes across most validators than non-remitters. Remission criteria corresponded well with absence of post-treatment diagnosis (sensitivity/specificity: 93%/83%). Using both the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale yielded more conservative results and more robust changes across validators, compared to only using the Y-BOCS. Conclusions: The current definitions of treatment response and remission capture meaningful improvements in the everyday life of individuals with OCD, whereas the concept of partial response has dubious clinimetric sensitivity.

Adult-Onset Still's Disease-A Complex Disease, a Challenging Treatment.

Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a systemic inflammatory disorder with an unknown cause characterized by high-spiking fever, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, hyperferritinemia, and leukocytosis. The clinical course can be divided into three significant patterns, each with a different prognosis: Self-limited or monophasic, intermittent or polycyclic systemic, and chronic articular. Two criteria sets have been validated. The Yamaguchi criteria are the most generally used, although the Fautrel criteria offer the benefit of adding ferritin and glycosylated ferritin values. AOSD's pathogenesis is not yet completely understood. Chemokines and pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interferon (IFN)-γ, tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-18, play a crucial role in the progression of illness, resulting in the development of innovative targeted therapeutics. There are no treatment guidelines for AOSD due to its rarity, absence of controlled research, and lack of a standard definition for remission and therapy objectives. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids (CS), and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) are used in AOSD treatment. Biological therapy, including IL-1, IL-6, IL-18, and IL-17 inhibitors, as well as TNFα or Janus-kinases (JAKs) inhibitors, is administered to patients who do not react to CS and csDMARDs or achieve an inadequate response.

American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Remission Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: 2022 Revision.

In 2011, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR endorsed provisional criteria for remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), both Boolean- and index-based. Based on recent studies indicating that a higher threshold for the patient global assessment (PtGA) may improve agreement between the 2 sets of criteria, our goals were to externally validate a revision of the Boolean remission criteria using a higher PtGA threshold and to validate the provisionally endorsed index-based criteria. We used data from 4 randomized trials comparing biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs to methotrexate or placebo. We tested the higher proposed PtGA threshold of 2 cm (Boolean2.0) (range 0-10 cm) compared to the original threshold of 1 cm (Boolean1.0). We analyzed agreement between the Boolean- and index-based criteria (Simplified Disease Activity Index [SDAI] and Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI]) for remission and examined how well each remission definition predicted later good physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ] score ≤0.5) and radiographic nonprogression. Data from 2,048 trial participants, 1,101 with early RA and 947 with established RA, were included. The proportion of patients with disease in remission at 6 months after treatment initiation increased when using Boolean2.0 compared to Boolean1.0, from 14.8% to 20.6% in early RA and 4.2% to 6.0% in established RA. Agreement between Boolean2.0 and the SDAI or CDAI remission criteria was better than for Boolean1.0, particularly in early disease. Boolean2.0, SDAI, and CDAI remission criteria had similar positive likelihood ratios (LRs) to predict radiographic nonprogression and a HAQ score of ≤0.5 (positive LR 3.8-4.3). The omission of PtGA (BooleanX) worsened the prediction of good functional outcomes. Using the Boolean 2.0 criteria classifies more patients as achieving remission and increases the agreement with index-based remission criteria without jeopardizing predictive value for radiographic or functional outcomes. This revised Boolean definition and the previously provisionally endorsed index-based criteria were endorsed by ACR and EULAR.

Agreeing to Agree: International Consensus Definitions of Complete Remission, Treatment Failure, and Relapse in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Agreeing to Agree: International Consensus Definitions of Complete Remission, Treatment Failure, and Relapse in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Concordance and Discordance Between Patient-reported Remission, Patient-reported Outcomes, and Physician Global Assessment.

Although validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements can categorize patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) into clinical remission or active disease, patients may have different definitions of remission. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-defined remission to remission based on PRO measures and physician global assessment (PGA) and to understand the clinical and demographic factors associated with disagreements. We retrospectively analyzed 3257 de-identified surveys from 2004 IBD patients who consented to participate in the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation's IBD Qorus Learning Health System between September 2019 and February 2021. We used logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations to analyze the clinical and demographic factors (eg, age, disease duration, health confidence) associated with discordance between patient-defined remission (yes/no) and PRO-defined remission for ulcerative colitis (UC; PRO2: stool frequency, rectal bleeding) and Crohn's disease (CD; PRO-3: average number of liquid stools, abdominal pain, well-being). Among patients with UC, overall concordance was 79% between patient self-report and PRO2-defined remission and 49% between patient self-report and PGA-defined remission. Among patients with CD, overall concordance was 69% between patient self-report and PRO3-defined remission and 54% between patient self-report and PGA-defined remission. Patients in PRO-defined remission were more likely to report active disease if they had IBD <5 years and low health confidence. Patients with PRO-defined active disease were more likely to report remission if they were not using prednisone and had high health confidence. Discordance exists between how remission is defined by patients, PRO measures, and PGA.

Need for a consensus definition of remission in paediatric asthma

With the introduction of several new biologic therapies for paediatric asthma, the concept of disease remission has been brought to the forefront. Although sometimes paediatric asthma appears to resolve over time, we do not have a mutually agreeable definition of remission among asthma experts. The US National Cancer Institute (NCI) states that the definition of remission is “a decrease in or disappearance of signs and symptoms of cancer. In partial remission, some, but not all, signs and symptoms of cancer have disappeared.

Minimal disease activity and remission in patients with psoriatic arthritis with elevated body mass index: an observational cohort study in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of elevated body mass index (BMI) in the achievement of minimal disease activity (MDA) and several definitions of remission in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in...

PREVALENCE OF RESIDUAL SYMPTOMS AND RELATIONSHIP WITH QUALITY OF LIFE IN REMITTED PATIENTS WITH MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER.

Background: Remission in major depressive disorder usually indicates that patient is free from disorder while as same at time it has been seen that definition for remission require patient to have HAM D less than 7. So those patients who score between 1-7 still have few symptoms even if they have been labeled as remitters. These symptoms are called residual symptoms and these can have direct consequences on quality of life. Material &amp; Method: Remitted patients of Major Depressive Disorder as per ICD-10 Criteria attending outpatient department of psychiatry were enrolled for study, socio demographic data was collected and patients were administered HAM-D scale to find out residual symptoms,also WHOQOL-BREF was administered for assessment of Quality of life in these patients. Results: 80 patients were enrolled.Mean age was {43 ±1.32} with majority of female gender and higher education and marital status.(90.2%) were found to have between 2 to 7 symptoms on HAM-D.The most common symptom domains was insomnia symptom (74.1%; 95% confidence interval 0.68–0.80). On assessment of quality of life it was seen that 46% patients reported impairment in quality of life and predominant impairment was seen in physical component (28.95 ± 10.04). On comparison of Quality of life with predominant residual symptoms significant relationship was seen with insomnia and anxiety symptoms (B = -1.125, p= 0.004 &amp; B =-2.629, P =0.008). Conclusion: There is presence of residual symptoms even in patients who have remitted from major depressive disorder and these residual symptoms have significant impact on quality of life of these patients. Identification and attending these residual symptoms should be part of treatment program in order to achieve a better quality of life

Remission and low disease activity (LDA) prevent damage accrual in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) inception cohort

ObjectiveTo determine the independent impact of different definitions of remission and low disease activity (LDA) on damage accrual.MethodsPatients with ≥2 annual assessments from a longitudinal multinational inception lupus cohort were...

Current treatment options and long-term outcomes in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis

Introduction Dietary and pharmacological (proton pump inhibitors, swallowed topical corticosteroids) therapies are effective for induction of clinical and histological remission of eosinophilic esophagitis. However, data evaluating their long-term efficacy and safety is limited. Areas covered Since eosinophilic esophagitis is chronic, clinical, endoscopic and histological features usually recur when successful treatments are stopped. In untreated patients, persistent esophageal eosinophilic inflammation may progress to fibrostenosis over time, giving place to strictures and narrow-caliber esophagi. This article comprehensively reviews available data on long-term maintenance of eosinophilic esophagitis with pharmacological and dietary treatment. It also discusses limitations re: available literature and outlines data gaps on adherence to therapy and monitoring disease activity in the long-term. Expert opinion Evidence indicates that long-term maintenance therapy may decrease the risk of esophageal stricture, food bolus impaction, and need for dilation in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Further knowledge on eosinophilic esophagitis phenotypes is needed to ascertain who will benefit best from sustained therapy. Unanswered questions include an adequate definition for sustained remission, best strategies for maintenance drugs and diets, enhancement of treatment adherence, and proper monitoring for long-term surveillance.